Controle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosato

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2014
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Marcos Vinicius Palma lattes
Orientador(a): Machado, Sérgio Luiz de Oliveira lattes
Banca de defesa: Kruse, Nelson Diehl lattes, Peixoto, Sandra Cadore lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
Departamento: Agronomia
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5103
Resumo: In general, in Rio Grande do Sul, the control of weeds in crops genetically modified soybean and resistant to the herbicide Roundup Ready® (RR® soybeans) in no-tillage is performed with glyphosate. However, weeds escapes to the treatment can occur as is the case of goosegrass which is considered by soybean growers plant is difficult to control by glyphosate. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the best combination of herbicide to control goosegrass, combining herbicides applied pre-seeding and post-emergence RR® soybean in two stages of development of this weed (Chapter I). Further evaluate the response of a biotype of goosegrass coming from the municipality of Tupanciretã (RS) to the glyphosate herbicide (Chapter II). The experiment I (Chapter I) was conducted in 2012/2013 harvest in Argisoil Yellow-Red hapludox typical belonging to unit Tupanciretã mapping. The results of the experiment I showed that the paraquat + diuron (200 g i.a. ha-1) and ammonium glufosinate (400 g i.a. ha-1) herbicides are efficient alternatives to glyphosate aiming to desiccation of goosegrass in operation management in RR® soybean pre-seeding. Regardless of desiccant herbicide, the control of goosegrass is higher when the plants receive the application of glyphosate (712 g e.a. ha-1) in vegetative stage three to four tillers, and clethodim (96 g i.a. ha-1) and imazethapyr (106 g i.a. ha-1) herbicides did not satisfactorily control goosegrass in vegetative stage from three tillers in RR® soybeans. Grain yield is higher with the application of glyphosate compared to the clethodim and imazethapyr, when the target is goosegrass with plants in stage three to six tillers. The experiment II (Chapter II) was conducted in the greenhouse of the Department (UFSM), in plastic pots (5 L) containing three seedlings of goosegrass (two to three tillers) with suspected resistance to glyphosate. The treatments consisted of five concentrations of the product (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400% of the dose registry of glyphosate, which is 712 g e.a. ha-1). The results for the control evaluations and production of dry biomass showed that biotype of goosegrass is susceptible to glyphosate, once at the lowest dose registration (712 g e.a. ha-1) tested, the control was greater than 98%.
id UFSM-20_c6e0506cba44cb6877516153a9a455b8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/5103
network_acronym_str UFSM-20
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2017-05-122017-05-122014-03-28ALVES, Marcos Vinicius Palma. Chemical control of Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. in soybean Roundup Ready® and response biotype to glyphosate herbicide. 2014. 47 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2014.http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5103In general, in Rio Grande do Sul, the control of weeds in crops genetically modified soybean and resistant to the herbicide Roundup Ready® (RR® soybeans) in no-tillage is performed with glyphosate. However, weeds escapes to the treatment can occur as is the case of goosegrass which is considered by soybean growers plant is difficult to control by glyphosate. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the best combination of herbicide to control goosegrass, combining herbicides applied pre-seeding and post-emergence RR® soybean in two stages of development of this weed (Chapter I). Further evaluate the response of a biotype of goosegrass coming from the municipality of Tupanciretã (RS) to the glyphosate herbicide (Chapter II). The experiment I (Chapter I) was conducted in 2012/2013 harvest in Argisoil Yellow-Red hapludox typical belonging to unit Tupanciretã mapping. The results of the experiment I showed that the paraquat + diuron (200 g i.a. ha-1) and ammonium glufosinate (400 g i.a. ha-1) herbicides are efficient alternatives to glyphosate aiming to desiccation of goosegrass in operation management in RR® soybean pre-seeding. Regardless of desiccant herbicide, the control of goosegrass is higher when the plants receive the application of glyphosate (712 g e.a. ha-1) in vegetative stage three to four tillers, and clethodim (96 g i.a. ha-1) and imazethapyr (106 g i.a. ha-1) herbicides did not satisfactorily control goosegrass in vegetative stage from three tillers in RR® soybeans. Grain yield is higher with the application of glyphosate compared to the clethodim and imazethapyr, when the target is goosegrass with plants in stage three to six tillers. The experiment II (Chapter II) was conducted in the greenhouse of the Department (UFSM), in plastic pots (5 L) containing three seedlings of goosegrass (two to three tillers) with suspected resistance to glyphosate. The treatments consisted of five concentrations of the product (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400% of the dose registry of glyphosate, which is 712 g e.a. ha-1). The results for the control evaluations and production of dry biomass showed that biotype of goosegrass is susceptible