Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2011
Autor(a) principal: Araldi, Pietro Furian
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000n9vc
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR
Engenharia Agrícola
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7544
Resumo: The objective of this thesis was evaluate the efficiencies of the harvesting operation in rice fields, located in the region of Depressão Central do Rio Grande do Sul. As specific objectives, this study sought to determine and evaluate the following efficiencies: field, time, field pattern and cutter bar; to verify if there is difference between the areas with land level and without it; compare the field efficiency found on this study with the efficiency established by ASAE D497 4 (2009b); To evaluate the influence of the geometry of land leveling fields on field efficiency; listing the variables that have more correlation with the reduction of the efficiencies and indicate actions that may will optimize the efficiencies evaluated. In the summer of 2008/2009, 19 operations were evaluated, shared in six farms, A, B, C, D, E and F, being fifteen fields of them with land level and four without land level. The operation data were collected manually, through the use of stopwatch, a clip board to record observations and with a signal receiver of GPS (Global Positioning System), Garmin® brand, model GPSMAP® 60CSX. For helping to analyze and calculate the efficiencies, the following variables were determined: area and ratio length/width of the fields, average harvest speed, ratio distance/turning and time spent in the operation. The field efficiency was calculated through the methodology used by Grisso et. al. (2002), and have been found the average of 65,2%, that being within the variation proposed by ASABE D497.4 (2009b), the time efficiency was determinate based on the concept of Hunt (2001), have been determined a average of 75,7%, to field pattern efficiency, had been used the methodology of Perin (2008) and was observed a average of 72,0% and for calculate the cutter bar efficiency was used the equation proposed by Taylor et. al. (2001), and have been found the average of 86,5%. There was no significant difference, at 5% probability of error, between the two methods studied in this thesis (with land level or without it). The time spent in maneuvers and unloading were the most important factors that influenced the field and time efficiencies. The efficiencies of field pattern and the cutter bar had a high correlation between themselves and the variables ratio of length/width of the field and distance/turning. Making unloading with the combine in operation and if possible avoid turning in the corners of the fields, even if this make to loose in efficiency in the cutting bar, can increase the field efficiency.
id UFSM_c44a1efcc15ae067520d6df339ed3237
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/7544
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigadoEvaluation of operating efficiencies in harvesting rice fieldsArroz irrigadoColheita mecanizadaEficiênciaRice fieldEfficiencyHarvestingCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLAThe objective of this thesis was evaluate the efficiencies of the harvesting operation in rice fields, located in the region of Depressão Central do Rio Grande do Sul. As specific objectives, this study sought to determine and evaluate the following efficiencies: field, time, field pattern and cutter bar; to verify if there is difference between the areas with land level and without it; compare the field efficiency found on this study with the efficiency established by ASAE D497 4 (2009b); To evaluate the influence of the geometry of land leveling fields on field efficiency; listing the variables that have more correlation with the reduction of the efficiencies and indicate actions that may will optimize the efficiencies evaluated. In the summer of 2008/2009, 19 operations were evaluated, shared in six farms, A, B, C, D, E and F, being fifteen fields of them with land level and four without land level. The operation data were collected manually, through the use of stopwatch, a clip board to record observations and with a signal receiver of GPS (Global Positioning System), Garmin® brand, model GPSMAP® 60CSX. For helping to analyze and calculate the efficiencies, the following variables were determined: area and ratio length/width of the fields, average harvest speed, ratio distance/turning and time spent in the operation. The field efficiency was calculated through the methodology used by Grisso et. al. (2002), and have been found the average of 65,2%, that being within the variation proposed by ASABE D497.4 (2009b), the time efficiency was determinate based on the concept of Hunt (2001), have been determined a average of 75,7%, to field pattern efficiency, had been used the methodology of Perin (2008) and was observed a average of 72,0% and for calculate the cutter bar efficiency was used the equation proposed by Taylor et. al. (2001), and have been found the average of 86,5%. There was no significant difference, at 5% probability of error, between the two methods studied in this thesis (with land level or without it). The time spent in maneuvers and unloading were the most important factors that influenced the field and time efficiencies. The efficiencies of field pattern and the cutter bar had a high correlation between themselves and the variables ratio of length/width of the field and distance/turning. Making unloading with the combine in operation and if possible avoid turning in the corners of the fields, even if this make to loose in efficiency in the cutting bar, can increase the field efficiency.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a eficiência da operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado, localizadas na região da Depressão Central do Rio Grande do Sul. Como objetivos específicos, o trabalho buscou determinar e avaliar as eficiências de campo, de tempo, de trajeto e da barra de corte; verificar se existe diferença entre as duas modalidades de sistematização para as variáveis estudadas; comparar a eficiência de campo encontrada com a estabelecida pela ASAE D497.4 (2009b); Avaliar influência da geometria das lavouras sistematizadas com nivelamento da superfície do solo em nível sobre a eficiência de campo;elencar as variáveis que possuem maior correlação com a redução e o aumento das eficiências e indicar medidas que possam otimizar as eficiências avaliadas. Na safra 2008/2009, forram avaliadas 19 operações, divididas em 6 propriedades, A, B, C, D, E, e F sendo que 15 lavouras eram sistematizadas com nivelamento da superfície do solo em nível e 4 sistematizadas com nivelamento da superfície do solo em desnível. Os dados das operações foram coletados de forma manual, através do uso de caderneta de campo e cronômetro, e com um receptor de sinal de GPS (Global Positioning System), marca Garmin®, modelo GPSMAP® 60CSX. Para auxiliar na análise e calcular as eficiências, foram determinadas as seguintes variáveis: área e relação comprimento/largura (F/W) das lavouras, deslocamento