Avaliação de desempenho de variantes dos Protocolos DCCP e TCP em cenários representativos

• Ano de defesa: 2012
• Autor(a) principal: Doria, Priscila Lôbo Gonçalves
• Orientador(a): Salgueiro, Ricardo José Paiva de Britto
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Sergipe
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Computação
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Protocolos de redes de computadores; Datagram congestion control protocol (DCCP); Transmission control protocol (TCP); Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP)
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::CIENCIA DA COMPUTACAO
• Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/3332

The Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) is a prominent transport protocol that has attracted the attention of the scientific community for its rapid progress and good results. The main novelty of DCCP is the performance priority design, as in UDP, however with congestion control capabilities, as in TCP. Literature about DCCP is still scarce and needs to be complemented to gather enouth scientific elements to support new research properly. In this context, this work joins the efforts of the scientific community to analise, mensure, compare and characterize DCCP in relevant scenarios that cover many real world situations. Three open questions were preliminarly identified in the literature: How DCCP behaves (i) when fighting for the same link bandwidth with other transport protocols; (ii) with highly relevant ones (e.g., Compound TCP, CUBIC) and (iii) fighting for the same link bandwidth with Compound TCP and CUBIC, adopting multimedia applications (e.g., VoIP). In this work, computational simulations are used to compare the performance of two DCCP variants (DCCP CCID2 and DCCP CCID3) with three highly representative TCP variants (Compound TCP, CUBIC and TCP SACK), in real world scenarios, including concurrent use of the same link by protocols, link errors and assorted bandwidths, latencies and traffic patterns. The simulation results show that, under contention, in most scenarios DCCP CCID2 has achieved higher throughput than Compound TCP or TCP SACK. Throughout the simulations there was a tendency of DCCP CCID3 to have lower throughput than the other chosen protocol. However, the results also showed that DCCP CCID3 has achieved significanly better throughput in the presence of link errors and higher values of latency and bandwidth, eventualy outperforming Compound TCP and TCP SACK. Finally, there was a tendency of predominance of CUBIC´ throughtput, which can be explained by its aggressive algorithm (i.e., non-linear) of return of the transmission window to the previous value before the discard event. However, CUBIC has presented the highest packet drop and the lowest delivery rate.