Racismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciais
Ano de defesa: | 2021 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/25794 |
Resumo: | Safernet data from the past few years has shown an increase in the number of reports of racism on the internet. In a country marked by structural racism, it is clear that the virtual environment becomes a new space for the propagation of racist hate speech. Victims of this type of conduct are left to resort to the Judiciary to ensure that the possible perpetrators are held responsible. As a result, and considering that the use of the internet as a means of spreading racism can pose a challenge to both current legislation and judges, the question arises: what are the main points discussed in judicial decisions about online racism in Brazil? To answer this problem, the predominantly inductive method was choosed, using first-person narrative, as recommended by the Racial Critical Theory, like the legal storytelling. As procedural methods, quantitative-qualitative research of judicial decisions of the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region was used, having as time frame from 2010 to 2020. As quantitative research, jurimetry was used to understand the meaning of the numbers involving the decisions found using the defined criteria. In addition, Grounded Theory was chosen for the qualitative research, in order to understand which are the main categories of argument that could be verified in the judgments. The research techniques, in turn, were the documentary and bibliographic, with extensive research in judicial decisions and legislation, as well as in articles and books about the subject, respectively. In the end, it was possible to verify a reduced number of decisions involving online racism against black people, while a greater number of judgments involving this type of discourse against Northeastern and indigenous people. In addition, five main categories were identified within the decisions, namely: a) delimitation of racism only in the form of direct discrimination; b) materiality and authorship of the offense most easily demonstrated through the evidence collected on the internet; c) the need to demonstrate the accused's deceit; d) debate between the right to freedom of expression versus the spread of racism and hate speech; e) the harmfulness of the internet as a means of spreading online racism. Such conclusions allow to think which are the biggest points to consider for a reform in the current anti-racist criminal legislation. |
id |
UFSM-20_b1ad77ac680b260832ff2f911d616fa9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/25794 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-20 |
network_name_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2022-08-04T19:13:59Z2022-08-04T19:13:59Z2021-03-29http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/25794Safernet data from the past few years has shown an increase in the number of reports of racism on the internet. In a country marked by structural racism, it is clear that the virtual environment becomes a new space for the propagation of racist hate speech. Victims of this type of conduct are left to resort to the Judiciary to ensure that the possible perpetrators are held responsible. As a result, and considering that the use of the internet as a means of spreading racism can pose a challenge to both current legislation and judges, the question arises: what are the main points discussed in judicial decisions about online racism in Brazil? To answer this problem, the predominantly inductive method was choosed, using first-person narrative, as recommended by the Racial Critical Theory, like the legal storytelling. As procedural methods, quantitative-qualitative research of judicial decisions of the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region was used, having as time frame from 2010 to 2020. As quantitative research, jurimetry was used to understand the meaning of the numbers involving the decisions found using the defined criteria. In addition, Grounded Theory was chosen for the qualitative research, in order to understand which are the main categories of argument that could be verified in the judgments. The research techniques, in turn, were the documentary and bibliographic, with extensive research in judicial decisions and legislation, as well as in articles and books about the subject, respectively. In the end, it was possible to verify a reduced number of decisions involving online racism against black people, while a greater number of judgments involving this type of discourse against Northeastern and indigenous people. In addition, five main categories were identified within the decisions, namely: a) delimitation of racism only in the form of direct discrimination; b) materiality and authorship of the offense most easily demonstrated through the evidence collected on the internet; c) the need to demonstrate the accused's deceit; d) debate between the right to freedom of expression versus the spread of racism and hate speech; e) the harmfulness of the internet as a means of spreading online racism. Such conclusions allow to think which are the biggest points to consider for a reform in the current anti-racist criminal legislation.Dados do Safernet dos últimos anos têm comprovado um crescimento no número de denúncias de racismo na internet. Em um país marcado pelo racismo estrutural, percebe-se que o ambiente virtual passa a ser um novo espaço para a propagação de discursos de ódio racistas. Às vítimas desse tipo de conduta, resta se socorrer do Poder Judiciário para conseguir a responsabilização dos possíveis autores. Em razão disso, e considerando que a utilização da internet como meio para disseminação do racismo pode significar um desafio tanto à legislação