A avaliação na Educação Física Escolar sob a perspectiva das dimensões de conhecimento apresentadas na BNCC

• Ano de defesa: 2020
• Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, José Celso Barros
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Brasil; UFRN; PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO FÍSICA EM REDE NACIONAL
• Palavras-chave em Português: Educação Física Escolar; Avaliação da aprendizagem; Dimensões do conhecimento; Base Nacional Comum Curricular
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/30056

The assessment of learning in Physical Education in Schools finds challenges that go beyond those present in other curricular components. The way in which the area organizes and evaluates the relationship of the subjects' bodies with the objects of knowledge, generates possibilities that still seem to be poorly understood in the school routine. In addition to the dimensions of the contents (attitudinal, procedural and conceptual), presented in the Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais (1998), the area finds in the Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC, 2017) other organizational demands. The proposal is to think about how students relate to the objects of knowledge, privileging now eight dimensions, which led us to the problem of how it is possible to structure a proposal for evaluating learning in Physical Education at School, contemplating the eight dimensions presented in the BNCC? The present study aimed to problematize a pedagogical experience in Physical Education at School, reflecting on the assessment of learning from the perspective of the dimensions of knowledge. An exploratory qualitative research was developed, in the format of an experience report, which consisted of elaborating and experimenting formal moments of learning assessment, for a class of the 8th grade of elementary school. Altogether there were six evaluation instruments with their respective registration forms. Participant observation was the technique used to construct the field data through observation scripts. Documentary analysis was used to compare the descriptions of the observation scripts with the guiding principles for the elaboration of instruments, transformed into analysis categories. As a result, we can highlight the construction and defense of the guiding principles themselves, since the evaluative moment must be a formative moment, an extension of the teaching-learning process, and should not end in itself and therefore it does not make sense to point out instruments such as right and / or wrong. Another result is the expansion of the notion of a learning verification instrument, as a set of actions that aim to encourage students to express their skills, taking into account the built principles. It should not be confused with the record sheets, these, despite integrating the instruments, should only graphically record their specifics. The fact sheets and summaries developed for our experience are relevant results that point out how to elaborate and conduct evaluative moments. The solutions found to suppress the dilemmas and difficulties of such an endeavor also appear as results, such as the choice to combine some dimensions in the same instrument due to the short time spent in class. Another is the balance between the use of more complex and laborious instruments with others that are simpler and more practical to adapt to the teacher's demands. We conclude that the experiences developed here point to a satisfactory, and still little explored, possibility of evaluating learning in school physical education, considering the different ways that students relate to the objects of knowledge.