A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Muniz, Carlos Roberto lattes
Orientador(a): Cribb, Andr? Yves
Banca de defesa: Cribb, Andr? Yves, Rocha, Saulo Barroso, Cribb, Sandra L?cia de Souza, Cunha, Robson Moreira
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Gest?o e Estrat?gia
Departamento: Instituto de Ci?ncias Sociais Aplicadas
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/5556
Resumo: The world lives in a constant technological transformation driven by knowledge. The interests of organizations for knowledge and their processes are justified by the speed of changes and innovations that society experiences daily and within organizations. The knowledge must be treated as active and its management can boost the results of organizations. Managing knowledge has become imperative for contemporary society. However, knowledge management still lacks tools that are consolidated and recognized as effective in measuring the processes that make up knowledge management. The maturity models of knowledge management emerged as a solution and thus, to score problems and processes of knowledge management. These models have the function of measuring and evaluating the main processes and factors that impact knowledge management, but there is still no model that has met all the demands that knowledge management needs for its efficient application within organizations. Throughout this research, it was noticed that the studies of the relations between the evaluated processes and items could be explored, because despite the various studies, only a few work and/or measure the relationship of the constructs that make up knowledge management. From these precepts, we try to answer the following question: Are there relationships between the constructs that make up a maturity model of knowledge management in a research and development organization? To answer this question, this study had the following objective: Evaluate the maturity of knowledge management and the relationships of constructs in a research and development organization. After the bibliographic review, it was defined that the model used is the Oliveira and Pedron (2014) and the company chosen for the application was the ?Embrapa Food Technology?, one of the forty-two centralized units. The study was of a quantitative nature and was performed by data collection. The data collection instrument was answered by fifty employees who handle, create and transform the active knowledge within the studied unit. The data collected were treated with descriptive statistical analysis through Excel software and the structural equation modeling was performed through the software SmartPLS. This study was limited to being carried out in a single research unit of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa). Nevertheless, due to the number of research plants in this unit, it was possible to apply the model proposed in the study, with no impairment to the quantitative analyzes performed in the study. The results of this study indicate that the knowledge management maturity model proposed by Oliveira and Pedron (2014) is applicable to the performance of the ?Embrapa Food Technology? and that eleven of the twelve relationships among the constructs proposed in the model were confirmed. The studied unit had its result as level three of maturity, according to the studied model. This stage is called development.
id UFRRJ-1_f508491dffbcf8d3feddd22843c51bb9
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:jspui/5556
network_acronym_str UFRRJ-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
repository_id_str
spelling Cribb, Andr? YvesCPF: 024.457.647-50Cribb, Andr? YvesRocha, Saulo BarrosoCribb, Sandra L?cia de SouzaCunha, Robson MoreiraCPF: 052.832.477-24http://lattes.cnpq.br/9041684052085682Muniz, Carlos Roberto2022-04-13T21:17:21Z2019-04-26MUNIZ, Carlos Roberto. A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa. 2019. 91 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado Profissional em Gest?o e Estrat?gia) - Instituto de Ci?ncias Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, 2019.https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/5556The world lives in a constant technological transformation driven by knowledge. The interests of organizations for knowledge and their processes are justified by the speed of changes and innovations that society experiences daily and within organizations. The knowledge must be treated as active and its management can boost the results of organizations. Managing knowledge has become imperative for contemporary society. However, knowledge management still lacks tools that are consolidated and recognized as effective in measuring the processes that make up knowledge management. The maturity models of knowledge management emerged as a solution and thus, to score problems and processes of knowledge management. These models have the function of measuring and evaluating the main processes and factors that impact knowledge management, but there is still no model that has met all the demands that knowledge management needs for its efficient application within organizations. Throughout this research, it was noticed that the studies of the relations between the evaluated processes and items could be explored, because despite the various studies, only a few work and/or measure the relationship of the constructs that make up knowledge management. From these precepts, we try to answer the following question: Are there relationships between the constructs that make up a maturity model of knowledge management in a research and development organization? To answer this question, this study had the following objective: Evaluate the maturity of knowledge management and the relationships of constructs in a research and development organization. After the bibliographic review, it was defined that the model used is the Oliveira and Pedron (2014) and the company chosen for the application was the ?Embrapa Food Technology?, one of the forty-two centralized units. The study was of a quantitative nature and was performed by data collection. The data collection instrument was answered by fifty employees who handle, create and transform the active knowledge within the studied unit. The data collected were treated with descriptive statistical analysis through Excel software and the structural equation modeling was performed through the software SmartPLS. This study was limited to being carried out in a single research unit of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa). Nevertheless, due to the number of research plants in this unit, it was possible to apply the model proposed in the study, with no impairment to the quantitative analyzes performed in the study. The results of this study indicate that the knowledge management maturity model proposed by Oliveira and Pedron (2014) is applicable to the performance of the ?Embrapa Food Technology? and that eleven of the twelve relationships among the constructs proposed in the model were confirmed. The studied unit had its result as level three of maturity, according to the studied model. This stage is called development.O mundo vive em uma constante transforma??o tecnol?gica impulsionada pelo conhecimento. Os interesses das organiza??es pelo conhecimento e seus processos s?o