Kant entre Husserl e Heidegger um argumento contra o continuísmo do projeto fenomenológico acerca da subjetividade

• Ano de defesa: 2010
• Autor(a) principal: Aguiar Filho, José Arlindo de
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraí­ba; BR; Filosofia; Programa de Pós Graduação em Filosofia; UFPB
• Palavras-chave em Português: Filosofia; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/5591

The thesis seeks to establish a foothold for the study of subjectivity in the work of Martin Heidegger. To achieve this goal it locates his argument in the works of the period between 1925 and 1930. The individual approach of the main texts on the subject indicates a representation of transcendence and freedom as the center of what could be the well understood subject of which Heidegger speaks. This characterization will deal with the problem of Heideggers supposed debt to Husserl's phenomenological project. This difficulty will be exposed in two versions of the same argument: the French version and the Scandinavian version. The presentation of both versions in their key features and arguments will be directed to an axis of decidability found in Kant's influence. To overcome the continuism problem, this work proposes an analysis of Heidegger s interpretation of Kant as major influence on his phenomenological project in comparison with that of Husserl. The analysis indicates a mismatch between the approach of Heidegger's particular view on subjectivity and phenomenology in strictly Husserlian terms. This mismatch allows the conclusion for the continuistic argument s invalidity.