Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Menezes, Cláudia Cardinale Nunes lattes
Orientador(a): Wartha, Elma Regina Silva de Andrade lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Propriedade Intelectual
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/3407
Resumo: Over the years there have been major developments in corporate identity, which included the integration of the concept of the logo branding systems of both companies and products; extending thereby at the level of legal definitions or in the application forms, colors and uses of logos, as well as the design of the mark. Since then, the brand began to be considered one of the main intangible assets, providing the basis for a sustainable competitive advantage. Thus, the legal protection of this asset becomes indispensable. Considering the growth and importance of intangible assets |brand|, this study aimed to evaluate the profile of the trademark filing consolidated two Brazilian companies and national prominence in the food sector, including analysis of trademark protection since its evolution and extension the visual identity to the comparative study of management strategies relating to these distinctive signs. From data collected in the National Institute of Industrial Property for the years 2000 to 2013, exploratory-descriptive research was conducted, analyzing the evolution of marcarios records and protection of trademarks by the companies Sadia and Perdigao SA. According to the records, it was found that from the beginning to the present day, Perdigao brand and had a few minor alterations and identified records of change in mixed company brand in the years 1958, 1980 and 2005 On the other hand, for Sadia records modernization of its visual identification in the years 1960, 1993 and 2011, characterized by the association consumers make the brand together the stylized S and the image of the mascot were observed. The strategies of brands of both companies are extensions: line (creating different flavors and different features in various products); brand (using their names in different product categories, including meat products, pizza, snacks and pasta) and multi (insertion of brands introduced in the same product category market, such as margarines and Deline Qualy). Furthermore, firms make use of licensing strategies, for example: |Monica| (Sadia) and |The Smurfs| (Perdigao). As for the number of records was verified to occur in six different classes: 29, 30, 31, 32, 39, 43, however, with greater expressiveness in class 29, comprising 436 records of Sadia and Perdigao 162. However, 80% of the records of Sadia are active and 20% of applications filed, the total of 731 On the other hand, the 196 brands Perdigao 71% refers to the active. So mark protection is very important for both companies, evidenced by the high numbers of records over the years. Moreover, the construction of each brand was strategic element for both companies to consolidate the market, communicating its value proposition to consumers. It is noteworthy also that Sadia and Perdigao, during its existence, used strategies similar brands, however with regard to launching products, Sadia is still higher than Perdigao.
id UFS-2_b7e0a8f0847c9e76beba721dde024e2b
oai_identifier_str oai:oai:ri.ufs.br:repo_01:riufs/3407
network_acronym_str UFS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFS
repository_id_str
spelling Menezes, Cláudia Cardinale Nuneshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4458297213334898Wartha, Elma Regina Silva de Andradehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/86494388230635652017-09-26T11:42:57Z2017-09-26T11:42:57Z2014-09-15MENEZES, Cláudia Cardinale Nunes. Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão. 2014. 57 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Outros) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2014.https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/3407Over the years there have been major developments in corporate identity, which included the integration of the concept of the logo branding systems of both companies and products; extending thereby at the level of legal definitions or in the application forms, colors and uses of logos, as well as the design of the mark. Since then, the brand began to be considered one of the main intangible assets, providing the basis for a sustainable competitive advantage. Thus, the legal protection of this asset becomes indispensable. Considering the growth and importance of intangible assets |brand|, this study aimed to evaluate the profile of the trademark filing consolidated two Brazilian companies and national prominence in the food sector, including analysis of trademark protection since its evolution and extension the visual identity to the comparative study of management strategies relating to these distinctive signs. From data collected in the National Institute of Industrial Property for the years 2000 to 2013, exploratory-descriptive research was conducted, analyzing the evolution of marcarios records and protection of trademarks by the companies Sadia and Perdigao SA. According to the records, it was found that from the beginning to the present day, Perdigao brand and had a few minor alterations and identified records of change in mixed company brand in the years 1958, 1980 and 2005 On the other hand, for Sadia records modernization of its visual identification in the years 1960, 1993 and 2011, characterized by the association consumers make the brand together the stylized S and the image of the mascot were observed. The strategies of brands of both companies are extensions: line (creating different flavors and different features in various products); brand (using their names in different product categories, including meat products, pizza, snacks and pasta) and multi (insertion of brands introduced in the same product category market, such as margarines and Deline Qualy). Furthermore, firms make use of licensing strategies, for example: |Monica| (Sadia) and |The