Influência do uso de meia-calça compressiva sobre estresse fisiológico e recuperação do teste de aptidão aeróbica específico para ballet em bailarinas clássicas

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: ROCHA, Mirelly Rangel
• Orientador(a): MOTA, Gustavo Ribeiro da
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física
• Departamento: Instituto de Ciências da Saúde - ICS::Curso de Graduação em Educação Física
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Dança.; Desempenho atlético.; Fadiga.
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Dance.; Athletic performance.; Fatigue.
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: Educação Física
• Link de acesso: http://bdtd.uftm.edu.br/handle/tede/607

The purpose of the present study was to verify the influence of the use of compressive pantyhose on the Ballet-specific Aerobic Fitness Test’s (BAFT) physiological stress and recovery. Eleven amateur classical dancers (21.45 ± 4.66 years old) underwent a randomized and balanced crossover design with two experimental trials separated for seven days: a placebo condition using uncompressed ballet pantyhose (PLA) and experimental condition with the use of compression pantyhose (CP). Participants were falsely led to believe in the effect of PLA. The effort intensity was evaluated in the integral execution of the BAFT and each of its five phases. During, heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and internal training load were monitored. After 5 and 30 minutes of its end it was taken recovery FC and general RPE, successively. The recovery indicators were assessed before and after the BAFT by blind evaluator. Triceps sural fatigability (by performance on the heel rise test) was seen 30 minutes and 24 hours after BAFT’s end and the perceived recovery and lower limb muscle pain only 24 hours after. Before each session the sleep, recovery status, pain, rest HR and menstrual status were recorded for control as well as belief in the effectiveness and comfort and pressure feeling of the socks. To compare conditions, the paired t-test and the Wilcoxon test were used, to compare moments and conditions the test the two-way ANOVA for repeated measures with Sidak. There was no difference (p>0.05) between treatments for any marker of physiological stress and recovery. Most participants believed in the effect of both socks. The CP’s pressure was significantly perceived and its comfort significantly lower (p<0.05). We concluded that the CP did not influence markers of BAFT physiological stress and recovery.