Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Rosa Filho, Sebasti?o Nunes da lattes
Orientador(a): Carmo, Margarida Gor?te Ferreira do
Banca de defesa: Carmo, Margarida Gor?te Ferreira do, Machado, Aroldo Ferreira Lopes, Ara?jo, Jo?o Sebasti?o de Paula, Perin, Ant?nio, Andrade, Jos? Weselli de S?
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Fitotecnia
Departamento: Instituto de Agronomia
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/2184
Resumo: Industrial tomato production is hampered by weed occurrence, which may reduce productivity through competition, affect the efficiency of products applied to crops and host commercially important diseases and pathogens. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the occurrence and management of weeds in industrial tomato cropping systems in the Cerrado of Goi?s. In Chapter One, the viable seed bank was evaluated in areas with different weed management systems. The evaluation was made in two conventional tillage areas (CT); two with no-till (NT) and four with no-till and reduced soil preparation (RSP). The most frequent weeds were Conyza bonariensis, Cenchrus echinatus, Ipomoea aristolochiaefolia, Leonotis nepetifolia, Spermacoce latif?lia, Senna obtusifolia, Nicandra physaloides, Euphorbia heterophylla, Gnaphalium spp., Brachiaria plantaginea, Zea mays, Bidens pilosa, Macroptilium spp., , Solanum lycopersicum (tiguera), Commelina benghalensis and Sida rhombifolia. Among the soil preparation systems, reduced preparation (RSP) resulted in two species with higher germination: Phyllanthus tenellus and Oxaliss pp. Conventional tillage (CT) resulted in six species with the highest plant emergence number ? Ageratum conyzoides, Coronopus didymus, Portulaca oleracea, Eragrostis pilosa, Digitaria horizontalis and Solanum americanum. In Chapter Two, different systems of weed management in tomato crops for industrial processing under center-pivot irrigation were evaluated. The applied treatments were combinations between harrowing and chemical management with glyphosate, s-metolachlor, sulfentrazone and metribuzin-based products at different application periods. The variables plant population and ?Brix were not influenced by the treatments. There was statistical difference within the production components: twenty-fruit mass, yield per plant and productivity. Highest productivity was observed in the following treatments: a) harrowing thirty days after transplant (DAT), application of glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1), metribuzin (480 g ha-1) and s-metolaclhor (1,200 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (83.39 t ha-1); harrowing on the 30th DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) and s-metolachlor (1,200 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (74.75 t ha-1); c) harrowing on the thirtieth DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) on the 14th DAT and sulfentrazone (100 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (73.06 t ha-1); d) harrowing on the 30th DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) on the 14th DAT and s-metolachlor (1,200 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (71.83 t ha-1) and; e) harrowing on the 30 DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (100g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (71.75 t ha.-1).With the ?no weeding? and ?harrowing-only? treatments, there was reduction of 63.82% and 69.29% in fruit productivity, respectively, compared to the weeded sample. The conclusion is that the applications of sulfentrazone (100 g ha-1) or s-metolachlor (1,200 g ha-1) in weed management systems using glyphosate revealed potential alternatives for industrial tomato production in Goi?s.
id UFRRJ-1_21e830e856dff10fcee7523de2e6ddc4
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:jspui/2184
network_acronym_str UFRRJ-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
repository_id_str
spelling Carmo, Margarida Gor?te Ferreira do592.910.606-15Cavalieri, Sidnei Douglas034.224.199-00Carmo, Margarida Gor?te Ferreira doMachado, Aroldo Ferreira LopesAra?jo, Jo?o Sebasti?o de PaulaPerin, Ant?nioAndrade, Jos? Weselli de S?278.117.001-15http://lattes.cnpq.br/3604066263869458Rosa Filho, Sebasti?o Nunes da2018-01-26T16:05:57Z2017-07-30ROSA FILHO, Sebasti?o Nunes da. Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial. 2014. 72 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Instituto de Agronomia, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica - RJ, 2014.https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/2184Industrial tomato production is hampered by weed occurrence, which may reduce productivity through competition, affect the efficiency of products applied to crops and host commercially important diseases and pathogens. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the occurrence and management of weeds in industrial tomato cropping systems in the Cerrado of Goi?s. In Chapter One, the viable seed bank was evaluated in areas with different weed management systems. The evaluation was made in two conventional tillage areas (CT); two with no-till (NT) and four with no-till and reduced soil preparation (RSP). The most frequent weeds were Conyza bonariensis, Cenchrus echinatus, Ipomoea aristolochiaefolia, Leonotis nepetifolia, Spermacoce latif?lia, Senna obtusifolia, Nicandra physaloides, Euphorbia heterophylla, Gnaphalium spp., Brachiaria plantaginea, Zea mays, Bidens pilosa, Macroptilium spp., , Solanum lycopersicum (tiguera), Commelina benghalensis and Sida rhombifolia. Among the soil preparation systems, reduced preparation (RSP) resulted in two species with higher germination: Phyllanthus tenellus and Oxaliss pp. Conventional tillage (CT) resulted in six species with the highest plant emergence number ? Ageratum conyzoides, Coronopus didymus, Portulaca oleracea, Eragrostis pilosa, Digitaria horizontalis and Solanum americanum. In Chapter Two, different systems of weed management in tomato crops for industrial processing under center-pivot irrigation were evaluated. The applied treatments were combinations between harrowing and chemical management with glyphosate, s-metolachlor, sulfentrazone and metribuzin-based products at different application periods. The variables plant population and ?Brix were not influenced by the treatments. There was statistical difference within the production components: twenty-fruit mass, yield per plant and productivity. Highest productivity was observed in the following treatments: a) harrowing thirty days after transplant (DAT), application of glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1), metribuzin (480 g ha-1) and s-metolaclhor (1,200 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (83.39 t ha-1); harrowing on the 30th DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) and s-metolachlor (1,200 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (74.75 t ha-1); c) harrowing on the thirtieth DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) on the 14th DAT and sulfentrazone (100 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (73.06 t ha-1); d) harrowing on the 30th DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) on the 14th DAT and s-metolachlor (1,200 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (71.83 t ha-1) and; e) harrowing on the 30 DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (100g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (71.75 t ha.-1).With the ?no weeding? and ?harrowing-only? treatments, there was reduction of 63.82% and 69.29% in fruit productivity, respectively, compared to the weeded sample. The conclusion is that the applications of sulfentrazone (100 g ha-1) or s-metolachlor (1,200 g ha-1) in weed management systems using glyphosate revealed potential alternatives for industrial tomato production in Goi?s.O cultivo de tomateiro industrial ? prejudicado pela ocorr?ncia de plantas daninhas que podem reduzir a produtividade por competi??o, afetar a efici?ncia de produtos aplicados nas lavouras e serem hospedeiras de pragas e pat?genos de import?ncia comercial. Com isso, este trabalho teve como objetivos avaliar a ocorr?ncia e o manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo de tomateiro industrial no Cerrado goiano. No primeiro cap?tulo, avaliou-se o banco de sementes vi?veis de ?reas com diferentes sistemas de manejo de plantas daninhas. As avalia??es foram feitas em duas ?reas de plantio convencional (PC), duas de plantio direto (PD) e quatro de plantio direto modificado com preparo reduzido do solo (PPR). As esp?cies de plantas daninhas mais frequentes foram Conyza bonariensis, Cenchrus echinatus, Ipomoea aristolochiaefolia, Leonotis nepetifolia, Spermacoce latif?lia, Senna obtusifolia, Nicandra physaloides, Euphorbia heterophylla, Gnaphalium spp., Brachiaria plantaginea, Zea mays, Bidens pilosa, Macroptilium spp., Solanum lycopersicum(tiguera), Commelina benghalensis, Sida rhombifolia. Entre os sistemas de preparo do solo, o preparo reduzido (PPR) apresentou duas esp?cies entre as de maior germina??o, a esp?cie Phyllanthus tenellus e a Oxalis spp. O plantio convencional (PC) apresentou tr?s esp?cies com maior n?meros de plantas emergidas, sendo Eleusine indica, Digitaria horizontalis e Amaranthus hybridus. O plantio direto (PD) teve seis esp?cies com maior emerg?ncia em compara??o aos outros manejos de solo, sendo Ageratum conyzoides, Coronopus didymus, Portulaca oleracea, Eragrostis pilosa, Digitaria horizontalis e a Solanum americanum. No segundo cap?tulo, objetivou-se avaliar diferentes sistemas de manejo de plantas daninhas na cultura do tomateiro para processamento industrial em parte de lavoura comercial sob piv? central. Os tratamentos utilizados foram combina??es entre o uso da gradagem e manejo qu?mico com produtos ? base de glyphosate, s-metolachlor, sulfentrazone e metribuzin em diferentes ?pocas de aplica??o. As vari?veis popula??o de plantas e ?Brix n?o foram influenciadas pelos tratamentos. Houve diferen?as estat?sticas