to glyphosate, once at the lowest dose registration (712 g e.a. ha-1) tested, the control was greater than 98%.Em geral, no Rio Grande do Sul, o controle de plantas daninhas em lavouras de soja geneticamente modificada e resistente ao herbicida Roundup Ready® (soja RR®) no sistema plantio direto, é realizado com o glifosato. Entretanto, plantas daninhas escapes ao tratamento podem ocorrer, como é o caso de Eleusine indica (capim pé-de-galinha) que é considerada pelos sojicultores planta de difícil controle pelo glifosato. Neste contexto, este trabalho tem por objetivos avaliar a melhor associação de herbicidas no controle de capim pé-de-galinha, combinando herbicidas aplicados em pré-semeadura e pós-emergência de soja RR® em dois estádios de desenvolvimento desta planta daninha (Capítulo I). Avaliar ainda a resposta de um biótipo de capim pé-de-galinha oriundo do município de Tupanciretã (RS) ao herbicida glifosato (Capítulo II). O experimento I (Capítulo I) foi conduzido na safra 2012/2013 em Argissolo Vermelho-Amarelo distrófico típico pertencente à unidade de mapeamento Tupanciretã. Os resultados do experimento I mostraram que os herbicidas paraquate + diurom (200 g i.a. ha-1) e glufosinato de amônio (400 g i.a. ha-1) são alternativas eficientes ao glifosato visando à dessecação do capim pé-de-galinha na operação de manejo em pré-semeadura da soja RR®. Independente do herbicida dessecante aplicado, o controle de capim pé-de-galinha é superior quando as plantas recebem a aplicação de glifosato (712 g e.a. ha-1) em estádio vegetativo de três a quatro afilhos; e os herbicidas cletodim (96 g i.a. ha-1) e imazetapir (106 g i.a. ha-1) não controlam satisfatoriamente o capim pé-de-galinha em estádio vegetativo a partir de três afilhos em soja RR®. A produtividade de grãos é superior com a aplicação do glifosato em comparação às de cletodim e imazetapir, quando o alvo for capim pé-de-galinha com as plantas no estádio de três a seis afilhos. O experimento II (Capítulo II) foi conduzido em casa de vegetação do Departamento de Fitotecnia (UFSM), em vasos plásticos (5 L) contendo três mudas de plantas de capim pé-de-galinha (dois a três afilhos) com suspeita de resistência a glifosato. Os tratamentos consistiram da aplicação de cinco concentrações do produto (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 e 400% da dose de registro de glifosato, que é de 712 g e.a. ha-1). Os resultados para as avaliações de controle e produção de biomassa seca mostraram que este biótipo de capim pé-de-galinha é suscetível ao glifosato, uma vez que na menor dose de registro (712 g e.a. ha-1) testada, o controle foi superior a 98%.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicoapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em AgronomiaUFSMBRAgronomiaCapim pé-de-galinhaGlycine maxResistênciaGoosegrassGlycine maxResistanceCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIAControle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosatoChemical control of Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. in soybean Roundup Ready® and response biotype to glyphosate herbicideinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisMachado, Sérgio Luiz de Oliveirahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0360886006002113Kruse, Nelson Diehlhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1755736441490062Peixoto, Sandra Cadorehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0051729840313401http://lattes.cnpq.br/6176980311108395Alves, Marcos Vinicius Palma500100000009400500300300500e60531fa-cb8f-416b-b6ca-73f0fb0c04283eba0a4a-33c3-4bb9-afd3-077e34c25c927b06d733-2739-465c-b455-6ae96f495793a756e725-e092-4a00-a474-12d73191eb38info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALALVES, MARCOS VINICIUS PALMA.pdfapplication/pdf1523272http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5103/1/ALVES%2c%20MARCOS%20VINICIUS%20PALMA.pdf99e934e246b4222ede44ba5b9dee0eeeMD51TEXTALVES, MARCOS VINICIUS PALMA.pdf.txtALVES, MARCOS VINICIUS PALMA.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain79292http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5103/2/ALVES%2c%20MARCOS%20VINICIUS%20PALMA.pdf.txtdd1bc326606aff73d2733bda0240762fMD52THUMBNAILALVES, MARCOS VINICIUS PALMA.pdf.jpgALVES, MARCOS VINICIUS PALMA.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4787http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5103/3/ALVES%2c%20MARCOS%20VINICIUS%20PALMA.pdf.jpg288032acee0396877e77e665614ed5c0MD531/51032022-03-21 09:03:56.481oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/5103Repositório Institucionalhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestopendoar:39132022-03-21T12:03:56Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Controle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosato
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Chemical control of Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. in soybean Roundup Ready® and response biotype to glyphosate herbicide
title Controle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosato
spellingShingle Controle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosato
Alves, Marcos Vinicius Palma
Capim pé-de-galinha
Glycine max
Resistência
Goosegrass
Glycine max
Resistance
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
title_short Controle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosato
title_full Controle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosato
title_fullStr Controle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosato
title_full_unstemmed Controle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosato
title_sort Controle químico de Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. em soja Roundup Ready® e resposta de biótipo ao herbicida glifosato
author Alves, Marcos Vinicius Palma
author_facet Alves, Marcos Vinicius Palma
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Machado, Sérgio Luiz de Oliveira
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0360886006002113
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Kruse, Nelson Diehl
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1755736441490062
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Peixoto, Sandra Cadore
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0051729840313401
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6176980311108395
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Marcos Vinicius Palma
contributor_str_mv Machado, Sérgio Luiz de Oliveira
Kruse, Nelson Diehl
Peixoto, Sandra Cadore
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Capim pé-de-galinha
Glycine max
Resistência
topic Capim pé-de-galinha
Glycine max
Resistência
Goosegrass
Glycine max
Resistance
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Goosegrass
Glycine max
Resistance
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
description In general, in Rio Grande do Sul, the control of weeds in crops genetically modified soybean and resistant to the herbicide Roundup Ready® (RR® soybeans) in no-tillage is performed with glyphosate. However, weeds escapes to the treatment can occur as is the case of goosegrass which is considered by soybean growers plant is difficult to control by glyphosate. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the best combination of herbicide to control goosegrass, combining herbicides applied pre-seeding and post-emergence RR® soybean in two stages of development of this weed (Chapter I). Further evaluate the response of a biotype of goosegrass coming from the municipality of Tupanciretã (RS) to the glyphosate herbicide (Chapter II). The experiment I (Chapter I) was conducted in 2012/2013 harvest in Argisoil Yellow-Red hapludox typical belonging to unit Tupanciretã mapping. The results of the experiment I showed that the paraquat + diuron (200 g i.a. ha-1) and ammonium glufosinate (400 g i.a. ha-1) herbicides are efficient alternatives to glyphosate aiming to desiccation of goosegrass in operation management in RR® soybean pre-seeding. Regardless of desiccant herbicide, the control of goosegrass is higher when the plants receive the application of glyphosate (712 g e.a. ha-1) in vegetative stage three to four tillers, and clethodim (96 g i.a. ha-1) and imazethapyr (106 g i.a. ha-1) herbicides did not satisfactorily control goosegrass in vegetative stage from three tillers in RR® soybeans. Grain yield is higher with the application of glyphosate compared to the clethodim and imazethapyr, when the target is goosegrass with plants in stage three to six tillers. The experiment II (Chapter II) was conducted in the greenhouse of the Department (UFSM), in plastic pots (5 L) containing three seedlings of goosegrass (two to three tillers) with suspected resistance to glyphosate. The treatments consisted of five concentrations of the product (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400% of the dose registry of glyphosate, which is 712 g e.a. ha-1). The results for the control evaluations and production of dry biomass showed that biotype of goosegrass is susceptible to glyphosate, once at the lowest dose registration (712 g e.a. ha-1) tested, the control was greater than 98%.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014-03-28
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-05-12
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2017-05-12
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ALVES, Marcos Vinicius Palma. Chemical control of Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. in soybean Roundup Ready® and response biotype to glyphosate herbicide. 2014. 47 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2014.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5103
identifier_str_mv ALVES, Marcos Vinicius Palma. Chemical control of Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. in soybean Roundup Ready® and response biotype to glyphosate herbicide. 2014. 47 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2014.
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5103
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 500100000009
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 400
500
300
300
500
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv e60531fa-cb8f-416b-b6ca-73f0fb0c0428
3eba0a4a-33c3-4bb9-afd3-077e34c25c92
7b06d733-2739-465c-b455-6ae96f495793
a756e725-e092-4a00-a474-12d73191eb38
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Agronomia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5103/1/ALVES%2c%20MARCOS%20VINICIUS%20PALMA.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5103/2/ALVES%2c%20MARCOS%20VINICIUS%20PALMA.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/5103/3/ALVES%2c%20MARCOS%20VINICIUS%20PALMA.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 99e934e246b4222ede44ba5b9dee0eee
dd1bc326606aff73d2733bda0240762f
288032acee0396877e77e665614ed5c0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1794524317833232384