Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pastures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2024
Autor(a) principal: Chase Lloret, Miguel Angel
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: eng
Instituição de defesa: Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-14032025-164226/
Resumo: There are few studies that have tested the use of functional oils for growing zebu cattle kept on tropical pastures. Therefore, we aimed to study the response of average daily gain (ADG) and dry matter intake (DMI) of bulls to the use of a blend of cashew and castor functional oils, compared to sodium monensin, in an alternating grazing system of Urochloa brizantha, cv Marandu at the end of the summer and during the autumn. One hundred and sixty Nellore bulls, aged 15 to 17 months, were used and allocated to 8 blocks based on initial body weight (IBW: 264 ± 18.5 kg) for a period of 112 days. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. For each block, 4 modules were assigned, each containing 2 paddocks of 1 hectare. These paddocks included a covered feeding area and free access to a water trough. Each block consisted of 4 experimental units (EU) of 5 animals each. Each EU occupied one module at a time, rotating to a new module every 28 days. This rotation ensured that no EU returned to the same module, and all EUs within a block experienced all modules. To adjust the leaf blade supply for all treatments, put-and-take bulls were added to the paddocks along with the experimental bulls, when necessary. The following four treatments were randomly assigned within each block: (1) CONT: supplementation of 0.3% of body weight (BW) of DDGS with a mineral mix without additives, (2) FO: 0.3% of BW (DM) of DDGS with a mineral mix and 2290 mg/kg of a functional oil blend (Essential®), (3) SM: 0.3% of BW (DM) of DDGS with a mineral mix and 195 mg/kg of sodium monensin (Rumensin®), (4) SMFO: 0.3% of BW (DM) of DDGS with a mineral mix, 2290 mg/kg of functional oil blend, and 195 mg/kg of monensin. At the beginning and end of the experiment, fasting weights were measured, while non-fasting weights were measured every 28 days to adjust the amount of supplement provided during the experimental period. The SMFO treatment showed a trend towards a 6.6% increase in ADG compared to the control treatment (1.034 vs. 0.970 kg; P = 0.08). There were no significant differences in ADG between the CONT, FO, and SM treatments (P>0.05), nor were there differences between the FO, SM, and SMFO treatments (P>0.05). There were no differences in final body weight (BW) or supplement intake as a percentage of BW per day among all treatments. In this study, the combination of a functional oil blend and monensin tended to improve the performance of Nellore bulls grazing tropical pastures. However, since there was a minimal difference in average daily gain (ADG) favoring the SMFO treatment (4 g/day) compared to the SM treatment, most of the benefit seems to be attributable to monensin.
id USP_e1ff1b567cc0ab0fd22d3a5f786a97ee
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-14032025-164226
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str
spelling Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pasturesFornecimento de óleos funcionais e/ou monensina para animais em crescimento mantidos em pastagens tropicaisAdditivesAditivosBullsDesempenhoGarrotesNelloreNelorePerformanceSuplementaçãoSupplementationTropicoTropicsThere are few studies that have tested the use of functional oils for growing zebu cattle kept on tropical pastures. Therefore, we aimed to study the response of average daily gain (ADG) and dry matter intake (DMI) of bulls to the use of a blend of cashew and castor functional oils, compared to sodium monensin, in an alternating grazing system of Urochloa brizantha, cv Marandu at the end of the summer and during the autumn. One hundred and sixty Nellore bulls, aged 15 to 17 months, were used and allocated to 8 blocks based on initial body weight (IBW: 264 ± 18.5 kg) for a period of 112 days. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. For each block, 4 modules were assigned, each containing 2 paddocks of 1 hectare. These paddocks included a covered feeding area and free access to a water trough. Each block consisted of 4 experimental units (EU) of 5 animals each. Each EU occupied one module at a time, rotating to a new module every 28 days. This rotation ensured that no EU returned to the same module, and all EUs within a block experienced all modules. To adjust the leaf blade supply for all treatments, put-and-take bulls were added to the paddocks along with the experimental bulls, when necessary. The following four treatments were randomly assigned within each block: (1) CONT: supplementation of 0.3% of body weight (BW) of DDGS with a mineral mix without additives, (2) FO: 0.3% of BW (DM) of DDGS with a mineral mix and 2290 mg/kg of a functional oil blend (Essential®), (3) SM: 0.3% of BW (DM) of DDGS with a mineral mix and 195 mg/kg of sodium monensin (Rumensin®), (4) SMFO: 0.3% of BW (DM) of DDGS with a mineral mix, 2290 mg/kg of functional oil blend, and 195 mg/kg of monensin. At the beginning and end of the experiment, fasting weights were measured, while non-fasting weights were measured every 28 days to adjust the amount of supplement provided during the experimental period. The SMFO treatment showed a trend towards a 6.6% increase in ADG compared to the control treatment (1.034 vs. 0.970 kg; P = 0.08). There were no significant differences in ADG between the CONT, FO, and SM treatments (P>0.05), nor were there differences between the FO, SM, and SMFO treatments (P>0.05). There were no differences in final body weight (BW) or supplement intake as a percentage of BW per day among all treatments. In this study, the combination of a functional oil blend and monensin tended to improve the performance of Nellore bulls grazing tropical pastures. However, since there was a minimal difference in average daily gain (ADG) favoring the SMFO treatment (4 g/day) compared to the SM treatment, most of the benefit seems to be attributable to monensin.Existem poucos trabalhos onde foi testado o uso de óleos funcionais para zebuínos em crescimento mantidos em pastagens tropicais. Sendo assim, objetivamos estudar a resposta sobre o ganho de peso (GPD) e o consumo de matéria seca (CMS) de garrotes ao uso de um blend de óleos funcionais de caju e mamona, em comparação com a monensina sódica, em sistemas de pastejo alternado de Urochloa brizantha, cv Marandu no final do período de verão e no período de outono. Foram utilizados 160 garrotes Nelore de 15 a 17 meses de idade e alocados em 8 blocos com base no peso inicial (PI: 264 ± 18.5 kg) por um período de 112 dias. O delineamento foi de blocos casualizados, e para cada bloco, foram designados 4 módulos com 2 piquetes de 1 hectare cada, contendo uma praça de alimentação coberta e acesso livre ao bebedouro. Cada bloco era composto de 4 unidades experimentais (UE) de 5 animais cada, em que cada UE utilizou um módulo por vez, rodando de módulo a cada 28 dias, sem que as UE voltassem para o mesmo módulo, para que todas as UE do bloco passassem por todos os módulos do bloco. Para ajustar a oferta de lâmina foliar de todos os tratamentos, garrotes ajustadores foram adicionados aos piquetes junto com os garrotes experimentais, quando necessário. Os seguintes 4 tratamentos foram sorteados dentro de cada bloco: (1) CONT: suplementação de 0,3% do PC (MS) de DDGS com mistura mineral sem aditivos, (2) FO: 0,3% do PC (MS) de DDGS com mistura mineral e 2290 mg/kg de blend de óleos funcionais (Essential®), (3) SM: 0,3% do PC (MS) de DDGS com mistura mineral e 195 mg/kg de monensina sódica (Rumensin®), (4) SMFO: 0,3% do PC (MS) de DDGS com mistura mineral, 2290 mg/kg de blend de óleos funcionais e 195 mg/kg de monensina. No início e no final do experimento, foram feitas pesagens em jejum, enquanto que pesagens sem jejum foram feitas a cada 28 dias para ajustar a quantidade de suplemento ofertado durante o período experimental. O tratamento SMFO apresentou uma tendência de aumento de 6,6% no ganho de peso diário (GPD) em relação ao tratamento controle (1,034 vs. 0,970 kg; P = 0,08). Não houve diferenças significativas no GPD entre os tratamentos CONT, FO, SM (P>0,05) e não houve diferenças entre os tratamentos FO, SM e SMFO (P>0,05). Não houve diferença no PC final e no consumo de suplemento em % do PC/dia entre todos os tratamentos. Nesse estudo, a combinação do blend de óleos funcionais com a monensina tendeu a melhorar o desempenho de machos nelore em pastagens tropicais, no entanto, como houve uma mínima diferença no GPD a favor do tratamento SMFO (4 g/dia) com relação ao tratamento SM, a maior parte do benefício parece ser efeito da monensina.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPSantos, Flavio Augusto PortelaChase Lloret, Miguel Angel 2024-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-14032025-164226/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2025-03-18T15:51:02Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-14032025-164226Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212025-03-18T15:51:02Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pastures