justificados pela velocidade das mudan?as e inova??es que a sociedade viv?ncia diariamente e dentro das organiza??es. O conhecimento deve ser tratado como ativo e a sua gest?o pode impulsionar os resultados das organiza??es. Gerir o conhecimento tornou-se imperativo para a sociedade contempor?nea. Contudo, a gest?o do conhecimento (GC) ainda carece de ferramentas consolidadas e reconhecidas como eficazes na aferi??o dos processos que comp?e a GC. Os modelos de maturidade da GC surgiram como solu??o e para pontuar problemas e processos da GC. Esses modelos t?m a fun??o de medir e avaliar os processos e fatores chaves que impactam na GC, mas ainda n?o existe um modelo que tenha preenchido e atendido todas as demandas que a GC precisa para a sua aplica??o eficiente dentro das organiza??es. Ao longo desta pesquisa notou-se que os estudos das rela??es entre os processos e itens avaliados poderiam ser explorados, pois apesar dos in?meros estudos, poucos trabalham e/ou medem a rela??o dos construtos que comp?e a GC. A partir desses preceitos buscou-se responder a seguinte quest?o: Existem rela??es entre os construtos que comp?em um modelo de maturidade da GC em uma organiza??o de pesquisa e desenvolvimento? Para responder essa pergunta, este estudo teve o seguinte objetivo: Avaliar a maturidade de GC e as rela??es dos construtos em uma organiza??o de pesquisa e desenvolvimento. Ap?s a revis?o bibliogr?fica, foi definido que o modelo utilizado ? o de Oliveira e Pedron (2014) e a empresa escolhida para a aplica??o foi a unidade da Embrapa Agroind?stria de Alimentos, uma das quarenta e duas unidades centralizadas. O estudo foi de natureza quantitativa tendo sido realizado por levantamento de dados. O instrumento de coleta de dados foi respondido por 50 colaboradores que manuseiam, criam e transformam o ativo conhecimento dentro da unidade estudada. Os dados coletados foram tratados com an?lises estat?sticas descritivas atrav?s do software Excel e a modelagem de equa??es estruturais foi realizada atrav?s do software SmartPLS. Este estudo limitou-se a ser realizado em uma ?nica unidade de pesquisa da Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu?ria (Embrapa). Apesar disso, por conta da quantidade de plantas de pesquisa existentes nesta unidade, foi poss?vel a aplica??o do modelo proposto no estudo, n?o havendo preju?zos ?s an?lises quantitativas nele realizadas. Os resultados deste estudo indicam que o modelo de maturidade da GC proposto por Oliveira e Pedron (2014) ? aplic?vel ? atua??o da Embrapa Agroind?stria de Alimentos e que onze das doze rela??es entre os construtos propostas no modelo, foram confirmadas. A unidade estudada teve o seu resultado como n?vel tr?s de maturidade, conforme o modelo estudado. Esse est?gio denomina-se desenvolvimento.Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2022-04-13T21:17:20Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2019 - Carlos Roberto Muniz.pdf: 2447715 bytes, checksum: 93dc9c31d9b33351ea6a1afad18cd951 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2022-04-13T21:17:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2019 - Carlos Roberto Muniz.pdf: 2447715 bytes, checksum: 93dc9c31d9b33351ea6a1afad18cd951 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-04-26CAPES - Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superiorapplication/pdfhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/retrieve/68903/2019%20-%20Carlos%20Roberto%20Muniz.pdf.jpgporUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Gest?o e Estrat?giaUFRRJBrasilInstituto de Ci?ncias Sociais AplicadasADIZES, I. Os ciclos de vida das organiza??es: como e por que as empresas crescem e morrem e o que fazer a respeito. S?o Paulo: Pioneira, 1990. ALE, M. A., TOLEDO, C. M., CHIOTTI, O., & GALLI, M. R. (2014). A conceptual model and technological support for organizational knowledge management. Science of Computer Programming, 95, Part 1, 73?92. AGGESTAM, L. Towards a maturity model for learning organizations: the role of knowledge management. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, IEEE, 2006, Krakow, p.141-145. ALAVI, M.; LEIDNER, D. Knowledge management system: issues, challenges and benefits. Communications of the Association for Information System, v.1, n.7, p.2-41, 1999. ALAVI, M. and LEIDNER, D.E. (2001), ??Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues??, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107-36. ALAZMI, M.; ZAIRI, M. Knowledge management critical success factors. Total Quality Management, v.14, n.2, p.199-204, 2003. AL-MABROUK, K. Critical success factors affecting knowledge management adoption: areview of the literature. Innovations in Information Technology, IEEE Xplorep.1-6, 2006. ARLING P. A, MARK W.S. CHUN, (2011) "Facilitating new knowledge creation and obtaining KM maturity", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 15 Issue: 2, pp.231-250jin BA?TA, A.M.C. O desafio da cria??o. Petr?polis: Vozes, 1999. BARUCH, Y.; HOLTON, B.C. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research.HumanRelations, v.61, n.8, p.1139-1160, 2008. BATISTA, F.F. Modelo de GC para a administra??o p?blica brasileira: como implementar a gest?o do conhecimento para produzir resultados em benef?cio do cidad?o. Bras?lia: Ipea, 2012. 132p. BERZTISS, A.T. Capability maturity for knowledge management. In: INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, IEEE Computer Science, 2002, Washington, DC. BHATTI, W.A.; ZAHEER, A.; REHMAN, K. The effect of knowledge management practices on organizational performance: a conceptual study. African Journal of Business Management, v.5, n.7, p.2847-2853, 2011. BOCK, G. W.; ZMUD, R. W.; KIM, Y.-G.; LEE, J.-N.; Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, socialpsychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS quarterly, 87?111, 2005. BOUGHZALA, I. AND BOUOUD, I. (2013) ?The development and application of a community maturity model?, Int. J. Information Technology and Management, Vol. 12, Nos. 3/4, pp.273?297. CHEN, L., & FONG, P. S. W. (2015). Evaluation of knowledge management performance: An organic approach. Information & Management. CHEN, S., DUAN, Y., EDWARDS, J. S., & LEHANEY, B. (2006). Toward understanding inter?organizational knowledge transfer needs in SMEs: insight from a UK investigation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 6?23. CHEN, M. Y., HUANG, M. J., & CHENG, Y. C. (2009). Measuring knowledge management performance using a competitive perspective: An empirical study. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8449?8459. CHIN, W. (2000). Partial least squares for IS researchers: an overview and presentation of recent advances using the PLS approach. In ICIS (Vol. 2000, p. 741? 742, 2000... University of Houston, 2000.Recuperado de http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wynne_Chin/publication/221600127_Partial _least_squares_for_IS_researchers_an_overview_and_presentation_of_recent _advances_using_the_PLS_approach/links/09e41514925109aa70000000.pdf. CHOI, B., &LEE, H. (2003). An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance. Information & Management, 40(5), 403?417. CHOO, C.W. (2006), the Knowing Organization, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. CHONG, C. W., Chong, S. C., & Gan, G. C. Inter-organizational knowledge transfer needs among small and medium enterprises. Library Review, 60(1), 37?52, 2011. COHEN, J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2o Ed). New York: Psychology, 1988. Press. Recuperado de http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schneider/P2465/Readings/Cohen,%201988%20(Statisti cal%20Power, %20273-406).pdfv COLLIS, J.; HUSSEY, R. Pesquisa em administra??o: um guia pr?tico para alunos de gradua??o e p?s-gradua??o. