Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and composition

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2026
Autor(a) principal: Gasparina, Jennifer Mayara
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: eng
Instituição de defesa: Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertacoes da USP
Universidade de São Paulo
Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-08052026-151124/
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of orange essential oil (OEO), rich in D-limonene (93.5%), on sheep nutrition, encompassing nutrient metabolism, ruminal and cecal fermentation, methane production (<i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> estimates), feedlot lamb performance, carcass traits, and milk production/composition in lactating ewes. In Chapter 2, the first <i>in vivo</i> experiment utilized 20 cannulated Dorper × Santa Inês lambs (39.6 ± 4.6 kg LW) in a randomized complete block design, with treatments: control, OEO (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg DM), and monensin (12.5 mg/kg DM). Intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance, and ruminal fermentation were assessed. Monensin increased the molar proportions of propionate (P = 0.01), butyrate (P<0.0001), isobutyrate (P = 0.01), and isovalerate (P=0.01), reducing the acetate:propionate ratio (P<0.01), while OEO did not affect intake, ruminal fermentation parameters, nitrogen balance, or digestibility. Complementarily, an <i>in vitro</i> experiment tested different additives: control, OEO1000 (25 mg OEO/L), narasin (NAR13: 0.13 mg/L; NAR20: 0.48 mg/L), sodium monensin (MON25: 0.6 mg/L), essential oil blend (BEO: 86 mg Agolin Ruminant L<sup><small>TM</sup></small>/L; Feedworks), and soluble quebracho tannins (3.4 mL SilvaFeed<sup><small>TM</sup></small>/L), in TMR and Mitchell grass substrates. Gas production, DM and OM digestibility, and VFA production were evaluated. Soluble tannins significantly reduced DM digestibility (P = 0.02; 6.86%) and OM digestibility (P = 0.03; 4.1%). Mitchell grass showed lower digestibility (P<0.0001) than TMR [DM: 26.5% vs. 75.4%; OM: 28.8% vs. 73.3%]. Total gas production (P<0.0001; 38.9 vs. 123.3 mL/g DM) and methane production (P < 0.001; 2.7 vs. 9.9 mL/g DM) were also lower in Mitchell grass, with no effects of the additives on these parameters. VFA concentrations were significantly lower in Mitchell grass (P<0.0001; except for isobutyrate). Additives affected propionate (P<0.001; lower with soluble tannins), valerate (P<0.0001; higher with NAR20 and MON25), isobutyrate (P=0.04), and isovalerate (P=0.01; lower with soluble tannins), reducing the A:P ratio (P=0.01) and total VFA production (P<0.01) with soluble tannins. In Chapter 4, effects of OEO (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg DM) and monensin (12.5 mg/kg DM) on ruminal and cecal fermentation of feedlot lambs were evaluated. In the rumen, OEO generated a quadratic effect (P=0.05) on acetate and A:P (P=0.04). Monensin increased propionate compared to the control diet (P=0.02), reducing A:P (P=0.04). In the cecum, OEO did not alter the variables, but monensin reduced acetate (P = 0.05), increased propionate (P=0.02), isobutyrate (P=0.04), and isovalerate (P=0.04), and decreased A:P (P=0.05) compared to the control. In Chapter 5, OEO (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg DM) was evaluated compared to the control diet and monensin (12.5 mg/kg DM) on performance and carcass traits of 50 Dorper × Santa Inês lambs. OEO linearly increased DMI (g/day, %LW, %LW<sup><small>0.75</sup></small>). It did not affect ADG, but OEO700 showed a trend for higher final LW (P=0.08). In Chapter 6, lactating Dorper × Santa Inês ewes (n = 50; 70% concentrate + 30% bagasse diet) received OEO (100, 500, 1000 mg/kg DM) or monensin (25 mg/kg DM). OEO increased DMI (kg/day; P=0.004) and (g/kg LW<sup><small>0.75</sup></small>) compared to monensin. However, no differences were observed in DMI (%LW), milk production and composition, and the unsaturated FA profile. OEO1000 had a quadratic effect (P<0.0001) on milk saturated FA reduction. Lambs from ewes fed OEO showed lower ADG (P=0.01) post-weaning compared to monensin. In conclusion, OEO did not negatively affect intake, digestibility, ruminal and cecal fermentation, increased DMI in feedlot lambs and lactating ewes, and altered the milk lipid profile (reduction of saturated FA). Although further studies are needed to define optimal doses and elucidate OEO effects on ruminal fermentation and animal performance.
