Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights
| Ano de defesa: | 2021 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2139/tde-26092022-090132/ |
Resumo: | Ronald Dworkin offered increasingly refined versions of his theory of rights throughout his work. The purpose of this dissertation is to assess whether, after all, he was able to improve our understanding of rights. I ultimately argue that he did succeed in this endeavour. This dissertation proceeds in three stages. In its first part, I present what I consider to be the best account of Dworkins theory of rights, mainly based on his later work. I read his theory of rights in light of two important axes, which I call as his interpretative and ethical turns. According to the former, a concrete claim based on a right shares the same structure as other interpretative moral claims. As such, it assumes a specific sense of objectivity and it is true if what it requires is coherent and advances the values a right protects. According to the latter, the protection of the dignity of the members of a political community is the substantive purpose or point of our rights. So, a claim based on rights must succeed if it promotes the ultimately ethical values associated with human dignity. In this sense, rights work as political trumps: so far as they protect human dignity, they trump other reasons for political action. In the second part of this dissertation, I test this interpretation against some challenges that have been offered against Dworkins theory of rights. I then critically assess and present responses to these challenges. In the final part of this dissertation, I conclude that far from being an empty slogan, Dworkins understanding of rights as trumps is the result of a careful philosophical investigation of attitudes and relationships that are key features of our form of life. In this way, Dworkin presents an appealing account of the place of our rights in the larger domain of values, mapping out and justifying their connections with other indispensable concepts of ethics and political morality. |
| id |
USP_6c71746b4d814604b3a69037f46fea03 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:teses.usp.br:tde-26092022-090132 |
| network_acronym_str |
USP |
| network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rightsDireitos como trunfos : uma análise da teoria dos direitos de Ronald DworkinDireitos como TrunfosDireitos FundamentaisFundamental RightsRights as TrumpsRonald DworkinRonald DworkinTeoria dos DireitosTheory of RightsRonald Dworkin offered increasingly refined versions of his theory of rights throughout his work. The purpose of this dissertation is to assess whether, after all, he was able to improve our understanding of rights. I ultimately argue that he did succeed in this endeavour. This dissertation proceeds in three stages. In its first part, I present what I consider to be the best account of Dworkins theory of rights, mainly based on his later work. I read his theory of rights in light of two important axes, which I call as his interpretative and ethical turns. According to the former, a concrete claim based on a right shares the same structure as other interpretative moral claims. As such, it assumes a specific sense of objectivity and it is true if what it requires is coherent and advances the values a right protects. According to the latter, the protection of the dignity of the members of a political community is the substantive purpose or point of our rights. So, a claim based on rights must succeed if it promotes the ultimately ethical values associated with human dignity. In this sense, rights work as political trumps: so far as they protect human dignity, they trump other reasons for political action. In the second part of this dissertation, I test this interpretation against some challenges that have been offered against Dworkins theory of rights. I then critically assess and present responses to these challenges. In the final part of this dissertation, I conclude that far from being an empty slogan, Dworkins understanding of rights as trumps is the result of a careful philosophical investigation of attitudes and relationships that are key features of our form of life. In this way, Dworkin presents an appealing account of the place of our rights in the larger domain of values, mapping out and justifying their connections with other indispensable concepts of ethics and political morality.Ronald Dworkin ofereceu versões cada vez mais refinadas de sua teoria dos direitos ao longo de sua obra. O objetivo desta dissertação é avaliar se, afinal, ele foi capaz de melhorar nossa compreensão dos direitos. Em última análise, argumento que ele teve sucesso nessa empreitada. Esta dissertação desenvolve-se em três etapas. Na primeira parte, apresento o que considero ser a melhor versão da teoria dos direitos de Dworkin, principalmente com base em seu trabalho posterior. Li sua teoria dos direitos à luz de dois eixos importantes, que chamo de suas viradas interpretativa e ética. De acordo com a primeira, a reivindicação de um direito compartilha a mesma estrutura que outras reivindicações morais interpretativas. Como tal, assume um sentido específico de objetividade e é verdadeira se o que exige é coerente e promove os valores que esse direito protege. De acordo com a segunda, a proteção da dignidade dos membros de uma comunidade política é o