Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2021
Autor(a) principal: Wallace Breno Barbosa
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/1843/38545
Resumo: Introduction: Antipsychotics have stood out in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia and some of these drugs are provided by SUS. The challenge of understanding the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of these drugs remains in evidence. Objective: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and its associated factors of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, through a cohort of 16 years of follow-up and nationwide. Methods: Three SUS databases were integrated and paired: Outpatient, Hospital and Mortality Information Systems. Subsequently, the patients were paired (1:1) for psychiatric hospitalization, year of receipt of the antipsychotic, sex and age; according to the cohort entry medications, olanzapine or risperidone. The cumulative probability curves of treatment discontinuation, generated by the Kaplan-Meier estimator, were analyzed and the factors associated with psychiatric hospitalization or death were evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards model. Subsequently, multivariate and sensitivity analyzes were performed. Results: 3416 pairs of patients were included, 1708 in the olanzapine group and 1708 in risperidone. Olanzapine had a longer time until discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.021). Consequently, risperidone was at higher risk for treatment discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.021), including in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.017). Considering the psychiatric hospitalization event, the risk was also greater with risperidone (p = 0.006). Among patients persisting for 24 months, there were no statistically significant differences between olanzapine and risperidone for the risk of discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.06). Conclusions: Olanzapine was shown to be more real world effective than risperidone, considering the entire population and among patients who had psychiatric hospitalization as an event. These findings were not supported in all analyzes. Possibly, patients in this cohort are being followed up on an outpatient basis and are more stable. Real-world studies from large databases collaborate with experimental studies in consolidating evidence.
id UFMG_f543de92cce748e2947ecee963d72251
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/38545
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.AntipsicóticosBase de dadosEfetividadeEsquizofreniaOlanzapinaRisperidonaIntroduction: Antipsychotics have stood out in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia and some of these drugs are provided by SUS. The challenge of understanding the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of these drugs remains in evidence. Objective: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and its associated factors of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, through a cohort of 16 years of follow-up and nationwide. Methods: Three SUS databases were integrated and paired: Outpatient, Hospital and Mortality Information Systems. Subsequently, the patients were paired (1:1) for psychiatric hospitalization, year of receipt of the antipsychotic, sex and age; according to the cohort entry medications, olanzapine or risperidone. The cumulative probability curves of treatment discontinuation, generated by the Kaplan-Meier estimator, were analyzed and the factors associated with psychiatric hospitalization or death were evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards model. Subsequently, multivariate and sensitivity analyzes were performed. Results: 3416 pairs of patients were included, 1708 in the olanzapine group and 1708 in risperidone. Olanzapine had a longer time until discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.021). Consequently, risperidone was at higher risk for treatment discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.021), including in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.017). Considering the psychiatric hospitalization event, the risk was also greater with risperidone (p = 0.006). Among patients persisting for 24 months, there were no statistically significant differences between olanzapine and risperidone for the risk of discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.06). Conclusions: Olanzapine was shown to be more real world effective than risperidone, considering the entire population and among patients who had psychiatric hospitalization as an event. These findings were not supported in all analyzes. Possibly, patients in this cohort are being followed up on an outpatient basis and are more stable. Real-world studies from large databases collaborate with experimental studies in consolidating evidence.CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais2021-10-29T12:45:37Z2025-09-09T01:33:15Z2021-10-29T12:45:37Z2021-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/38545porWallace Breno Barbosainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2025-09-09T01:33:15Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/38545Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-09T01:33:15Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.
title Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.
spellingShingle Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.
Wallace Breno Barbosa
Antipsicóticos
Base de dados
Efetividade
Esquizofrenia
Olanzapina
Risperidona
title_short Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.
title_full Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.
title_fullStr Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.
title_sort Avaliação de desempenho de olanzapina e risperidona em pacientes com esquizofrenia no Sistema Único de Saúde: estudo de efetividade em uma coorte de dezesseis anos no Brasil.
author Wallace Breno Barbosa
author_facet Wallace Breno Barbosa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wallace Breno Barbosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antipsicóticos
Base de dados
Efetividade
Esquizofrenia
Olanzapina
Risperidona
topic Antipsicóticos
Base de dados
Efetividade
Esquizofrenia
Olanzapina
Risperidona
description Introduction: Antipsychotics have stood out in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia and some of these drugs are provided by SUS. The challenge of understanding the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of these drugs remains in evidence. Objective: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and its associated factors of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, through a cohort of 16 years of follow-up and nationwide. Methods: Three SUS databases were integrated and paired: Outpatient, Hospital and Mortality Information Systems. Subsequently, the patients were paired (1:1) for psychiatric hospitalization, year of receipt of the antipsychotic, sex and age; according to the cohort entry medications, olanzapine or risperidone. The cumulative probability curves of treatment discontinuation, generated by the Kaplan-Meier estimator, were analyzed and the factors associated with psychiatric hospitalization or death were evaluated using Cox's proportional hazards model. Subsequently, multivariate and sensitivity analyzes were performed. Results: 3416 pairs of patients were included, 1708 in the olanzapine group and 1708 in risperidone. Olanzapine had a longer time until discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.021). Consequently, risperidone was at higher risk for treatment discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.021), including in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.017). Considering the psychiatric hospitalization event, the risk was also greater with risperidone (p = 0.006). Among patients persisting for 24 months, there were no statistically significant differences between olanzapine and risperidone for the risk of discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.06). Conclusions: Olanzapine was shown to be more real world effective than risperidone, considering the entire population and among patients who had psychiatric hospitalization as an event. These findings were not supported in all analyzes. Possibly, patients in this cohort are being followed up on an outpatient basis and are more stable. Real-world studies from large databases collaborate with experimental studies in consolidating evidence.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-29T12:45:37Z
2021-10-29T12:45:37Z
2021-03-31
2025-09-09T01:33:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1843/38545
url https://hdl.handle.net/1843/38545
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1856413960886026240