id USP_33d83e531192ea58bdcdd87fbf187e55
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-08052026-151124
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str
spelling Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and compositionÓleo essencial de laranja na dieta de ovinos: influência no desempenho animal, fermentação ruminal e cecal, e produção e composição do leiteAditivosCecoNutriçãoConfinamentoLimonenoAdditivesLimoneneFeedlotCecumNutritionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of orange essential oil (OEO), rich in D-limonene (93.5%), on sheep nutrition, encompassing nutrient metabolism, ruminal and cecal fermentation, methane production (<i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> estimates), feedlot lamb performance, carcass traits, and milk production/composition in lactating ewes. In Chapter 2, the first <i>in vivo</i> experiment utilized 20 cannulated Dorper × Santa Inês lambs (39.6 ± 4.6 kg LW) in a randomized complete block design, with treatments: control, OEO (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg DM), and monensin (12.5 mg/kg DM). Intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance, and ruminal fermentation were assessed. Monensin increased the molar proportions of propionate (P = 0.01), butyrate (P<0.0001), isobutyrate (P = 0.01), and isovalerate (P=0.01), reducing the acetate:propionate ratio (P<0.01), while OEO did not affect intake, ruminal fermentation parameters, nitrogen balance, or digestibility. Complementarily, an <i>in vitro</i> experiment tested different additives: control, OEO1000 (25 mg OEO/L), narasin (NAR13: 0.13 mg/L; NAR20: 0.48 mg/L), sodium monensin (MON25: 0.6 mg/L), essential oil blend (BEO: 86 mg Agolin Ruminant L<sup><small>TM</sup></small>/L; Feedworks), and soluble quebracho tannins (3.4 mL SilvaFeed<sup><small>TM</sup></small>/L), in TMR and Mitchell grass substrates. Gas production, DM and OM digestibility, and VFA production were evaluated. Soluble tannins significantly reduced DM digestibility (P = 0.02; 6.86%) and OM digestibility (P = 0.03; 4.1%). Mitchell grass showed lower digestibility (P<0.0001) than TMR [DM: 26.5% vs. 75.4%; OM: 28.8% vs. 73.3%]. Total gas production (P<0.0001; 38.9 vs. 123.3 mL/g DM) and methane production (P < 0.001; 2.7 vs. 9.9 mL/g DM) were also lower in Mitchell grass, with no effects of the additives on these parameters. VFA concentrations were significantly lower in Mitchell grass (P<0.0001; except for isobutyrate). Additives affected propionate (P<0.001; lower with soluble tannins), valerate (P<0.0001; higher with NAR20 and MON25), isobutyrate (P=0.04), and isovalerate (P=0.01; lower with soluble tannins), reducing the A:P ratio (P=0.01) and total VFA production (P<0.01) with soluble tannins. In Chapter 4, effects of OEO (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg DM) and monensin (12.5 mg/kg DM) on ruminal and cecal fermentation of feedlot lambs were evaluated. In the rumen, OEO generated a quadratic effect (P=0.05) on acetate and A:P (P=0.04). Monensin increased propionate compared to the control diet (P=0.02), reducing A:P (P=0.04). In the cecum, OEO did not alter the variables, but monensin reduced acetate (P = 0.05), increased propionate (P=0.02), isobutyrate (P=0.04), and isovalerate (P=0.04), and decreased A:P (P=0.05) compared to the control. In Chapter 5, OEO (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg DM) was evaluated compared to the control diet and monensin (12.5 mg/kg DM) on performance and carcass traits of 50 Dorper × Santa Inês lambs. OEO linearly increased DMI (g/day, %LW, %LW<sup><small>0.75</sup></small>). It did not affect ADG, but OEO700 showed a trend for higher final LW (P=0.08). In Chapter 6, lactating Dorper × Santa Inês ewes (n = 50; 70% concentrate + 30% bagasse diet) received OEO (100, 500, 1000 mg/kg DM) or monensin (25 mg/kg DM). OEO