Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties?
| Ano de defesa: | 2024 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25147/tde-07082024-142202/ |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of auto mix and manual mixing on the physicochemical and mechanical properties of AH Plus Jet sealer (Dentsply/DeTrey). Evaluated properties included radiopacity, initial and final setting times, flow, and solubility, following the specifications outlined in ISO 6876/2012 and ADA No. 57/2000. pH levels were measured at intervals of 3, 24, 72, and 168 hours. Push-out bond strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA, USA), and failure modes were analyzed with stereomicroscopy (Stemi 508; ZEISS). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests, unpaired Student\'s t-tests, or Mann-Whitney tests were used with a significance level of 5%. Regarding radiopacity, the auto mix method presented a radiopacity value of 12.11 mmAl, while manual mixing showed 12.55 mmAl (P>0.05). For initial and final setting times, auto mix showed 901 minutes and 1779 minutes, respectively, while manual mixing recorded values of 631 minutes and 1504 minutes (P<0.05). In terms of flow, auto mix demonstrated higher values (25.26 mm) than manual mixing (21.71 mm) (P<0.05). No statistical differences were observed between the two methods for solubility and pH (P>0.05). Finally, manual mixing showed a higher bond strength value (14.52 MPa) compared to auto mix (9.81 MPa) (P<0.05). Mixed failure mode was the most frequent outcome for both methods. The mixing method employed for AH Plus Jet sealer significantly influences both the physicochemical and mechanical properties of the material. Manual mixing demonstrated better properties compared to auto mix. |
| id |
USP_7abeeb57301aa9a7074bd30a1d79bc77 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:teses.usp.br:tde-07082024-142202 |
| network_acronym_str |
USP |
| network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties?O método de manipulação do AH Plus Jet afeta suas propriedades físico-químicas e mecânicas?EpóxiEpoxy resinPhysicochemical propertiesPropriedades físico-químicaPush-out bond strengthResistência de adesão por push-outThe aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of auto mix and manual mixing on the physicochemical and mechanical properties of AH Plus Jet sealer (Dentsply/DeTrey). Evaluated properties included radiopacity, initial and final setting times, flow, and solubility, following the specifications outlined in ISO 6876/2012 and ADA No. 57/2000. pH levels were measured at intervals of 3, 24, 72, and 168 hours. Push-out bond strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA, USA), and failure modes were analyzed with stereomicroscopy (Stemi 508; ZEISS). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests, unpaired Student\'s t-tests, or Mann-Whitney tests were used with a significance level of 5%. Regarding radiopacity, the auto mix method presented a radiopacity value of 12.11 mmAl, while manual mixing showed 12.55 mmAl (P>0.05). For initial and final setting times, auto mix showed 901 minutes and 1779 minutes, respectively, while manual mixing recorded values of 631 minutes and 1504 minutes (P<0.05). In terms of flow, auto mix demonstrated higher values (25.26 mm) than manual mixing (21.71 mm) (P<0.05). No statistical differences were observed between the two methods for solubility and pH (P>0.05). Finally, manual mixing showed a higher bond strength value (14.52 MPa) compared to auto mix (9.81 MPa) (P<0.05). Mixed failure mode was the most frequent outcome for both methods. The mixing method employed for AH Plus Jet sealer significantly influences both the physicochemical and mechanical properties of the material. Manual mixing demonstrated better properties compared to auto mix.O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência da mistura auto mix e manual nas propriedades físico-químicas e mecânicas do cimento AH Plus Jet (Dentsply/DeTrey). As propriedades avaliadas incluíram radiopacidade, tempos de presa inicial e final, escoamento e solubilidade, seguindo as especificações delineadas na ISO 6876/2012 e ADA Nº 57/2000. Os níveis de pH foram medidos em intervalos de 3, 24, 72 e 168 horas. O teste de resistência de adesão por push-out foi realizado usando uma máquina de ensaios universal (Instron, Canton, MA, USA), e os modos de falha foram analisados com estereomicroscopia (Stemi 508; ZEISS). Análise de variância unidirecional e testes de Tukey, t de Student não pareado ou testes de Mann-Whitney foram utilizados com um nível de significância de 5%. Com relação a radiopacidade, o método auto mix apresentou um valor de radiopacidade de 12,11 mmAl, enquanto a mistura manual de 12,55 mmAl (P>0,05). Para os tempos de presa inicial e final, o auto mix mostrou 901 minutos e 1779 minutos, respectivamente, enquanto a