Comparação de três tipos de treinamento físico sobre o controle do perfil antropométrico, metabólico e inflamatório de adolescentes obesos submetidos à terapia interdisciplinar de longo prazo

• Ano de defesa: 2010
• Autor(a) principal: Inoue, Daniela Sayuri [UNIFESP]
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• dARK ID: ark:/48912/001300002d2sj
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Treinamento físico; Adiponectina; Resistência à insulina; Terapia interdisciplinar; Obesidade; Adiponectin; Insulin resistance; Interdisciplinary therapy; Physical training; Obesity
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/9213

The physical training associated with interdisciplinary therapy is an important tool to obesity control. However, it‟s not clear if the type of exercise and its periodization can influence this pathology control. Therefore, the present study compared the effectiveness of three types of exercise training on obesity control related with anthropometric, metabolic and inflammatory profile in adolescents submitted to a long-term interdisciplinary therapy. Forty-five post-puberty obese adolescents (16.28 ± 1.34y) were randomized in three groups according to exercise training: predominantly aerobic training group (AT n=20), aerobic plus resistance training with linear periodization (LP n=13) and aerobic plus resistance training with daily undulating periodization (DUP n=12). The body composition was evaluated by air-displacement plethysmography and the serum analysis was collected after an overnight fast. Results: The most important finding of this study was that both LP and DUP groups improved total cholesterol (LP=164.4±8.5 to 149.8±8.9; DUP= 167.8±5.9 to 149.7± 5.3), LDL-c (LP=105.1±7.3 to 91.7±6.8; DUP 108.5±6 to 90.3±5.6), HOMA-IR (LP=3.5±0.4 to 1.8±0.2; DUP=4.2±2.1 to 2.1±0.4), insulin (LP=15.7±1.6 to 8.5±1.1; DUP=19.5±2.1 to 10.5±1.7) and adiponectin concentration (LP=10±1.7 to 12.5±1; DUP=8.6±2.7 to12.4±1). The linear regression showed a negative association (β=-0.45) between delta (%) adiponectin and delta (%) insulin (p<0.05). All exercise groups presented a significant reduction in body mass (AT= 99.7±3.8 to 90.6±3; LP=99.4±3.8 to 88.5±3.2; DUP=107.9±3.3 to 91.5±3.3), BMI (AT=35.1±0.9 to 31.8±1.1; LP=36.4±1.6 to 32.2±1.3; DUP= 38.2±1.3 to 32.1±1.5) fat mass (Kg) (AT=40±1.7 to 32.5±2.1; LP=45.7±3.3 to 33.3±2.8; DUP=50.3±3.1 to 32.4±4.3) after short and long-term intervention. There was a negative correlation between percentage of protein oxidation and RMR (r=-0.75) in all groups. Conclusion: The interdisciplinary therapy models that include aerobic plus resistance training was more effective than aerobic training to improve lipid profile and insulin sensitivity, as well as inflammatory state by increasing adiponectin. In all groups it was observed an improvement on anthropometric profile.