increased DMI (kg/day; P=0.004) and (g/kg LW<sup><small>0.75</sup></small>) compared to monensin. However, no differences were observed in DMI (%LW), milk production and composition, and the unsaturated FA profile. OEO1000 had a quadratic effect (P<0.0001) on milk saturated FA reduction. Lambs from ewes fed OEO showed lower ADG (P=0.01) post-weaning compared to monensin. In conclusion, OEO did not negatively affect intake, digestibility, ruminal and cecal fermentation, increased DMI in feedlot lambs and lactating ewes, and altered the milk lipid profile (reduction of saturated FA). Although further studies are needed to define optimal doses and elucidate OEO effects on ruminal fermentation and animal performance.O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar os efeitos do óleo essencial de laranja (OEL), rico em D-limoneno (93,5%), na nutrição de ovinos, abrangendo metabolismo de nutrientes, fermentação ruminal e cecal, produção de metano (<i>in vitro</i> e estimativas <i>in vivo</i>), desempenho de cordeiros confinados, características de carcaça, produção e composição do leite em ovelhas lactantes. No Capítulo 2, o primeiro experimento <i>in vivo</i> utilizou 20 cordeiros Dorper × Santa Inês canulados (39,6 ± 4,6 kg PV), em delineamento de blocos completos casualizados, com tratamentos controle, OEL (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg MS) e monensina (12,5 mg/kg MS).Avaliaram-se consumo, digestibilidade, balanço de nitrogênio e fermentação ruminal.A monensina elevou as concentrações molares de propionato (P=0,01), butirato (P<0,0001), isobutirato (P=0,01) e isovalerato (P<0,01), e reduzindo a relação acetato:propionato (P<0,01). Enquanto o OEL não afetou consumo, parâmetros de fermentação ruminal, balanço de nitrogênio e digestibilidade. Complementarmente, um experimento <i>in vitro</i> testou diferentes aditivos: controle, OEO1000 (25 mg OEL/L), narasin (NAR13: 0,13 mg/L; NAR20: 0,48 mg/L), monensina sódica (MON25: 0,6 mg/L), blend de óleos essenciais (BEO: 86 mg Agolin Ruminant L<sup><small>TM</sup></small>/L; Feedworks) e taninos solúveis Quebracho (3,4 mL SilvaFeed<sup><small>TM</sup></small>/L), em dois substratos: dieta total (TMR) e Mitchell grass. Avaliou-se a produção de gás, digestibilidade da MN e MO e produção dos AGV. Os taninos solúveis reduziram significativamente a digestibilidade de MN (P=0,02; -6,86%) e MO (P=0,03; -4,1%). O Mitchell grass apresentou menor digestibilidade (P<0,0001) em relação a TMR [MN: 26,5% vs 75,4%; MO: 28,8% vs 73,3%]. A produção total de gás (P<0,0001; 38,9 vs 123,3 mL/g MN) e metano (P<0,001; 2,7 vs 9,9 mL/g MN) também foram inferiores no Mitchell grass, sem efeito dos aditivos sobre esses parâmetros. As concentrações de AGV foram significativamente menores no Mitchell grass (P<0,0001; exceto isobutirato). Os aditivos afetaram propionato (P<0,001; menor com taninos solúveis), valerato (P<0,0001; maiores com NAR20 e MON25), isobutirato (P=0,04) e isovalerato (P=0,01; menores com taninos solúveis), reduzindo a relação A:P (P=0,01) e a produção total de AGV (P<0,01) com taninos solúveis. No Capítulo 4, avaliaram-se efeitos de OEL (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg MS) e monensina (12,5 mg/kg MS) na fermentação ruminal e cecal de cordeiros confinados. No rúmen, OEL gerou efeito quadrático (P=0,05) no acetato e A:P (P=0,04). A monensina elevou propionato em comparação a dieta controle (P=0,02), reduzindo A:P (P=0,04). No ceco, OEL não alterou variáveis, mas monensina reduziu acetato (P=0,05), elevou propionate (P=0,02), isobutirato (P=0,04) e isovalerato (P=0,04) e diminuiu A:P e (P=0,05) em relação ao controle. No Capítulo 5, avaliaram-se o OEL (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg MS), comparado a dieta controle e monensina (12,5 mg/kg MS), sobre desempenho e características de carcaça de 50 cordeiros Dorper × Santa