para os componentes de produ??o: massa de vinte frutos, produ??o por planta e produtividade. As maiores produtividades foram observadas nos seguintes tratamentos: a) gradagem aos trinta dias antes do transplantio (DAT), aplica??o de glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1), metribuzin (480 g ha-1) e de s-metolaclhor (1.200 g ha-1) aos sete DAT (83,39 t ha-1); b) gradagem aos 30 DAT, glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) e s-metolachlor (1.200 g ha-1) aos sete DAT (74,75 t ha-1);c) gradagem aos trinta DAT, glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) aos 14 DAT e sulfentrazone (100 g ha-1) aos sete DAT (73,06 t ha-1); d) gradagem aos 30 DAT, glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) aos 14 DAT e s-metolachlor (1.200 g ha-1) aos sete DAT (71,83 t ha-1) e ; e) gradagem aos 30 DAT, glyphosate (1.080 g ha-1) e sulfentrazone (100 g ha-1) aos sete DAT (71,75 t ha.-1). Nos tratamentos ?sem capina? e ?apenas gradagem?, houve redu??o de 63,82% e 69,29% na produtividade de frutos, respectivamente, em rela??o ? testemunha capinada. Conclui-se que as aplica??es de sulfentrazone (100 g ha-1) ou s-metolachlor (1.200 g ha-1), em sistemas de manejo de plantas daninhas contendo glyphosate, se revelaram alternativas potenciais na cultura do tomateiro industrial em Goi?s.Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2018-01-26T16:05:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2014 - Sebasti?o Nunes da Rosa Filho.pdf: 2091591 bytes, checksum: f35a1bfbdc5bdd66764178c67ffba67b (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-26T16:05:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2014 - Sebasti?o Nunes da Rosa Filho.pdf: 2091591 bytes, checksum: f35a1bfbdc5bdd66764178c67ffba67b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-30CAPESapplication/pdfhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/61271/2014%20-%20Sebasti%c3%a3o%20Nunes%20da%20Rosa%20Filho.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em FitotecniaUFRRJBrasilInstituto de Agronomiainvasive plantsherbicideweedingSolanum lycopersicumplantas invasorasherbicidacapinaAgronomiaBanco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrialViable seed bank and weed management in industrial tomato cropping systemsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJTHUMBNAIL2014 - Sebasti?o Nunes da Rosa Filho.pdf.jpg2014 - Sebasti?o Nunes da Rosa Filho.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg1943http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2184/18/2014+-+Sebasti%C3%A3o+Nunes+da+Rosa+Filho.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD518TEXT2014 - Sebasti?o Nunes da Rosa Filho.pdf.txt2014 - Sebasti?o Nunes da Rosa Filho.pdf.txttext/plain160142http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2184/17/2014+-+Sebasti%C3%A3o+Nunes+da+Rosa+Filho.pdf.txt02e2842e990eb421a85f4be0b84ff1c2MD517ORIGINAL2014 - Sebasti?o Nunes da Rosa Filho.pdf2014 - Sebasti?o Nunes da Rosa Filho.pdfapplication/pdf2088659http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2184/2/2014+-+Sebasti%C3%A3o+Nunes+da+Rosa+Filho.pdff0ec9752e9367d6568003522c76edfbcMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2184/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51jspui/21842021-04-09 20:49:45.927oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://tede.ufrrj.br/PUBhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/oai/requestbibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.bropendoar:2021-04-09T23:49:45Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Viable seed bank and weed management in industrial tomato cropping systems
title Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial
spellingShingle Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial
Rosa Filho, Sebasti?o Nunes da
invasive plants
herbicide
weeding
Solanum lycopersicum
plantas invasoras
herbicida
capina
Agronomia
title_short Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial
title_full Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial
title_fullStr Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial
title_full_unstemmed Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial
title_sort Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial
author Rosa Filho, Sebasti?o Nunes da
author_facet Rosa Filho, Sebasti?o Nunes da
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Carmo, Margarida Gor?te Ferreira do
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 592.910.606-15
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Cavalieri, Sidnei Douglas
dc.contributor.advisor-co1ID.fl_str_mv 034.224.199-00
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Carmo, Margarida Gor?te Ferreira do
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Machado, Aroldo Ferreira Lopes
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Ara?jo, Jo?o Sebasti?o de Paula
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Perin, Ant?nio
dc.contributor.referee5.fl_str_mv Andrade, Jos? Weselli de S?
