Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2024
Autor(a) principal: Beltrami, Marco Aurélio Leão [UNESP]
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/11449/253340
Resumo: Introduction: Aponeurosis dehiscence (AD) is a significant surgical complication that can result in enduring structural damage and death. There are several established scores in the literature that incorporate preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables to classify the risk of aponeurotic dehiscence. Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of aponeurotic dehiscence in pacients undergoing colectomy and to evaluate the proportion of patients who benefit from prophylactic mesh use based on the Vidal score. Method: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study was carried out on patients who underwent colectomy with an infraumbilical midline incision at a hospital of São Paulo state between 1 January 1st 2020 and July 31st 2022. Participants were divided into two groups based on their main outcome, identifying those who developed an incisional hernia and those who did not, and calculating the frequency of these events. All participants in the sample were assessed according to AD risk using the Vidal Score to determine those who necessitated a prophylactic mesh. Outcomes: 152 surgeries were performed during the period, 39 of which were excluded because they did not meet the study inclusion criteria, resulting in a sample of 113 patients.. A total of 152 patients underwent surgery during the study period. The evaluated cohort consisted of 59 female participants, accounting for 52.2% of the sample, with an age range of 19 to 85 years. Among them, the incidence of hernia was observed in 53 cases, representing 46.9% of the sample. 15 OF these cases were detected by physical examination and 37 were diagnosed by imaging techniques. All patients underwent elective surgery, with 94 individuals (83.1%) undergoing surgery for malignant neoplasms. During the assessment of prophylactic mesh usage, 96 (84.95%) patients displayed an indication according to the Vidal score. Among them, 50 (44.2%) were diagnosed with incisional hernia. Intraoperatively, the suture type used for aponeurosis closure was evalueted. Polydioxanone was the most commonly used suture, being preferred in 80 (70.7%) cases, followed by polypropylene, used in only 15 (13.2%) cases. Conclusion: The incidence of aponeurotic dehiscence remains high, especially in high-risk groups such as cancer patients. Therefore, there is a potential benefit with the use of prophylactic mesh in this population.
id UNSP_f5f69dbcc40c5dc264ebacf60a5060ee
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/253340
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de BotucatuAssessment of the incidence of aponeurosis dehiscence in the postoperative period of elective colectomies performed at the Hospital das Clínicas de BotucatuAponeuroseHérnia incisionalColectomiaLaparotomiaAponeurosisIncisional herniaColectomyLaparotomyIntroduction: Aponeurosis dehiscence (AD) is a significant surgical complication that can result in enduring structural damage and death. There are several established scores in the literature that incorporate preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables to classify the risk of aponeurotic dehiscence. Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of aponeurotic dehiscence in pacients undergoing colectomy and to evaluate the proportion of patients who benefit from prophylactic mesh use based on the Vidal score. Method: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study was carried out on patients who underwent colectomy with an infraumbilical midline incision at a hospital of São Paulo state between 1 January 1st 2020 and July 31st 2022. Participants were divided into two groups based on their main outcome, identifying those who developed an incisional hernia and those who did not, and calculating the frequency of these events. All participants in the sample were assessed according to AD risk using the Vidal Score to determine those who necessitated a prophylactic mesh. Outcomes: 152 surgeries were performed during the period, 39 of which were excluded because they did not meet the study inclusion criteria, resulting in a sample of 113 patients.. A total of 152 patients underwent surgery during the study period. The evaluated cohort consisted of 59 female participants, accounting for 52.2% of the sample, with an age range of 19 to 85 years. Among them, the incidence of hernia was observed in 53 cases, representing 46.9% of the sample. 15 OF these cases were detected by physical examination and 37 were diagnosed by imaging techniques. All patients underwent elective surgery, with 94 individuals (83.1%) undergoing surgery for malignant neoplasms. During the assessment of prophylactic mesh usage, 96 (84.95%) patients displayed an indication according to the Vidal score. Among them, 50 (44.2%) were diagnosed with incisional hernia. Intraoperatively, the suture type used for aponeurosis closure was evalueted. Polydioxanone was the most commonly used suture, being preferred in 80 (70.7%) cases, followed by polypropylene, used in only 15 (13.2%) cases. Conclusion: The incidence of aponeurotic dehiscence remains high, especially in high-risk groups such as cancer patients. Therefore, there is a potential benefit with the use of prophylactic mesh in this population.Introduction: Aponeurosis dehiscence (AD) is a significant surgical complication that can result in enduring structural damage and death. There are several established scores in the literature that incorporate preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables to classify the risk of aponeurotic dehiscence. Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of aponeurotic dehiscence in pacients undergoing colectomy and to evaluate the proportion of patients who benefit from prophylactic mesh use based on the Vidal score. Method: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study was carried out on patients who underwent colectomy with an infraumbilical midline incision at a hospital of São Paulo state between 1 January 1st 2020 and July 31st 2022. Participants were divided into two groups based on their main outcome, identifying those who developed an incisional hernia and those who did not, and calculating the frequency of these events. All participants in the sample were assessed according to AD risk using the Vidal Score to determine those who necessitated a prophylactic mesh. Outcomes: 152 surgeries were performed during the period, 39 of which were excluded because they did not meet the study inclusion criteria, resulting in a sample of 113 patients.. A total of 152 patients underwent surgery during the study period. The evaluated cohort consisted of 59 female participants, accounting for 52.2% of the sample, with an age range of 19 to 85 years. Among them, the incidence of hernia was observed in 53 cases, representing 46.9% of the sample. 15 OF these cases were detected by physical examination and 37 were diagnosed by imaging techniques. All patients underwent elective surgery, with 94 individuals (83.1%) undergoing surgery for malignant neoplasms. During the assessment of prophylactic mesh usage, 96 (84.95%) patients displayed an indication according to the Vidal score. Among them, 50 (44.2%) were diagnosed with incisional hernia. Intraoperatively, the suture type used for aponeurosis closure was evalueted. Polydioxanone was the most commonly used suture, being preferred in 80 (70.7%) cases, followed by polypropylene, used in only 15 (13.2%) cases. Conclusion: The incidence of aponeurotic dehiscence remains high, especially in high-risk groups such as cancer patients. Therefore, there is a potential benefit with the use of prophylactic mesh in this population.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Sobreira, Marcone Lima [UNESP]Hasimoto, Claudia Nishida [UNESP]Oliveira, Walmar Kerche de [UNESP]Beltrami, Marco Aurélio Leão [UNESP]2024-02-19T17:14:55Z2024-02-19T17:14:55Z2024-02-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/25334033004064088P4porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP2025-10-16T11:59:45Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/253340Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-10-16T11:59:45Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu
Assessment of the incidence of aponeurosis dehiscence in the postoperative period of elective colectomies performed at the Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu
title Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu
spellingShingle Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu
Beltrami, Marco Aurélio Leão [UNESP]
Aponeurose
Hérnia incisional
Colectomia
Laparotomia
Aponeurosis
Incisional hernia
Colectomy
Laparotomy
title_short Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu
title_full Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu
title_fullStr Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu
title_sort Avaliação da incidência de deiscência profunda da aponeurose no pós-operatório de colectomias eletivas realizadas no Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu
author Beltrami, Marco Aurélio Leão [UNESP]
author_facet Beltrami, Marco Aurélio Leão [UNESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sobreira, Marcone Lima [UNESP]
Hasimoto, Claudia Nishida [UNESP]
Oliveira, Walmar Kerche de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Beltrami, Marco Aurélio Leão [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aponeurose
Hérnia incisional
Colectomia
Laparotomia
Aponeurosis
Incisional hernia
Colectomy
Laparotomy
topic Aponeurose
Hérnia incisional
Colectomia
Laparotomia
Aponeurosis
Incisional hernia
Colectomy
Laparotomy
description Introduction: Aponeurosis dehiscence (AD) is a significant surgical complication that can result in enduring structural damage and death. There are several established scores in the literature that incorporate preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables to classify the risk of aponeurotic dehiscence. Objectives: Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of aponeurotic dehiscence in pacients undergoing colectomy and to evaluate the proportion of patients who benefit from prophylactic mesh use based on the Vidal score. Method: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study was carried out on patients who underwent colectomy with an infraumbilical midline incision at a hospital of São Paulo state between 1 January 1st 2020 and July 31st 2022. Participants were divided into two groups based on their main outcome, identifying those who developed an incisional hernia and those who did not, and calculating the frequency of these events. All participants in the sample were assessed according to AD risk using the Vidal Score to determine those who necessitated a prophylactic mesh. Outcomes: 152 surgeries were performed during the period, 39 of which were excluded because they did not meet the study inclusion criteria, resulting in a sample of 113 patients.. A total of 152 patients underwent surgery during the study period. The evaluated cohort consisted of 59 female participants, accounting for 52.2% of the sample, with an age range of 19 to 85 years. Among them, the incidence of hernia was observed in 53 cases, representing 46.9% of the sample. 15 OF these cases were detected by physical examination and 37 were diagnosed by imaging techniques. All patients underwent elective surgery, with 94 individuals (83.1%) undergoing surgery for malignant neoplasms. During the assessment of prophylactic mesh usage, 96 (84.95%) patients displayed an indication according to the Vidal score. Among them, 50 (44.2%) were diagnosed with incisional hernia. Intraoperatively, the suture type used for aponeurosis closure was evalueted. Polydioxanone was the most commonly used suture, being preferred in 80 (70.7%) cases, followed by polypropylene, used in only 15 (13.2%) cases. Conclusion: The incidence of aponeurotic dehiscence remains high, especially in high-risk groups such as cancer patients. Therefore, there is a potential benefit with the use of prophylactic mesh in this population.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-19T17:14:55Z
2024-02-19T17:14:55Z
2024-02-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11449/253340
33004064088P4
url https://hdl.handle.net/11449/253340
identifier_str_mv 33004064088P4
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1854954424415289344