Inês. O OEL elevou linearmente o CMS (g/dia, %PV, %PV<sup><small>0,75</sup></small>). Não afetou GMD, mas OEO700 apresentou tendência a maior PC final (P=0,08). No Capítulo 6, ovelhas lactantes Dorper × Santa Inês (n=50; dieta 70% concentrado + 30% bagaço) receberam OEL (100, 500, 1000 mg/kg MS) ou monensina (25 mg/kg MS). O OEL elevou CMS (kg/dia; P=0,004) e (g/kg PV<sup><small>0,75</sup></small>) em comparação à monensina. Porém, sem diferenças no CMS %PV, produção e composição do leite e perfil de AG insaturado. O OEL1000 teve efeito quadrático (P<0,0001) na redução de AG saturados do leite. Os cordeiros filhos de ovelhas que receberam OEO na dieta apresentaram GMD menor (P=0,01) no pós-desmama comparado com monensina. Conclui-se que OEL não afetou negativamente consumo, digestibilidade, fermentação ruminal e cecal, elevando CMS em confinamento e ovelhas em lactação, alterando o perfil lipídico do leite (redução de AG saturados). Embora mais estudos sejam necessários para definir doses ótimas e elucidar os efeitos do OEL na fermentação ruminal e desempenho animal.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertacoes da USPUniversidade de São PauloEscola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de QueirozFerreira, Evandro MaiaGasparina, Jennifer Mayara2026-03-042026-05-11info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-08052026-151124/doi:10.11606/T.11.2026.tde-08052026-151124Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP2026-05-11T20:15:02Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-08052026-151124Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212026-05-11T20:15:02Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and composition
Óleo essencial de laranja na dieta de ovinos: influência no desempenho animal, fermentação ruminal e cecal, e produção e composição do leite
title Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and composition
spellingShingle Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and composition
Gasparina, Jennifer Mayara
Aditivos
Ceco
Nutrição
Confinamento
Limoneno
Additives
Limonene
Feedlot
Cecum
Nutrition
title_short Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and composition
title_full Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and composition
title_fullStr Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and composition
title_full_unstemmed Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and composition
title_sort Orange essential oil in sheep diets: influence on animal performance, ruminal and cecal fermentation, and milk production and composition
author Gasparina, Jennifer Mayara
author_facet Gasparina, Jennifer Mayara
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Evandro Maia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gasparina, Jennifer Mayara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aditivos
Ceco
Nutrição
Confinamento
Limoneno
Additives
Limonene
Feedlot
Cecum
Nutrition
topic Aditivos
Ceco
Nutrição
Confinamento
Limoneno
Additives
Limonene
Feedlot
Cecum
Nutrition
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of orange essential oil (OEO), rich in D-limonene (93.5%), on sheep nutrition, encompassing nutrient metabolism, ruminal and cecal fermentation, methane production (<i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> estimates), feedlot lamb performance, carcass traits, and milk production/composition in lactating ewes. In Chapter 2, the first <i>in vivo</i> experiment utilized 20 cannulated Dorper × Santa Inês lambs (39.6 ± 4.6 kg LW) in a randomized complete block design, with treatments: control, OEO (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg DM), and monensin (12.5 mg/kg DM). Intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance, and ruminal fermentation were assessed. Monensin increased the molar proportions of propionate (P = 0.01), butyrate (P<0.0001), isobutyrate (P = 0.01), and isovalerate (P=0.01), reducing the acetate:propionate ratio (P<0.01), while OEO did not affect intake, ruminal fermentation parameters, nitrogen balance, or digestibility. Complementarily, an <i>in vitro</i> experiment tested different additives: control, OEO1000 (25 mg OEO/L), narasin (NAR13: 0.13 mg/L; NAR20: 0.48 mg/L), sodium monensin (MON25: 0.6 mg/L), essential oil blend (BEO: 86 mg Agolin Ruminant L<sup><small>TM</sup></small>/L; Feedworks), and soluble quebracho tannins (3.4 mL SilvaFeed<sup><small>TM</sup></small>/L), in TMR and Mitchell grass substrates. Gas production, DM and OM digestibility, and VFA production were evaluated. Soluble tannins significantly reduced DM digestibility (P = 0.02; 6.86%) and OM digestibility (P = 0.03; 4.1%). Mitchell grass showed lower digestibility (P<0.0001) than TMR [DM: 26.5% vs. 75.4%; OM: 28.8% vs. 73.3%]. Total gas production (P<0.0001; 38.9 vs. 123.3 mL/g DM) and methane production (P < 0.001; 2.7 vs. 9.9 mL/g DM) were also lower in Mitchell grass, with no effects of the additives on these parameters. VFA concentrations were significantly lower in Mitchell grass (P<0.0001; except for isobutyrate). Additives affected propionate (P<0.001; lower with soluble tannins), valerate (P<0.0001; higher with NAR20 and MON25), isobutyrate (P=0.04), and isovalerate (P=0.01; lower with soluble tannins), reducing the A:P ratio (P=0.01) and total VFA production (P<0.01) with soluble tannins. In Chapter 4, effects of OEO (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg DM) and monensin (12.5 mg/kg DM) on ruminal and cecal fermentation of feedlot lambs were evaluated. In the rumen, OEO generated a quadratic effect (P=0.05) on acetate and A:P (P=0.04). Monensin increased propionate compared to the control diet (P=0.02), reducing A:P (P=0.04). In the cecum, OEO did not alter the variables, but monensin reduced acetate (P = 0.05), increased propionate (P=0.02), isobutyrate (P=0.04), and isovalerate (P=0.04), and decreased A:P (P=0.05) compared to the control. In Chapter 5, OEO (700, 1400, 2100 mg/kg DM) was evaluated compared to the control diet and monensin (12.5 mg/kg DM) on performance and carcass traits of 50 Dorper × Santa Inês lambs. OEO linearly increased DMI (g/day, %LW, %LW<sup><small>0.75</sup></small>). It did not affect ADG, but OEO700 showed a trend for higher final LW (P=0.08). In Chapter 6, lactating Dorper × Santa Inês ewes (n = 50; 70% concentrate + 30% bagasse diet) received OEO (100, 500, 1000 mg/kg DM) or monensin (25 mg/kg DM). OEO increased DMI (kg/day; P=0.004) and (g/kg LW<sup><small>0.75</sup></small>) compared to monensin. However, no differences were observed in DMI (%LW), milk production and composition, and the unsaturated FA profile. OEO1000 had a quadratic effect (P<0.0001) on milk saturated FA reduction. Lambs from ewes fed OEO showed lower ADG (P=0.01) post-weaning compared to monensin. In conclusion, OEO did not negatively affect intake, digestibility, ruminal and cecal fermentation, increased DMI in feedlot lambs and lactating ewes, and altered the milk lipid profile (reduction of saturated FA). Although further studies are needed to define optimal doses and elucidate OEO effects on ruminal fermentation and animal performance.
publishDate 2026
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2026-03-04
2026-05-11
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-08052026-151124/
doi:10.11606/T.11.2026.tde-08052026-151124
url https://teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-08052026-151124/
identifier_str_mv doi:10.11606/T.11.2026.tde-08052026-151124
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertacoes da USP
Universidade de São Paulo
Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertacoes da USP
Universidade de São Paulo
Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1865492698933231616