Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753)
| Ano de defesa: | 2014 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | , |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Alfenas
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Engenharia Ambiental
|
| Departamento: |
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/handle/123456789/624 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to evaluate the single and joint ecotoxicological effects of the drugs propranolol hydrochloride and losartan potassium, using the Lemna minor growth inhibition test and to compare the observed effects with those predicted by the models of concentration addition and independent action. In addition, water quality criteria were derivated for the protection of aquatic life against the possible adverse effects caused by these antihypertensive drugs. The sensitivity tests were carried out employing sodium chloride as a reference substance. Ecotoxicological tests were carried out according to OECD protocol, with the modification of using photoperiod instead of continuous lighting, in order to provide conditions closer to the environmental ones. The Ecotox Database and the database of the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science were consulted for derivation of the water quality criteria and for the data predicted by quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), respectively. With regard to the sensitivity tests, all results were within the range of acceptability at a 95% confidence level, with a mean value of median effective concentration (EC50) of 4042.6 mg.L-1. The tests with propranolol hydrochloride for the parameters frond number, total frond area and fresh weight resulted in mean EC50 values of 101.4 mg.L-1; 76.2 mg.L-1 and 84.0 mg.L-1, respectively, whereas in the tests with losartan potassium, those EC50 values were 63.9 mg.L-1, 61.3 mg.L-1 and 76.9 mg.L-1, respectively. The NOEC and LOEC values obtained in the tests with propranolol hydrochloride were 1.56 mg.L-1 and 3.1 mg.L-1, respectively, whereas in the tests with losartan potassium, these values were 0.78 mg.L-1 and 1.56 mg.L-1, respectively. Both the reference predictive models overestimated the mixture toxicity of the pharmaceuticals at all the effect concentration levels evaluated in the L. minor test. Therefore, the mixture of propranolol hydrochloride and losartan potassium showed an antagonistic interaction in the L. minor test in comparison to the predicted effects. Regarding to the water quality criteria, the values of 0.9 and 0.18 µg.L-1 of propranolol hydrochloride were calculated for the protection of pelagic organisms living in freshwater and marine ecosystems, respectively, whereas for losartan potassium, the calculated preliminary criteria for protection of pelagic organisms living in freshwater and saltwater ecosystems were 0.055 and 0.0055 µg.L-1, respectively. The results showed that losartan potassium proved to be more toxic to L. minor than propranolol hydrochloride. Furthermore, this macrophyte seemed to be more sensitive to losartan toxicity than other organisms reported in the literature. The mixture test showed that the capability of the two reference models in accurately predicting the mixture toxicity is limited. The concentrations reported of propranolol hydrochloride in aquatic environment are not usually higher than the water quality criteria values. More data on chronic test to losartan are necessary in order to derive definitive criteria. |
| id |
UNIFAL_a7b66d982ae4fd36c3d6c22f40046646 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br:123456789/624 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNIFAL |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Alfenas - RiUnifal |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Godoy, Aline Andradehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7293362176615851Kummrow, FábioMendes, Patrícia NevesRocha, OdetePamplin, Paulo Augusto Zaitunehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/67637391356224602015-07-31T18:34:14Z2014-07-25GODOY, Aline Andrade. Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753). 2014. 213 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência e Engenharia Ambiental) - Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Poços de Caldas, MG, 2014.https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/handle/123456789/624This study aimed to evaluate the single and joint ecotoxicological effects of the drugs propranolol hydrochloride and losartan potassium, using the Lemna minor growth inhibition test and to compare the observed effects with those predicted by the models of concentration addition and independent action. In addition, water quality criteria were derivated for the protection of aquatic life against the possible adverse effects caused by these antihypertensive drugs. The sensitivity tests were carried out employing sodium chloride as a reference substance. Ecotoxicological tests were carried out according to