Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva lattes
Orientador(a): Alves Filho, Dari Celestino lattes
Banca de defesa: Silveira, Magali Floriano da lattes, Donicht, Patrícia Alessandra Meneguzzi Metz lattes, Pascoal, Leonir Luíz lattes, Pizzuti, Luiz Angelo Damian lattes
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
Departamento: Zootecnia
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19131
Resumo: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cow weight changes during development gestation, carcass and meat characteristics, empty body components and progeny reproductive performance. Data collected from beef cows and their offspring, born between 2002 and 2013, were used for confinement at 24 months of age in males and mated at 24 months of age in females. The treatments studied were: Weight gain (GA): pregnant cows that gained from 0.0 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Moderate weight loss (PM): pregnant cows that lost 0.1 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Severe weight loss (PS): pregnant cows that lost 15.1 to 30.0% of body weight during pregnancy. The highest slaughter weights were obtained in treatments GA and PM, 428 and 424 kg, respectively. The lowest weight was registered in the PS treatment, 406 kg. Moderate and severe weight loss during pregnancy increases the relative spleen weight of male offspring, with relative weights of 0.36 and 0.34 kg/100 kg of PCVZ for PM and PS, in that order and 0.29 kg/ 100 kg PCVZ for the GA. Kidney and intestine participation in empty body weight is higher in male offspring of pregnant cows who have severely lost weight. The relative weight of kidneys was higher in PS (0.23 kg/100 kg PCVZ) than in GA (0.20 kg/100 kg PCVZ) and PM (0.21 kg/100 kg PCVZ). Cow weight variation during pregnancy does not influence the internal fat participation in male offspring. At 210 and 365 days of age, the animals from treatment GA (135.26 and 211.67 kg) and PM (128.89 and 210.98 kg) presented higher weight than animals from PS (119.25 and 197.27 kg). Slaughter and hot carcass weights were higher in GA (434 and 240 kg) and PM (433 and 238 kg) animals than in PS (407 and 223 kg) animals. The GA and PM presented carcasses with higher compactness (1.90 kg cm-1) than the PS treatment (1.80 kg cm-1). Cow weight gain during pregnancy increases the degree of marbling in the meat and the area of Longissimus dorsi of male offspring. The female offspring of cows that gain weight during pregnancy have higher weight and percentage of adult weight at 7 and 18 months of age. In the first reproductive season, PS showed a tendency of higher pregnancy rate (69.8%). GA and PM showed a lower pregnancy rate (50.0 and 59.9%). In the second reproductive season, the offspring of cows that lost more weight show higher birth weight of calves. In the third breeding season, GA showed a higher pregnancy rate (64.3%), lower productive efficiency (13.5 kg calves/kg cow) and higher calf production index (57.7 kg calf/cow).
id UFSM_b0358f9e794c5671058d4b9adfc89cff
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/19131
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling 2019-12-09T21:33:13Z2019-12-09T21:33:13Z2019-08-16http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19131The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cow weight changes during development gestation, carcass and meat characteristics, empty body components and progeny reproductive performance. Data collected from beef cows and their offspring, born between 2002 and 2013, were used for confinement at 24 months of age in males and mated at 24 months of age in females. The treatments studied were: Weight gain (GA): pregnant cows that gained from 0.0 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Moderate weight loss (PM): pregnant cows that lost 0.1 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Severe weight loss (PS): pregnant cows that lost 15.1 to 30.0% of body weight during pregnancy. The highest slaughter weights were obtained in treatments GA and PM, 428 and 424 kg, respectively. The lowest weight was registered in the PS treatment, 406 kg. Moderate and severe weight loss during pregnancy increases the relative spleen weight of male offspring, with relative weights of 0.36 and 0.34 kg/100 kg of PCVZ for PM and PS, in that order and 0.29 kg/ 100 kg PCVZ for the GA. Kidney and intestine participation in empty body weight is higher in male offspring of pregnant cows who have severely lost weight. The relative weight of kidneys was higher in PS (0.23 kg/100 kg PCVZ) than in GA (0.20 kg/100 kg PCVZ) and PM (0.21 kg/100 kg PCVZ). Cow weight variation during pregnancy does not influence the internal fat participation in male offspring. At 210 and 365 days of age, the animals from treatment GA (135.26 and 211.67 kg) and PM (128.89 and 210.98 kg) presented higher weight than animals from PS (119.25 and 197.27 kg). Slaughter and hot carcass weights were higher in GA (434 and 240 kg) and PM (433 and 238 kg) animals than in PS (407 and 223 kg) animals. The GA and PM presented carcasses with higher compactness (1.90 kg cm-1) than the PS treatment (1.80 kg cm-1). Cow weight gain during pregnancy increases the degree of marbling in the meat and the area of Longissimus dorsi of male offspring. The female offspring of cows that gain weight during pregnancy have higher weight and percentage of adult weight at 7 and 18 months of age. In the first reproductive season, PS showed a tendency of higher pregnancy rate (69.8%). GA and PM showed a lower pregnancy rate (50.0 and 59.9%). In the second reproductive season, the offspring of cows that lost more weight show higher birth weight of calves. In the third breeding season, GA showed a higher pregnancy rate (64.3%), lower productive efficiency (13.5 kg calves/kg cow) and higher calf production index (57.7 kg calf/cow).O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar os efeitos das variações de peso da matriz durante a gestação no desenvolvimento, nas características de carcaça e carne, nos componentes do corpo vazio e no desempenho reprodutivo da progênie. Foram utilizados dados coletados de vacas de corte e sua prole, nascidos entre os anos de 2002 a 2013, terminados em confinamento aos 24 meses de idade no caso dos machos e acasaladas aos 24 meses de idade no caso das fêmeas. Os tratamentos estudados foram: Ganho de peso (GA): vacas gestantes que ganharam de 0,0 a 15,0% do peso corporal durante a gestação; Perda moderada de peso (PM): vacas gestantes que perderam de 0,1 a 15,0% do peso corporal durante a gestação; Perda severa de peso (PS): vacas gestantes que perderam de 15,1 a 30,0% do peso corporal durante a gestação. Os maiores pesos de abate foram obtidos nos tratamentos GA e PM, 428 e 424 kg, respectivamente. O menor peso foi registrado no tratamento PS, 406 kg. A perda de peso moderada e severa durante a gestação aumenta o peso relativo de baço da prole masculina, sendo obtidos pesos relativos de 0,36 e 0,34 kg/100 kg de PCVZ para PM e PS, nessa ordem e 0,29 kg/100 kg de PCVZ para o GA. A participação de rins e intestino no peso de corpo vazio é maior na prole masculina de vacas gestantes que perderam peso de forma severa. O peso relativo de rins foi maior no PS (0,23 kg/100 kg do PCVZ) do que no GA (0,20 kg/100 kg PCVZ) e PM (0,21 kg/100 kg de PCVZ). A variação de peso da vaca durante a gestação não influencia a participação de gordura interna na prole masculina. Aos 210 e aos 365 dias de idade os animais do tratamento GA (135,26 e 211,67 kg) e PM (128,89 e 210,98 kg) apresentaram maior peso do que os animais do PS (119,25 e 197,27 kg). Os pesos de abate e de carcaça quente foram maiores nos animais GA (434 e 240 kg) e PM (433 e 238 kg) do que em relação aos animais do PS (407 e 223 kg). O GA e PM apresentaram carcaças com maior compacidade (1,90 kg cm-1) que o tratamento PS (1,80 kg cm-1). O ganho de peso da vaca durante a gestação aumenta o grau de marmoreio na carne e a área de Longissimus dorsi da prole masculina. A prole feminina de vacas que ganham peso durante a gestação, apresenta maior peso e porcentagem do peso adulto aos 7 e 18 meses de idade. Na primeira estação reprodutiva, o PS apresentou tendência de maior taxa de prenhez (69,8%). Já o GA e PM apresentaram tendência de menor taxa de prenhez (50,0 e 59,9 %). Na segunda estação reprodutiva, a prole de vacas que perderam peso de forma mais acentuada apresenta maior peso ao nascer dos bezerros. Na terceira estação reprodutiva, o GA apresentou tendência de maior taxa de prenhez (64,3%), menor eficiência produtiva (13,5 kg de bezerros/ kg de vaca) e maior índice de produção de bezerros (57,7 kg de bezerro/vaca).Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências RuraisPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaUFSMBrasilZootecniaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarcaçaCarneNutrição fetalÓrgão vitaisReproduçãoCarcassMeatFetal nutritionReproductionVital organsCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIAProgramação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênieFetal programming: impacts of cow weight variation on your progenyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisAlves Filho, Dari Celestinohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2140386505744337Silveira, Magali Floriano dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7618829620378519Donicht, Patrícia Alessandra Meneguzzi Metzhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3921011577858890Pascoal, Leonir Luízhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6500944541004301Pizzuti, Luiz Angelo Damianhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9463866484065885http://lattes.cnpq.br/4019812794231388Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva500400000002600e80896c6-107c-4173-83b3-2f62810c5f9cad7d8195-e481-4066-a09c-686b43c32d8ff7653d0c-db08-44ae-a8de-3ed78cd23d6bf68fc3ed-2a5b-4b68-80f4-29ad8d379b71ae5dd3b2-0a6d-4a65-b6df-285294de95b6e051d5c8-fb70-4ecc-936b-dc6fe252daf8reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdfTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdfTese de Doutoradoapplication/pdf1282600http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/1/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdfd2e6708a84a3a3dc2b862f4b621aaaffMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.txtTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain217425http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/4/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.txt66057b1b1ea0946029d37175d8572c89MD54THUMBNAILTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.jpgTES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4453http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/5/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.jpge209664b22fe9a85e3be54aa99f19517MD551/191312019-12-10 03:02:57.885oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2019-12-10T06:02:57Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Fetal programming: impacts of cow weight variation on your progeny
title Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie
spellingShingle Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie
Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva
Carcaça
Carne
Nutrição fetal
Órgão vitais
Reprodução
Carcass
Meat
Fetal nutrition
Reproduction
Vital organs
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
title_short Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie
title_full Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie
title_fullStr Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie
title_full_unstemmed Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie
title_sort Programação fetal: impactos da variação de peso da vaca gestante sobre sua progênie
author Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva
author_facet Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Alves Filho, Dari Celestino
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2140386505744337
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Silveira, Magali Floriano da
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7618829620378519
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Donicht, Patrícia Alessandra Meneguzzi Metz
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3921011577858890
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv Pascoal, Leonir Luíz
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/6500944541004301
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv Pizzuti, Luiz Angelo Damian
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9463866484065885
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4019812794231388
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Leonel da Silva
contributor_str_mv Alves Filho, Dari Celestino
Silveira, Magali Floriano da
Donicht, Patrícia Alessandra Meneguzzi Metz
Pascoal, Leonir Luíz
Pizzuti, Luiz Angelo Damian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carcaça
Carne
Nutrição fetal
Órgão vitais
Reprodução
topic Carcaça
Carne
Nutrição fetal
Órgão vitais
Reprodução
Carcass
Meat
Fetal nutrition
Reproduction
Vital organs
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Carcass
Meat
Fetal nutrition
Reproduction
Vital organs
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
description The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cow weight changes during development gestation, carcass and meat characteristics, empty body components and progeny reproductive performance. Data collected from beef cows and their offspring, born between 2002 and 2013, were used for confinement at 24 months of age in males and mated at 24 months of age in females. The treatments studied were: Weight gain (GA): pregnant cows that gained from 0.0 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Moderate weight loss (PM): pregnant cows that lost 0.1 to 15.0% of body weight during pregnancy; Severe weight loss (PS): pregnant cows that lost 15.1 to 30.0% of body weight during pregnancy. The highest slaughter weights were obtained in treatments GA and PM, 428 and 424 kg, respectively. The lowest weight was registered in the PS treatment, 406 kg. Moderate and severe weight loss during pregnancy increases the relative spleen weight of male offspring, with relative weights of 0.36 and 0.34 kg/100 kg of PCVZ for PM and PS, in that order and 0.29 kg/ 100 kg PCVZ for the GA. Kidney and intestine participation in empty body weight is higher in male offspring of pregnant cows who have severely lost weight. The relative weight of kidneys was higher in PS (0.23 kg/100 kg PCVZ) than in GA (0.20 kg/100 kg PCVZ) and PM (0.21 kg/100 kg PCVZ). Cow weight variation during pregnancy does not influence the internal fat participation in male offspring. At 210 and 365 days of age, the animals from treatment GA (135.26 and 211.67 kg) and PM (128.89 and 210.98 kg) presented higher weight than animals from PS (119.25 and 197.27 kg). Slaughter and hot carcass weights were higher in GA (434 and 240 kg) and PM (433 and 238 kg) animals than in PS (407 and 223 kg) animals. The GA and PM presented carcasses with higher compactness (1.90 kg cm-1) than the PS treatment (1.80 kg cm-1). Cow weight gain during pregnancy increases the degree of marbling in the meat and the area of Longissimus dorsi of male offspring. The female offspring of cows that gain weight during pregnancy have higher weight and percentage of adult weight at 7 and 18 months of age. In the first reproductive season, PS showed a tendency of higher pregnancy rate (69.8%). GA and PM showed a lower pregnancy rate (50.0 and 59.9%). In the second reproductive season, the offspring of cows that lost more weight show higher birth weight of calves. In the third breeding season, GA showed a higher pregnancy rate (64.3%), lower productive efficiency (13.5 kg calves/kg cow) and higher calf production index (57.7 kg calf/cow).
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-12-09T21:33:13Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-12-09T21:33:13Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-08-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19131
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/19131
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 500400000002
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv e80896c6-107c-4173-83b3-2f62810c5f9c
ad7d8195-e481-4066-a09c-686b43c32d8f
f7653d0c-db08-44ae-a8de-3ed78cd23d6b
f68fc3ed-2a5b-4b68-80f4-29ad8d379b71
ae5dd3b2-0a6d-4a65-b6df-285294de95b6
e051d5c8-fb70-4ecc-936b-dc6fe252daf8
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSM
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/1/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/2/license_rdf
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/3/license.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/4/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.txt
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/19131/5/TES_PPGZOOTECNIA_2019_RODRIGUES_LEONEL.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d2e6708a84a3a3dc2b862f4b621aaaff
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df
66057b1b1ea0946029d37175d8572c89
e209664b22fe9a85e3be54aa99f19517
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1793240145374216192