Reserva biol?gica do Tingu?/RJ: idas e vindas de um processo de recategoriza??o

• Ano de defesa: 2021
• Autor(a) principal: Diniz, Rosiane Garcia
• Orientador(a): Andriolli, Carmen Silvia
• Banca de defesa: Andriolli, Carmen Silvia , Furtado, Fabrina Pontes , May, Peter Herman , Gerhardt, Cleyton Henrique
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Sociais em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade
• Departamento: Instituto de Ci?ncias Humanas e Sociais
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Regulariza??o fundi?ria; Patrim?nios hist?rico-cultural; Popula??o residentes; Consolida??o de unidades de conserva??o; Consolidation of Cconservation units
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Land tenure regularization; Historical-cultural heritage; Resident population
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: Ci?ncias Sociais
• Link de acesso: https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/6791

The discussion that this research intends to analyze encompasses the attempt to change the preservation category -- from Biological Reserve to National Park -- through a process of recategorization, which, although provided for by law (Federal Constitution (1988), art. 225, ?1, III and in SNUC 9.985/2000), is analyzed by me as a social situation (MAX GLUCKMANN, 1987 [1958]). The main justification for this change of category is the fact that the area houses in its interior several historical and cultural heritages from the time of the empire, resulting from the process of occupation and development of the Baixada Fluminense, which the population would have the right to know and visit. The argument of those who support the recategorization of the UC, mainly represented by the municipal power of the Municipality of Nova Igua?u and some civil society institutions, such as the Ecopreservar Institute, which we will call here the pro-park group, is based on the justification of the need to regulating visitation, increasing inspection of the area so that the nature conservation function is effectively fulfilled. In the case of the Tingu? Biological Reserve, the recategorization pleads for a change to a conservation category that is very close in terms of restrictions and objectives of use, and that belong to the group of Integral Protection Conservation Units. This fact is what prompts us to analyze this recategorization process, above all to understand what this apparently small change could entail in the general context of nature conservation in the PA in question. The research aims to analyze the creation process and the current institutional management situation of the Tingu? Biological Reserve in order to understand the context in which attempts to recategorize the Conservation Unit are inserted, understanding these attempts as a social situation ( cf. Gluckman). For the development of this research, I use a mosaic of research techniques, namely: a literature review on the topic, document analysis (Minutes, Processes, etc.), analysis of the speeches produced and published by the social actors involved in the problem (those who follow the management of the UC through participation in the advisory board and those who reside in its surroundings and/or interior) and questionnaire. The choice of key informants was made arbitrarily, however, we prioritized actors known to be involved in the management of RBT, as well as public managers and representatives identified through participation in the public hearing held in the Chamber of Deputies.