As aproximações do audismo com o colonialismo na educação de surdos

• Ano de defesa: 2024
• Autor(a) principal: Natividade, Hélio de Deus da
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300001c8dt
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; Brasil; Educação; UFSM; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação; Centro de Educação
• Palavras-chave em Português: Audismo; Colonialismo; Normalização; Educação de surdos; Resistência; Audism; Colonialism; Normalization; Deaf education; Resistance; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/33443

This thesis was carried out in the Postgraduate Program in Education at the Federal University of Santa Maria, in the Special Education, Inclusion and Difference research line, and was concerned with a bibliographical study with the aim of identifying some possible approximations between the colonial discourse and the audist discourse. The aim was to problematize the discourse of colonialism and identify its approximations in the field of deaf education, based on the notions of audism and hearing culture. The analysis focuses on how the discourse of audism could have been nourished by the terrifying mechanisms of a colonial past, materializing in contemporary times through practices that operate with great normalizing force. This production was organized based on a theoreticalmethodological design aligned with post-structuralist perspectives, with an emphasis on the fields of Cultural Studies, Deaf Studies, Decolonial Studies and some conceptual operators from the studies developed by Michel Foucault. As this is a bibliographical study, the empirical corpus of the work is made up of scientific productions by deaf and hearing authors published in scientific materials such as books, magazines, articles, thesis and dissertations. Based on the analyses carried out, it was possible to identify some clues as to how the discourses established by hearing practices are articulated to set in motion mechanisms of normalization and, at the same time, resistance by deaf communities to these practices. The central categories that emerged from this discursive purification are two analytical movements: the first is called the ‘field of gagging and hand tying’, made up of a set of elements that reverberate from a discursive field marked by violence, oppression and domination imposed by normalizing and exclusionary logic. The second, entitled ‘field of resistance and insurgency’, deals with how deaf communities confront the oppressive practices of audism. To this end, it centers on issues of resistance, empowerment, identities, cultures and deaf protagonism.