Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Alessandra Vallim [UNESP]
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: eng
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/150823
Resumo: Recently, ecological niche modelling has been receiving more attention in several areas in biology, due to the evolution of personal computers, and the increasing availability of data used in modelling. The results obtained can be used in preventive actions such as species management and invasive species distribution. Since its increasing popularity, several algorithms are available and undergoing tests regarding their performance towards different phylum. Marine invertebrates, more specifically cnidarians, present few studies on this field, and should receive closer attention in the next years due to worldwide increases in jellyfish population (blooms), and bleaching in almost every known shallow water coral reef. Because of this gap of information, we chose this still poor studied group to compare three algorithms. We used MAXENT, GARP and AquaMaps in its desktop form and selected them based on other studies comparing algorithms. Our aim was to, based on different organisms of the phylum Cnidaria, Lychnorhiza lucerna, Chrysaora lactea, Phyllorhiza punctata, Tamoya haplonema, Ceriantheomorphe brasiliensis and Mussismilia hispida, compare those algorithms and examine which one performed the best. Our results shown that MAXENT outperformed the other algorithms both regarding de Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) and the map distribution. GARP show varying results with generalized maps and AquaMaps was the least accurate of them. Our results are similar to those found in other papers, thus meaning that MAXENT is the most reliable software when it comes to modelling these animals.
id UNSP_5c2e17e599729f65183f147fdf7e7785
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/150823
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str
spelling Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studiesModelagem de Nicho: uma comparação entre métodos de modelagem que melhor se aplicam para estudo de distribuição de nicho de cnidáriosNiche ModellingCnidariaComparison of algorithmsComparação de algoritmosModelagem de NichoRecently, ecological niche modelling has been receiving more attention in several areas in biology, due to the evolution of personal computers, and the increasing availability of data used in modelling. The results obtained can be used in preventive actions such as species management and invasive species distribution. Since its increasing popularity, several algorithms are available and undergoing tests regarding their performance towards different phylum. Marine invertebrates, more specifically cnidarians, present few studies on this field, and should receive closer attention in the next years due to worldwide increases in jellyfish population (blooms), and bleaching in almost every known shallow water coral reef. Because of this gap of information, we chose this still poor studied group to compare three algorithms. We used MAXENT, GARP and AquaMaps in its desktop form and selected them based on other studies comparing algorithms. Our aim was to, based on different organisms of the phylum Cnidaria, Lychnorhiza lucerna, Chrysaora lactea, Phyllorhiza punctata, Tamoya haplonema, Ceriantheomorphe brasiliensis and Mussismilia hispida, compare those algorithms and examine which one performed the best. Our results shown that MAXENT outperformed the other algorithms both regarding de Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) and the map distribution. GARP show varying results with generalized maps and AquaMaps was the least accurate of them. Our results are similar to those found in other papers, thus meaning that MAXENT is the most reliable software when it comes to modelling these animals.Nas ultimas décadas, modelagem de nicho ecológico vem recebendo maior atenção em diversas áreas da biologia devido a evolução dos computadores pessoais e aumento dos dados disponíveis utilizados para a modelagem. Os resultados obtidos podem ser utilizados em ações preventivas, tais quais manejo de espécie e acompanhamento da distribuição de espécies invasoras. Desde o aumento dessa popularidade, diversos algoritmos estão disponíveis e testes estão em andamento para averiguar suas performances em relação a diferentes filos. Invertebrados marinhos, mais especificamente cnidários, apresentam poucos estudos nesse ramo, devendo receber mais atenção nos próximos anos devido ao aumento global das populações de aguas vivas (blooms), e branqueamento em quase todos os recifes de corais. Devido a essa lacuna em informação, este grupo foi escolhido para comparar três algoritmos. Utilizamos o MAXENT, GARP e AquaMaps em suas formas de desktop e os selecionamos baseado em outros estudos comparando algoritmos. Utilizamos diferentes organismos do filo cnidária, Lychnorhiza lucerna, Chrysaora lactea, Phyllorhiza punctata, Tamoya haplonema, Ceriantheomorphe brasiliensis e Mussismilia hispida, para comparar os algoritmos e averiguar qual demonstrou melhor performance. Nossos resultados mostram que o MAXENT superou os outros algoritmos tanto com relação a Área Sob a Curva ROC (AUC), quanto com relação aos mapas de distribuição. O GARP apresentou resultados variados com mapas generalizados e AquaMaps foi o menos confiável. Nossos resultados são similares aqueles encontrados em diversas publicações, significando então, que o MAXENT é o algoritmo mais confiável em se tratando da modelagem de nicho desses organismos.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Stampar, Sérgio Nascimento [UNESP]Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Lima, Alessandra Vallim [UNESP]2017-06-06T14:03:06Z2017-06-06T14:03:06Z2017-05-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15082300088710333004161001P7enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP2024-10-24T13:54:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/150823Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-10-24T13:54:35Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studies
Modelagem de Nicho: uma comparação entre métodos de modelagem que melhor se aplicam para estudo de distribuição de nicho de cnidários
title Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studies
spellingShingle Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studies
Lima, Alessandra Vallim [UNESP]
Niche Modelling
Cnidaria
Comparison of algorithms
Comparação de algoritmos
Modelagem de Nicho
title_short Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studies
title_full Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studies
title_fullStr Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studies
title_full_unstemmed Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studies
title_sort Niche Modelling: a comparison between modelling methods best applied for Cnidaria niche dispersion studies
author Lima, Alessandra Vallim [UNESP]
author_facet Lima, Alessandra Vallim [UNESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Stampar, Sérgio Nascimento [UNESP]
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Alessandra Vallim [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Niche Modelling
Cnidaria
Comparison of algorithms
Comparação de algoritmos
Modelagem de Nicho
topic Niche Modelling
Cnidaria
Comparison of algorithms
Comparação de algoritmos
Modelagem de Nicho
description Recently, ecological niche modelling has been receiving more attention in several areas in biology, due to the evolution of personal computers, and the increasing availability of data used in modelling. The results obtained can be used in preventive actions such as species management and invasive species distribution. Since its increasing popularity, several algorithms are available and undergoing tests regarding their performance towards different phylum. Marine invertebrates, more specifically cnidarians, present few studies on this field, and should receive closer attention in the next years due to worldwide increases in jellyfish population (blooms), and bleaching in almost every known shallow water coral reef. Because of this gap of information, we chose this still poor studied group to compare three algorithms. We used MAXENT, GARP and AquaMaps in its desktop form and selected them based on other studies comparing algorithms. Our aim was to, based on different organisms of the phylum Cnidaria, Lychnorhiza lucerna, Chrysaora lactea, Phyllorhiza punctata, Tamoya haplonema, Ceriantheomorphe brasiliensis and Mussismilia hispida, compare those algorithms and examine which one performed the best. Our results shown that MAXENT outperformed the other algorithms both regarding de Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) and the map distribution. GARP show varying results with generalized maps and AquaMaps was the least accurate of them. Our results are similar to those found in other papers, thus meaning that MAXENT is the most reliable software when it comes to modelling these animals.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-06T14:03:06Z
2017-06-06T14:03:06Z
2017-05-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11449/150823
000887103
33004161001P7
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/150823
identifier_str_mv 000887103
33004161001P7
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1854954544104996864