A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabend
| Ano de defesa: | 2011 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-8N7FCN |
Resumo: | This work is a general exposition of the Austrian philosophy of science Paul Feyerabend (1924-1994) regarding the problem of scientific change. Feyerabend's thought develops into methodological and epistemological discussions marked by a dispute between logical positivism and critical rationalism. Contention that sees the new historicist element emerging whose introduction, among others, was due to Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend. We organize our text to address the feyerabendian criticism of the empiricist model of theoretical change, namely the logic of reduction (Nagel) and explanation (Hempel and Oppenheim). In our first chapter we show the Feyerabend's rejection of the idea of neutrality of the observational language and the thesis of consistency and stability of the terms required, according to him, by the instrumentalist interpretation of theories. Our second chapter makes a similar path regarding to critical rationalism. The falsificationist model is shown insufficient for historical and methodological reasons. We discussed in our text the attribution of the "relativist deviation" to the historicist approach of the author. We present Feyerabend's opposition to the notion of verisimilitude. Against this idea, the philosopher states that a comparison of content ignores that a theoretical change can cause an ontological change. Our third chapter develops better the incipient ideas of our earlier chapters, in order to situate feyerabendian philosophy within his methodological option for realism. In this last chapter we discuss the hypothetical realism, incommensurability and his infamous theoretical anarchism, concluding on the possibility of a new rationality attentive to the themes introduced by the author. |
| id |
UFMG_a3d74d0b65aeaeef07ff92d2bc1ef507 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/BUOS-8N7FCN |
| network_acronym_str |
UFMG |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
2019-08-10T07:59:18Z2025-09-08T23:44:47Z2019-08-10T07:59:18Z2011-06-27https://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-8N7FCNThis work is a general exposition of the Austrian philosophy of science Paul Feyerabend (1924-1994) regarding the problem of scientific change. Feyerabend's thought develops into methodological and epistemological discussions marked by a dispute between logical positivism and critical rationalism. Contention that sees the new historicist element emerging whose introduction, among others, was due to Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend. We organize our text to address the feyerabendian criticism of the empiricist model of theoretical change, namely the logic of reduction (Nagel) and explanation (Hempel and Oppenheim). In our first chapter we show the Feyerabend's rejection of the idea of neutrality of the observational language and the thesis of consistency and stability of the terms required, according to him, by the instrumentalist interpretation of theories. Our second chapter makes a similar path regarding to critical rationalism. The falsificationist model is shown insufficient for historical and methodological reasons. We discussed in our text the attribution of the "relativist deviation" to the historicist approach of the author. We present Feyerabend's opposition to the notion of verisimilitude. Against this idea, the philosopher states that a comparison of content ignores that a theoretical change can cause an ontological change. Our third chapter develops better the incipient ideas of our earlier chapters, in order to situate feyerabendian philosophy within his methodological option for realism. In this last chapter we discuss the hypothetical realism, incommensurability and his infamous theoretical anarchism, concluding on the possibility of a new rationality attentive to the themes introduced by the author.Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisPaul FeyerabendMudança teóricaRealismo hipotéticoPluralismoCiência FilosofiaRacionalismoFilosofia Texeseyerabend, Paul K,924-A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabendinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTiago Luis Teixeira de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGPatricia Maria Kauark LeiteErnesto Perini Frizzera da Mota SantosOlimpio Jose Pimenta NetoTulio Roberto Xavier de AguiarEste trabalho é uma exposição geral da filosofia da ciência do austríaco Paul Feyerabend (1924-1994) no que concerne ao problema da mudança científica. O pensamento de Feyerabend se desenvolve dentro de discussões metodológicas e epistemológicas marcadas pela disputa entre o positivismo lógico e o racionalismo crítico. Disputa essa que vê surgir o novo elemento historicista cuja introdução entreouros, deveu-se a Thomas Kuhn e Paul Feyerabend. Organizamos o nosso texto de forma a abordar primeiramente a crítica feyerabendiana ao modelo empirista de troca teórica, nomeadamente a lógica da redução (Nagel) e da explicação (Hempel e Oppenheim). No nosso primeiro capítulo abordamos a recusa de Feyerabend à ideia deneutralidade da linguagem observacional e das condições de consistência e estabilidade dos termos exigidas, segundo ele, pela interpretação instrumentalista