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005. COLOMBO, M.G.; DELMASTRO, M. How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, v.31, p.1103-1122, 2002. CRESWELL, J.W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Sage Publications, 2003. CRESWELL, J.W. Projeto de Pesquisa: m?todos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage PublicationsLtd. CRIBB, A. Y. Uma abordagem pragm?tica de constru??o de estrat?gias de gest?o do conhecimento em organiza??es. Revista Iberoamericana de Sistemas, Cibern?tica e Inform?tica, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 75-80, 2010. DAFT, R.L. Organiza??es: teorias e projetos. S?o Paulo: Pioneira Thompson Learning, 2003. DAVENPORT, T.; DE LONG, D.; BEERS, M. Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, v.39, n.2, p.43-57, 1998. DAVENPORT, T.; PRUSAK, L. Conhecimento empresarial. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2003. DHANARAJ, C., LYLES, M. A., STEENSMA, H. K., TIHANYI, L. Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance.Journal ofInternational Business Studies, 35(5), 428?442, 2004. EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECU?RIA ? EMBRAPA.2018. Organograma Dispon?vel em: <https://www.embrapa.br/organograma>. Acesso em: fevereiro 2018. EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECU?RIA ? EMBRAPA.2018Organograma. Dispon?vel em: <https://www.embrapa.br/agroindustria-de-alimentos/organograma>. Acesso em novembro 2018. FAHEY, L.; PRUSAK, L. The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, v.40, n.3, p.265-276, 1998. FENG, J. Constructing a knowledge management maturity model from perspective of knowledge management.In: INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, IEEE, 2005, p.912-917. FERREIRA, V.R.B. A utiliza??o de pr?ticas de gest?o do conhecimento em organiza??es da sociedade civil que trabalham com projetos de inclus?o digital: um estudo de caso. 2007. Disserta??o de mestrado - Programa de P?s-Gradua??o de Engenharia e Gest?o do Conhecimento, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florian?polis, 2007. FRASER, P., MOULTRIE, J. AND GREGORY, M. (2002) ?The use of maturity models I grids as a tool in assessing product development capability?, Paper presented at 2002 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 2002, IEMC ?02. GA?L, Z. et al. Knowledge management profile maturity model. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2008, p.209 -216. GALBRAITH, J. The stages of growth. Journal of Business Strategy, v.3, n.4, p.70-79, 1982. GARVIN, D.A. Gerenciando a qualidade: a vis?o estrat?gica e competitiva. Rio de Janeiro: Quality mark, 1992. GOLD, A.H.; MALHOTRA, A.; SEGARS, A.H. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, v.18, n.1, p.185- 214, 2001. GOMES FILHO, A. C. Inova??o sistem?tica com responsabilidade social nos empreendimentos de base tecnol?gica: o modelo mcns-triz. 2010. Tese de doutorado - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florian?polis, 2010. GOTTSCHALK, P.; HOLGERSSON, S. Stages of knowledge management technology in the value shop: the case of police investigation performance. Expert Systems, v.23, n.4, p.183? 193, 2006. GROVER, V.; DAVENPORT, T. General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda. Journal of Management Information Systems,v.18, n.1, p.5-22, 2001. HAIR, J. F., HULT, G. T. M., RINGLE, C., & SARSTEDT, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications. HAIR JR, J.F., et al. Fundamentos de m?todos de pesquisa em administra??o. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005. HANSEN, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What is your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106?116, 187. HELFAT, C.E.; PETERAF, M.A. The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed. Strategic Management Journal, v.24, n.10, p.997?1010, 2003. HENSELER, J.; RINGLE, C. M.; SINKOVICS, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New Challenges to International Marketing, Vol. 20, and p. 277?319, 2009. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. HSIEH, P. J; LIN, B.; LIN, C. The construction and application of knowledge navigator model (KNMTM): An evaluation of knowledge management maturity. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(two, Part 2), 4087?4100, 2009. JAWARAR, I.M.; MCLAUGHLIN, G.L. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life-cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, v.26, n.3, p.397-414, 2001. JIN, D., KAH-HIN, CHAI KAY-CHUAN, Tan,"New service development maturity model", Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 24 Iss 1 pp. 86-116, 2014. JIULING, W.; JIANKANG, W.; HONGJIANG, Y. Study on maturity level transition mechanism of knowledge management. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 325-328. JOHNSON, R. B.; ONWUEGBUZIE, A. J. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, v.33, n.7, p.14-26, 2004. KHATIBIAN, N.; HASAN, T.; JAFARI, H.A. ?Measurement of knowledge management maturity level within organizations?. Business Strategy Series, v.11, n.1, p.54-70, 2010. KIM, T. H., LEE, J.-N., CHUN, J. U., & Bombast, I. (2014). Understanding the effect of knowledge management strategies on knowledge management performance: A contingency perspective. Information & Management, 51(4), 398?416. KLIMKO, G. Knowledge management and maturity models, building common understanding. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2001, Kochikar, 269-278. KRUGER, C. J.; SNYMAN, M. M. M. Formulation of a strategic knowledge Management Maturity model. South African Journal of Information Management, v.7, n.2, p.1-11, 2005. KRUGER, C.J.; JOHNSON, R.D. Is there a correlation between knowledge management maturity and organizational performance, VINE, v.41, n.3, p.265-295, 2011. KULKARNI, U.; ST LOUIS, R. Organizational self-assessment of knowledge management maturity. In: AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, Tampa, Florida, 2542-2551. LEE, J.H., KIM Y.G. A stage model of organizational knowledge management: a latent content analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, v.20, n.4, p.299-311, 2001. LEE, K.C.; LEE, S.; KANG, I.W. KMPI: measuring KM performance, Information and Management, v.42, n.1, p.469-82, 2005. LEE, J.H.; KIM, Y.G.; YU, S. Stage Model for Knowledge Management. In: HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, Maui, Hawaii. LIN, H. Antecedents of the stage-based knowledge management evolution. Journal of Knowledge Management, v.15, n.1, p.136-155, 2011. LIN, C.; WU, J.; YEN, D.C. Exploring barriers to knowledge flow at different knowledge management maturity stages, Information and Management, v.49, p.10-23, 2012. LIN, H.F. A stage model of knowledge management: an empirical investigation of process and effectiveness. Journal of Information Science, v.33, n.6, p.643-659, 2007. LIN, H. Antecedents of the stage-based knowledge management evolution. Jornal of Knowledge Management, v.15, n.1, p.136-155, 2011. MARCONI, M.A.; LAKATOS, E.M. Fundamentos da metodologia cient?fica. S?o Paulo: Atlas, 2003. MARTINS, G.A.; THE?PHILO, C.R. Metodologia da investiga??o cient?fica para ci?ncias sociais aplicadas. S?o Paulo: Atlas, 2009. MARTINS, R.A. Princ?pios da pesquisa cient?fica. In: MIGUEL, P.A.C. et al. Metodologia de pesquisa cient?fica em engenharia de produ??o e gest?o de opera??es. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010. MORGAN, D.L. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Quality Health Research, v.8, n.3, p.362-376, 2007. NEJATIAN, M., NEJATI, M., ZAREI, M. H., & SOLTANI, S. (2013). Critical Enablers for Knowledge Creation Process: Synthesizing the Literature. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 5(2), 105. NEUMAN, W.L. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2000. NISSEN, M. E. Harnessing knowledge dynamics. Idea Group Inc., 2006. NGAI, E.W.T., CHAU, D.C.K., POON, J.K.L. AND TO, C.K.M. (2013) ?Energy and utility management maturity model for sustainable manufacturing process?, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol. 146, No. 2, pp.453?464. NODARI, F. (2013). A rela??o entre o compartilhamento de conhecimento e o desempenho organizacional, mediada pela capacidade absortiva. Recuperado de http://repositorio.pucrs.br:80/dspace/handle/10923/1232 NONAKA, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14?37. NONAKA, I.; TAKEUCHI, H. The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. NONAKA, I.; TAKEUCHI, H. (1997), Cria??o de Conhecimento na Empresa: Como as Empresas Japonesas Geram a Din?mica da Inova??o, Campus, Rio de Janeiro. NONAKA, I., & VON KROGH, G. (2009). Perspective-Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635?652. OLIVA, F, LOTTI "Knowledge management barriers, practices and maturity model", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 18 Is 6 pp. 1053 ? 1074. 2014 OLIVEIRA, M., & Caldeira, M. (2008). Um ?framework? para a gest?o do conhecimento nas organiza??es. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gest?o, 7(1), 33?43. OLIVEIRA, M., PEDRON, C. D., NODARI, F., & RIBEIRO, R. (2014, September). Knowledge management in small and micro enterprises: applying a maturity model. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (Vol. Two, p. 757). Academic Conferences International Limited. OLIVEIRA, M., &PEDRON, C. D. (2014). Maturity Model for Knowledge Management and Strategic Benefits. European Conference on Knowledge Management, 1, 1?10. OLIVEIRA, M., PEDRON, C., ROM?O, M., & BECKER, G. (2011). Proposta de um modelo de maturidade para Gest?o do Conhecimento: KM3. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gest?o, 10(4), 14?25. PEE, L.G.; KANKANHALLI, A. A model of knowledge organizational management maturity: based on people, process and technology. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, v.8, n.2, p.79-99, 2009. PETTIGREW, ANDREW M. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, v. 24, n. six, p. 649-670, 1987. PHELPS R.; ADAMS R.; BESSANT J. Life cycles of growing organizations: a review with implications for knowledge and learning. International Journal of Management Reviews, v.9, n.1, p.1-30, 2007. POLANYI, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Londres. PORTER, M.E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press, 1990. POUR, M.J., MANIAN, A. AND YAZDANI, H.R. (2016) ?A theoretical and methodological examination of knowledge management maturity models: a systematic review?, Int. J. Business Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp.330?352. RASULA, J.; VUKSIAE, V.B.; STEMBERGER, M.I. The integrated knowledge Management Maturity Model. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, v.11, n.2, p.47-62, 2008. RINGLE, C. M., DA SILVA, D., & BIDO, D. D. S. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with the Smartpls. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(02), 56?73. RUGGLES, R. The state of the notion: knowledge management in practice. California Management Review, v.40, n.3, p.80-9, 1998. RYOO, S. Y., &KIM, K. K. (2015). The impact of knowledge complementarities on supply chain performance through knowledge exchange. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3029? 3040. SAITO, A., UMEMOTO, K., & Ikeda, M. (2007). A strategy-based ontology of knowledge management technologies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 97?114. SAVEJA, S.; JUCEVICIUS, R. The model of knowledge management system maturity and its approbation in business companies, Ocialiniai Mokslai, v.3, n.69, p.57-68, 2010. SANTOS, I.C.; AMATO NETO, J.A. Gest?o do conhecimento em ind?stria de alta tecnologia.Gest?o e Produ??o, v.18, n.3, p.569-582, 2008. SABHERWAL AND I. BEZERRA-FERNANDEZ, An empirical study of the effect of knowledge management processes at individual, group, and organizational levels, Decision Sciences 34(2) (2003) 225?60. SERENKO, A.; HULL, E.; BONTIS, N. An application of the knowledge Management Maturity Model: the case of credit unions, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, in press, 2014. SERNA, E. Maturity model of knowledge management in the interpretivist perspective, International Journal of Information Management, v.32, n.4, p.365-371, 2012. SILVEIRA, D.T.; C?RDOVA, F.P.A pesquisa cient?fica. In: M?todos de pesquisa. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2009. SINHA, R.R.; DATE, H.A. Maturity of knowledge management and knowledge enable business process. International Journal of Research in Business and Technology, v.4, n.1, p.367-373, 2014. SPENDOLINI, M.J. Benchmarking. S?o Paulo: Makron Books, 1994. SVEIBY, K. E. What is knowledge management? April 2001. Dispon?vel em acesso em 10/12/2017. STEWART, T.A. Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations.New York: Doubleday/ Currency, 1997. SZLEZAK, T.A. (2010), Plat?o e Arist?teles na doutrina do Nous de Plotino, Paulus, S?o Paulo. TEAH; H.Y.; PEE, L.G.; KANKANHALLI, A. Development and application of a general Knowledge Management Maturity Model. In: PACIFIC ASIA CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 1-8, 401-416 TERENCE, A.C.F.; ESCRIV?O FILHO, E. Abordagem quantitativa, qualitativa e a utiliza??o da pesquisa-a??o nos estudos organizacionais. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODU??O, 26, 2006, Fortaleza. VRIES, R. E. DE, HOOFF, B. VAN DEN, & RIDDER, J. A. de. (2006). Explaining Knowledge Sharing The Role of Team Communication Styles, Job Satisfaction, and Performance Beliefs. Communication Research, 33(2), 115?135. WETZELS, M.; ODEKERKEN, SHRODER. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. Management Information Systems Quarterly - MISQ, 33, 2009. YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e m?todos. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2001. YEH, Y.-J., LAI, S.-Q., & HO, C.