Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Henrique Machado dos
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
dARK ID: ark:/26339/0013000008ntj
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
História
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Patrimônio Cultural
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15909
Resumo: This study aims to contextualize and discuss the applicability of OAIS - ISO 14721: 2012 and ACTDR - ISO 16363: 2012 standards in the context of trustworthy digital archival repositories. For this, the OAIS functional model is analyzed initially in the context of Archives, emphasizing the perspectives of preservation and guarantee of access to authentic documents in the long term. Subsequently, the ACTDR audit standard is analyzed by looking at its applicability to OAIS-compliant digital archival repositories. The methodology consists of a research of an applied nature, in which the data collection is carried out by means of records, which are planned through a database instrument. The data collection is based essentially on a documentary survey, contemplating norms and recommendations to which it composes the nucleus of this study. And in a complementary way, a bibliographic survey is used, consisting of previously published materials such as books, theses, dissertations and scientific articles retrieved by the Google Scholar search tool. The OAIS analysis demonstrates that there is theoretical compliance with Archival, although it is not explicit, it is possible to shape an archival repository based on its requirements. With this, an OAIS-compliant repository can contemplate principles such as provenance and uniqueness, as well as fit into the context of the seven archival functions. The OAIS functional model conceptualizes packet structures and information objects, which include fundamental properties for preservation, maintenance of authenticity and guarantee of access to digital documents. Therefore, OAIS is considered a prerequisite in the implementation of a trustworthy digital archival repository. In a second moment, the ACTDR audit pattern is analyzed to make explicit the potentially archival aspects that are implicit, so its detailing supports the auditing process of trustworthy digital archival repositories. The ACTDR standard is divided into three sections in which the requirements related to institutional policies of digital preservation, management of stored digital objects and the management of security and risk of the digital repository are subdivided. Among the contributions of this study, it is emphasized that the implementation of a trustworthy digital archival repository should initially consider the OAIS reference model, and, in a second moment, this repository should be audited by the ACTDR standard. In case the repository reaches the levels of reliability required in the audit, it is certified by the appropriate body. Finally, the complement of this study consists of the elaboration of a product, the "Manual for Auditing Reliable Digital Archival Repositories", thus establishing a dialogue between OAIS and ACTDR, in addition to considering archival aspects pertinent to long-term preservation. This manual synthesizes the knowledge discussed to serve as guidance to archivists working within digital archival repositories.
id UFSM_6890881c1127bc3c92bc1ee25d7afe9d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/15909
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363Audit of trustworthy digital archival repositories: an analysis of standards ISO 14721 and ISO 16363Patrimônio culturalDocumento digitalArquivologiaPreservação digitalRepositório digitalCultural heritageDigital recordArchival scienceDigital preservationDigital repositoryCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIAThis study aims to contextualize and discuss the applicability of OAIS - ISO 14721: 2012 and ACTDR - ISO 16363: 2012 standards in the context of trustworthy digital archival repositories. For this, the OAIS functional model is analyzed initially in the context of Archives, emphasizing the perspectives of preservation and guarantee of access to authentic documents in the long term. Subsequently, the ACTDR audit standard is analyzed by looking at its applicability to OAIS-compliant digital archival repositories. The methodology consists of a research of an applied nature, in which the data collection is carried out by means of records, which are planned through a database instrument. The data collection is based essentially on a documentary survey, contemplating norms and recommendations to which it composes the nucleus of this study. And in a complementary way, a bibliographic survey is used, consisting of previously published materials such as books, theses, dissertations and scientific articles retrieved by the Google Scholar search tool. The OAIS analysis demonstrates that there is theoretical compliance with Archival, although it is not explicit, it is possible to shape an archival repository based on its requirements. With this, an OAIS-compliant repository can contemplate principles such as provenance and uniqueness, as well as fit into the context of the seven archival functions. The OAIS functional model conceptualizes packet structures and information objects, which include fundamental properties for preservation, maintenance of authenticity and guarantee of access to digital documents. Therefore, OAIS is considered a prerequisite