das teorias. Nosso segundo capítulo realiza um percurso semelhante com relação ao racionalismo crítico Omodelo falsificacionista é demonstrado insuficiente por razões metodológicas e históricas. Discutimos no nosso texto a atribuição do desvio relativista à aproximação historicista do autor. Expomos a contraposição de Feyerabend à noção de verossimilhança. Contra essa ideia o filósofo estabelece que uma comparação por conteúdo ignora que uma mudança teórica pode ocasionar uma mudança ontológica.Nosso terceiro capítulo desenvolve melhor as ideias incipientes nos anteriores, de modo a situar a filosofia feyerabendiana no interior de sua opção metodológica pelo realismo. Nesse último capítulo discutimos o realismo hipotético, a incomensurabilidade teórica e o famigerado anarquismo, concluindo sobre a possibilidade de uma nova racionalidade atenta aos temas introduzidos pelo autor.UFMGORIGINALdisserta__o_tiago.pdfapplication/pdf1480352https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/35c14bce-12c5-4619-8d1c-d9f98f3d4cc0/download673b49b2d444738a7e27aaa492707ed9MD51trueAnonymousREADTEXTdisserta__o_tiago.pdf.txttext/plain296732https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/a67cd188-00a6-4258-afb2-e74ce3753c5d/downloade9de4a1baeb986ba8d348e1758eca955MD52falseAnonymousREAD1843/BUOS-8N7FCN2025-09-08 20:44:47.706open.accessoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/BUOS-8N7FCNhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-08T23:44:47Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabend |
| title |
A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabend |
| spellingShingle |
A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabend Tiago Luis Teixeira de Oliveira Ciência Filosofia Racionalismo Filosofia Texes eyerabend, Paul K,924- Paul Feyerabend Mudança teórica Realismo hipotético Pluralismo |
| title_short |
A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabend |
| title_full |
A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabend |
| title_fullStr |
A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabend |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabend |
| title_sort |
A mudança nas ciências segundo Paul Feyerabend |
| author |
Tiago Luis Teixeira de Oliveira |
| author_facet |
Tiago Luis Teixeira de Oliveira |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tiago Luis Teixeira de Oliveira |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Filosofia Racionalismo Filosofia Texes eyerabend, Paul K,924- |
| topic |
Ciência Filosofia Racionalismo Filosofia Texes eyerabend, Paul K,924- Paul Feyerabend Mudança teórica Realismo hipotético Pluralismo |
| dc.subject.other.none.fl_str_mv |
Paul Feyerabend Mudança teórica Realismo hipotético Pluralismo |
| description |
This work is a general exposition of the Austrian philosophy of science Paul Feyerabend (1924-1994) regarding the problem of scientific change. Feyerabend's thought develops into methodological and epistemological discussions marked by a dispute between logical positivism and critical rationalism. Contention that sees the new historicist element emerging whose introduction, among others, was due to Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend. We organize our text to address the feyerabendian criticism of the empiricist model of theoretical change, namely the logic of reduction (Nagel) and explanation (Hempel and Oppenheim). In our first chapter we show the Feyerabend's rejection of the idea of neutrality of the observational language and the thesis of consistency and stability of the terms required, according to him, by the instrumentalist interpretation of theories. Our second chapter makes a similar path regarding to critical rationalism. The falsificationist model is shown insufficient for historical and methodological reasons. We discussed in our text the attribution of the "relativist deviation" to the historicist approach of the author. We present Feyerabend's opposition to the notion of verisimilitude. Against this idea, the philosopher states that a comparison of content ignores that a theoretical change can cause an ontological change. Our third chapter develops better the incipient ideas of our earlier chapters, in order to situate feyerabendian philosophy within his methodological option for realism. In this last chapter we discuss the hypothetical realism, incommensurability and his infamous theoretical anarchism, concluding on the possibility of a new rationality attentive to the themes introduced by the author. |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2011-06-27 |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-10T07:59:18Z 2025-09-08T23:44:47Z |
| dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-10T07:59:18Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-8N7FCN |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-8N7FCN |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| instacron_str |
UFMG |
| institution |
UFMG |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/35c14bce-12c5-4619-8d1c-d9f98f3d4cc0/download https://repositorio.ufmg.br//bitstreams/a67cd188-00a6-4258-afb2-e74ce3753c5d/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
673b49b2d444738a7e27aaa492707ed9 e9de4a1baeb986ba8d348e1758eca955 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ufmg.br |
| _version_ |
1862105842676924416 |