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 278.117.001-15
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3604066263869458
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosa Filho, Sebasti?o Nunes da
contributor_str_mv Carmo, Margarida Gor?te Ferreira do
Cavalieri, Sidnei Douglas
Carmo, Margarida Gor?te Ferreira do
Machado, Aroldo Ferreira Lopes
Ara?jo, Jo?o Sebasti?o de Paula
Perin, Ant?nio
Andrade, Jos? Weselli de S?
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv invasive plants
herbicide
weeding
topic invasive plants
herbicide
weeding
Solanum lycopersicum
plantas invasoras
herbicida
capina
Agronomia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Solanum lycopersicum
plantas invasoras
herbicida
capina
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv Agronomia
description Industrial tomato production is hampered by weed occurrence, which may reduce productivity through competition, affect the efficiency of products applied to crops and host commercially important diseases and pathogens. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the occurrence and management of weeds in industrial tomato cropping systems in the Cerrado of Goi?s. In Chapter One, the viable seed bank was evaluated in areas with different weed management systems. The evaluation was made in two conventional tillage areas (CT); two with no-till (NT) and four with no-till and reduced soil preparation (RSP). The most frequent weeds were Conyza bonariensis, Cenchrus echinatus, Ipomoea aristolochiaefolia, Leonotis nepetifolia, Spermacoce latif?lia, Senna obtusifolia, Nicandra physaloides, Euphorbia heterophylla, Gnaphalium spp., Brachiaria plantaginea, Zea mays, Bidens pilosa, Macroptilium spp., , Solanum lycopersicum (tiguera), Commelina benghalensis and Sida rhombifolia. Among the soil preparation systems, reduced preparation (RSP) resulted in two species with higher germination: Phyllanthus tenellus and Oxaliss pp. Conventional tillage (CT) resulted in six species with the highest plant emergence number ? Ageratum conyzoides, Coronopus didymus, Portulaca oleracea, Eragrostis pilosa, Digitaria horizontalis and Solanum americanum. In Chapter Two, different systems of weed management in tomato crops for industrial processing under center-pivot irrigation were evaluated. The applied treatments were combinations between harrowing and chemical management with glyphosate, s-metolachlor, sulfentrazone and metribuzin-based products at different application periods. The variables plant population and ?Brix were not influenced by the treatments. There was statistical difference within the production components: twenty-fruit mass, yield per plant and productivity. Highest productivity was observed in the following treatments: a) harrowing thirty days after transplant (DAT), application of glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1), metribuzin (480 g ha-1) and s-metolaclhor (1,200 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (83.39 t ha-1); harrowing on the 30th DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) and s-metolachlor (1,200 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (74.75 t ha-1); c) harrowing on the thirtieth DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) on the 14th DAT and sulfentrazone (100 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (73.06 t ha-1); d) harrowing on the 30th DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) on the 14th DAT and s-metolachlor (1,200 g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (71.83 t ha-1) and; e) harrowing on the 30 DAT, glyphosate (1,080 g ha-1) and sulfentrazone (100g ha-1) on the seventh DAT (71.75 t ha.-1).With the ?no weeding? and ?harrowing-only? treatments, there was reduction of 63.82% and 69.29% in fruit productivity, respectively, compared to the weeded sample. The conclusion is that the applications of sulfentrazone (100 g ha-1) or s-metolachlor (1,200 g ha-1) in weed management systems using glyphosate revealed potential alternatives for industrial tomato production in Goi?s.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017-07-30
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-01-26T16:05:57Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ROSA FILHO, Sebasti?o Nunes da. Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial. 2014. 72 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Instituto de Agronomia, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica - RJ, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/2184
identifier_str_mv ROSA FILHO, Sebasti?o Nunes da. Banco de sementes vi?veis e manejo de plantas daninhas em sistemas de cultivo do tomateiro industrial. 2014. 72 f. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia) - Instituto de Agronomia, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica - RJ, 2014.
url https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/2184
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Fitotecnia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRRJ
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Instituto de Agronomia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2184/18/2014+-+Sebasti%C3%A3o+Nunes+da+Rosa+Filho.pdf.jpg
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2184/17/2014+-+Sebasti%C3%A3o+Nunes+da+Rosa+Filho.pdf.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2184/2/2014+-+Sebasti%C3%A3o+Nunes+da+Rosa+Filho.pdf
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/2184/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
02e2842e990eb421a85f4be0b84ff1c2
f0ec9752e9367d6568003522c76edfbc
7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.br
_version_ 1800313637318950912