Avaliação de potência de toxina botulínica tipo a por ensaios biológicos e método por cromatografia líquida em fase reversa

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Guilherme Weber de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000rxj0
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; BR; Farmacologia; UFSM; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas
• Palavras-chave em Português: Toxina botulínica tipo A (BTTA); Cromatografia líquida em fase reversa; Bioensaio de DL50; Cultura celular T47D; Validação; Correlação; Botulinum toxin type A; Reversed-phase liquid chromatography; LD50 mice bioassay; Cell culture T47D; Validation; Correlation; CNPQ::CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::FARMACOLOGIA
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/6003

Botulinum toxin type A (BTTA) is a polypeptide with 1296 amino acids and its used in some pathologies like hyperhidrosis and migraine, but the cosmetic area is the most important application. BTTA is produced from broth-culture synthesized by the Clostridium botulinum as a single peptide with 150 kDa. Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) method was developed and validated for the assessment of botulinum toxin type A in biopharmaceutical formulations. A RP-LC method was carried out on a Zorbax 300 SB C18 column (150 mm x 4.6 mm i.d.), maintained at 45 ºC. The mobile phase A consisted of 0.05 M sodium sulphate buffer, pH 2.8, and the mobile phase B was acetonitrile, run isocratically at flow rate 0.3 mL/min. Cromatographic separation was obtained with retention time of 11.4 min, and was linear over the concentration range of 0.2-100 IU/mL (r2 = 0.9999) with photodiode array (PDA) detection at 214 nm. The limits of detection and quantitation were 0.04 and 0.16 IU/mL, respectively. Specificity was established in degradation studies, which also showed that there was no interference of the excipients. Equally, the accuracy was 100.31% with bias lower than 0.80%. The method was correlated with in vivo and in vitro bioassays. Moreover, the in vitro cytotoxicity test of related proteins and higher molecular weight forms showed significant differences (p <0.05) compared to intact molecule. The validated methods were applied for the determination of BTTA in biopharmaceutical-derived products, giving mean values of the estimated content/potencies 1.16% lower compared to the in vivo bioassay. It is concluded that represents a contribution to establish new alternatives to monitor stability, quality control and thereby assure efficacy of the biotechnology-derived product.