Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigada

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Basso, Laudenir Juciê
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000x8bw
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Engenharia Agrícola
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola
Centro de Ciências Rurais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/17917
Resumo: Water is one of the most important inputs in agricultural production and a determinant of crop productivity. Adequate irrigation management aims the efficiency in water use, providing an increase in the productivity of the water, at the same time that it propitiates economic return to the irrigated areas. Thus, the present study aimed to (a) simulate the soil water balance for different irrigation management strategies by determining the basal crop coefficient (Kcb) and soil evaporation coefficient (Ke), (b) to evaluate the combined effect on soil evaporation (Es) and crop transpiration (Tc) and, (c) to predict grain yield (Y), water productivity (WP), irrigated water productivity (WPI) and economic return (RE) of soybean crop yields for different levels of soil water deficit and product price quotations. The experiment was conducted in an experimental area of the Irriga® System (DER/CCR), at the Federal University of Santa Maria, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The study was carried out inside a rainout shelter, whose objective was to control the water deficit applied to the different treatments. The experimental design was fully randomized, with four irrigation management levels, named T80, T70, T60 and T50 (80, 70, 60 and 50% of the total soil available water - TAW, respectively), with three replications. The soil water content was daily measured with a set of FDR (Reflectometry in Frequency Domain) sensors. Morphological characteristics were evaluated during the crop cycle and, at harvest, the yield components were determined. The SIMDualKc model was used to simulate the soil water balance, to calibrate and validate Kcb and Ke coefficients. Statistical results show that the SIMDualKc model was effective in simulating the water balance with values of b0, ranging from 0.96 and 0.99, with a mean square error (RMSE) < 8.30 mm, and PBIAS ranging from 0.90 to 3.65%, which slightly underestimate the ASW values. The initial, mid-season and end-season Kcb were calibrated and validated at 0.15, 1.00 and 0.10, respectively. The Es represented approximately 30% of ETc, due to the absence of surface residues and frequent soil wetting. The results also have shown that the grain yield can be simulated from the Tc, since that the water-yield factor (Ky) is properly calibrated. WPI was higher in T50 treatment, while WP was higher in T80 treatment. The best economic return was found for the T80 and with a sale price of R$ 70.00 per bag of 60 kg, resulting in an ER of R$ 3151.80 per hectare. The T50, on the other hand, when considering a sale price of R$ 50.00 per bag of 60 kg, resulted in a negative economic return of R$ 27.10 per hectare.
id UFSM_de5bab4b48c22ccc25aae36b984f14d9
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/17917
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigadaEstimation of yield and economic viability of irrigated soybeansGlycine maxBalanço hídrico do soloSIMDualKcRetorno econômicoSoil water balanceEconomic returnCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLAWater is one of the most important inputs in agricultural production and a determinant of crop productivity. Adequate irrigation management aims the efficiency in water use, providing an increase in the productivity of the water, at the same time that it propitiates economic return to the irrigated areas. Thus, the present study aimed to (a) simulate the soil water balance for different irrigation management strategies by determining the basal crop coefficient (Kcb) and soil evaporation coefficient (Ke), (b) to evaluate the combined effect on soil evaporation (Es) and crop transpiration (Tc) and, (c) to predict grain yield (Y), water productivity (WP), irrigated water productivity (WPI) and economic return (RE) of soybean crop yields for different levels of soil water deficit and product price quotations. The experiment was conducted in an experimental area of the Irriga® System (DER/CCR), at the Federal University of Santa Maria, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The study was carried out inside a rainout shelter, whose objective was to control the water deficit applied to the different treatments. The experimental design was fully randomized, with four irrigation management levels, named T80, T70, T60 and T50 (80, 70, 60 and 50% of the total soil available water - TAW, respectively), with three replications. The soil water content was daily measured