Recursos Compensatórios Hidrelétricos: Avaliação do impacto sobre o desenvolvimento socioeconômico de municípios de Minas Gerais

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Marinalva de Jesus
• Orientador(a): Silveira, Suely de Fátima Ramos
• Banca de defesa: Fernandes, Elaine Aparecida , Delgado, Victor Maia Senna , Cunha, Nina Rosa da Silveira
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Administração
• Departamento: Administração Pública
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Hidrelétricas - Aspectos socioeconômicos; Recursos compensatórios hidrelétricos; Políticas públicas
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Hydroelectric - Socioeconomic aspects; Compensatory hydroelectric resources; Public policy
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO::ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA
• Link de acesso: http://locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/1996

The hydroelectric compensatory resources, which involves The Financial Compensation received by the Usage of Water Resources (CFURH) and the royalties from Itaipu, consists in an economic instrument of Environmental Policy whose main goal is to compensate municipalities for the externalities caused by implantation of a hydropower plant. Due to such fact, this study seeks to evaluate the overall impact of hydroelectric compensatory resources over socio-economic indicators in the municipalities of Minas Gerais between the years 2000 to 2010. As a bibliographical resource we used the principles related to public policy evaluation impact, the socio-economic development, the water resource policy in Brazil, the environmental externalities and economic instruments for environmental policy. Concerning methodological procedures, we adopted the methodology of impact assessment through the combination of non- experimental methods Propensity Score Matching and the Difference in Differences, which, allowed to determine the liquid effect, i.e. the impact of the receipt of compensatory hydroelectric resources. These obtained results indicate a positive impact of hydropower resources in variable compensation related to Individual Expenses, IMRS Health, IDHM Income and Absolute Poverty, and negatively to stress investment in both estimated models (Model 1 and Model 2), except IDHM income and Absolute Poverty pointed out that impact only in Model 2. However, the other indicators and variables analyzed considered important to the socioeconomic development such as education, health, sanitation, employment and income, per capita spending on priority areas and public investments were not significant, indicating statistical equality among the municipalities of the treatment groups and control. Thus, it appears that the fact of the municipalities in the treatment group receiving larger amounts of compensatory hydroelectric resources, when compared to the control group, did not reflect in impacts to most socioeconomic indicators in the analyzed period. What is suggested is that such resources are not being used in areas considered priority for development but, as seen in the results, in current expenditures.