Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devices

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2023
Autor(a) principal: Cavalcanti, Heloísa Nelson
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: eng
Instituição de defesa: Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-18052023-173246/
Resumo: Objective: To compare the accuracy and reliability of intra- and inter-arch linear measurements obtained from 3D digital models from intraoral scanning and from scanning conventional models. Material and Methods: The sample consisted of 25 volunteers (11 and 14 women) with a mean age of 29.6 years, who had their dental models divided into three groups: Group T, digital models from scanning with a Trios® intraoral scanner; Group P, models from scanning with a Panda® intraoral scanner and Control group, models from scanning conventional models with an E3® desktopscanning, previously obtained through molding with alginate Hydrogum®. Seventy five pairs of three-dimensional digital models were analyzed. Orthoanalyzer software was used for the evaluation of measurements from this study including: Mesiodistal size of the teeth, clinical height of the crown, Intercanine, interpremolar and molar distances, perimeter and arch length, overjet and overbite. The normality of the variables was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Intergroup comparisons were performed using repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey\'s tests (P<0.05). Results: The normality of the sample was confirmed. All variables showed good and excellent reliability with ICC ranging from 0.808 to 0.987 and 0.814 to 0.950 from the Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility assessment, respectively. No significant differences were found between the three study groups. Conclusion: Both intraoral scanning devices showed similar accuracy.
id USP_e5477cc192bf7de07b56ec0d94ced9be
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-18052023-173246
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str
spelling Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devicesComparação da precisão dimensional entre scanners intraoraisDental modelsDigital technologyDimensional measurement accuracyModelos dentáriosOrthodonticsOrtodontiaPrecisão da medição dimensionalTecnologia digitalObjective: To compare the accuracy and reliability of intra- and inter-arch linear measurements obtained from 3D digital models from intraoral scanning and from scanning conventional models. Material and Methods: The sample consisted of 25 volunteers (11 and 14 women) with a mean age of 29.6 years, who had their dental models divided into three groups: Group T, digital models from scanning with a Trios® intraoral scanner; Group P, models from scanning with a Panda® intraoral scanner and Control group, models from scanning conventional models with an E3® desktopscanning, previously obtained through molding with alginate Hydrogum®. Seventy five pairs of three-dimensional digital models were analyzed. Orthoanalyzer software was used for the evaluation of measurements from this study including: Mesiodistal size of the teeth, clinical height of the crown, Intercanine, interpremolar and molar distances, perimeter and arch length, overjet and overbite. The normality of the variables was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Intergroup comparisons were performed using repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey\'s tests (P<0.05). Results: The normality of the sample was confirmed. All variables showed good and excellent reliability with ICC ranging from 0.808 to 0.987 and 0.814 to 0.950 from the Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility assessment, respectively. No significant differences were found between the three study groups. Conclusion: Both intraoral scanning devices showed similar accuracy.Objetivo: Comparar a precisão e confiabilidade das medidas lineares intra e interarcos obtidas de modelos digitais 3D provenientes do escaneamento intraoral e do escaneamento de modelos de gesso. Material e Métodos: A amostra foi constituída por 25 voluntários (11 homens e 14 mulheres) com idade média de 29,6 anos, que tiveram seus modelos dentários divididos em três grupos: Grupo T, Modelos digitais do escaneamento com scanner intraoral Trios®; Grupo P, modelos do escaneamento com scanner intraoral Panda® e Grupo controle: Modelos do escaneamento de modelos de gesso com scanner de bancada E3®, previamente obtidos por moldagem com alginato Hydrogum®. Setenta e cinco pares de modelos digitais tridimensionais foram analisados. O software Orthoanalyzer foi utilizado para a avaliação das medidas deste estudo, incluindo: Tamanho mesiodistal dos dentes, altura clínica da coroa, distâncias intercaninos, inter pré-molares e molares, perímetro e comprimento do arco, sobressaliência e sobremordida. A normalidade das variáveis foi testada por meio do teste de Shapiro-Wilk. As comparações intergrupos foram realizadas usando ANOVA para medidas repetidas e testes de Tukey (P <0,05). Resultados: A normalidade da amostra foi confirmada. Todas as variáveis apresentaram confiabilidade boa e excelente com ICC variando de 0,808 a 0,987 e 0,814 a 0,950 na avaliação da reprodutibilidade intra e Interexaminadores, respectivamente. Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre os três grupos de estudo. Conclusão: Ambos os aparelhos de escaneamento intraoral apresentaram acurácia semelhante.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPHenriques, Jose Fernando CastanhaCavalcanti, Heloísa Nelson2023-03-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-18052023-173246/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPReter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2024-08-02T16:12:02Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-18052023-173246Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212024-08-02T16:12:02Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devices
Comparação da precisão dimensional entre scanners intraorais
title Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devices
spellingShingle Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devices
Cavalcanti, Heloísa Nelson
Dental models
Digital technology
Dimensional measurement accuracy
Modelos dentários
Orthodontics
Ortodontia
Precisão da medição dimensional
Tecnologia digital
title_short Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devices
title_full Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devices
title_fullStr Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devices
title_full_unstemmed Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devices
title_sort Dimensional Accuracy comparison between intraoral scanning devices
author Cavalcanti, Heloísa Nelson
author_facet Cavalcanti, Heloísa Nelson
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Henriques, Jose Fernando Castanha
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cavalcanti, Heloísa Nelson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental models
Digital technology
Dimensional measurement accuracy
Modelos dentários
Orthodontics
Ortodontia
Precisão da medição dimensional
Tecnologia digital
topic Dental models
Digital technology
Dimensional measurement accuracy
Modelos dentários
Orthodontics
Ortodontia
Precisão da medição dimensional
Tecnologia digital
description Objective: To compare the accuracy and reliability of intra- and inter-arch linear measurements obtained from 3D digital models from intraoral scanning and from scanning conventional models. Material and Methods: The sample consisted of 25 volunteers (11 and 14 women) with a mean age of 29.6 years, who had their dental models divided into three groups: Group T, digital models from scanning with a Trios® intraoral scanner; Group P, models from scanning with a Panda® intraoral scanner and Control group, models from scanning conventional models with an E3® desktopscanning, previously obtained through molding with alginate Hydrogum®. Seventy five pairs of three-dimensional digital models were analyzed. Orthoanalyzer software was used for the evaluation of measurements from this study including: Mesiodistal size of the teeth, clinical height of the crown, Intercanine, interpremolar and molar distances, perimeter and arch length, overjet and overbite. The normality of the variables was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Intergroup comparisons were performed using repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey\'s tests (P<0.05). Results: The normality of the sample was confirmed. All variables showed good and excellent reliability with ICC ranging from 0.808 to 0.987 and 0.814 to 0.950 from the Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility assessment, respectively. No significant differences were found between the three study groups. Conclusion: Both intraoral scanning devices showed similar accuracy.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-18052023-173246/
url https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/25/25144/tde-18052023-173246/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Reter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Reter o conteúdo por motivos de patente, publicação e/ou direitos autoriais.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1815258242004025344