Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andrei

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2024
Autor(a) principal: Gadini, Rafael Schroeder
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000nj79
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Engenharia Ambiental
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental
Centro de Tecnologia
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/32175
Resumo: The use of herbicides combined with insecticides is motivated by the need to control weeds and pests that occur concurrently in agricultural crops. Even with the increasing use of these products to ensure productivity, there is a concern directed towards the toxicity caused in non-target organisms, risks to human health, and effects on the environment. Therefore, this study aims to assess the ecotoxicity of the herbicide 2,4-D + Picloram® and the biological insecticide based on Bacillus thuringiensis in soil, using the earthworm Eisenia andrei as a bioindicator. The tests were carried out during 28 days of exposure and evaluated the interaction between the compounds and the assessment of biomarkers of antioxidant activity (ACAP, CAT, GPx, and GR), oxidative stress (Peroxide, ROS, Carbonyl, NO, TBARS), and neurotoxicity (AChE and BChE) in earthworms exposed to the following treatments: CT- control; CD- 2,4-D and Picloram® (4L/ha); BT- Bacillus thuringiensis; and CDB- 2,4-D and Picloram® (4L/ha) + Bacillus thuringiensis (1L/ha). After 14 and 28 days of exposure, the results revealed that the CDB treatment induced oxidative stress, evidenced by the high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a reduction in the activity of the catalase (CAT) enzyme. Although there was a compensatory response of the antioxidant system, with an increase in glutathione reductase (GR), prolonged exposure appears to have exceeded the adaptive capacity of the earthworms. Additionally, the CDB treatment also showed neurotoxic effects, with an increase in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and a reduction in butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), indicating changes in the nervous system of the earthworms. Overall, the mixture of herbicides with the biological insecticide proved to be more harmful to non-target organisms than when applied individually, suggesting the need for a more comprehensive assessment of the effects of combined compounds in the soil and their potential ecological risks.
id UFSM_924b2e162d2fb890937042a9ad7795c2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/32175
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andreiEcotoxicological effects of herbicide and biological insecticide in soil: study with Eisenia andrei earthwormsEcotoxicidadeOligoquetaBiomarcadoresEcotoxicityBiomarkersCNPQ::ENGENHARIASThe use of herbicides combined with insecticides is motivated by the need to control weeds and pests that occur concurrently in agricultural crops. Even with the increasing use of these products to ensure productivity, there is a concern directed towards the toxicity caused in non-target organisms, risks to human health, and effects on the environment. Therefore, this study aims to assess the ecotoxicity of the herbicide 2,4-D + Picloram® and the biological insecticide based on Bacillus thuringiensis in soil, using the earthworm Eisenia andrei as a bioindicator. The tests were carried out during 28 days of exposure and evaluated the interaction between the compounds and the assessment of biomarkers of antioxidant activity (ACAP, CAT, GPx, and GR), oxidative stress (Peroxide, ROS, Carbonyl, NO, TBARS), and neurotoxicity (AChE and BChE) in earthworms exposed to the following treatments: CT- control; CD- 2,4-D and Picloram® (4L/ha); BT- Bacillus thuringiensis; and CDB- 2,4-D and Picloram® (4L/ha) + Bacillus thuringiensis (1L/ha). After 14 and 28 days of exposure, the results revealed that the CDB treatment induced oxidative stress, evidenced by the high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a reduction in the activity of the catalase (CAT) enzyme. Although there was a compensatory response of the antioxidant system, with an increase in glutathione reductase (GR), prolonged exposure appears to have exceeded the adaptive capacity of the earthworms. Additionally, the CDB treatment also showed neurotoxic effects, with an increase in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and a reduction in butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), indicating changes in the nervous system of the earthworms. Overall, the mixture of herbicides with the biological insecticide proved to be more harmful to non-target organisms than when applied individually, suggesting the need for a more comprehensive assessment of the effects of combined compounds in the soil and their potential ecological risks.O uso de herbicidas combinado com inseticidas é motivado pela necessidade do controle de plantas daninhas e pragas que ocorrem concomitantemente em culturas agrícolas. Mesmo com o uso crescente desses produtos para garantir a produtividade, há uma preocupação direcionada à toxicidade ocasionada em organismos não alvo, riscos à saúde humana e efeitos ao meio ambiente. Sendo assim, este estudo tem como objetivo principal avaliar a ecotoxicidade de herbicida a base de 2,4-D + Picloram ®, e de inseticida biológico à base de Bacillus thuringiensis, em solo, utilizando minhocas da espécie Eisenia andrei como bioindicador. Os ensaios foram realizados durante 28 dias de exposição e avaliaram a interação entre os compostos e a avaliação de biomarcadores de atividade antioxidante (ACAP, CAT, GPx e GR), estresse oxidativo (Peróxido, EROs Carbonil, NO, TBARS) e neurotoxicidade (AChE e BChE) em minhocas expostas aos seguintes tratamentos: CT- controle; CD- 2,4-D e Picloram ® (4L/ha); BT- Bacillus thuringiensis; e CDB- 2,4-D e Picloram ® (4L/ha) + Bacillus thuringiensis (1L/ha). Após 