-T. (2006). Knowledge management enablers: a case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(6), 793?810.Modelo de MaturidadeGest?o do ConhecimentoEmbrapa Agroind?stria de AlimentosMaturity ModelKnowledge ManagementEmbrapa Food TechnologyAdministra??oA maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisaThe maturity of organizational knowledge management: The case of a research organizationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJinstname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)instacron:UFRRJTHUMBNAIL2019 - Carlos Roberto Muniz.pdf.jpg2019 - Carlos Roberto Muniz.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg1943http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/5556/4/2019+-+Carlos+Roberto+Muniz.pdf.jpgcc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2MD54TEXT2019 - Carlos Roberto Muniz.pdf.txt2019 - Carlos Roberto Muniz.pdf.txttext/plain159585http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/5556/3/2019+-+Carlos+Roberto+Muniz.pdf.txt23954025c9fc1a3bb81a1454e7820f4eMD53ORIGINAL2019 - Carlos Roberto Muniz.pdf2019 - Carlos Roberto Muniz.pdfapplication/pdf2447715http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/5556/2/2019+-+Carlos+Roberto+Muniz.pdf93dc9c31d9b33351ea6a1afad18cd951MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82089http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/5556/1/license.txt7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7MD51jspui/55562022-04-14 01:00:32.128oai:localhost: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://tede.ufrrj.br/PUBhttps://tede.ufrrj.br/oai/requestbibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.bropendoar:2022-04-14T04:00:32Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv The maturity of organizational knowledge management: The case of a research organization
title A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa
spellingShingle A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa
Muniz, Carlos Roberto
Modelo de Maturidade
Gest?o do Conhecimento
Embrapa Agroind?stria de Alimentos
Maturity Model
Knowledge Management
Embrapa Food Technology
Administra??o
title_short A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa
title_full A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa
title_fullStr A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa
title_full_unstemmed A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa
title_sort A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa
author Muniz, Carlos Roberto
author_facet Muniz, Carlos Roberto
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Cribb, Andr? Yves
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv CPF: 024.457.647-50
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Cribb, Andr? Yves
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Rocha, Saulo Barroso
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Cribb, Sandra L?cia de Souza
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Cunha, Robson Moreira
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv CPF: 052.832.477-24
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9041684052085682
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Muniz, Carlos Roberto
contributor_str_mv Cribb, Andr? Yves
Cribb, Andr? Yves
Rocha, Saulo Barroso
Cribb, Sandra L?cia de Souza
Cunha, Robson Moreira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Modelo de Maturidade
Gest?o do Conhecimento
Embrapa Agroind?stria de Alimentos
topic Modelo de Maturidade
Gest?o do Conhecimento
Embrapa Agroind?stria de Alimentos
Maturity Model
Knowledge Management
Embrapa Food Technology
Administra??o
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Maturity Model
Knowledge Management
Embrapa Food Technology
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv Administra??o
description The world lives in a constant technological transformation driven by knowledge. The interests of organizations for knowledge and their processes are justified by the speed of changes and innovations that society experiences daily and within organizations. The knowledge must be treated as active and its management can boost the results of organizations. Managing knowledge has become imperative for contemporary society. However, knowledge management still lacks tools that are consolidated and recognized as effective in measuring the processes that make up knowledge management. The maturity models of knowledge management emerged as a solution and thus, to score problems and processes of knowledge management. These models have the function of measuring and evaluating the main processes and factors that impact knowledge management, but there is still no model that has met all the demands that knowledge management needs for its efficient application within organizations. Throughout this research, it was noticed that the studies of the relations between the evaluated processes and items could be explored, because despite the various studies, only a few work and/or measure the relationship of the constructs that make up knowledge management. From these precepts, we try to answer the following question: Are there relationships between the constructs that make up a maturity model of knowledge management in a research and development organization? To answer this question, this study had the following objective: Evaluate the maturity of knowledge management and the relationships of constructs in a research and development organization. After the bibliographic review, it was defined that the model used is the Oliveira and Pedron (2014) and the company chosen for the application was the ?Embrapa Food Technology?, one of the forty-two centralized units. The study was of a quantitative nature and was performed by data collection. The data collection instrument was answered by fifty employees who handle, create and transform the active knowledge within the studied unit. The data collected were treated with descriptive statistical analysis through Excel software and the structural equation modeling was performed through the software SmartPLS. This study was limited to being carried out in a single research unit of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa). Nevertheless, due to the number of research plants in this unit, it was possible to apply the model proposed in the study, with no impairment to the quantitative analyzes performed in the study. The results of this study indicate that the knowledge management maturity model proposed by Oliveira and Pedron (2014) is applicable to the performance of the ?Embrapa Food Technology? and that eleven of the twelve relationships among the constructs proposed in the model were confirmed. The studied unit had its result as level three of maturity, according to the studied model. This stage is called development.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-04-26
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-04-13T21:17:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv MUNIZ, Carlos Roberto. A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa. 2019. 91 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado Profissional em Gest?o e Estrat?gia) - Instituto de Ci?ncias Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, 2019.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/5556
identifier_str_mv MUNIZ, Carlos Roberto. A maturidade da gest?o do conhecimento organizacional: O caso de uma organiza??o de pesquisa. 2019. 91 f. Disserta??o (Mestrado Profissional em Gest?o e Estrat?gia) - Instituto de Ci?ncias Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, 2019.
