Desempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviária

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Giacomini, Letícia da Silva lattes
Orientador(a): Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôres lattes
Banca de defesa: Braunig, Patricia, Libardoni, Felipe
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária
Departamento: Medicina Veterinária
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21579
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccination against avian coccidiosis (live attenuated commercial vaccine LIVACOX® T) in the face of a challenge, and its correlation with the productive, economic performance, clinical observation and oocyst excretion in broilers. For this purpose, 420 1-day-old Cobb chicks were divided into five groups of 84 birds divided into 6 cages per group: G1. Unvaccinated and unchallenged control group; G2. Control group vaccinated with 10 ul of the vaccine on the day (zero); G3. Group challenged with 200 ul of the vaccine on day 1; G4. Group vaccinated on day (zero) and challenged on day 14; G5. Non-vaccinated group, but challenged on day 14. Vaccination by mouth was performed at a dose of 300 to 500 oocysts. After vaccination, groups 3, 4 and 5 were challenged orally with 6,000 to 10,000 oocysts (equivalent to 20 times the dose of the vaccine). During the entire period of the experiment (28 days), clinical signs were evaluated, the weight and feed conversion of the birds were evaluated, and feces were collected to evaluate the excretion of oocysts. In addition, macroscopic analysis of intestinal injuries of birds was also performed. It can be observed that both after the vaccination of groups 2, 3 and 4 and after the challenge in groups 4 and 5 there was an increase in the excretion of oocysts. In relation to clinical signs, on the 14th and 21st days in group 3, they were observed in more intense clinical signs such as weakness and lack of appetite, the feces presented with a watery and fetid consistency. In macroscopic evaluations performed on the 7th and 14th day in animals in group 3, hemorrhagic villi, presence of mucus and flaking were seen. In the analysis of weight gain, if we compare our results of final weights between groups 3 and 4, we have a difference of -105.74g per bird. Therefore, if we multiply this value by the number of birds slaughtered per day in a medium / large size refrigerator (250,000), we have an amount of 26,435 kg less chicken meat per day of slaughter, representing 581,570 kg of monthly losses (22 slaughter days), or about R $ 3,489,420.00 or U $$ 872,355.00, considering the commercial value of chicken meat at R $ 6.00 / kg or U $$ 1.5 / kg. Thus, the productive and economic impact of coccidiosis on birds is evident, and the importance of vaccination to prevent the occurrence of the disease and thus reduce losses is highlighted.
id UFSM-20_54ca63f4593b460b69045faa602f4793
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/21579
network_acronym_str UFSM-20
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2021-07-23T11:06:08Z2021-07-23T11:06:08Z2020-02-20http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21579The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccination against avian coccidiosis (live attenuated commercial vaccine LIVACOX® T) in the face of a challenge, and its correlation with the productive, economic performance, clinical observation and oocyst excretion in broilers. For this purpose, 420 1-day-old Cobb chicks were divided into five groups of 84 birds divided into 6 cages per group: G1. Unvaccinated and unchallenged control group; G2. Control group vaccinated with 10 ul of the vaccine on the day (zero); G3. Group challenged with 200 ul of the vaccine on day 1; G4. Group vaccinated on day (zero) and challenged on day 14; G5. Non-vaccinated group, but challenged on day 14. Vaccination by mouth was performed at a dose of 300 to 500 oocysts. After vaccination, groups 3, 4 and 5 were challenged orally with 6,000 to 10,000 oocysts (equivalent to 20 times the dose of the vaccine). During the entire period of the experiment (28 days), clinical signs were evaluated, the weight and feed conversion of the birds were evaluated, and feces were collected to evaluate the excretion of oocysts. In addition, macroscopic analysis of intestinal injuries of birds was also performed. It can be observed that both after the vaccination of groups 2, 3 and 4 and after the challenge in groups 4 and 5 there was an increase in the excretion of oocysts. In relation to clinical signs, on the 14th and 21st days in group 3, they were observed in more intense clinical signs such as weakness and lack of appetite, the feces presented with a watery and fetid consistency. In macroscopic evaluations performed on the 7th and 14th day in animals in group 3, hemorrhagic villi, presence of mucus and flaking were seen. In the analysis of weight gain, if we compare our results of final weights between groups 3 and 4, we have a difference of -105.74g per bird. Therefore, if we multiply this value by the number of birds slaughtered per day in a medium / large size refrigerator (250,000), we have an amount of 26,435 kg less chicken meat per day of slaughter, representing 581,570 kg of monthly losses (22 slaughter days), or about R $ 3,489,420.00 or U $$ 872,355.00, considering the commercial value of chicken meat at R $ 6.00 / kg or U $$ 1.5 / kg. Thus, the productive and economic impact of coccidiosis on birds is evident, and the importance of vaccination to prevent the occurrence of the disease and thus reduce losses is highlighted.