médio, distância percorrida/manora (DP/M) e tempos envolvidos na operação. A eficiência de campo foi calculada através da metodologia utilizada por Grisso et al. (2002), e encontrouse um valor médio de 65,2%, localizado dentro da variação proposta pela ASABE D497.4 (2009b), a eficiência de tempo foi determinada com base no conceito de Hunt (2001), determinou-se um valor médio de 75,7%, para a eficiência de trajeto, seguiu-se a metodologia de Perin (2008) e observou-se um valor médio de 72,0% e para o cálculo da eficiência da barra, realizado pela equação proposta por Taylor et al. (2001), encontrou-se valor médio de 86,5%. Não houve diferença significativa, em nível de 5% de probabilidade de erro, entre as duas modalidades de sistematização. Os tempos gastos em manobras e descargas foram os fatores que mais influenciaram na eficiência de campo e de tempo. As eficiências de trajeto e da barra de corte tiveram alta correlação entre elas e com as variáveis relação comprimento/largura da lavoura e relação distância percorrida/manobra. Realizar as descargas com a colhedora em operação e evitar efetuar manobras nos vértices das lavouras, mesmo que se perca em eficiência da barra de corte, podem otimizar a eficiência de campo.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBREngenharia AgrícolaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia AgrícolaSchlosser, José Fernandohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0575023987760421Trein, Carlos Ricardohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6396133025404655Dallmeyer, Arno Udohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6410822186320216Araldi, Pietro Furian2012-08-272012-08-272011-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfARALDI, Pietro Furian. EVALUATION OF OPERATING EFFICIENCIES IN HARVESTING RICE FIELDS. 2011. 93 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2011.http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7544ark:/26339/001300000n9vcporinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2022-06-01T12:11:40Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/7544Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.bropendoar:2022-06-01T12:11:40Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado
Evaluation of operating efficiencies in harvesting rice fields
title Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado
spellingShingle Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado
Araldi, Pietro Furian
Arroz irrigado
Colheita mecanizada
Eficiência
Rice field
Efficiency
Harvesting
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
title_short Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado
title_full Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado
title_fullStr Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado
title_sort Avaliação da eficiência operacional na operação de colheita mecanizada em lavouras de arroz irrigado
author Araldi, Pietro Furian
author_facet Araldi, Pietro Furian
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Schlosser, José Fernando
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0575023987760421
Trein, Carlos Ricardo
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6396133025404655
Dallmeyer, Arno Udo
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6410822186320216
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Araldi, Pietro Furian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arroz irrigado
Colheita mecanizada
Eficiência
Rice field
Efficiency
Harvesting
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
topic Arroz irrigado
Colheita mecanizada
Eficiência
Rice field
Efficiency
Harvesting
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
description The objective of this thesis was evaluate the efficiencies of the harvesting operation in rice fields, located in the region of Depressão Central do Rio Grande do Sul. As specific objectives, this study sought to determine and evaluate the following efficiencies: field, time, field pattern and cutter bar; to verify if there is difference between the areas with land level and without it; compare the field efficiency found on this study with the efficiency established by ASAE D497 4 (2009b); To evaluate the influence of the geometry of land leveling fields on field efficiency; listing the variables that have more correlation with the reduction of the efficiencies and indicate actions that may will optimize the efficiencies evaluated. In the summer of 2008/2009, 19 operations were evaluated, shared in six farms, A, B, C, D, E and F, being fifteen fields of them with land level and four without land level. The operation data were collected manually, through the use of stopwatch, a clip board to record observations and with a signal receiver of GPS (Global Positioning System), Garmin® brand, model GPSMAP® 60CSX. For helping to analyze and calculate the efficiencies, the following variables were determined: area and ratio length/width of the fields, average harvest speed, ratio distance/turning and time spent in the operation. The field efficiency was calculated through the methodology used by Grisso et. al. (2002), and have been found the average of 65,2%, that being within the variation proposed by ASABE D497.4 (2009b), the time efficiency was determinate based on the concept of Hunt (2001), have been determined a average of 75,7%, to field pattern efficiency, had been used the methodology of Perin (2008) and was observed a average of 72,0% and for calculate the cutter bar efficiency was used the equation proposed by Taylor et. al. (2001), and have been found the average of 86,5%. There was no significant difference, at 5% probability of error, between the two methods studied in this thesis (with land level or without it). The time spent in maneuvers and unloading were the most important factors that influenced the field and time efficiencies. The efficiencies of field pattern and the cutter bar had a high correlation between themselves and the variables ratio of length/width of the field and distance/turning. Making unloading with the combine in operation and if possible avoid turning in the corners of the fields, even if this make to loose in efficiency in the cutting bar, can increase the field efficiency.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-03-31
2012-08-27
2012-08-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv ARALDI, Pietro Furian. EVALUATION OF OPERATING EFFICIENCIES IN HARVESTING RICE FIELDS. 2011. 93 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2011.
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7544
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000n9vc
identifier_str_mv ARALDI, Pietro Furian. EVALUATION OF OPERATING EFFICIENCIES IN HARVESTING RICE FIELDS. 2011. 93 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2011.
ark:/26339/001300000n9vc
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/7544
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR
Engenharia Agrícola
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
BR
Engenharia Agrícola
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.br
_version_ 1847153423263203328