in the implementation of a trustworthy digital archival repository. In a second moment, the ACTDR audit pattern is analyzed to make explicit the potentially archival aspects that are implicit, so its detailing supports the auditing process of trustworthy digital archival repositories. The ACTDR standard is divided into three sections in which the requirements related to institutional policies of digital preservation, management of stored digital objects and the management of security and risk of the digital repository are subdivided. Among the contributions of this study, it is emphasized that the implementation of a trustworthy digital archival repository should initially consider the OAIS reference model, and, in a second moment, this repository should be audited by the ACTDR standard. In case the repository reaches the levels of reliability required in the audit, it is certified by the appropriate body. Finally, the complement of this study consists of the elaboration of a product, the "Manual for Auditing Reliable Digital Archival Repositories", thus establishing a dialogue between OAIS and ACTDR, in addition to considering archival aspects pertinent to long-term preservation. This manual synthesizes the knowledge discussed to serve as guidance to archivists working within digital archival repositories.Este estudo tem por objetivo contextualizar e discutir a aplicabilidade das normas OAIS – ISO 14721:2012 e ACTDR – ISO 16363:2012 no âmbito dos repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis. Para isto, analisa-se inicialmente o modelo funcional OAIS no contexto da Arquivística, enfatizando as perspectivas de preservação e garantia de acesso a documentos autênticos no longo prazo. Posteriormente, o padrão de auditoria ACTDR é analisado vislumbrando a sua aplicabilidade aos repositórios arquivísticos digitais em conformidade com o OAIS. A metodologia consiste em uma pesquisa de natureza aplicada, na qual a coleta de dados é realizada por meio de fichamentos, os quais são planificados através de um instrumento de banco de dados. A coleta de dados parte, essencialmente, de um levantamento documental, contemplando normas e recomendações às quais compõe o núcleo deste estudo. E em caráter complementar, utiliza-se o levantamento bibliográfico, composto por materiais previamente publicados, como livros, teses, dissertações e artigos científicos recuperados pela ferramenta de busca Google Scholar. A análise do OAIS demonstra que há conformidade teórica com a Arquivística, embora não esteja explícito, é possível moldar um repositório arquivístico com base em seus requisitos. Com isto, um repositório em conformidade com o OAIS poderá contemplar princípios como, proveniência e unicidade, além de se enquadrar no contexto das sete funções arquivísticas. O modelo funcional OAIS conceitua estruturas de pacotes e objetos de informação, os quais contemplam propriedades fundamentais à preservação, manutenção da autenticidade e garantia de acesso aos documentos digitais. Logo, o OAIS é considerado um pré-requisito na implementação de um repositório arquivístico digital confiável. Em um segundo momento, o padrão de auditoria ACTDR é analisado para explicitar aspectos potencialmente arquivísticos que estão implícitos, assim, seu detalhamento fornece suporte ao processo de auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis. O padrão ACTDR se divide em três seções nas quais estão subdivididos os requisitos relacionados a políticas institucionais de preservação digital, gerenciamento dos objetos digitais armazenados e a gestão de segurança e risco do repositório digital. Dentre as contribuições deste estudo, ressalta-se que a implementação de um repositório arquivístico digital confiável deverá, inicialmente, considerar o modelo de referência OAIS, e, em um segundo momento, este repositório deve ser auditado pelo padrão ACTDR. Caso o repositório atinja os níveis de confiabilidade requeridos na auditoria, procede-se a certificação do mesmo, através do órgão competente para tal. Por fim, a complementação deste estudo consiste na elaboração de um produto, o “manual para auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis”, estabelecendo assim, um diálogo entre o OAIS e ACTDR, além de considerar os aspectos arquivísticos pertinentes na preservação de longo prazo. Este manual sintetiza os conhecimentos discutidos para servir como orientação aos arquivistas que atuam no âmbito dos repositórios arquivísticos digitais.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilHistóriaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Patrimônio CulturalCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasFlores, Danielhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9640543272532398Kantorski, Gustavo Zaninihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0721839644753258Rocha, Rafael Port dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5118387541734094Santos, Henrique Machado dos2019-03-14T18:45:25Z2019-03-14T18:45:25Z2018-03-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15909ark:/26339/0013000008ntjporAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2019-03-15T06:01:46Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/15909Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.bropendoar:2019-03-15T06:01:46Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363
Audit of trustworthy digital archival repositories: an analysis of standards ISO 14721 and ISO 16363
title Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363
spellingShingle Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363
Santos, Henrique Machado dos
Patrimônio cultural
Documento digital
Arquivologia
Preservação digital
Repositório digital
Cultural heritage
Digital record
Archival science
Digital preservation
Digital repository
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
title_short Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363
title_full Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363
title_fullStr Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363
title_full_unstemmed Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363
title_sort Auditoria de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis: uma análise das normas ISO 14721 e ISO 16363
author Santos, Henrique Machado dos
author_facet Santos, Henrique Machado dos
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Flores, Daniel
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9640543272532398
Kantorski, Gustavo Zanini
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0721839644753258
Rocha, Rafael Port da
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5118387541734094
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Henrique Machado dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Patrimônio cultural
Documento digital
Arquivologia
Preservação digital
Repositório digital
Cultural heritage
Digital record
Archival science
Digital preservation
Digital repository
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
topic Patrimônio cultural
Documento digital
Arquivologia
Preservação digital
Repositório digital
Cultural heritage
Digital record
Archival science
Digital preservation
Digital repository
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA
description This study aims to contextualize and discuss the applicability of OAIS - ISO 14721: 2012 and ACTDR - ISO 16363: 2012 standards in the context of trustworthy digital archival repositories. For this, the OAIS functional model is analyzed initially in the context of Archives, emphasizing the perspectives of preservation and guarantee of access to authentic documents in the long term. Subsequently, the ACTDR audit standard is analyzed by looking at its applicability to OAIS-compliant digital archival repositories. The methodology consists of a research of an applied nature, in which the data collection is carried out by means of records, which are planned through a database instrument. The data collection is based essentially on a documentary survey, contemplating norms and recommendations to which it composes the nucleus of this study. And in a complementary way, a bibliographic survey is used, consisting of previously published materials such as books, theses, dissertations and scientific articles retrieved by the Google Scholar search tool. The OAIS analysis demonstrates that there is theoretical compliance with Archival, although it is not explicit, it is possible to shape an archival repository based on its requirements. With this, an OAIS-compliant repository can contemplate principles such as provenance and uniqueness, as well as fit into the context of the seven archival functions. The OAIS functional model conceptualizes packet structures and information objects, which include fundamental properties for preservation, maintenance of authenticity and guarantee of access to digital documents. Therefore, OAIS is considered a prerequisite in the implementation of a trustworthy digital archival repository. In a second moment, the ACTDR audit pattern is analyzed to make explicit the potentially archival aspects that are implicit, so its detailing supports the auditing process of trustworthy digital archival repositories. The ACTDR standard is divided into three sections in which the requirements related to institutional policies of digital preservation, management of stored digital objects and the management of security and risk of the digital repository are subdivided. Among the contributions of this study, it is emphasized that the implementation of a trustworthy digital archival repository should initially consider the OAIS reference model, and, in a second moment, this repository should be audited by the ACTDR standard. In case the repository reaches the levels of reliability required in the audit, it is certified by the appropriate body. Finally, the complement of this study consists of the elaboration of a product, the "Manual for Auditing Reliable Digital Archival Repositories", thus establishing a dialogue between OAIS and ACTDR, in addition to considering archival aspects pertinent to long-term preservation. This manual synthesizes the knowledge discussed to serve as guidance to archivists working within digital archival repositories.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-05
2019-03-14T18:45:25Z
2019-03-14T18:45:25Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15909
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/0013000008ntj
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/15909
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/0013000008ntj
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
História
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Patrimônio Cultural
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
História
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Patrimônio Cultural
Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.br
_version_ 1847153368719425536