OECD protocol, with the modification of using photoperiod instead of continuous lighting, in order to provide conditions closer to the environmental ones. The Ecotox Database and the database of the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science were consulted for derivation of the water quality criteria and for the data predicted by quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), respectively. With regard to the sensitivity tests, all results were within the range of acceptability at a 95% confidence level, with a mean value of median effective concentration (EC50) of 4042.6 mg.L-1. The tests with propranolol hydrochloride for the parameters frond number, total frond area and fresh weight resulted in mean EC50 values of 101.4 mg.L-1; 76.2 mg.L-1 and 84.0 mg.L-1, respectively, whereas in the tests with losartan potassium, those EC50 values were 63.9 mg.L-1, 61.3 mg.L-1 and 76.9 mg.L-1, respectively. The NOEC and LOEC values obtained in the tests with propranolol hydrochloride were 1.56 mg.L-1 and 3.1 mg.L-1, respectively, whereas in the tests with losartan potassium, these values were 0.78 mg.L-1 and 1.56 mg.L-1, respectively. Both the reference predictive models overestimated the mixture toxicity of the pharmaceuticals at all the effect concentration levels evaluated in the L. minor test. Therefore, the mixture of propranolol hydrochloride and losartan potassium showed an antagonistic interaction in the L. minor test in comparison to the predicted effects. Regarding to the water quality criteria, the values of 0.9 and 0.18 µg.L-1 of propranolol hydrochloride were calculated for the protection of pelagic organisms living in freshwater and marine ecosystems, respectively, whereas for losartan potassium, the calculated preliminary criteria for protection of pelagic organisms living in freshwater and saltwater ecosystems were 0.055 and 0.0055 µg.L-1, respectively. The results showed that losartan potassium proved to be more toxic to L. minor than propranolol hydrochloride. Furthermore, this macrophyte seemed to be more sensitive to losartan toxicity than other organisms reported in the literature. The mixture test showed that the capability of the two reference models in accurately predicting the mixture toxicity is limited. The concentrations reported of propranolol hydrochloride in aquatic environment are not usually higher than the water quality criteria values. More data on chronic test to losartan are necessary in order to derive definitive criteria.O presente estudo teve como objetivos avaliar os efeitos ecotoxicológicos das ações individual e combinada dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, por meio do ensaio de inibição do crescimento da macrófita aquática Lemna minor e comparar esses efeitos com os preditos por meio dos modelos de adição de concentração e ação independente. Buscou-se também calcular critérios de qualidade da água para a proteção da vida aquática para esses dois fármacos. Os testes de sensibilidade foram realizados empregando-se o cloreto de sódio como substância de referência. Os testes ecotoxicológicos foram conduzidos de acordo com Protocolo da OECD, com a modificação do uso de fotoperíodo ao invés de luz contínua para simular condições ambientais mais realísticas. As bases de dados Ecotox Database e da National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science foram consultadas, respectivamente, para a obtenção de dados ecotoxicológicos para a derivação dos critérios de qualidade da água e para a obtenção de dados previstos por meio de relações quantitativas estrutura-atividade (RQEA). Com relação aos testes de sensibilidade, todos os resultados estiveram dentro da faixa de aceitabilidade ao nível de confiança de 95%, com um valor médio de concentração efetiva mediana (CE50) de 4042,6 mg.L-1. Os testes com o fármaco cloridrato de propranolol para os parâmetros número de frondes, área foliar total e peso fresco resultaram nos valores médios de CE50 respectivos de 101,4 mg.L-1; 76,2 mg.L-1 e 84,0 mg.L-1, enquanto que nos testes com a losartana potássica esses valores foram, respectivamente, de 63,9 mg.L-1; 61,3 mg.L-1 e de 76,9 mg.L-1. Os valores de CENO e de CEO obtidos nos testes com o cloridrato de propranolol foram de 1,56 mg.L-1 e 3,1 mg.L-1, respectivamente, enquanto que nos testes com a losartana potássica, esses valores foram de 0,78 mg.L-1 e de 1,56 mg.L-1. O teste de ação combinada com os fármacos mostrou que ambos os modelos preditivos superestimaram, em todos os níveis de concentração testados, os efeitos de toxicidade da mistura nos testes com a L. minor. Portanto, observaram-se interações antagonísticas na ação combinada desses dois fármacos em relação aos efeitos preditos pelos modelos de referência. Com relação aos critérios de qualidade da água, calcularam-se os valores de 0,9 e 0,18 µg.L-1 de cloridrato de propranolol para a proteção das espécies pelágicas de água doce e salina, respectivamente, enquanto que para a losartana potássica, os valores preliminares calculados