Avaliação da eficiência da superovulação em bovinos da raça GIR baseada na mobilização da população folicular

• Ano de defesa: 2013
• Autor(a) principal: Minaré, Télcio Parreira
• Orientador(a): Viana, João Henrique Moreira
• Banca de defesa: Arashiro, Eduardo Kenji Nunes , Gonçalves, Fernanda da Silva
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Jose do Rosario Vellano
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Mestrado em Medicina Veterinária
• Departamento: Reprodução Animal
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: crescimento folicular; FSH; embriões; zebu
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: follicle growth; FSH; embryos; zebu cattle
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
• Link de acesso: http://tede2.unifenas.br:8080/jspui/handle/jspui/143

Most of the previous studies aiming to improve superovulation evaluated only differences in the number of corpora lutea (CL) observed and of embryos recovered. Therefore, differences in total follicular population before hormonal stimulation and in response parameters associated to follicle growth were frequently neglected, causing bias in the conclusion. The aim of the present study was to characterize individual variation in both relative and absolute efficiency of superovulation, based on ovarian follicular population. Non-lactating Gir breed cows (n=2) and heifers (n=15), kept under the same management, were used. Four days before the start of superovulatory treatment, follicular growth was synchronized by the insertion of an intravaginal device of progesterone and estradiol benzoate application. Superovulations started on D1 with the injection of 200 UI FSHp, following a conventional protocol. The number and diameter of the follicles present before (D0) and during superovulation (D5 to D8), as well as the number of CL at flushing (D12), were evaluated by ultrasonography. Follicular population was ranked according to size (&#8804;4 mm, 5-7 mm, &#8805;8 mm), and changes in the percentage of follicles in each size class were used to calculate relative efficiency. The absolute efficiency was determined by the ratio number of embryos recovered : number of follicles &#8804;4 mm on D5. Results are shown as mean±SEM. As expected, there was a great individual variation in the superovulation outcomes, both considering the number of CL (0 to 28, mean 12.6±2.1; CV=68.2%) and embryos collected (0 to 15, mean 5.1±1.1; CV=92.4%). There was no increase (P>0.05) in total follicular population during treatment, and the correlation between the number of follicles during superovulation and the further number of CL or embryos remained relatively constant between D5 and D8 (r=0.56 to 0.65 and r=0.70 to 0.79, respectively; P<0.01). FSH treatment induced a progressive (P<0.05) but partial mobilization of small follicles to larger size classes. The relative efficiency of the follicle growth stimulation was 41.9±5.5% (0 to 75.6%), and this was the endpoint with the largest correlation (R=0.80; P<0.0001) with the absolute efficiency of the process (12.2±2.1%, ranging from 0.0 to 25.0%). Retrospective analysis demonstrated that donors with relative efficiency >50% had a number of follicles &#8804;4 mm on D1 similar to those with efficiency <50% (41.6±6.8 vs 42.1±3.1; P<0.001), but produced more CL and embryos (17.8±2.5 and 7.6±1.7 vs 6.9±2.1 and 2.4±0.9, respectively; P<0.001). In conclusion, individual differences in follicular population and in the follicle response to FSH are important sources of variation in superovulation results, and shall be taken into account for experimental design. Acknowledgement: FAPEMIG, CAPES, Biotran LTDA.