Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931)
| Ano de defesa: | 2019 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://hdl.handle.net/1843/31964 |
Resumo: | This dissertation has as its object the history of Brazil written by Manoel Bomfim, more specifically his trilogy about the "national formation". The essays Brasil na América (1929), Brasil na História (1930) e Brasil Nação (1931) were analyzed from the perspective of a history of historiography concerned with the centrality of language in the construction of the past. Our objective was to investigate the conceptual apparatus used by the author to represent the national past and the discursive strategies mobilized in the elaboration of a plot to Brazilian history. We chose as our main methodological strategy the analysis of two concepts that played a central role in the historical representation throughout the essays: tradition and formation. Analyzing the use of these terms was a starting point to understand how a past reality was constructed in the narrative. Two broader concerns are present in this dissertation. The first one is to investigate how the history of Brazil written by Manoel Bomfim sought to answer dilemmas that mobilized many intellectuals throughout the First Republic. Among these dilemmas were: the possibility of building a modern nation, the searching of a Brazilian identity in "national language” and the sense of crisis in the Brazilian Republic. The second concern is to understand how Manoel Bomfim wrote a history of Brazil using conceptual categories, analytical procedures and epistemological conceptions present in different disciplinary fields, all of them in formation at that time. In order to comprehend this writing of history that dialogued with different knowledge and theories, especially those from sociology and psychology, we analyze the trilogy together with another work from Bomfim, published in 1923: the book Pensar e dizer: estudo do símbolo no pensamento e na linguagem. |
| id |
UFMG_fcbb0a48a241dff6f27a74eaebccbe5d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/31964 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFMG |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931)HistóriaBomfim, Manoel, 1868-1932Brasil - HistoriografiaManoel BomfimEscrita da históriaTemporalidadeLinguagemRepúblicaThis dissertation has as its object the history of Brazil written by Manoel Bomfim, more specifically his trilogy about the "national formation". The essays Brasil na América (1929), Brasil na História (1930) e Brasil Nação (1931) were analyzed from the perspective of a history of historiography concerned with the centrality of language in the construction of the past. Our objective was to investigate the conceptual apparatus used by the author to represent the national past and the discursive strategies mobilized in the elaboration of a plot to Brazilian history. We chose as our main methodological strategy the analysis of two concepts that played a central role in the historical representation throughout the essays: tradition and formation. Analyzing the use of these terms was a starting point to understand how a past reality was constructed in the narrative. Two broader concerns are present in this dissertation. The first one is to investigate how the history of Brazil written by Manoel Bomfim sought to answer dilemmas that mobilized many intellectuals throughout the First Republic. Among these dilemmas were: the possibility of building a modern nation, the searching of a Brazilian identity in "national language” and the sense of crisis in the Brazilian Republic. The second concern is to understand how Manoel Bomfim wrote a history of Brazil using conceptual categories, analytical procedures and epistemological conceptions present in different disciplinary fields, all of them in formation at that time. In order to comprehend this writing of history that dialogued with different knowledge and theories, especially those from sociology and psychology, we analyze the trilogy together with another work from Bomfim, published in 1923: the book Pensar e dizer: estudo do símbolo no pensamento e na linguagem.CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais2020-01-17T11:27:53Z2025-09-09T00:35:26Z2020-01-17T11:27:53Z2019-08-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/31964porCarolina de Oliveira Silva Otheroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2025-09-09T00:35:26Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/31964Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-09T00:35:26Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931) |
| title |
Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931) |
| spellingShingle |
Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931) Carolina de Oliveira Silva Othero História Bomfim, Manoel, 1868-1932 Brasil - Historiografia Manoel Bomfim Escrita da história Temporalidade Linguagem República |
| title_short |
Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931) |
| title_full |
Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931) |
| title_fullStr |
Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931) |
| title_sort |
Tradição, linguagem e orientação: a escrita da história de Manoel Bomfim (1923-1931) |
| author |
Carolina de Oliveira Silva Othero |
| author_facet |
Carolina de Oliveira Silva Othero |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carolina de Oliveira Silva Othero |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
História Bomfim, Manoel, 1868-1932 Brasil - Historiografia Manoel Bomfim Escrita da história Temporalidade Linguagem República |
| topic |
História Bomfim, Manoel, 1868-1932 Brasil - Historiografia Manoel Bomfim Escrita da história Temporalidade Linguagem República |
| description |
This dissertation has as its object the history of Brazil written by Manoel Bomfim, more specifically his trilogy about the "national formation". The essays Brasil na América (1929), Brasil na História (1930) e Brasil Nação (1931) were analyzed from the perspective of a history of historiography concerned with the centrality of language in the construction of the past. Our objective was to investigate the conceptual apparatus used by the author to represent the national past and the discursive strategies mobilized in the elaboration of a plot to Brazilian history. We chose as our main methodological strategy the analysis of two concepts that played a central role in the historical representation throughout the essays: tradition and formation. Analyzing the use of these terms was a starting point to understand how a past reality was constructed in the narrative. Two broader concerns are present in this dissertation. The first one is to investigate how the history of Brazil written by Manoel Bomfim sought to answer dilemmas that mobilized many intellectuals throughout the First Republic. Among these dilemmas were: the possibility of building a modern nation, the searching of a Brazilian identity in "national language” and the sense of crisis in the Brazilian Republic. The second concern is to understand how Manoel Bomfim wrote a history of Brazil using conceptual categories, analytical procedures and epistemological conceptions present in different disciplinary fields, all of them in formation at that time. In order to comprehend this writing of history that dialogued with different knowledge and theories, especially those from sociology and psychology, we analyze the trilogy together with another work from Bomfim, published in 1923: the book Pensar e dizer: estudo do símbolo no pensamento e na linguagem. |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-16 2020-01-17T11:27:53Z 2020-01-17T11:27:53Z 2025-09-09T00:35:26Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/31964 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1843/31964 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| instacron_str |
UFMG |
| institution |
UFMG |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ufmg.br |
| _version_ |
1856414135938449408 |