Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2023
Autor(a) principal: Dias, Bruno Garcia de Carvalho
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: eng
Instituição de defesa: Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-05022024-184430/
Resumo: Feed additives, such as direct-fed microbials (DFM), are included into feedlot diets to improve rumen fermentation, gastrointestinal tract health, and overall animal performance. Among the strains of interest in DFM products, yeast, lactic acid and bacilli are highlighted. Hence, we hypothesized that the supplementation of different DFM would improve nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and performance of feedlot Bos indicus cattle receiving a finishing diet. In Exp. 1, 30 rumen-cannulated Nellore steers were blocked based on initial body weight (BW; 350 ±) 35.0 kg) in 1 of 30 pens and, within each block, animals were randomly assigned to: (1) Control: corn-based diet without DFM , (2) EFSC: CONT + 1 gram/head per day of a DFM based on Enterococcus faecium and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Probios® Precise, Chr. Hansen A/S, Horsholm, Denmark), and (3) BLBS: CONT + 2 grams/head per day of a DFM based on Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis (Bovacillus™ Chr. Hansen A/S). The experimental period lasted 35 days, while between days 30 to 34, total fecal collection was performed and on days 34 and 35, feces and rumen fluid were collected at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 h post-feeding. In Exp. 2, 240 Nellore bulls were blocked based on initial body weight (BW; 374 ± 35.3 kg) into 1 of 60 feedlot pens (4 bulls/pen) and pens within blocks were randomly assigned to receive the same treatments as Exp. 1. There were 3 adapting diets and the finishing diet (20% corn silage, 33% ground flint corn, 45% distillers bran plus solubles and 2% minerals and vitamins mixture) that was offered throughout the experimental period (115 days). On day 113, carcass ultrasound evaluations were performed and carcass traits were also obtained upon slaughter on day 117. In Exp.1 the inclusion or type of DFM did not affect either nutrient digestibility or ruminal fermentation parameters (P ≥ 0.40). In contrast, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, yielded a lower mean ammonia concentration (14.7 vs. 15.7 mg/L; P = 0.05). Moreover, ammonia levels were lower in EFSC at 3 and 6 h post-feeding vs. CONT (P ≤ 0.04), but also lower for BSBL vs. CONT at 6 h (P < 0.01). In summary, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, reduced proteolysis, with no effect on other parameters of rumen fermentation. In Exp. 2 no effects were observed on daily DMI (P 0.18) or final BW (P ≥ 0.12). Nonetheless, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, tended to improve ADG (1.57 vs. 1.50 kg; P = 0.10) and FE (145 vs. 140 g/kg; P = 0.07). No further effects were observed on carcass traits measured via ultrasound or at slaughter (P ≥ 0.22). In summary, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, tended to benefit feedlot performance of Bos indicus bulls.
id USP_b667a0fdb32d7cc044bec0bcc3bc4abf
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-05022024-184430
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str
spelling Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate dietEfeito de diferentes tipos probióticos no metabolismo, desempenho, e carcaça de bovinos Bos indicusconfinados com dieta de alto concentradoBacillusBacillusEnterococcus faeciumEnterococcus faeciumSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeConfinamentoFeedlotMetabolismMetabolismoZebuZebuínosFeed additives, such as direct-fed microbials (DFM), are included into feedlot diets to improve rumen fermentation, gastrointestinal tract health, and overall animal performance. Among the strains of interest in DFM products, yeast, lactic acid and bacilli are highlighted. Hence, we hypothesized that the supplementation of different DFM would improve nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and performance of feedlot Bos indicus cattle receiving a finishing diet. In Exp. 1, 30 rumen-cannulated Nellore steers were blocked based on initial body weight (BW; 350 ±) 35.0 kg) in 1 of 30 pens and, within each block, animals were randomly assigned to: (1) Control: corn-based diet without DFM , (2) EFSC: CONT + 1 gram/head per day of a DFM based on Enterococcus faecium and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Probios® Precise, Chr. Hansen A/S, Horsholm, Denmark), and (3) BLBS: CONT + 2 grams/head per day of a DFM based on Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis (Bovacillus™ Chr. Hansen A/S). The experimental period lasted 35 days, while between days 30 to 34, total fecal collection was