14 e 28 dias de exposição, os resultados revelaram que o tratamento CDB induziu estresse oxidativo, evidenciado pelos elevados níveis de espécies reativas de oxigênio (EROs) e redução na atividade da enzima catalase (CAT). Embora tenha havido uma resposta compensatória do sistema antioxidante, com aumento na glutationa redutase (GR), a exposição prolongada parece ter excedido a capacidade adaptativa das minhocas. Adicionalmente, o tratamento CDB também apresentou efeitos neurotóxicos, com aumento da atividade da acetilcolinesterase (AChE) e redução da butirilcolinesterase (BChE), indicando alterações no sistema nervoso das minhocas. De modo geral, a mistura dos herbicidas com o inseticida biológico demonstrou ser mais prejudicial aos organismos não-alvo do que quando aplicados de forma individual, sugerindo a necessidade de uma avaliação mais abrangente dos efeitos de compostos combinados no solo e seus potenciais riscos ecológicos.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilEngenharia AmbientalUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia AmbientalCentro de TecnologiaClasen, Bárbara Estevãohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4618772929333729Bisognin, Ramiro PereiraLeitemperger, Jossiele WeszSouza, Eduardo Lorensi deGadini, Rafael Schroeder2024-07-05T15:20:14Z2024-07-05T15:20:14Z2024-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/32175ark:/26339/001300000nj79porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2024-07-05T15:20:14Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/32175Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.bropendoar:2024-07-05T15:20:14Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andrei
Ecotoxicological effects of herbicide and biological insecticide in soil: study with Eisenia andrei earthworms
title Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andrei
spellingShingle Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andrei
Gadini, Rafael Schroeder
Ecotoxicidade
Oligoqueta
Biomarcadores
Ecotoxicity
Biomarkers
CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS
title_short Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andrei
title_full Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andrei
title_fullStr Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andrei
title_full_unstemmed Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andrei
title_sort Efeitos ecotoxicológicos de herbicida e de inseticida biológico em solo: estudo com minhocas Eisenia andrei
author Gadini, Rafael Schroeder
author_facet Gadini, Rafael Schroeder
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Clasen, Bárbara Estevão
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4618772929333729
Bisognin, Ramiro Pereira
Leitemperger, Jossiele Wesz
Souza, Eduardo Lorensi de
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gadini, Rafael Schroeder
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ecotoxicidade
Oligoqueta
Biomarcadores
Ecotoxicity
Biomarkers
CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS
topic Ecotoxicidade
Oligoqueta
Biomarcadores
Ecotoxicity
Biomarkers
CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS
description The use of herbicides combined with insecticides is motivated by the need to control weeds and pests that occur concurrently in agricultural crops. Even with the increasing use of these products to ensure productivity, there is a concern directed towards the toxicity caused in non-target organisms, risks to human health, and effects on the environment. Therefore, this study aims to assess the ecotoxicity of the herbicide 2,4-D + Picloram® and the biological insecticide based on Bacillus thuringiensis in soil, using the earthworm Eisenia andrei as a bioindicator. The tests were carried out during 28 days of exposure and evaluated the interaction between the compounds and the assessment of biomarkers of antioxidant activity (ACAP, CAT, GPx, and GR), oxidative stress (Peroxide, ROS, Carbonyl, NO, TBARS), and neurotoxicity (AChE and BChE) in earthworms exposed to the following treatments: CT- control; CD- 2,4-D and Picloram® (4L/ha); BT- Bacillus thuringiensis; and CDB- 2,4-D and Picloram® (4L/ha) + Bacillus thuringiensis (1L/ha). After 14 and 28 days of exposure, the results revealed that the CDB treatment induced oxidative stress, evidenced by the high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a reduction in the activity of the catalase (CAT) enzyme. Although there was a compensatory response of the antioxidant system, with an increase in glutathione reductase (GR), prolonged exposure appears to have exceeded the adaptive capacity of the earthworms. Additionally, the CDB treatment also showed neurotoxic effects, with an increase in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and a reduction in butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), indicating changes in the nervous system of the earthworms. Overall, the mixture of herbicides with the biological insecticide proved to be more harmful to non-target organisms than when applied individually, suggesting the need for a more comprehensive assessment of the effects of combined compounds in the soil and their potential ecological risks.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-05T15:20:14Z
2024-07-05T15:20:14Z
2024-03-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/32175
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000nj79
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/32175
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000nj79
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Engenharia Ambiental
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental
Centro de Tecnologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Engenharia Ambiental
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental
Centro de Tecnologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.br
_version_ 1847153424401956864