propósito ou point substantivo de nossos direitos. Portanto, uma reivindicação baseada em direitos deve ter sucesso se promover os valores éticos em última instância associados à dignidade humana. Nesse sentido, os direitos funcionam como trunfos políticos: na medida em que protegem a dignidade humana, superam outras razões para a ação política. Na segunda parte desta dissertação, testo essa interpretação frente a alguns desafios que foram oferecidos contra a teoria dos direitos de Dworkin. Em seguida, avalio criticamente e apresento respostas a esses desafios. Na parte final desta dissertação, concluo que, longe de ser um slogan vazio, a compreensão de Dworkin dos direitos como trunfos é o resultado de uma investigação filosófica cuidadosa de atitudes e relações que são características de nossa forma de vida. Desse modo, Dworkin apresenta uma teoria promissora do lugar de nossos direitos no domínio mais amplo dos valores, mapeando e justificando suas conexões com outros conceitos indispensáveis da ética e da moralidade política.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPMacedo Júnior, Ronaldo Porto Goulart, André Coletto Pedroso2021-11-19info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2139/tde-26092022-090132/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2024-10-14T12:29:21Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-26092022-090132Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212024-10-14T12:29:21Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights Direitos como trunfos : uma análise da teoria dos direitos de Ronald Dworkin |
| title |
Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights |
| spellingShingle |
Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights Goulart, André Coletto Pedroso Direitos como Trunfos Direitos Fundamentais Fundamental Rights Rights as Trumps Ronald Dworkin Ronald Dworkin Teoria dos Direitos Theory of Rights |
| title_short |
Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights |
| title_full |
Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights |
| title_fullStr |
Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights |
| title_sort |
Rights as trumps : an analysis of Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights |
| author |
Goulart, André Coletto Pedroso |
| author_facet |
Goulart, André Coletto Pedroso |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Macedo Júnior, Ronaldo Porto |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Goulart, André Coletto Pedroso |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direitos como Trunfos Direitos Fundamentais Fundamental Rights Rights as Trumps Ronald Dworkin Ronald Dworkin Teoria dos Direitos Theory of Rights |
| topic |
Direitos como Trunfos Direitos Fundamentais Fundamental Rights Rights as Trumps Ronald Dworkin Ronald Dworkin Teoria dos Direitos Theory of Rights |
| description |
Ronald Dworkin offered increasingly refined versions of his theory of rights throughout his work. The purpose of this dissertation is to assess whether, after all, he was able to improve our understanding of rights. I ultimately argue that he did succeed in this endeavour. This dissertation proceeds in three stages. In its first part, I present what I consider to be the best account of Dworkins theory of rights, mainly based on his later work. I read his theory of rights in light of two important axes, which I call as his interpretative and ethical turns. According to the former, a concrete claim based on a right shares the same structure as other interpretative moral claims. As such, it assumes a specific sense of objectivity and it is true if what it requires is coherent and advances the values a right protects. According to the latter, the protection of the dignity of the members of a political community is the substantive purpose or point of our rights. So, a claim based on rights must succeed if it promotes the ultimately ethical values associated with human dignity. In this sense, rights work as political trumps: so far as they protect human dignity, they trump other reasons for political action. In the second part of this dissertation, I test this interpretation against some challenges that have been offered against Dworkins theory of rights. I then critically assess and present responses to these challenges. In the final part of this dissertation, I conclude that far from being an empty slogan, Dworkins understanding of rights as trumps is the result of a careful philosophical investigation of attitudes and relationships that are key features of our form of life. In this way, Dworkin presents an appealing account of the place of our rights in the larger domain of values, mapping out and justifying their connections with other indispensable concepts of ethics and political morality. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-19 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2139/tde-26092022-090132/ |
| url |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2139/tde-26092022-090132/ |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
|
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público. |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
| instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
| instacron_str |
USP |
| institution |
USP |
| reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br |
| _version_ |
1818279235815473152 |