Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2021
Autor(a) principal: Braun, Adeli Beatriz
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade de Passo Fundo
Faculdade de Engenharia e Arquitetura – FEAR
Brasil
UPF
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.upf.br/handle/123456789/2691
Resumo: The application of sustainability concepts in remediation processes is a recent but significant evolution in the traditional approach to managing contaminated sites. In recent years, many advances have been made in the field of sustainable remediation, however, there are still great difficulties for its application in practice, largely due to the lack of regulatory mandates, standards and more holistic methodologies that integrate a transparent guidance system to prepare and implement a sustainable remediation process. Thus, the aim was to outline a method to support decision making for the application of sustainable remediation in the management of contaminated sites. To achieve the aim, the scope of the research was divided into three main stages: 1) a list of 63 indicators was developed, divided into environmental (25), social (24) and economic (14), which can be used to qualitatively or quantitatively assess the sustainable performance of remediation techniques. These indicators were validated and weighted by 57 stakeholders from the area and from eleven different countries, confirming the relevance and applicability of the results obtained and allowing to better understand the different perceptions about sustainable remediation; 2) matrices were elaborated and structured for the screening of remediation techniques based on parameters of the contaminated site. The matrices were composed of 14 different contaminated soil remediation techniques, in addition to excavation/disposal, characterizing them in relation to 16 different input variables divided into four large groups: characteristics of soil, contamination, operation and feasibility. As a validation strategy for these matrices, they were applied in two case studies (I - international and II - national), resulting in the extraction of appropriate techniques for application in these sites and subsequent sustainability assessment (case study I - phytoremediation, electrokinetics and excavation/disposition; case study II - nanoremediation and soil washing); 3) finally, the central tool for assessing the sustainability of remediation techniques was created. The tool was designed by adapting traditional impact assessment matrices and a mathematical model for sustainability calculating. In this process, the indicators developed in the first stage were used. Validation occurred through the application of the tool to assess the sustainability of the remediation techniques selected in the previous stage (phytoremediation > electrokinetics > excavation/disposition; nanoremediation > soil flushing). The tool offers comprehensive assessments of the positive and negative impacts on the three pillars of sustainability and a diagnosis of the main impact components that influence the achievement of sustainable results from each remediation technique. In general, it is possible to highlight that the results obtained give consistency to the study and indicate its relevance, in addition to confirming the potential of the method developed to support users in decision making for the sustainable remediation application. It was also concluded that the structuring of the method in a process with sequential and complementary steps and guidelines, without the need to use complex computational tools, provides significant benefits for future users, especially when the focus is on time optimization, thus encouraging the selection and application of remediation techniques based on the principles of sustainability.
id UPF_79d3f65d1c5a756d8e2212374b128f76
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.upf.br:123456789/2691
network_acronym_str UPF
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UPF
repository_id_str
spelling Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadasSolos - ContaminaçãoSustentabilidadeSolos - RemediaçãoImpacto ambiental - AvaliaçãoENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVILThe application of sustainability concepts in remediation processes is a recent but significant evolution in the traditional approach to managing contaminated sites. In recent years, many advances have been made in the field of sustainable remediation, however, there are still great difficulties for its application in practice, largely due to the lack of regulatory mandates, standards and more holistic methodologies that integrate a transparent guidance system to prepare and implement a sustainable remediation process. Thus, the aim was to outline a method to support decision making for the application of sustainable remediation in the management of contaminated sites. To achieve the aim, the scope of the research was divided into three main stages: 1) a list of 63 indicators was developed, divided into environmental (25), social (24) and economic (14), which can be used to qualitatively or quantitatively assess the sustainable performance of remediation techniques. These indicators were validated and weighted by 57 stakeholders from the area and from eleven different countries, confirming the relevance and applicability of the results obtained and allowing to better understand the different perceptions about sustainable remediation; 2) matrices were elaborated and structured for the screening of remediation techniques based on parameters of the contaminated site. The matrices were composed of 14 different contaminated soil remediation techniques, in addition to excavation/disposal, characterizing them in relation to 16 different input variables divided into four large groups: characteristics of soil, contamination, operation and feasibility. As a validation strategy for these matrices, they were applied in two case studies (I - international and II - national), resulting in the extraction of appropriate techniques for application in these sites and subsequent sustainability assessment (case study I - phytoremediation, electrokinetics and