Smurfs| (Perdigao). As for the number of records was verified to occur in six different classes: 29, 30, 31, 32, 39, 43, however, with greater expressiveness in class 29, comprising 436 records of Sadia and Perdigao 162. However, 80% of the records of Sadia are active and 20% of applications filed, the total of 731 On the other hand, the 196 brands Perdigao 71% refers to the active. So mark protection is very important for both companies, evidenced by the high numbers of records over the years. Moreover, the construction of each brand was strategic element for both companies to consolidate the market, communicating its value proposition to consumers. It is noteworthy also that Sadia and Perdigao, during its existence, used strategies similar brands, however with regard to launching products, Sadia is still higher than Perdigao.Ao longo dos anos houve grande evolução na identidade coorporativa, o que compreendeu a integração do conceito de logotipo aos sistemas de identidade visual tanto das empresas quanto de produtos; estendendo-se, desta forma, em nível de definições legais seja nas formas de aplicação, cores e usos de logotipos, como também ao design da marca. A partir de então, a marca começou a ser considerada um dos principais ativos intangíveis, proporcionando a base de uma vantagem competitiva sustentável. Logo, a proteção legal desse ativo torna-se indispensável. Considerando o crescimento e a importância do ativo intangível marca , este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar o perfil do depósito marcário de duas empresas brasileiras consolidadas e de destaque nacional no setor alimentício, incluindo a análise de proteção das marcas desde a sua evolução e extensão da identidade visual até o estudo comparativo de estratégias administrativas referentes a estes sinais distintivos. A partir de dados coletados no Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial, correspondentes aos anos de 2000 a 2013, foi realizada pesquisa exploratório-descritiva, com análise da evolução dos registros marcario e da proteção de marcas pelas empresas Sadia S.A. e Perdigão. De acordo com os registros, foi constatado que do início até os dias atuais, a marca Perdigão teve poucas e discretas alterações, sendo identificados registros de modificação na marca mista da empresa nos anos de 1958, 1980 e 2005. Por outro lado, para a marca Sadia foram observados registros de modernização de sua identificação visual nos anos de 1960, 1993 e 2011, caracterizados pela associação que os consumidores fazem à marca conjuntamente ao S estilizado e a imagem da mascote. As estratégias de marcas de ambas as empresas se constituem de extensões: de linha (criando diversos sabores e características diferentes em vários produtos); de marca (utilizando seus nomes em diferentes categorias de produtos, incluindo derivados de carne, pizzas, salgadinhos e massas) e multimarcas (inserção no mercado de marcas introduzidas na mesma categoria de produto, como exemplo margarinas Deline e Qualy). Ademais, as empresas se utilizam de estratégias de licenciamento, por exemplo: Turma da Mônica (Sadia) e os Smurfs (Perdigão). Quanto ao número de registros foi verificada a ocorrência em seis classes diferentes: 29, 30, 31, 32, 39, 43, no entanto, com maior expressividade na classe 29, compreendendo 436 registros da Sadia e 162 da Perdigão. Contudo, 80% dos registros da Sadia encontram-se ativos e 20% de pedidos arquivados, do total de 731. Por outro lado, das 196 marcas da Perdigão 71% referem-se às ativas. Portanto, a proteção marcaria representa grande relevância para as duas empresas, constatada pelos elevados números de registros ao longo dos anos. Além disso, a construção da marca de cada uma foi elemento estratégico para ambas as empresas se consolidarem no mercado, comunicando sua proposta de valor aos consumidores. Ressalta-se, ainda, que a Sadia e a Perdigão, no decorrer de sua existência, utilizaram estratégias de marcas semelhantes, contudo no que diz respeito ao lançamento de produtos, a Sadia ainda é superior à Perdigão.application/pdfporUniversidade Federal de SergipePós-Graduação em Ciência da Propriedade IntelectualUFSBRPropriedade industrialMarca registradaMarca de produtosAlimentosSetor alimentícioIndústria de alimentosSadiaPerdigãoPropriedade intelectualBrandMark protectionFood industryIndustrial propertyCNPQ::OUTROSMarca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSinstname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)instacron:UFSTEXTCLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf.txtCLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain113973https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/3407/2/CLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf.txtd81406ad4d3d35ede02e6b9ef74eb0f6MD52THUMBNAILCLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf.jpgCLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1187https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/3407/3/CLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf.jpg379c3e7d12d3ba42d855a73dacaf061aMD53ORIGINALCLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdfapplication/pdf1355413https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/3407/1/CLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf6e3d7c9e37e204568b282ad09d6d5a23MD51riufs/34072018-02-21 07:53:07.595oai:oai:ri.ufs.br:repo_01:riufs/3407Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://ri.ufs.br/oai/requestrepositorio@academico.ufs.bropendoar:2018-02-21T10:53:07Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão
title Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão
spellingShingle Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão
Menezes, Cláudia Cardinale Nunes
Propriedade industrial
Marca registrada
Marca de produtos
Alimentos
Setor alimentício
Indústria de alimentos
Sadia
Perdigão
Propriedade intelectual
Brand
Mark protection
Food industry
Industrial property
CNPQ::OUTROS
title_short Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão
title_full Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão
title_fullStr Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão
title_full_unstemmed Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão
title_sort Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão
author Menezes, Cláudia Cardinale Nunes
author_facet Menezes, Cláudia Cardinale Nunes
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Menezes, Cláudia Cardinale Nunes
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4458297213334898
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Wartha, Elma Regina Silva de Andrade
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8649438823063565
contributor_str_mv Wartha, Elma Regina Silva de Andrade
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Propriedade industrial
Marca registrada
Marca de produtos
Alimentos
Setor alimentício
Indústria de alimentos
Sadia
Perdigão
Propriedade intelectual
topic Propriedade industrial
Marca registrada
Marca de produtos
Alimentos
Setor alimentício
Indústria de alimentos
Sadia
Perdigão
Propriedade intelectual
Brand
Mark protection
Food industry
Industrial property
CNPQ::OUTROS
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Brand
Mark protection
Food industry
Industrial property
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::OUTROS
description Over the years there have been major developments in corporate identity, which included the integration of the concept of the logo branding systems of both companies and products; extending thereby at the level of legal definitions or in the application forms, colors and uses of logos, as well as the design of the mark. Since then, the brand began to be considered one of the main intangible assets, providing the basis for a sustainable competitive advantage. Thus, the legal protection of this asset becomes indispensable. Considering the growth and importance of intangible assets |brand|, this study aimed to evaluate the profile of the trademark filing consolidated two Brazilian companies and national prominence in the food sector, including analysis of trademark protection since its evolution and extension the visual identity to the comparative study of management strategies relating to these distinctive signs. From data collected in the National Institute of Industrial Property for the years 2000 to 2013, exploratory-descriptive research was conducted, analyzing the evolution of marcarios records and protection of trademarks by the companies Sadia and Perdigao SA. According to the records, it was found that from the beginning to the present day, Perdigao brand and had a few minor alterations and identified records of change in mixed company brand in the years 1958, 1980 and 2005 On the other hand, for Sadia records modernization of its visual identification in the years 1960, 1993 and 2011, characterized by the association consumers make the brand together the stylized S and the image of the mascot were observed. The strategies of brands of both companies are extensions: line (creating different flavors and different features in various products); brand (using their names in different product categories, including meat products, pizza, snacks and pasta) and multi (insertion of brands introduced in the same product category market, such as margarines and Deline Qualy). Furthermore, firms make use of licensing strategies, for example: |Monica| (Sadia) and |The Smurfs| (Perdigao). As for the number of records was verified to occur in six different classes: 29, 30, 31, 32, 39, 43, however, with greater expressiveness in class 29, comprising 436 records of Sadia and Perdigao 162. However, 80% of the records of Sadia are active and 20% of applications filed, the total of 731 On the other hand, the 196 brands Perdigao 71% refers to the active. So mark protection is very important for both companies, evidenced by the high numbers of records over the years. Moreover, the construction of each brand was strategic element for both companies to consolidate the market, communicating its value proposition to consumers. It is noteworthy also that Sadia and Perdigao, during its existence, used strategies similar brands, however with regard to launching products, Sadia is still higher than Perdigao.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-09-15
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-09-26T11:42:57Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2017-09-26T11:42:57Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv MENEZES, Cláudia Cardinale Nunes. Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão. 2014. 57 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Outros) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/3407
identifier_str_mv MENEZES, Cláudia Cardinale Nunes. Marca : evolução e proteção - um estudo comparativo entre as empresas Sadia e Perdigão. 2014. 57 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Outros) - Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2014.
url https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/3407
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Sergipe
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Propriedade Intelectual
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Sergipe
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFS
instname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
instacron:UFS
instname_str Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
instacron_str UFS
institution UFS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/3407/2/CLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf.txt
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/3407/3/CLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf.jpg
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/3407/1/CLAUDIA_CARDINALE_NUNES_MENEZES.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d81406ad4d3d35ede02e6b9ef74eb0f6
379c3e7d12d3ba42d855a73dacaf061a
6e3d7c9e37e204568b282ad09d6d5a23
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@academico.ufs.br
_version_ 1851759394828582912