Comparação da rugosidade após abrasão por escovação e da microdureza entre resinas compostas nanoparticuladas e microhíbrida

• Ano de defesa: 2006
• Autor(a) principal: Rosa, Rogério Simões
• Orientador(a): Mota, Eduardo Gonçalves
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre
• Palavras-chave em Português: ODONTOLOGIA; RESINAS COMPOSTAS; MATERIAIS DENTÁRIOS; ABRASIVOS (ODONTOLOGIA)
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/392

The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness after three body wear and Vickers microhardness of direct composite resins with different sizes of inorganic filler particles, microhybrid Z250 and nano-filled Z350 and Supreme XT, which are fabricated by one company (3M ESPE, St Paul, Minessota, USA). Six specimens (n=6) of each composite resin were manufactured to be evaluated, in sequence, in each one of control, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years simulated toothbrushing periods. Three measurements of surface roughness Ra (μm) were realized for specimen after each simulation. One representative specimen was manufactured to each composite resin tested in each simulated toothbrushing period to be examinated in SEM. The minimums and maximums means values were 0. 14 μm control group Z350 composite resin and 0. 21 μm 1 year simulated toothbrushing period Z250. Were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey ( =0. 05) and there was no significant statistically difference between the groups. The General Linear Model and Tukey ( =0. 05) was applied, with purpose to evaluated composite resin and time factors in surface roughness Ra (μm). There was significant statistically difference of control time roughness (0. 15 μm) in regard to 1 year time roughness (0. 19 μm), about the kind of composite resin, both nano-filled composite resins (0. 16 μm) had more homogeneous surface after three body wear than microhybrid (0. 19 μm).The photomicrographs did not show any difference among the three composite resins control group. However, the nano-filled 6 months, 1 year and 2 years simulated toothbrushing periods photomicrographs showed the most homogeneous surface. For Vickers microhardness, 5 specimens of each composite resin were manufactured (n=5). Means for Vickers microhardness (VHN) were: Z250 74. 44; Z350 73. 87; XT 78. 28. Data were statistically compared with ANOVA, and there was no significant difference between the means. The results of this study indicate that the nano-filled composite resins showed a similar behavior to microhybrid for Vickers microhardness, but had more homogeneous surface after three body wear.