atual, quanto aos julgadores, questiona-se: quais os principais pontos discutidos em decisões judiciais sobre racismo online no Brasil? Para responder a este problema, utilizou-se como método de abordagem o método predominantemente indutivo, com emprego da narrativa em primeira pessoa, conforme preconiza a Teoria Crítica Racial, por meio dos legal storytelling. Como métodos de procedimento, empregou-se a pesquisa quantitativa-qualitativa de decisões judiciais do Tribunal Regional Federal da 4ª Região, no período de 2010 a 2020. No que tange à pesquisa quantitativa, a jurimetria foi empregada para compreender o significado dos números envolvendo as decisões encontradas a partir dos critérios definidos. Além disso, a Teoria Fundamentada nos Dados foi escolhida para o viés analítico qualitativo, a fim de compreender quais as principais categorias de argumentação que puderam ser verificadas nos acórdãos. As técnicas de pesquisa, por sua vez, foram a documental e a bibliográfica, com ampla pesquisa em decisões judiciais e legislações, assim como em artigos e livros sobre o tema, respectivamente. Ao final, foi possível constatar um número reduzido de decisões envolvendo racismo online contra pessoas negras, enquanto um número maior de julgamentos envolvendo esse tipo de discurso contra nordestino e indígenas. Ainda, identificou-se cinco categorias principais dentro das decisões, a saber: a) delimitação do racismo somente em sua forma de discriminação direta; b) materialidade e autoria do delito mais facilmente demonstrados por meio das provas coletadas na internet; c) necessidade de demonstração do dolo do acusado; d) embate entre o direito à liberdade de expressão versus propagação de racismo e discurso de ódio; e) a nocividade do alcance permitido pelo uso da internet como meio de propagação do racismo online. Tais conclusões permitem pensar quais os maiores pontos a se considerar para uma reforma na legislação penal antirracista vigente.porUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em DireitoUFSMBrasilDireitoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDecisão judicialRacismo onlineJudicial decisionOnline racismCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITORacismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciaisOnline racism in Brazil: an analysis from the perspective of judicial decisionsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisRodrigues, Nina Trícia Disconzihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7964995474008653Lima, Fernanda da SilvaMacedo, João Heitor Silvahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8893649892589552Silva, Fernanda dos Santos Rodrigues60010000000160060060060060004753473-5ab8-4155-8921-dbc86c0475721b8ae8e6-c5eb-4758-92c0-896b624503bce3d9341e-1d32-4e22-bb34-188f0593edc908bef565-bbae-48f6-ba56-7c4224b63b0ereponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/25794/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/25794/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53ORIGINALDIS_PPGDIREITO_2021_SILVA_FERNANDA.pdfDIS_PPGDIREITO_2021_SILVA_FERNANDA.pdfDissertação de mestradoapplication/pdf1752675http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/25794/1/DIS_PPGDIREITO_2021_SILVA_FERNANDA.pdf6ee3d08ce3bd9009f8a68a0b8aa309e7MD511/257942022-08-04 16:13:59.664oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/25794TElDRU7Dh0EgREUgRElTVFJJQlVJw4fDg08gTsODTy1FWENMVVNJVkEKCkNvbSBhIGFwcmVzZW50YcOnw6NvIGRlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCB2b2PDqiAobyBhdXRvciAoZXMpIG91IG8gdGl0dWxhciBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgZGUgYXV0b3IpIGNvbmNlZGUgw6AgVW5pdmVyc2lkYWRlCkZlZGVyYWwgZGUgU2FudGEgTWFyaWEgKFVGU00pIG8gZGlyZWl0byBuw6NvLWV4Y2x1c2l2byBkZSByZXByb2R1emlyLCAgdHJhZHV6aXIgKGNvbmZvcm1lIGRlZmluaWRvIGFiYWl4byksIGUvb3UKZGlzdHJpYnVpciBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gKGluY2x1aW5kbyBvIHJlc3VtbykgcG9yIHRvZG8gbyBtdW5kbyBubyBmb3JtYXRvIGltcHJlc3NvIGUgZWxldHLDtG5pY28gZQplbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mgw6F1ZGlvIG91IHbDrWRlby4KClZvY8OqIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhIFVGU00gcG9kZSwgc2VtIGFsdGVyYXIgbyBjb250ZcO6ZG8sIHRyYW5zcG9yIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbwpwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIGEgVUZTTSBwb2RlIG1hbnRlciBtYWlzIGRlIHVtYSBjw7NwaWEgYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdQpkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcwpuZXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYS4gVm9jw6ogdGFtYsOpbSBkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBvIGRlcMOzc2l0byBkYSBzdWEgdGVzZSBvdSBkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIG7Do28sIHF1ZSBzZWphIGRlIHNldQpjb25oZWNpbWVudG8sIGluZnJpbmdlIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGRlIG5pbmd1w6ltLgoKQ2FzbyBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gY29udGVuaGEgbWF0ZXJpYWwgcXVlIHZvY8OqIG7Do28gcG9zc3VpIGEgdGl0dWxhcmlkYWRlIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcywgdm9jw6oKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgIFVGU00Kb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXByZXNlbnRhZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3TDoSBjbGFyYW1lbnRlCmlkZW50aWZpY2FkbyBlIHJlY29uaGVjaWRvIG5vIHRleHRvIG91IG5vIGNvbnRlw7pkbyBkYSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gb3JhIGRlcG9zaXRhZGEuCgpDQVNPIEEgVEVTRSBPVSBESVNTRVJUQcOHw4NPIE9SQSBERVBPU0lUQURBIFRFTkhBIFNJRE8gUkVTVUxUQURPIERFIFVNIFBBVFJPQ8ONTklPIE9VCkFQT0lPIERFIFVNQSBBR8OKTkNJQSBERSBGT01FTlRPIE9VIE9VVFJPIE9SR0FOSVNNTyBRVUUgTsODTyBTRUpBIEEgVUZTTQosIFZPQ8OKIERFQ0xBUkEgUVVFIFJFU1BFSVRPVSBUT0RPUyBFIFFVQUlTUVVFUiBESVJFSVRPUyBERSBSRVZJU8ODTyBDT01PClRBTULDiU0gQVMgREVNQUlTIE9CUklHQcOHw5VFUyBFWElHSURBUyBQT1IgQ09OVFJBVE8gT1UgQUNPUkRPLgoKQSBVRlNNIHNlIGNvbXByb21ldGUgYSBpZGVudGlmaWNhciBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIG8gc2V1IG5vbWUgKHMpIG91IG8ocykgbm9tZShzKSBkbyhzKQpkZXRlbnRvcihlcykgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGRhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbywgZSBuw6NvIGZhcsOhIHF1YWxxdWVyIGFsdGVyYcOnw6NvLCBhbMOpbSBkYXF1ZWxhcwpjb25jZWRpZGFzIHBvciBlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLgoKRepositório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132022-08-04T19:13:59Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Racismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciais |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Online racism in Brazil: an analysis from the perspective of judicial decisions |