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a eficácia da vacinação contra coccidiose aviária (vacina comercial viva atenuada LIVACOX® T) frente a um desafio, e sua correlação com o desempenho produtivo, econômico, observação clínica e excreção de oocistos em frangos de corte. Para tanto, 420 pintainhos de 1 dia da linhagem Cobb, foram divididos em cinco grupos de 84 aves divididas em 6 gaiolas por grupo: G1. Grupo controle não vacinado e não desafiado; G2. Grupo controle vacinado com 10 ul da vacina no dia (zero); G3. Grupo desafiado com 200 ul da vacina no dia 1; G4. Grupo vacinado no dia (zero) e desafiado no dia 14; G5. Grupo não vacinado, porém desafiado no dia 14. A vacinação via oral foi realizada na dose de 300 a 500 oocistos. Após a vacinação, os grupos 3, 4 e 5 foram desafiados via oral com 6.000 à 10.000 oocistos (equivalente a 20 vezes a dose da vacina). Durante todo o período do experimento (28 dias) foram avaliados os sinais clínicos, avaliou-se o peso e a conversão alimentar das aves e foram coletadas fezes para avaliação de excreção de oocistos. Além disso, também foi realizada análise macroscópica de lesões intestinais das aves. Pode-se observar que tanto após a vacinação dos grupos 2, 3 e 4 quanto após o desafio nos grupos 4 e 5 houve aumento na excreção de oocistos. Em relação aos sinais clínicos, no 14º e 21º dia no grupo 3 foram observados em sinais clínicos mais intensos como debilidade e ausência de apetite, as fezes apresentaram-se com consistência aquosa e fétida. Nas avaliações macroscópicas realizadas no 7º e 14º dia nos animais do grupo 3 foram visualizadas vilosidades hemorrágicas, presença de muco e descamação. Já na análise do ganho de peso, se compararmos nossos resultados dos pesos finais entre os grupos 3 e 4, temos uma diferença de -105,74g por ave. Logo, se multiplicarmos este valor pelo número de aves abatidas por dia em um frigorífico de médio/grande porte (250.000), temos um montante de 26.435 kg a menos de carne de frango por dia de abate, representando 581.570kg de perdas mensais (22 dias de abate), ou cerca de R$ 3.489.420,00 ou U$$ 872.355,00, considerando o valor comercial da carne de frango a R$ 6,00/kg ou U$$ 1,5/kg. Desta forma, fica evidente o impacto produtivo e econômico da coccidiose em aves, e destaca-se a importância da vacinação para prevenir a ocorrência da doença e desta forma reduzir as perdas.porUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências RuraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Medicina VeterináriaUFSMBrasilMedicina VeterináriaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCoccidiose aviáriaFrangos de corteVacinaçãoDesafioAvian coccidiosisBroilersVaccinationChallengeCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIADesempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviáriaPerformance of chicken after vaccination with a live vaccine active against avian coccidiosisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisVogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôreshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9676833435314493Braunig, PatriciaLibardoni, Felipehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6296321031869792Giacomini, Letícia da Silva500500000007600600600600600a86342d7-ec99-49d4-8748-67e3266c07591a7b320a-16d6-46ee-b101-4fe8a6b4c1201850ee3b-4175-4346-bcc0-932fb662879b74619b61-c41f-4c75-89f3-e4d3c9acea98reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53ORIGINALDIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdfDIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdfDissertaçãoapplication/pdf983103http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/1/DIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf1cc86efa4ebedee32e8e0edb1e48584fMD51TEXTDIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf.txtDIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain99333http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/4/DIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf.txt0f0b4095d4673e6e3efc9ee31157694fMD54THUMBNAILDIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf.jpgDIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4446http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/5/DIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf.jpg5f13888d0ed40771f680d05504d741c8MD551/215792021-07-24 03:02:25.441oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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ório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132021-07-24T06:02:25Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Desempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviária
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Performance of chicken after vaccination with a live vaccine active against avian coccidiosis
title Desempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviária
