Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Batista, Aline da Silveira lattes
Orientador(a): Santarém, Vamilton Alvares lattes
Banca de defesa: Giuffrida, Rogerio lattes, Silva, Rodrigo Costa da lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade do Oeste Paulista
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Ciência Animal
Departamento: Mestrado em Ciência Animal
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/jspui/handle/jspui/1115
Resumo: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of different techniques to recover Toxocara spp. eggs from artificially and naturally contaminated soil samples. In the first stage, soil samples (n= 12 samples of 1g) were artificially contaminated with 100 eggs of T. canis. Three techniques were used: 1) centrifugal-sedimentation after soil filtration in a series of four sieves, using distilled water (300, 212, 90, and 63 μm); 2) centrifugal-flotation with zinc sulfate (d= 1.35 g/cm3) after sieving; and, 3) centrifugal-flotation with zinc sulfate without sieving. The recovery of eggs using technique 1 was significantly superior to the other techniques, with 78.25%, 16.33%, and 10.92% positivity, respectively. In the second stage, soil samples from 15 public squares/parks were evaluated over a period of 6 months, comparing the more efficient techniques in stage 1 (techniques 1 and 2). The recovery of eggs by technique 1 was more efficient. In the three out of the 6 months evaluated, there was a significant difference in the mean number of eggs recovered, using the technique of centrifugal-sedimentation with sieving. The technique is low cost, easy to implement, and does not require solutions which present environmental risks for its execution.
id UOES_941a1073ffa05e45039daa3114d02094
oai_identifier_str oai:bdtd.unoeste.br:jspui/1115
network_acronym_str UOES
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNOESTE
repository_id_str
spelling Santarém, Vamilton Alvareshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2204972437815213Giuffrida, Rogeriohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3283677364323759Silva, Rodrigo Costa dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/816653850898146636995506816http://lattes.cnpq.br/8637478124968270Batista, Aline da Silveira2018-11-23T17:01:02Z2018-08-16Batista, Aline da Silveira. Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo. 2018. 29f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Presidente Prudente, 2018.http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/jspui/handle/jspui/1115The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of different techniques to recover Toxocara spp. eggs from artificially and naturally contaminated soil samples. In the first stage, soil samples (n= 12 samples of 1g) were artificially contaminated with 100 eggs of T. canis. Three techniques were used: 1) centrifugal-sedimentation after soil filtration in a series of four sieves, using distilled water (300, 212, 90, and 63 μm); 2) centrifugal-flotation with zinc sulfate (d= 1.35 g/cm3) after sieving; and, 3) centrifugal-flotation with zinc sulfate without sieving. The recovery of eggs using technique 1 was significantly superior to the other techniques, with 78.25%, 16.33%, and 10.92% positivity, respectively. In the second stage, soil samples from 15 public squares/parks were evaluated over a period of 6 months, comparing the more efficient techniques in stage 1 (techniques 1 and 2). The recovery of eggs by technique 1 was more efficient. In the three out of the 6 months evaluated, there was a significant difference in the mean number of eggs recovered, using the technique of centrifugal-sedimentation with sieving. The technique is low cost, easy to implement, and does not require solutions which present environmental risks for its execution.O objetivo do estudo foi comparar a eficiência de três técnicas de recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp., a partir de amostras de solo artificialmente e naturalmente contaminadas. Na primeira etapa, amostras de solo (n= 12 amostras de 1g) foram contaminadas com 100 ovos de T. canis. Foram utilizadas três técnicas: 1) centrifugo-sedimentação após filtragem do solo em série de quatro tamises (300, 212, 90 e 63 μm); 2) centrifugo-flutuação com sulfato de zinco (d = 1.35 g/cm3) após tamisação; e, 3) centrifugo-flutuação com sulfato de zinco sem tamisação. A recuperação de ovos pela técnica 1 foi significativamente superior às demais, com 78,25%; 16,33% e 10,92% de positividade, respectivamente. Em uma segunda etapa, foram avaliadas amostras de solo de 15 praças e parques públicos de Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, durante um período de 6 meses, com comparação das técnicas 1 e 2. A recuperação de ovos pela técnica 1 mostrou ser mais eficiente. Em três meses avaliados, houve diferença significativa na média dos ovos recuperados. A técnica de tamisação centrifugo-sedimentação mostrou maior eficiência na recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em relação as outras técnicas. A técnica é de baixo custo, fácil execução e não requer soluções com riscos ambientais para sua execução.Submitted by Michele Mologni (mologni@unoeste.br) on 2018-11-23T17:01:02Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Aline da Silveira Batista.pdf: 165848 bytes, checksum: c187bcd430f8b370d46748116a9de117 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-11-23T17:01:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Aline da Silveira Batista.pdf: 165848 bytes, checksum: c187bcd430f8b370d46748116a9de117 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-08-16application/pdfhttp://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/jspui/retrieve/2872/Aline%20da%20Silveira%20Batista.pdf.jpgporUniversidade do Oeste PaulistaMestrado em Ciência AnimalUNOESTEBrasilMestrado em Ciência Animalcontaminação ambiental, diagnóstico, larva migrans, toxocaríase, zoonosediagnosis, environmental contamination, larva migrans, toxocariasis, zoonosisCIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIAComparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de soloComparison of different techniques to recover Toxocara spp. Eggs from soil samplesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis18867256397436141355005006001886725639743614135453670264235017319info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNOESTEinstname:Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)instacron:UNOESTETHUMBNAILAline da Silveira Batista.pdf.jpgAline da Silveira Batista.