url https://tede.ufrrj.br/jspui/handle/jspui/5556
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.references.por.fl_str_mv ADIZES, I. Os ciclos de vida das organiza??es: como e por que as empresas crescem e morrem e o que fazer a respeito. S?o Paulo: Pioneira, 1990. ALE, M. A., TOLEDO, C. M., CHIOTTI, O., & GALLI, M. R. (2014). A conceptual model and technological support for organizational knowledge management. Science of Computer Programming, 95, Part 1, 73?92. AGGESTAM, L. Towards a maturity model for learning organizations: the role of knowledge management. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, IEEE, 2006, Krakow, p.141-145. ALAVI, M.; LEIDNER, D. Knowledge management system: issues, challenges and benefits. Communications of the Association for Information System, v.1, n.7, p.2-41, 1999. ALAVI, M. and LEIDNER, D.E. (2001), ??Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues??, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107-36. ALAZMI, M.; ZAIRI, M. Knowledge management critical success factors. Total Quality Management, v.14, n.2, p.199-204, 2003. AL-MABROUK, K. Critical success factors affecting knowledge management adoption: areview of the literature. Innovations in Information Technology, IEEE Xplorep.1-6, 2006. ARLING P. A, MARK W.S. CHUN, (2011) "Facilitating new knowledge creation and obtaining KM maturity", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 15 Issue: 2, pp.231-250jin BA?TA, A.M.C. O desafio da cria??o. Petr?polis: Vozes, 1999. BARUCH, Y.; HOLTON, B.C. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research.HumanRelations, v.61, n.8, p.1139-1160, 2008. BATISTA, F.F. Modelo de GC para a administra??o p?blica brasileira: como implementar a gest?o do conhecimento para produzir resultados em benef?cio do cidad?o. Bras?lia: Ipea, 2012. 132p. BERZTISS, A.T. Capability maturity for knowledge management. In: INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DATABASE AND EXPERT SYSTEMS APPLICATIONS, IEEE Computer Science, 2002, Washington, DC. BHATTI, W.A.; ZAHEER, A.; REHMAN, K. The effect of knowledge management practices on organizational performance: a conceptual study. African Journal of Business Management, v.5, n.7, p.2847-2853, 2011. BOCK, G. W.; ZMUD, R. W.; KIM, Y.-G.; LEE, J.-N.; Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, socialpsychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS quarterly, 87?111, 2005. BOUGHZALA, I. AND BOUOUD, I. (2013) ?The development and application of a community maturity model?, Int. J. Information Technology and Management, Vol. 12, Nos. 3/4, pp.273?297. CHEN, L., & FONG, P. S. W. (2015). Evaluation of knowledge management performance: An organic approach. Information & Management. CHEN, S., DUAN, Y., EDWARDS, J. S., & LEHANEY, B. (2006). Toward understanding inter?organizational knowledge transfer needs in SMEs: insight from a UK investigation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 6?23. CHEN, M. Y., HUANG, M. J., & CHENG, Y. C. (2009). Measuring knowledge management performance using a competitive perspective: An empirical study. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8449?8459. CHIN, W. (2000). Partial least squares for IS researchers: an overview and presentation of recent advances using the PLS approach. In ICIS (Vol. 2000, p. 741? 742, 2000... University of Houston, 2000.Recuperado de http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wynne_Chin/publication/221600127_Partial _least_squares_for_IS_researchers_an_overview_and_presentation_of_recent _advances_using_the_PLS_approach/links/09e41514925109aa70000000.pdf. CHOI, B., &LEE, H. (2003). An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance. Information & Management, 40(5), 403?417. CHOO, C.W. (2006), the Knowing Organization, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. CHONG, C. W., Chong, S. C., & Gan, G. C. Inter-organizational knowledge transfer needs among small and medium enterprises. Library Review, 60(1), 37?52, 2011. COHEN, J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2o Ed). New York: Psychology, 1988. Press. Recuperado de http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schneider/P2465/Readings/Cohen,%201988%20(Statisti cal%20Power, %20273-406).pdfv COLLIS, J.; HUSSEY, R. Pesquisa em administra??o: um guia pr?tico para alunos de gradua??o e p?s-gradua??o. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005. COLOMBO, M.G.; DELMASTRO, M. How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, v.31, p.1103-1122, 2002. CRESWELL, J.W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Sage Publications, 2003. CRESWELL, J.W. Projeto de Pesquisa: m?todos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage PublicationsLtd. CRIBB, A. Y. Uma abordagem pragm?tica de constru??o de estrat?gias de gest?o do conhecimento em organiza??es. Revista Iberoamericana de Sistemas, Cibern?tica e Inform?tica, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 75-80, 2010. DAFT, R.L. Organiza??es: teorias e projetos. S?o Paulo: Pioneira Thompson Learning, 2003. DAVENPORT, T.; DE LONG, D.; BEERS, M. Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, v.39, n.2, p.43-57, 1998. DAVENPORT, T.; PRUSAK, L. Conhecimento empresarial. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2003. DHANARAJ, C., LYLES, M. A., STEENSMA, H. K., TIHANYI, L. Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance.Journal ofInternational Business Studies, 35(5), 428?442, 2004. EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECU?RIA ? EMBRAPA.2018. Organograma Dispon?vel em: <https://www.embrapa.br/organograma>. Acesso em: fevereiro 2018. EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECU?RIA ? EMBRAPA.2018Organograma. Dispon?vel em: <https://www.embrapa.br/agroindustria-de-alimentos/organograma>. Acesso em novembro 2018. FAHEY, L.; PRUSAK, L. The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, v.40, n.3, p.265-276, 1998. FENG, J. Constructing a knowledge management maturity model from perspective of knowledge management.In: INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, IEEE, 2005, p.912-917. FERREIRA, V.R.B. A utiliza??o de pr?ticas de gest?o do conhecimento em organiza??es da sociedade civil que trabalham com projetos de inclus?o digital: um estudo de caso. 2007. Disserta??o de mestrado - Programa de P?s-Gradua??o de Engenharia e Gest?o do Conhecimento, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florian?polis, 2007. FRASER, P., MOULTRIE, J. AND GREGORY, M. (2002) ?The use of maturity models I grids as a tool in assessing product development capability?, Paper presented at 2002 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 2002, IEMC ?02. GA?L, Z. et al. Knowledge management profile maturity model. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2008, p.209 -216. GALBRAITH, J. The stages of growth. Journal of Business Strategy, v.3, n.4, p.70-79, 1982. GARVIN, D.A. Gerenciando a qualidade: a vis?o estrat?gica e competitiva. Rio de Janeiro: Quality mark, 1992. GOLD, A.H.; MALHOTRA, A.; SEGARS, A.H. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, v.18, n.1, p.185- 214, 2001. GOMES FILHO, A. C. Inova??o sistem?tica com responsabilidade social nos empreendimentos de base tecnol?gica: o modelo mcns-triz. 2010. Tese de doutorado - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florian?polis, 2010. GOTTSCHALK, P.; HOLGERSSON, S. Stages of knowledge management technology in the value shop: the case of police investigation performance. Expert Systems, v.23, n.4, p.183? 193, 2006. GROVER, V.; DAVENPORT, T. General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda. Journal of Management Information Systems,v.18, n.1, p.5-22, 2001. HAIR, J. F., HULT, G. T. M., RINGLE, C., & SARSTEDT, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications. HAIR JR, J.F., et al. Fundamentos de m?todos de pesquisa em administra??o. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005. HANSEN, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What is your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106?116, 187. HELFAT, C.E.; PETERAF, M.A. The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed Dynamic Capabilities Deconstructed. Strategic Management Journal, v.24, n.10, p.997?1010, 2003. HENSELER, J.; RINGLE, C. M.; SINKOVICS, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New Challenges to International Marketing, Vol. 20, and p. 277?319, 2009. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. HSIEH, P. J; LIN, B.; LIN, C. The construction and application of knowledge navigator model (KNMTM): An evaluation of knowledge management maturity. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(two, Part 2), 4087?4100, 2009. JAWARAR, I.M.; MCLAUGHLIN, G.L. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life-cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, v.26, n.3, p.397-414, 2001. JIN, D., KAH-HIN, CHAI KAY-CHUAN, Tan,"New service development maturity model", Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 24 Iss 1 pp. 86-116, 2014. JIULING, W.; JIANKANG, W.; HONGJIANG, Y. Study on maturity level transition mechanism of knowledge management. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 325-328. JOHNSON, R. B.; ONWUEGBUZIE, A. J. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, v.33, n.7, p.14-26, 2004. KHATIBIAN, N.; HASAN, T.; JAFARI, H.A. ?Measurement of knowledge management maturity level within organizations?. Business Strategy Series, v.11, n.1, p.54-70, 2010. KIM, T. H., LEE, J.-N., CHUN, J. U., & Bombast, I. (2014). Understanding the effect of knowledge management strategies on knowledge management performance: A contingency perspective. Information & Management, 51(4), 398?416. KLIMKO, G. Knowledge management and maturity models, building common understanding. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2001, Kochikar, 269-278. KRUGER, C. J.; SNYMAN, M. M. M. Formulation of a strategic knowledge Management Maturity model. South African Journal of Information Management, v.7, n.2, p.1-11, 2005. KRUGER, C.J.; JOHNSON, R.D. Is there a correlation between knowledge management maturity and organizational performance, VINE, v.41, n.3, p.265-295, 2011. KULKARNI, U.; ST LOUIS, R. Organizational self-assessment of knowledge management maturity. In: AMERICAS CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, Tampa, Florida, 2542-2551. LEE, J.H., KIM Y.G. A stage model of organizational knowledge management: a latent content analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, v.20, n.4, p.299-311, 2001. LEE, K.C.; LEE, S.; KANG, I.W. KMPI: measuring KM performance, Information and Management, v.42, n.1, p.469-82, 2005. LEE, J.H.; KIM, Y.G.; YU, S. Stage Model for Knowledge Management. In: HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, Maui, Hawaii. LIN, H. Antecedents of the stage-based knowledge management evolution. Journal of Knowledge Management, v.15, n.1, p.136-155, 2011. LIN, C.; WU, J.; YEN, D.C. Exploring barriers to knowledge flow at different knowledge management maturity stages, Information and Management, v.49, p.10-23, 2012. LIN, H.F. A stage model of knowledge management: an empirical investigation of process and effectiveness. Journal of Information Science, v.33, n.6, p.643-659, 2007. LIN, H. Antecedents of the stage-based knowledge management evolution. Jornal of Knowledge Management, v.15, n.1, p.136-155, 2011. MARCONI, M.A.; LAKATOS, E.M. Fundamentos da metodologia cient?fica. S?o Paulo: Atlas, 2003. MARTINS, G.A.; THE?PHILO, C.R. Metodologia da investiga??o cient?fica para ci?ncias sociais aplicadas. S?o Paulo: Atlas, 2009. MARTINS, R.A. Princ?pios da pesquisa cient?fica. In: MIGUEL, P.A.C. et al. Metodologia de pesquisa cient?fica em engenharia de produ??o e gest?o de opera??es. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010. MORGAN, D.L. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Quality Health Research, v.8, n.3, p.362-376, 2007. NEJATIAN, M., NEJATI, M., ZAREI, M. H., & SOLTANI, S. (2013). Critical Enablers for Knowledge Creation Process: Synthesizing the Literature. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 5(2), 105. NEUMAN, W.L. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2000. NISSEN, M. E. Harnessing knowledge dynamics. Idea Group Inc., 2006. NGAI, E.W.T., CHAU, D.C.K., POON, J.K.L. AND TO, C.K.M. (2013) ?Energy and utility management maturity model for sustainable manufacturing process?, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol. 146, No. 2, pp.453?464. NODARI, F. (2013). A rela??o entre o compartilhamento de conhecimento e o desempenho organizacional, mediada pela capacidade absortiva. Recuperado de http://repositorio.pucrs.br:80/dspace/handle/10923/1232 NONAKA, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14?37. NONAKA, I.; TAKEUCHI, H. The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. NONAKA, I.; TAKEUCHI, H. (1997), Cria??o de Conhecimento na Empresa: Como as Empresas Japonesas Geram a Din?mica da Inova??o, Campus, Rio de Janeiro. NONAKA, I., & VON KROGH, G. (2009). Perspective-Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635?652. OLIVA, F, LOTTI "Knowledge management barriers, practices and maturity model", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 18 Is 6 pp. 1053 ? 