mistura manual registrou valores de 631 minutos e 1504 minutos (P<0,05). Em termos de escoamento, o auto mix demonstrou valores mais altos (25,26 mm) do que a mistura manual (21,71 mm) (P<0,05). Não foram observadas diferenças estatísticas entre os dois métodos para solubilidade e pH (P>0,05). Por fim, a mistura manual apresentou um valor de resistência de adesão mais alto (14,52 MPa) do que o auto mix (9,81 MPa) (P<0,05). O modo de falha mista foi o resultado mais frequente para ambos os métodos. O método de mistura empregado para o cimento AH Plus Jet influencia significativamente tanto as propriedades físico-químicas quanto as mecânicas do material. A mistura manual demonstrou melhores propriedades em comparação com o auto mix.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPAlcalde, Murilo PrioriRosa, Stefani Jovedi2024-04-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25147/tde-07082024-142202/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPReter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2024-08-19T14:54:02Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-07082024-142202Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212024-08-19T14:54:02Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties? O método de manipulação do AH Plus Jet afeta suas propriedades físico-químicas e mecânicas? |
| title |
Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties? |
| spellingShingle |
Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties? Rosa, Stefani Jovedi Epóxi Epoxy resinPhysicochemical properties Propriedades físico-química Push-out bond strength Resistência de adesão por push-out |
| title_short |
Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties? |
| title_full |
Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties? |
| title_fullStr |
Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties? |
| title_sort |
Does the mixing method of AH Plus Jet affect its physicochemical and mechanical properties? |
| author |
Rosa, Stefani Jovedi |
| author_facet |
Rosa, Stefani Jovedi |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Alcalde, Murilo Priori |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosa, Stefani Jovedi |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Epóxi Epoxy resinPhysicochemical properties Propriedades físico-química Push-out bond strength Resistência de adesão por push-out |
| topic |
Epóxi Epoxy resinPhysicochemical properties Propriedades físico-química Push-out bond strength Resistência de adesão por push-out |
| description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of auto mix and manual mixing on the physicochemical and mechanical properties of AH Plus Jet sealer (Dentsply/DeTrey). Evaluated properties included radiopacity, initial and final setting times, flow, and solubility, following the specifications outlined in ISO 6876/2012 and ADA No. 57/2000. pH levels were measured at intervals of 3, 24, 72, and 168 hours. Push-out bond strength testing was performed using a universal testing machine (Instron, Canton, MA, USA), and failure modes were analyzed with stereomicroscopy (Stemi 508; ZEISS). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests, unpaired Student\'s t-tests, or Mann-Whitney tests were used with a significance level of 5%. Regarding radiopacity, the auto mix method presented a radiopacity value of 12.11 mmAl, while manual mixing showed 12.55 mmAl (P>0.05). For initial and final setting times, auto mix showed 901 minutes and 1779 minutes, respectively, while manual mixing recorded values of 631 minutes and 1504 minutes (P<0.05). In terms of flow, auto mix demonstrated higher values (25.26 mm) than manual mixing (21.71 mm) (P<0.05). No statistical differences were observed between the two methods for solubility and pH (P>0.05). Finally, manual mixing showed a higher bond strength value (14.52 MPa) compared to auto mix (9.81 MPa) (P<0.05). Mixed failure mode was the most frequent outcome for both methods. The mixing method employed for AH Plus Jet sealer significantly influences both the physicochemical and mechanical properties of the material. Manual mixing demonstrated better properties compared to auto mix. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-04 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25147/tde-07082024-142202/ |
| url |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25147/tde-07082024-142202/ |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
|
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Reter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Reter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais. |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
| instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
| instacron_str |
USP |
| institution |
USP |
| reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br |
| _version_ |
1815257942942810112 |