title |
Racismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciais |
spellingShingle |
Racismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciais Silva, Fernanda dos Santos Rodrigues Decisão judicial Racismo online Judicial decision Online racism CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Racismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciais |
title_full |
Racismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciais |
title_fullStr |
Racismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciais |
title_full_unstemmed |
Racismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciais |
title_sort |
Racismo online no Brasil: uma análise a partir da perspectiva de decisões judiciais |
author |
Silva, Fernanda dos Santos Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Silva, Fernanda dos Santos Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Nina Trícia Disconzi |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7964995474008653 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Fernanda da Silva |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Macedo, João Heitor Silva |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8893649892589552 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Fernanda dos Santos Rodrigues |
contributor_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Nina Trícia Disconzi Lima, Fernanda da Silva Macedo, João Heitor Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Decisão judicial Racismo online |
topic |
Decisão judicial Racismo online Judicial decision Online racism CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Judicial decision Online racism |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
Safernet data from the past few years has shown an increase in the number of reports of racism on the internet. In a country marked by structural racism, it is clear that the virtual environment becomes a new space for the propagation of racist hate speech. Victims of this type of conduct are left to resort to the Judiciary to ensure that the possible perpetrators are held responsible. As a result, and considering that the use of the internet as a means of spreading racism can pose a challenge to both current legislation and judges, the question arises: what are the main points discussed in judicial decisions about online racism in Brazil? To answer this problem, the predominantly inductive method was choosed, using first-person narrative, as recommended by the Racial Critical Theory, like the legal storytelling. As procedural methods, quantitative-qualitative research of judicial decisions of the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region was used, having as time frame from 2010 to 2020. As quantitative research, jurimetry was used to understand the meaning of the numbers involving the decisions found using the defined criteria. In addition, Grounded Theory was chosen for the qualitative research, in order to understand which are the main categories of argument that could be verified in the judgments. The research techniques, in turn, were the documentary and bibliographic, with extensive research in judicial decisions and legislation, as well as in articles and books about the subject, respectively. In the end, it was possible to verify a reduced number of decisions involving online racism against black people, while a greater number of judgments involving this type of discourse against Northeastern and indigenous people. In addition, five main categories were identified within the decisions, namely: a) delimitation of racism only in the form of direct discrimination; b) materiality and authorship of the offense most easily demonstrated through the evidence collected on the internet; c) the need to demonstrate the accused's deceit; d) debate between the right to freedom of expression versus the spread of racism and hate speech; e) the harmfulness of the internet as a means of spreading online racism. Such conclusions allow to think which are the biggest points to consider for a reform in the current anti-racist criminal legislation. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-29 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-04T19:13:59Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-04T19:13:59Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/25794 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/25794 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
600100000001 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
04753473-5ab8-4155-8921-dbc86c047572 1b8ae8e6-c5eb-4758-92c0-896b624503bc e3d9341e-1d32-4e22-bb34-188f0593edc9 08bef565-bbae-48f6-ba56-7c4224b63b0e |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
collection |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/25794/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/25794/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/25794/1/DIS_PPGDIREITO_2021_SILVA_FERNANDA.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 6ee3d08ce3bd9009f8a68a0b8aa309e7 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1794524419621650432 |