Proposta curricular do Estado de São Paulo: a relação entre as crenças e a prática de dois professores de inglês

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Santos, Andressa Cristiane dos [UNESP]
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Linguistica aplicada; Língua inglesa; Pratica de ensino; Linguagem e cultura; Professores de ingles; Educação e Estado
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/127944; http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/cathedra/01-09-2015/000844431.pdf

This research aims at investigating how the implementation of Proposta Curricular (Curricular Proposal) of São Paulo state is characterized by the relation between beliefs and actions of two English teachers in public schools. In this research teachers beliefs and the documents that are part of Proposta Curricular (Curricular Proposal) are viewed from a sociocultural perspective and considered potential mediational tools in teaching and learning process. This investigation is characterized as a qualitative research with etnographic traits, constituting a case study. In order to investigate the beliefs of the teachers, data were collected by means of class observation, field notes, audio recordings, questionnaire, autobiography and an interview and then were triangulated. The analysis pointed out that the first teacher (T1) sometimes has her actions mediated by her beliefs, but sometimes her actions point that there is an internalization process of the theoretical assumptions that underpin the Curricular Proposal. Therefore the Caderno do Aluno and Caderno do Professor (Student's and Teacher's Notebook) have been used as tools for the implementation of Curricular Proposal in some situations, however they have been used as artifacts in other situations. The data of the second teacher (T2) indicates that her actions are mediate by her beliefs and that the teacher does not know the theoretical asumptions that underpin the Proposal. Because of this, Student's and Teacher's Notebook have not been used as tools for the implementation of the Proposal, but as artifacts. The results point out that in order to promote a curricular reform, creating documents and prescriptions to implement a top-down reform is not enough. Teachers must have the oportunity to think abour their beliefs, in order to internalize theoretical assumptions that underpin the Curricular Proposal, as well as Student's and Teacher...