O direito ao esquecimento na internet no contexto das decisões judiciais no Brasil

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: Moraes, Melina Ferracini de
• Orientador(a): Ribeiro, Hélcio
• Banca de defesa: Scalquette, Rodrigo Arnoni , Lima, Fernando Rister de Souza
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Direito Político e Econômico
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito (FDIR)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: direito ao esquecimento; internet; poder judiciário; desindexação de dados; sociedade da informação
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO CONSTITUCIONAL; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PUBLICO::DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITO PRIVADO::DIREITO CIVIL; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::DIREITOS ESPECIAIS; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/24002

The technological advance of the last decades has brought new paradigms for a new kind of society: the information society. The constant use of the World Wide Web, the fluidity in the placement of information and data, and the permanent feeling of electronic surveillance contributed to rethink the Law and its applicability. If it was possible to separate the actuation of the individual in the public space and in the private space, today, with the pervasiveness of information, acting on such spaces is confused, making it impossible to establish a traditional privacy protection. It’s necessary to think about privacy as how the subject wants to be reminded or known in society as a right to oblivion. In this scenario, the idea of right to oblivion on the Internet appeared supported by leading European foreign cases (cases “Lebach” and “Mario Costeja”), together with the European Union directives that ensured the protection of sensitive and personal data to those involved. In Brazil, there isn’t legal provision of the institute, and despite the efforts made by the Judiciary in an attempt to resolve the matter in important cases, such as cases “Aída Curi” (Resp. n. 1.335.153/RJ), “Slaughter of Candelária” (Resp. n. 1.334.097/RJ) and “Xuxa versus Google” (Process n. 0024717-80.2010.8.19.0209), the foundations presented were insufficient for its application. Besides the lack of technical and specific knowledge of the Judiciary in dealing with the matter, another two factors must be considered: the functioning of the information society and the power of surveillance that the State exercises over individuals. These arguments, added to the manipulation of the legal rules to legalize violations and to the relativization speech of rights at the expense of national security and protective barriers, undermine democracy and, therefore, put away the application of the right to oblivion on the Internet, featuring, also, an exception state.