para a proteção das espécies de água doce e marinhas foram, respectivamente, de 0,055 e de 0,0055 µg.L-1. Os resultados obtidos permitiram observar que a losartana potássica mostrou-se mais tóxica para L. minor do que o cloridrato de propranolol. Além disso, a macrófita mostrou-se mais sensível aos efeitos de toxicidade da losartana potássica do que outras espécies relatadas na literatura. O teste de mistura mostrou que a capacidade dos dois modelos avaliados em predizer a toxicidade de misturas é limitada. As concentrações do cloridrato de propranolol em ambientes aquáticos não ultrapassam os critérios de qualidade da água. Testes crônicos adicionais com a losartana são necessários para a derivação de critérios definitivos.application/pdfporUniversidade Federal de AlfenasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Engenharia AmbientalUNIFAL-MGBrasilInstituto de Ciência e Tecnologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Lemna minor.Fármacos anti-hipertensivosFitotoxicidade de fármacosToxicidade de misturaCritérios de qualidade da águaSANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL::ECOLOGIA APLICADA A ENGENHARIA SANITARIAAvaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753)info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-4297417259498638931600600-1660098726228552190reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Alfenas - RiUnifalinstname:Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL)instacron:UNIFALGodoy, Aline AndradeLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81987https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/433baf21-d9ef-497a-a34b-deca73ffd08a/download31555718c4fc75849dd08f27935d4f6bMD51CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-843https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/2f4afa2a-8794-4a83-abf4-e8eb05105923/download321f3992dd3875151d8801b773ab32edMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-821080https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/5f21b08e-511e-4d05-b88f-92742604e7dd/download61bae8834f24e8106e87f884f26f63a9MD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-819874https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/8c7437b5-5d7f-4cdf-a65f-61a25601df00/download38cb62ef53e6f513db2fb7e337df6485MD54ORIGINALDISSERTAÇÃO Aline Andrade Godoy 2014.pdfDISSERTAÇÃO Aline Andrade Godoy 2014.pdfAvaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753)application/pdf2544280https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/36226ed3-cfe8-4f0d-a228-19bfd6407c33/downloadab2a0a146182397b06cb69c38f00c593MD55TEXTDISSERTAÇÃO Aline Andrade Godoy 2014.pdf.txtDISSERTAÇÃO Aline Andrade Godoy 2014.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain102361https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/657925b7-12b0-4400-9782-9f6dbf8f1198/download865264046b91b59dd1b58fb81b402a20MD510THUMBNAILDISSERTAÇÃO Aline Andrade Godoy 2014.pdf.jpgDISSERTAÇÃO Aline Andrade Godoy 2014.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg3062https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/30ecc7a0-83fe-4d7d-bc80-cd7a10c5a645/download977e643eefc2077ef00a8121f1eed1c2MD59123456789/6242026-01-07 14:25:20.708http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/open.accessoai:repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br:123456789/624https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://bdtd.unifal-mg.edu.br:8443/oai/requestrepositorio@unifal-mg.edu.bropendoar:2026-01-07T17:25:20Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Alfenas - RiUnifal - Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL)falseTElDRU7Dh0EgREUgRElTVFJJQlVJw4fDg08gTsODTy1FWENMVVNJVkEKCkNvbSBhIGFwcmVzZW50YcOnw6NvIGRlc3RhIGxpY2Vuw6dhLCBvIGF1dG9yIG91IG8gdGl0dWxhciBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgZGUgYXV0b3IgY29uY2VkZSDDoCBVbml2ZXJzaWRhZGUgCkZlZGVyYWwgZGUgQWxmZW5hcyAgKFVOSUZBTC1NRykgbyBkaXJlaXRvIG7Do28tZXhjbHVzaXZvIGRlIHJlcHJvZHV6aXIsICB0cmFkdXppciAoY29uZm9ybWUgZGVmaW5pZG8gYWJhaXhvKSwgZS9vdSAKZGlzdHJpYnVpciBhIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28gKGluY2x1aW5kbyBvIHJlc3VtbykgcG9yIHRvZG8gbyBtdW5kbyBubyBmb3JtYXRvIGltcHJlc3NvIGUgZWxldHLDtG5pY28gZSAKZW0gcXVhbHF1ZXIgbWVpbywgaW5jbHVpbmRvIG9zIGZvcm1hdG9zIMOhdWRpbyBvdSB2w61kZW8uCgpWb2PDqiBjb25jb3JkYSBxdWUgYSBVTklGQUwtTUcgcG9kZSwgc2VtIGFsdGVyYXIgbyBjb250ZcO6ZG8sIHRyYW5zcG9yIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyAKcGFyYSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvIG91IGZvcm1hdG8gcGFyYSBmaW5zIGRlIHByZXNlcnZhw6fDo28uCgpWb2PDqiB0YW1iw6ltIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBhICBVTklGQUwtTUcgcG9kZSBtYW50ZXIgbWFpcyBkZSB1bWEgY8OzcGlhIGRlIHN1YSB0ZXNlIG91IApkaXNzZXJ0YcOnw6NvIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFuw6dhLCBiYWNrLXVwIGUgcHJlc2VydmHDp8Ojby4KClZvY8OqIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyDDqSBvcmlnaW5hbCBlIHF1ZSB2b2PDqiB0ZW0gbyBwb2RlciBkZSBjb25jZWRlciBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBjb250aWRvcyAKbmVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuIFZvY8OqIHRhbWLDqW0gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgbyBkZXDDs3NpdG8gZGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBuw6NvLCBxdWUgc2VqYSBkZSBzZXUgCmNvbmhlY2ltZW50bywgaW5mcmluZ2UgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgZGUgbmluZ3XDqW0uCgpDYXNvIGEgc3VhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBjb250ZW5oYSBtYXRlcmlhbCBxdWUgdm9jw6ogbsOjbyBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2PDqiAKZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc8OjbyBpcnJlc3RyaXRhIGRvIGRldGVudG9yIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBwYXJhIGNvbmNlZGVyIMOgICBVTklGQUwtTUcgCm9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGFwcmVzZW50YWRvcyBuZXN0YSBsaWNlbsOnYSwgZSBxdWUgZXNzZSBtYXRlcmlhbCBkZSBwcm9wcmllZGFkZSBkZSB0ZXJjZWlyb3MgZXN0w6EgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSAKaWRlbnRpZmljYWRvIGUgcmVjb25oZWNpZG8gbm8gdGV4dG8gb3Ugbm8gY29udGXDumRvIGRhIHRlc2Ugb3UgZGlzc2VydGHDp8OjbyBvcmEgZGVwb3NpdGFkYS4KCkNBU08gQSBURVNFIE9VIERJU1NFUlRBw4fDg08gT1JBIERFUE9TSVRBREEgVEVOSEEgU0lETyBSRVNVTFRBRE8gREUgVU0gUEFUUk9Dw41OSU8gT1UgCkFQT0lPIERFIFVNQSBBR8OKTkNJQSBERSBGT01FTlRPIE9VIE9VVFJPIE9SR0FOSVNNTyBRVUUgTsODTyBTRUpBIEEgIFVOSUZBTC1NRywgClZPQ8OKIERFQ0xBUkEgUVVFIFJFU1BFSVRPVSBUT0RPUyBFIFFVQUlTUVVFUiBESVJFSVRPUyBERSBSRVZJU8ODTyBDT01PIApUQU1Cw4lNIEFTIERFTUFJUyBPQlJJR0HDh8OVRVMgRVhJR0lEQVMgUE9SIENPTlRSQVRPIE9VIEFDT1JETy4KCkEgVU5JRkFMLU1HIHNlIGNvbXByb21ldGUgYSBpZGVudGlmaWNhciBjbGFyYW1lbnRlIG8gc2V1IG5vbWUgKHMpIG91IG8ocykgbm9tZShzKSBkbyhzKSAKZGV0ZW50b3IoZXMpIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBkYSB0ZXNlIG91IGRpc3NlcnRhw6fDo28sIGUgbsOjbyBmYXLDoSBxdWFscXVlciBhbHRlcmHDp8OjbywgYWzDqW0gZGFxdWVsYXMgCmNvbmNlZGlkYXMgcG9yIGVzdGEgbGljZW7Dp2EuCg== |
| dc.title.pt-BR.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753) |
| title |
Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753) |
| spellingShingle |
Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753) Godoy, Aline Andrade Lemna minor. Fármacos anti-hipertensivos Fitotoxicidade de fármacos Toxicidade de mistura Critérios de qualidade da água SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL::ECOLOGIA APLICADA A ENGENHARIA SANITARIA |
| title_short |
Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753) |
| title_full |
Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753) |
| title_fullStr |
Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753) |
| title_sort |
Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753) |
| author |
Godoy, Aline Andrade |
| author_facet |
Godoy, Aline Andrade |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Godoy, Aline Andrade |
| dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7293362176615851 |
| dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
Kummrow, Fábio |
| dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Mendes, Patrícia Neves |
| dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, Odete |
| dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Pamplin, Paulo Augusto Zaitune |
| dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6763739135622460 |
| contributor_str_mv |
Kummrow, Fábio Mendes, Patrícia Neves Rocha, Odete Pamplin, Paulo Augusto Zaitune |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lemna minor. Fármacos anti-hipertensivos Fitotoxicidade de fármacos Toxicidade de mistura Critérios de qualidade da água |
| topic |
Lemna minor. Fármacos anti-hipertensivos Fitotoxicidade de fármacos Toxicidade de mistura Critérios de qualidade da água SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL::ECOLOGIA APLICADA A ENGENHARIA SANITARIA |
| dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
SANEAMENTO AMBIENTAL::ECOLOGIA APLICADA A ENGENHARIA SANITARIA |
| description |
This study aimed to evaluate the single and joint ecotoxicological effects of the drugs propranolol hydrochloride and losartan potassium, using the Lemna minor growth inhibition test and to compare the observed effects with those predicted by the models of concentration addition and independent action. In addition, water quality criteria were derivated for the protection of aquatic life against the possible adverse effects caused by these antihypertensive drugs. The sensitivity tests were carried out employing sodium chloride as a reference substance. Ecotoxicological tests were carried out according to OECD protocol, with the modification of using photoperiod instead of continuous lighting, in order to provide conditions closer to the environmental ones. The Ecotox Database and the database of the National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science were consulted for derivation of the water quality criteria and for the data predicted by quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs), respectively. With regard to the sensitivity tests, all results were within the range of acceptability at a 95% confidence level, with a mean value of median effective concentration (EC50) of 4042.6 mg.L-1. The tests with propranolol