excavation/disposition; case study II - nanoremediation and soil washing); 3) finally, the central tool for assessing the sustainability of remediation techniques was created. The tool was designed by adapting traditional impact assessment matrices and a mathematical model for sustainability calculating. In this process, the indicators developed in the first stage were used. Validation occurred through the application of the tool to assess the sustainability of the remediation techniques selected in the previous stage (phytoremediation > electrokinetics > excavation/disposition; nanoremediation > soil flushing). The tool offers comprehensive assessments of the positive and negative impacts on the three pillars of sustainability and a diagnosis of the main impact components that influence the achievement of sustainable results from each remediation technique. In general, it is possible to highlight that the results obtained give consistency to the study and indicate its relevance, in addition to confirming the potential of the method developed to support users in decision making for the sustainable remediation application. It was also concluded that the structuring of the method in a process with sequential and complementary steps and guidelines, without the need to use complex computational tools, provides significant benefits for future users, especially when the focus is on time optimization, thus encouraging the selection and application of remediation techniques based on the principles of sustainability.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESA aplicação dos conceitos de sustentabilidade nos processos de remediação se apresenta como uma recente, mas significativa evolução na abordagem tradicional do gerenciamento de áreas contaminadas. Nos últimos anos, muitos avanços foram alcançados no âmbito da remediação sustentável, porém, ainda são grandes as dificuldades para a sua aplicação na prática, muito em função da falta de mandatos regulatórios, padronizações e metodologias mais holísticas que integrem um sistema orientativo transparente para elaborar e implementar um processo de remediação sustentável. Desta forma, objetivou-se delinear um método de suporte à tomada de decisão para a aplicação da remediação sustentável no gerenciamento de áreas contaminadas. Para alcançar o objetivo dividiu-se o escopo da pesquisa em três etapas principais: 1) foi desenvolvida uma lista de 63 indicadores divididos nas categorias ambientais (25), sociais (24) e econômicos (14), os quais podem ser utilizados para avaliar qualitativamente ou quantitativamente o desempenho sustentável de técnicas de remediação. Estes indicadores foram validados e ponderados por 57 stakeholders da área de onze países diferentes, confirmando a relevância e aplicabilidade dos resultados obtidos e permitindo compreender melhor as diferentes percepções sobre a remediação sustentável; 2) foram elaboradas e estruturadas matrizes para a triagem de técnicas de remediação com base em parâmetros da área contaminada. As matrizes foram compostas por 14 diferentes técnicas de remediação de solos contaminados, além da escavação/disposição, caracterizando-as em relação a 16 diferentes variáveis de entrada divididas em quatro grandes grupos: características do solo, da contaminação, de operação e de viabilidade. Como estratégia de validação destas matrizes, estas foram aplicadas em dois estudos de caso (I - internacional e II - nacional), resultando na extração das técnicas adequadas para aplicação nestas áreas e posterior avaliação da sustentabilidade (estudo de caso I - fitoremediação, eletrocinética e escavação/disposição; estudo de caso II - nanoremediação e lavagem do solo); 3) por fim foi elaborada a ferramenta central de avaliação da sustentabilidade de técnicas de remediação. A ferramenta foi projetada por meio da adequação das matrizes tradicionais de avaliação de impacto e de um modelo matemático de cálculo da sustentabilidade. Neste processo foram utilizados os indicadores desenvolvidos na primeira etapa. A validação ocorreu por meio da aplicação da ferramenta na avaliação da sustentabilidade das técnicas de remediação selecionadas na etapa anterior (fitoremediação > eletrocinética > escavação/disposição; nanoremediação > lavagem do solo). A ferramenta oferece avaliações amplas dos impactos positivos e negativos nos três pilares da sustentabilidade e o diagnóstico dos principais componentes de impacto que influenciam na obtenção dos resultados sustentáveis de cada técnica de remediação. De forma geral, é possível destacar que os resultados obtidos dão consistência ao estudo e indicam sua relevância, além de confirmar o potencial do método elaborado em apoiar os usuários na tomada de decisão para a aplicação da remediação sustentável. Concluiu-se que a estruturação do método em um processo com etapas e orientações sequenciais e complementares, sem a necessidade de uso de complexas ferramentas computacionais, proporciona benefícios significativos para futuros usuários, especialmente quando o foco é a otimização de tempo, incentivando assim a seleção e aplicação de técnicas de remediação baseada nos princípios da sustentabilidade.Universidade de Passo FundoFaculdade de Engenharia e Arquitetura – FEARBrasilUPFPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil e AmbientalThomé, Antôniohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2522985431702727Braun, Adeli Beatriz2025-05-07T14:28:56Z2021-09-24info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfBRAUN, Adeli Beatriz. Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas. 2021. 261 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental) - Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, 2021.https://repositorio.upf.br/handle/123456789/2691porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UPFinstname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPF2025-10-23T12:42:25Zoai:repositorio.upf.br:123456789/2691Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://repositorio.upf.br/oai/requestjucelei@upf.br||biblio@upf.bropendoar:16102025-10-23T12:42:25Repositório Institucional da UPF - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas
title Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas
spellingShingle Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas
Braun, Adeli Beatriz
Solos - Contaminação
Sustentabilidade
Solos - Remediação
Impacto ambiental - Avaliação
ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL
title_short Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas
title_full Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas
title_fullStr Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas
title_full_unstemmed Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas
title_sort Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas
author Braun, Adeli Beatriz
author_facet Braun, Adeli Beatriz
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Thomé, Antônio
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2522985431702727
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Braun, Adeli Beatriz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Solos - Contaminação
Sustentabilidade
Solos - Remediação
Impacto ambiental - Avaliação
ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL
topic Solos - Contaminação
Sustentabilidade
Solos - Remediação
Impacto ambiental - Avaliação
ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL
description The application of sustainability concepts in remediation processes is a recent but significant evolution in the traditional approach to managing contaminated sites. In recent years, many advances have been made in the field of sustainable remediation, however, there are still great difficulties for its application in practice, largely due to the lack of regulatory mandates, standards and more holistic methodologies that integrate a transparent guidance system to prepare and implement a sustainable remediation process. Thus, the aim was to outline a method to support decision making for the application of sustainable remediation in the management of contaminated sites. To achieve the aim, the scope of the research was divided into three main stages: 1) a list of 63 indicators was developed, divided into environmental (25), social (24) and economic (14), which can be used to qualitatively or quantitatively assess the sustainable performance of remediation techniques. These indicators were validated and weighted by 57 stakeholders from the area and from eleven different countries, confirming the relevance and applicability of the results obtained and allowing to better understand the different perceptions about sustainable remediation; 2) matrices were elaborated and structured for the screening of remediation techniques based on parameters of the contaminated site. The matrices were composed of 14 different contaminated soil remediation techniques, in addition to excavation/disposal, characterizing them in relation to 16 different input variables divided into four large groups: characteristics of soil, contamination, operation and feasibility. As a validation strategy for these matrices, they were applied in two case studies (I - international and II - national), resulting in the extraction of appropriate techniques for application in these sites and subsequent sustainability assessment (case study I - phytoremediation, electrokinetics and excavation/disposition; case study II - nanoremediation and soil washing); 3) finally, the central tool for assessing the sustainability of remediation techniques was created. The tool was designed by adapting traditional impact assessment matrices and a mathematical model for sustainability calculating. In this process, the indicators developed in the first stage were used. Validation occurred through the application of the tool to assess the sustainability of the remediation techniques selected in the previous stage (phytoremediation > electrokinetics > excavation/disposition; nanoremediation > soil flushing). The tool offers comprehensive assessments of the positive and negative impacts on the three pillars of sustainability and a diagnosis of the main impact components that influence the achievement of sustainable results from each remediation technique. In general, it is possible to highlight that the results obtained give consistency to the study and indicate its relevance, in addition to confirming the potential of the method developed to support users in decision making for the sustainable remediation application. It was also concluded that the structuring of the method in a process with sequential and complementary steps and guidelines, without the need to use complex computational tools, provides significant benefits for future users, especially when the focus is on time optimization, thus encouraging the selection and application of remediation techniques based on the principles of sustainability.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-24
2025-05-07T14:28:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv BRAUN, Adeli Beatriz. Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas. 2021. 261 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental) - Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, 2021.
https://repositorio.upf.br/handle/123456789/2691
identifier_str_mv BRAUN, Adeli Beatriz. Método de apoio a tomada de decisão na remediação sustentável de áreas contaminadas. 2021. 261 f. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental) - Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, 2021.
url https://repositorio.upf.br/handle/123456789/2691
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
Faculdade de Engenharia e Arquitetura – FEAR
Brasil
UPF
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
Faculdade de Engenharia e Arquitetura – FEAR
Brasil
UPF
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Civil e Ambiental
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UPF
instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron:UPF
instname_str Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron_str UPF
institution UPF
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UPF
collection Repositório Institucional da UPF
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UPF - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jucelei@upf.br||biblio@upf.br
_version_ 1864264062839291904