Fornecimento de óleos funcionais e/ou monensina para animais em crescimento mantidos em pastagens tropicais
title Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pastures
spellingShingle Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pastures
Chase Lloret, Miguel Angel
Additives
Aditivos
Bulls
Desempenho
Garrotes
Nellore
Nelore
Performance
Suplementação
Supplementation
Tropico
Tropics
title_short Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pastures
title_full Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pastures
title_fullStr Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pastures
title_full_unstemmed Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pastures
title_sort Feeding functional oils and/or monensin for growing cattle grazing on tropical pastures
author Chase Lloret, Miguel Angel
author_facet Chase Lloret, Miguel Angel
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Santos, Flavio Augusto Portela
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chase Lloret, Miguel Angel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Additives
Aditivos
Bulls
Desempenho
Garrotes
Nellore
Nelore
Performance
Suplementação
Supplementation
Tropico
Tropics
topic Additives
Aditivos
Bulls
Desempenho
Garrotes
Nellore
Nelore
Performance
Suplementação
Supplementation
Tropico
Tropics
description There are few studies that have tested the use of functional oils for growing zebu cattle kept on tropical pastures. Therefore, we aimed to study the response of average daily gain (ADG) and dry matter intake (DMI) of bulls to the use of a blend of cashew and castor functional oils, compared to sodium monensin, in an alternating grazing system of Urochloa brizantha, cv Marandu at the end of the summer and during the autumn. One hundred and sixty Nellore bulls, aged 15 to 17 months, were used and allocated to 8 blocks based on initial body weight (IBW: 264 ± 18.5 kg) for a period of 112 days. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design. For each block, 4 modules were assigned, each containing 2 paddocks of 1 hectare. These paddocks included a covered feeding area and free access to a water trough. Each block consisted of 4 experimental units (EU) of 5 animals each. Each EU occupied one module at a time, rotating to a new module every 28 days. This rotation ensured that no EU returned to the same module, and all EUs within a block experienced all modules. To adjust the leaf blade supply for all treatments, put-and-take bulls were added to the paddocks along with the experimental bulls, when necessary. The following four treatments were randomly assigned within each block: (1) CONT: supplementation of 0.3% of body weight (BW) of DDGS with a mineral mix without additives, (2) FO: 0.3% of BW (DM) of DDGS with a mineral mix and 2290 mg/kg of a functional oil blend (Essential®), (3) SM: 0.3% of BW (DM) of DDGS with a mineral mix and 195 mg/kg of sodium monensin (Rumensin®), (4) SMFO: 0.3% of BW (DM) of DDGS with a mineral mix, 2290 mg/kg of functional oil blend, and 195 mg/kg of monensin. At the beginning and end of the experiment, fasting weights were measured, while non-fasting weights were measured every 28 days to adjust the amount of supplement provided during the experimental period. The SMFO treatment showed a trend towards a 6.6% increase in ADG compared to the control treatment (1.034 vs. 0.970 kg; P = 0.08). There were no significant differences in ADG between the CONT, FO, and SM treatments (P>0.05), nor were there differences between the FO, SM, and SMFO treatments (P>0.05). There were no differences in final body weight (BW) or supplement intake as a percentage of BW per day among all treatments. In this study, the combination of a functional oil blend and monensin tended to improve the performance of Nellore bulls grazing tropical pastures. However, since there was a minimal difference in average daily gain (ADG) favoring the SMFO treatment (4 g/day) compared to the SM treatment, most of the benefit seems to be attributable to monensin.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-06
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-14032025-164226/
url https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/11/11139/tde-14032025-164226/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1865492237649969152