with a set of FDR (Reflectometry in Frequency Domain) sensors. Morphological characteristics were evaluated during the crop cycle and, at harvest, the yield components were determined. The SIMDualKc model was used to simulate the soil water balance, to calibrate and validate Kcb and Ke coefficients. Statistical results show that the SIMDualKc model was effective in simulating the water balance with values of b0, ranging from 0.96 and 0.99, with a mean square error (RMSE) < 8.30 mm, and PBIAS ranging from 0.90 to 3.65%, which slightly underestimate the ASW values. The initial, mid-season and end-season Kcb were calibrated and validated at 0.15, 1.00 and 0.10, respectively. The Es represented approximately 30% of ETc, due to the absence of surface residues and frequent soil wetting. The results also have shown that the grain yield can be simulated from the Tc, since that the water-yield factor (Ky) is properly calibrated. WPI was higher in T50 treatment, while WP was higher in T80 treatment. The best economic return was found for the T80 and with a sale price of R$ 70.00 per bag of 60 kg, resulting in an ER of R$ 3151.80 per hectare. The T50, on the other hand, when considering a sale price of R$ 50.00 per bag of 60 kg, resulted in a negative economic return of R$ 27.10 per hectare.A água é um dos insumos mais importantes na produção agrícola e determinante na produtividade da cultura. Um adequado gerenciamento da irrigação visa a eficiência no uso da água, proporcionando o aumento na produtividade da água, ao mesmo tempo em que propicia retorno econômico ao irrigante. Assim, o presente estudo teve como objetivos (a) simular o balanço hídrico do solo em diferentes estratégias de manejo de irrigação determinando os coeficientes de cultura basal (Kcb) e de evaporação (Ke), (b) avaliar o efeito combinado na evaporação da água do solo (Es) e transpiração da cultura (Tc) e, (c) predizer o rendimento de grãos, produtividade da água (WP), produtividade da água irrigada (WPI) e retorno econômico (RE) da cultura da soja para diferentes níveis de déficit hídrico e cotações de preço. O experimento foi conduzido em área experimental do Sistema Irriga® (DER/CCR), na Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. O estudo foi desenvolvido no interior de uma cobertura móvel, tipo rainout shelter, cujo objetivo era o de controlar o déficit hídrico aplicado aos experimentos. O delineamento experimental utilizado foi o inteiramente casualisado, com quatro níveis de manejo da irrigação, denominados T80, T70, T60 e T50 (80, 70, 60 e 50% do total de água disponível no solo – TAW, respectivamente), com três repetições. O conteúdo de água no solo foi medido diariamente, com sensores FDR (Reflectometria no Domínio da Frequência). Características morfológicas foram avaliadas durante o ciclo da cultura e, na colheita, determinou-se os componentes de rendimento. O modelo SIMDualKc foi utilizado para simular o balanço hídrico do solo, calibrar e validar o Kcb e o Ke. Resultados estatísticos demonstram que o modelo SIMDualKc foi eficaz na simulação do balanço hídrico com valores de b0, entre 0,96 e 0,99, RMSE entre 5,30 e 8,30, e PBIAS entre 0,90 e 3,65, com leve subestimação dos valores de ASW. Os Kcb inicial, médio e final foram calibrados e validados em 0,15, 1,00 e 0,10 respectivamente. A Es do solo representou aproximadamente 30% da ETc, devido à ausência de resíduos na superfície e umedecimento frequente do solo. Os resultados demonstram ainda que o rendimento de grãos pode ser simulado a partir da Tc, desde que o fator água-rendimento (Ky) seja devidamente calibrado. A WPI foi maior no tratamento T50, enquanto a WP foi maior no tratamento T80. O melhor retorno econômico encontrado foi no T80 e com preço de venda de R$ 70,00, resultando em R$ 3151,80 por hectare. O T50, em contrapartida, quando se considerou preço de venda de R$ 50,00, resultou em retorno econômico negativo de R$ 27,10 por hectare.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilEngenharia AgrícolaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia AgrícolaCentro de Ciências RuraisPetry, Mirta Teresinhahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0358609083747198Zwirtes, Anderson Luizhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7105268741658406Carlesso, Reimarhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4740272927848914Basso, Laudenir Juciê2019-08-14T15:03:46Z2019-08-14T15:03:46Z2019-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/17917ark:/26339/001300000x8bwporAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2019-08-15T06:01:04Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/17917Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.bropendoar:2019-08-15T06:01:04Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigada
Estimation of yield and economic viability of irrigated soybeans
title Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigada
spellingShingle Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigada
Basso, Laudenir Juciê
Glycine max
Balanço hídrico do solo
SIMDualKc
Retorno econômico
Soil water balance
Economic return
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
title_short Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigada
title_full Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigada
title_fullStr Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigada
title_full_unstemmed Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigada
title_sort Estimativa de rendimento e viabilidade econômica da soja irrigada
author Basso, Laudenir Juciê
author_facet Basso, Laudenir Juciê
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Petry, Mirta Teresinha
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0358609083747198
Zwirtes, Anderson Luiz
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7105268741658406
Carlesso, Reimar
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4740272927848914
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Basso, Laudenir Juciê
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glycine max
Balanço hídrico do solo
SIMDualKc
Retorno econômico
Soil water balance
Economic return
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
topic Glycine max
Balanço hídrico do solo
SIMDualKc
Retorno econômico
Soil water balance
Economic return
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA
description Water is one of the most important inputs in agricultural production and a determinant of crop productivity. Adequate irrigation management aims the efficiency in water use, providing an increase in the productivity of the water, at the same time that it propitiates economic return to the irrigated areas. Thus, the present study aimed to (a) simulate the soil water balance for different irrigation management strategies by determining the basal crop coefficient (Kcb) and soil evaporation coefficient (Ke), (b) to evaluate the combined effect on soil evaporation (Es) and crop transpiration (Tc) and, (c) to predict grain yield (Y), water productivity (WP), irrigated water productivity (WPI) and economic return (RE) of soybean crop yields for different levels of soil water deficit and product price quotations. The experiment was conducted in an experimental area of the Irriga® System (DER/CCR), at the Federal University of Santa Maria, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The study was carried out inside a rainout shelter, whose objective was to control the water deficit applied to the different treatments. The experimental design was fully randomized, with four irrigation management levels, named T80, T70, T60 and T50 (80, 70, 60 and 50% of the total soil available water - TAW, respectively), with three replications. The soil water content was daily measured with a set of FDR (Reflectometry in Frequency Domain) sensors. Morphological characteristics were evaluated during the crop cycle and, at harvest, the yield components were determined. The SIMDualKc model was used to simulate the soil water balance, to calibrate and validate Kcb and Ke coefficients. Statistical results show that the SIMDualKc model was effective in simulating the water balance with values of b0, ranging from 0.96 and 0.99, with a mean square error (RMSE) < 8.30 mm, and PBIAS ranging from 0.90 to 3.65%, which slightly underestimate the ASW values. The initial, mid-season and end-season Kcb were calibrated and validated at 0.15, 1.00 and 0.10, respectively. The Es represented approximately 30% of ETc, due to the absence of surface residues and frequent soil wetting. The results also have shown that the grain yield can be simulated from the Tc, since that the water-yield factor (Ky) is properly calibrated. WPI was higher in T50 treatment, while WP was higher in T80 treatment. The best economic return was found for the T80 and with a sale price of R$ 70.00 per bag of 60 kg, resulting in an ER of R$ 3151.80 per hectare. The T50, on the other hand, when considering a sale price of R$ 50.00 per bag of 60 kg, resulted in a negative economic return of R$ 27.10 per hectare.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-14T15:03:46Z
2019-08-14T15:03:46Z
2019-03-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/17917
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000x8bw
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/17917
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000x8bw
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Engenharia Agrícola
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola
Centro de Ciências Rurais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Engenharia Agrícola
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.br
_version_ 1847153460887158784