1074. 2014 OLIVEIRA, M., & Caldeira, M. (2008). Um ?framework? para a gest?o do conhecimento nas organiza??es. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gest?o, 7(1), 33?43. OLIVEIRA, M., PEDRON, C. D., NODARI, F., & RIBEIRO, R. (2014, September). Knowledge management in small and micro enterprises: applying a maturity model. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (Vol. Two, p. 757). Academic Conferences International Limited. OLIVEIRA, M., &PEDRON, C. D. (2014). Maturity Model for Knowledge Management and Strategic Benefits. European Conference on Knowledge Management, 1, 1?10. OLIVEIRA, M., PEDRON, C., ROM?O, M., & BECKER, G. (2011). Proposta de um modelo de maturidade para Gest?o do Conhecimento: KM3. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gest?o, 10(4), 14?25. PEE, L.G.; KANKANHALLI, A. A model of knowledge organizational management maturity: based on people, process and technology. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, v.8, n.2, p.79-99, 2009. PETTIGREW, ANDREW M. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, v. 24, n. six, p. 649-670, 1987. PHELPS R.; ADAMS R.; BESSANT J. Life cycles of growing organizations: a review with implications for knowledge and learning. International Journal of Management Reviews, v.9, n.1, p.1-30, 2007. POLANYI, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Londres. PORTER, M.E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press, 1990. POUR, M.J., MANIAN, A. AND YAZDANI, H.R. (2016) ?A theoretical and methodological examination of knowledge management maturity models: a systematic review?, Int. J. Business Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp.330?352. RASULA, J.; VUKSIAE, V.B.; STEMBERGER, M.I. The integrated knowledge Management Maturity Model. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, v.11, n.2, p.47-62, 2008. RINGLE, C. M., DA SILVA, D., & BIDO, D. D. S. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with the Smartpls. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(02), 56?73. RUGGLES, R. The state of the notion: knowledge management in practice. California Management Review, v.40, n.3, p.80-9, 1998. RYOO, S. Y., &KIM, K. K. (2015). The impact of knowledge complementarities on supply chain performance through knowledge exchange. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3029? 3040. SAITO, A., UMEMOTO, K., & Ikeda, M. (2007). A strategy-based ontology of knowledge management technologies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 97?114. SAVEJA, S.; JUCEVICIUS, R. The model of knowledge management system maturity and its approbation in business companies, Ocialiniai Mokslai, v.3, n.69, p.57-68, 2010. SANTOS, I.C.; AMATO NETO, J.A. Gest?o do conhecimento em ind?stria de alta tecnologia.Gest?o e Produ??o, v.18, n.3, p.569-582, 2008. SABHERWAL AND I. BEZERRA-FERNANDEZ, An empirical study of the effect of knowledge management processes at individual, group, and organizational levels, Decision Sciences 34(2) (2003) 225?60. SERENKO, A.; HULL, E.; BONTIS, N. An application of the knowledge Management Maturity Model: the case of credit unions, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, in press, 2014. SERNA, E. Maturity model of knowledge management in the interpretivist perspective, International Journal of Information Management, v.32, n.4, p.365-371, 2012. SILVEIRA, D.T.; C?RDOVA, F.P.A pesquisa cient?fica. In: M?todos de pesquisa. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2009. SINHA, R.R.; DATE, H.A. Maturity of knowledge management and knowledge enable business process. International Journal of Research in Business and Technology, v.4, n.1, p.367-373, 2014. SPENDOLINI, M.J. Benchmarking. S?o Paulo: Makron Books, 1994. SVEIBY, K. E. What is knowledge management? April 2001. Dispon?vel em acesso em 10/12/2017. STEWART, T.A. Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations.New York: Doubleday/ Currency, 1997. SZLEZAK, T.A. (2010), Plat?o e Arist?teles na doutrina do Nous de Plotino, Paulus, S?o Paulo. TEAH; H.Y.; PEE, L.G.; KANKANHALLI, A. Development and application of a general Knowledge Management Maturity Model. In: PACIFIC ASIA CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 1-8, 401-416 TERENCE, A.C.F.; ESCRIV?O FILHO, E. Abordagem quantitativa, qualitativa e a utiliza??o da pesquisa-a??o nos estudos organizacionais. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODU??O, 26, 2006, Fortaleza. VRIES, R. E. DE, HOOFF, B. VAN DEN, & RIDDER, J. A. de. (2006). Explaining Knowledge Sharing The Role of Team Communication Styles, Job Satisfaction, and Performance Beliefs. Communication Research, 33(2), 115?135. WETZELS, M.; ODEKERKEN, SHRODER. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. Management Information Systems Quarterly - MISQ, 33, 2009. YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e m?todos. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2001. YEH, Y.-J., LAI, S.-Q., & HO, C.-T. (2006). Knowledge management enablers: a case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(6), 793?810.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Gest?o e Estrat?gia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRRJ
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Instituto de Ci?ncias Sociais Aplicadas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron:UFRRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
instacron_str UFRRJ
institution UFRRJ
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/5556/4/2019+-+Carlos+Roberto+Muniz.pdf.jpg
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/5556/3/2019+-+Carlos+Roberto+Muniz.pdf.txt
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/5556/2/2019+-+Carlos+Roberto+Muniz.pdf
http://localhost:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/5556/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv cc73c4c239a4c332d642ba1e7c7a9fb2
23954025c9fc1a3bb81a1454e7820f4e
93dc9c31d9b33351ea6a1afad18cd951
7b5ba3d2445355f386edab96125d42b7
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ - Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliot@ufrrj.br||bibliot@ufrrj.br
_version_ 1800313708681887744