spellingShingle Desempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviária
Giacomini, Letícia da Silva
Coccidiose aviária
Frangos de corte
Vacinação
Desafio
Avian coccidiosis
Broilers
Vaccination
Challenge
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
title_short Desempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviária
title_full Desempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviária
title_fullStr Desempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviária
title_full_unstemmed Desempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviária
title_sort Desempenho de frangos de corte após vacinação com uma vacina viva atuada contra coccidiose aviária
author Giacomini, Letícia da Silva
author_facet Giacomini, Letícia da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôres
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9676833435314493
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Braunig, Patricia
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Libardoni, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6296321031869792
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Giacomini, Letícia da Silva
contributor_str_mv Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flôres
Braunig, Patricia
Libardoni, Felipe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coccidiose aviária
Frangos de corte
Vacinação
Desafio
topic Coccidiose aviária
Frangos de corte
Vacinação
Desafio
Avian coccidiosis
Broilers
Vaccination
Challenge
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Avian coccidiosis
Broilers
Vaccination
Challenge
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccination against avian coccidiosis (live attenuated commercial vaccine LIVACOX® T) in the face of a challenge, and its correlation with the productive, economic performance, clinical observation and oocyst excretion in broilers. For this purpose, 420 1-day-old Cobb chicks were divided into five groups of 84 birds divided into 6 cages per group: G1. Unvaccinated and unchallenged control group; G2. Control group vaccinated with 10 ul of the vaccine on the day (zero); G3. Group challenged with 200 ul of the vaccine on day 1; G4. Group vaccinated on day (zero) and challenged on day 14; G5. Non-vaccinated group, but challenged on day 14. Vaccination by mouth was performed at a dose of 300 to 500 oocysts. After vaccination, groups 3, 4 and 5 were challenged orally with 6,000 to 10,000 oocysts (equivalent to 20 times the dose of the vaccine). During the entire period of the experiment (28 days), clinical signs were evaluated, the weight and feed conversion of the birds were evaluated, and feces were collected to evaluate the excretion of oocysts. In addition, macroscopic analysis of intestinal injuries of birds was also performed. It can be observed that both after the vaccination of groups 2, 3 and 4 and after the challenge in groups 4 and 5 there was an increase in the excretion of oocysts. In relation to clinical signs, on the 14th and 21st days in group 3, they were observed in more intense clinical signs such as weakness and lack of appetite, the feces presented with a watery and fetid consistency. In macroscopic evaluations performed on the 7th and 14th day in animals in group 3, hemorrhagic villi, presence of mucus and flaking were seen. In the analysis of weight gain, if we compare our results of final weights between groups 3 and 4, we have a difference of -105.74g per bird. Therefore, if we multiply this value by the number of birds slaughtered per day in a medium / large size refrigerator (250,000), we have an amount of 26,435 kg less chicken meat per day of slaughter, representing 581,570 kg of monthly losses (22 slaughter days), or about R $ 3,489,420.00 or U $$ 872,355.00, considering the commercial value of chicken meat at R $ 6.00 / kg or U $$ 1.5 / kg. Thus, the productive and economic impact of coccidiosis on birds is evident, and the importance of vaccination to prevent the occurrence of the disease and thus reduce losses is highlighted.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-02-20
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-07-23T11:06:08Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-07-23T11:06:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21579
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21579
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 500500000007
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv a86342d7-ec99-49d4-8748-67e3266c0759
1a7b320a-16d6-46ee-b101-4fe8a6b4c120
1850ee3b-4175-4346-bcc0-932fb662879b
74619b61-c41f-4c75-89f3-e4d3c9acea98
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina Veterinária
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Medicina Veterinária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/3/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/1/DIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/4/DIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/21579/5/DIS_PPGMV_2020_GIACOMINI_LETICIA.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
1cc86efa4ebedee32e8e0edb1e48584f
0f0b4095d4673e6e3efc9ee31157694f
5f13888d0ed40771f680d05504d741c8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1794524431900475392