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg2163http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1115/3/Aline+da+Silveira+Batista.pdf.jpga9fa3011115c3dadbde84696a3684b78MD53ORIGINALAline da Silveira Batista.pdfAline da Silveira Batista.pdfapplication/pdf165848http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1115/2/Aline+da+Silveira+Batista.pdfc187bcd430f8b370d46748116a9de117MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82067http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1115/1/license.txt47745281809acb27fb322a97f2d9cb88MD51jspui/11152018-11-24 01:00:15.588oai:bdtd.unoeste.br: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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/jspui/PUBhttp://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@unoeste.bropendoar:2018-11-24T03:00:15Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNOESTE - Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Comparison of different techniques to recover Toxocara spp. Eggs from soil samples
title Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo
spellingShingle Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo
Batista, Aline da Silveira
contaminação ambiental, diagnóstico, larva migrans, toxocaríase, zoonose
diagnosis, environmental contamination, larva migrans, toxocariasis, zoonosis
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
title_short Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo
title_full Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo
title_fullStr Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo
title_full_unstemmed Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo
title_sort Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo
author Batista, Aline da Silveira
author_facet Batista, Aline da Silveira
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Santarém, Vamilton Alvares
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2204972437815213
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv Giuffrida, Rogerio
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3283677364323759
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv Silva, Rodrigo Costa da
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8166538508981466
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 36995506816
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8637478124968270
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Batista, Aline da Silveira
contributor_str_mv Santarém, Vamilton Alvares
Giuffrida, Rogerio
Silva, Rodrigo Costa da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv contaminação ambiental, diagnóstico, larva migrans, toxocaríase, zoonose
topic contaminação ambiental, diagnóstico, larva migrans, toxocaríase, zoonose
diagnosis, environmental contamination, larva migrans, toxocariasis, zoonosis
CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv diagnosis, environmental contamination, larva migrans, toxocariasis, zoonosis
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::MEDICINA VETERINARIA
description The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of different techniques to recover Toxocara spp. eggs from artificially and naturally contaminated soil samples. In the first stage, soil samples (n= 12 samples of 1g) were artificially contaminated with 100 eggs of T. canis. Three techniques were used: 1) centrifugal-sedimentation after soil filtration in a series of four sieves, using distilled water (300, 212, 90, and 63 μm); 2) centrifugal-flotation with zinc sulfate (d= 1.35 g/cm3) after sieving; and, 3) centrifugal-flotation with zinc sulfate without sieving. The recovery of eggs using technique 1 was significantly superior to the other techniques, with 78.25%, 16.33%, and 10.92% positivity, respectively. In the second stage, soil samples from 15 public squares/parks were evaluated over a period of 6 months, comparing the more efficient techniques in stage 1 (techniques 1 and 2). The recovery of eggs by technique 1 was more efficient. In the three out of the 6 months evaluated, there was a significant difference in the mean number of eggs recovered, using the technique of centrifugal-sedimentation with sieving. The technique is low cost, easy to implement, and does not require solutions which present environmental risks for its execution.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-11-23T17:01:02Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-08-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Batista, Aline da Silveira. Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo. 2018. 29f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Presidente Prudente, 2018.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/jspui/handle/jspui/1115
identifier_str_mv Batista, Aline da Silveira. Comparação de métodos para recuperação de ovos de Toxocara spp. em amostras de solo. 2018. 29f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Animal) - Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Presidente Prudente, 2018.
url http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/jspui/handle/jspui/1115
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 1886725639743614135
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 1886725639743614135
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 453670264235017319
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste Paulista
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Mestrado em Ciência Animal
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UNOESTE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Mestrado em Ciência Animal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Oeste Paulista
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNOESTE
instname:Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)
instacron:UNOESTE
instname_str Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)
instacron_str UNOESTE
institution UNOESTE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNOESTE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNOESTE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1115/3/Aline+da+Silveira+Batista.pdf.jpg
http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1115/2/Aline+da+Silveira+Batista.pdf
http://bdtd.unoeste.br:8080/tede/bitstream/jspui/1115/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a9fa3011115c3dadbde84696a3684b78
c187bcd430f8b370d46748116a9de117
47745281809acb27fb322a97f2d9cb88
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UNOESTE - Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdtd@unoeste.br
_version_ 1850079079364034560