hydrochloride for the parameters frond number, total frond area and fresh weight resulted in mean EC50 values of 101.4 mg.L-1; 76.2 mg.L-1 and 84.0 mg.L-1, respectively, whereas in the tests with losartan potassium, those EC50 values were 63.9 mg.L-1, 61.3 mg.L-1 and 76.9 mg.L-1, respectively. The NOEC and LOEC values obtained in the tests with propranolol hydrochloride were 1.56 mg.L-1 and 3.1 mg.L-1, respectively, whereas in the tests with losartan potassium, these values were 0.78 mg.L-1 and 1.56 mg.L-1, respectively. Both the reference predictive models overestimated the mixture toxicity of the pharmaceuticals at all the effect concentration levels evaluated in the L. minor test. Therefore, the mixture of propranolol hydrochloride and losartan potassium showed an antagonistic interaction in the L. minor test in comparison to the predicted effects. Regarding to the water quality criteria, the values of 0.9 and 0.18 µg.L-1 of propranolol hydrochloride were calculated for the protection of pelagic organisms living in freshwater and marine ecosystems, respectively, whereas for losartan potassium, the calculated preliminary criteria for protection of pelagic organisms living in freshwater and saltwater ecosystems were 0.055 and 0.0055 µg.L-1, respectively. The results showed that losartan potassium proved to be more toxic to L. minor than propranolol hydrochloride. Furthermore, this macrophyte seemed to be more sensitive to losartan toxicity than other organisms reported in the literature. The mixture test showed that the capability of the two reference models in accurately predicting the mixture toxicity is limited. The concentrations reported of propranolol hydrochloride in aquatic environment are not usually higher than the water quality criteria values. More data on chronic test to losartan are necessary in order to derive definitive criteria. |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014-07-25 |
| dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-31T18:34:14Z |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
GODOY, Aline Andrade. Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753). 2014. 213 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência e Engenharia Ambiental) - Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Poços de Caldas, MG, 2014. |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/handle/123456789/624 |
| identifier_str_mv |
GODOY, Aline Andrade. Avaliação ecotoxicológica dos fármacos cloridrato de propranolol e losartana potássica, em ação individual e combinada, na macrófita lemna minor L. (1753). 2014. 213 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência e Engenharia Ambiental) - Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Poços de Caldas, MG, 2014. |
| url |
https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/handle/123456789/624 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-4297417259498638931 |
| dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 |
| dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-1660098726228552190 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Alfenas |
| dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Engenharia Ambiental |
| dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UNIFAL-MG |
| dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
| dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Alfenas |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Alfenas - RiUnifal instname:Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL) instacron:UNIFAL |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL) |
| instacron_str |
UNIFAL |
| institution |
UNIFAL |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Alfenas - RiUnifal |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Alfenas - RiUnifal |
| bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/433baf21-d9ef-497a-a34b-deca73ffd08a/download https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/2f4afa2a-8794-4a83-abf4-e8eb05105923/download https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/5f21b08e-511e-4d05-b88f-92742604e7dd/download https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/8c7437b5-5d7f-4cdf-a65f-61a25601df00/download https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/36226ed3-cfe8-4f0d-a228-19bfd6407c33/download https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/657925b7-12b0-4400-9782-9f6dbf8f1198/download https://repositorio.unifal-mg.edu.br/bitstreams/30ecc7a0-83fe-4d7d-bc80-cd7a10c5a645/download |
| bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
31555718c4fc75849dd08f27935d4f6b 321f3992dd3875151d8801b773ab32ed 61bae8834f24e8106e87f884f26f63a9 38cb62ef53e6f513db2fb7e337df6485 ab2a0a146182397b06cb69c38f00c593 865264046b91b59dd1b58fb81b402a20 977e643eefc2077ef00a8121f1eed1c2 |
| bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Alfenas - RiUnifal - Universidade Federal de Alfenas (UNIFAL) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@unifal-mg.edu.br |
| _version_ |
1859830869855830016 |