performed and on days 34 and 35, feces and rumen fluid were collected at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 h post-feeding. In Exp. 2, 240 Nellore bulls were blocked based on initial body weight (BW; 374 ± 35.3 kg) into 1 of 60 feedlot pens (4 bulls/pen) and pens within blocks were randomly assigned to receive the same treatments as Exp. 1. There were 3 adapting diets and the finishing diet (20% corn silage, 33% ground flint corn, 45% distillers bran plus solubles and 2% minerals and vitamins mixture) that was offered throughout the experimental period (115 days). On day 113, carcass ultrasound evaluations were performed and carcass traits were also obtained upon slaughter on day 117. In Exp.1 the inclusion or type of DFM did not affect either nutrient digestibility or ruminal fermentation parameters (P ≥ 0.40). In contrast, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, yielded a lower mean ammonia concentration (14.7 vs. 15.7 mg/L; P = 0.05). Moreover, ammonia levels were lower in EFSC at 3 and 6 h post-feeding vs. CONT (P ≤ 0.04), but also lower for BSBL vs. CONT at 6 h (P < 0.01). In summary, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, reduced proteolysis, with no effect on other parameters of rumen fermentation. In Exp. 2 no effects were observed on daily DMI (P 0.18) or final BW (P ≥ 0.12). Nonetheless, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, tended to improve ADG (1.57 vs. 1.50 kg; P = 0.10) and FE (145 vs. 140 g/kg; P = 0.07). No further effects were observed on carcass traits measured via ultrasound or at slaughter (P ≥ 0.22). In summary, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, tended to benefit feedlot performance of Bos indicus bulls.Aditivos alimentares, tais como probióticos (DFM), são incluídos nas dietas para melhorar a fermentação ruminal, a saúde do trato gastrointestinal e o desempenho animal. Entre os probióticos mais estudados estão as leveduras, as bactérias produtoras de ácido lático e os bacillus. Assim, nós hipotetizamos que a suplementação com diferentes probióticos poderia melhorar a digestibilidade dos nutrientes, a fermentação ruminal e o desempenho de bovinos Bos indicus em confinamento recebendo dieta de terminação. No Exp. 1, 30 novilhos Nelore canulados no rúmen foram alocados em 3 blocos (10 baias por bloco) com base no peso corporal inicial (PI; 350 ± 35.0 kg) e os seguintes tratamentos foram sorteados dentro de cada bloco: (1) Controle: dieta sem DFM, (2) EFSC: CONT + 1 gram/animal por dia de uma mistura de Enterococcus faecium e Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Probios® Precise, Chr. Hansen A/S, Horsholm, Denmark), e (3) BLBS: CONT + 2 grams/animal por dia de uma mistura de Bacillus licheniformis e Bacillus subtilis (Bovacillus™ Chr. Hansen A/S). O período experimental durou 35 dias, entre os dias 30 e 34, foi calculada a produção total de fezes e nos dias 34 e 35, fezes e fluido ruminal foram coletados às 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 e 21 h após a alimentação. No Exp. 2, 240 touros Nelore foram blocados pelo peso inicial (PI; 374±35.3 kg) em 1 das 60 baias (4 animais/baia) e as baias foram aleatoriamente distribuídas para receber os mesmos tratamentos do Exp. 1. Durante os 115 dias do período experimental foram ofertadas 3 dietas de adaptação e então a dieta de terminação (20% silagem de milho, 33% milho Flint moído seco, 45% de fibra seca de destilaria mais solúveis e 2% da mistura de minerais e vitaminas, com os respectivos aditivos. No dia 113, foi realizada a avaliação por ultrassonografia de carcaça e o rendimento de carcaça foi obtido no dia do abate dos animais (dia 117). No Exp. 1 a inclusão ou tipo de DFM não afetou a digestibilidade dos nutrientes ou os parâmetros de fermentação ruminal (P ≥ 0.40). No entanto, a suplementação com DFM, independentemente do tipo, produziu menor média de N-amoniacal (14.7 vs. 15.7 mg/L; P = 0.05). Além disso, os níveis de N-amoniacal foram menores para EFSC às 3 e 6 h após a alimentação vs. CONT (P ≤ 0.04), e menor para BSBL vs. CONT às 6 h (P < 0.01). No Exp. 2 nenhum efeito foi observado no CMS diário (P ≥ 0.18) ou peso final (P ≥ 0.12). Apesar disso, a suplementação com DFM, independentemente do tipo, tendeu a melhorar o GMD (1.57 vs. 1.50 kg; P = 0.10) e a EA (145 vs. 140 g/kg; P = 0.07). Nenhum efeito foi observado para os dados de carcaça na ultrassonografia ou abate (P ≥ 0.22). Em resumo, a suplementação com DFM, independentemente do tipo, tendeu a melhorar o desempenho dos touros Bos indicus.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPSantos, Flavio Augusto PortelaDias, Bruno Garcia de Carvalho2023-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-05022024-184430/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2024-02-06T14:00:02Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-05022024-184430Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212024-02-06T14:00:02Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet
Efeito de diferentes tipos probióticos no metabolismo, desempenho, e carcaça de bovinos Bos indicusconfinados com dieta de alto concentrado
title Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet
spellingShingle Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet
Dias, Bruno Garcia de Carvalho
Bacillus
Bacillus
Enterococcus faecium
Enterococcus faecium
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Confinamento
Feedlot
Metabolism
Metabolismo
Zebu
Zebuínos
title_short Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet
title_full Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet
title_fullStr Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet
title_full_unstemmed Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet
title_sort Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet
author Dias, Bruno Garcia de Carvalho
author_facet Dias, Bruno Garcia de Carvalho
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Santos, Flavio Augusto Portela
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, Bruno Garcia de Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bacillus
Bacillus
Enterococcus faecium
Enterococcus faecium
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Confinamento
Feedlot
Metabolism
Metabolismo
Zebu
Zebuínos
topic Bacillus
Bacillus
Enterococcus faecium
Enterococcus faecium
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Confinamento
Feedlot
Metabolism
Metabolismo
Zebu
Zebuínos
description Feed additives, such as direct-fed microbials (DFM), are included into feedlot diets to improve rumen fermentation, gastrointestinal tract health, and overall animal performance. Among the strains of interest in DFM products, yeast, lactic acid and bacilli are highlighted. Hence, we hypothesized that the supplementation of different DFM would improve nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and performance of feedlot Bos indicus cattle receiving a finishing diet. In Exp. 1, 30 rumen-cannulated Nellore steers were blocked based on initial body weight (BW; 350 ±) 35.0 kg) in 1 of 30 pens and, within each block, animals were randomly assigned to: (1) Control: corn-based diet without DFM , (2) EFSC: CONT + 1 gram/head per day of a DFM based on Enterococcus faecium and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Probios® Precise, Chr. Hansen A/S, Horsholm, Denmark), and (3) BLBS: CONT + 2 grams/head per day of a DFM based on Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis (Bovacillus™ Chr. Hansen A/S). The experimental period lasted 35 days, while between days 30 to 34, total fecal collection was performed and on days 34 and 35, feces and rumen fluid were collected at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 h post-feeding. In Exp. 2, 240 Nellore bulls were blocked based on initial body weight (BW; 374 ± 35.3 kg) into 1 of 60 feedlot pens (4 bulls/pen) and pens within blocks were randomly assigned to receive the same treatments as Exp. 1. There were 3 adapting diets and the finishing diet (20% corn silage, 33% ground flint corn, 45% distillers bran plus solubles and 2% minerals and vitamins mixture) that was offered throughout the experimental period (115 days). On day 113, carcass ultrasound evaluations were performed and carcass traits were also obtained upon slaughter on day 117. In Exp.1 the inclusion or type of DFM did not affect either nutrient digestibility or ruminal fermentation parameters (P ≥ 0.40). In contrast, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, yielded a lower mean ammonia concentration (14.7 vs. 15.7 mg/L; P = 0.05). Moreover, ammonia levels were lower in EFSC at 3 and 6 h post-feeding vs. CONT (P ≤ 0.04), but also lower for BSBL vs. CONT at 6 h (P < 0.01). In summary, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, reduced proteolysis, with no effect on other parameters of rumen fermentation. In Exp. 2 no effects were observed on daily DMI (P 0.18) or final BW (P ≥ 0.12). Nonetheless, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, tended to improve ADG (1.57 vs. 1.50 kg; P = 0.10) and FE (145 vs. 140 g/kg; P = 0.07). No further effects were observed on carcass traits measured via ultrasound or at slaughter (P ≥ 0.22). In summary, DFM supplementation, regardless of type, tended to benefit feedlot performance of Bos indicus bulls.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-06
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-05022024-184430/
url https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-05022024-184430/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1865490904983273472