Responsabilidade penal da pessoa jurídica: uma proposta legal

• Ano de defesa: 2025
• Autor(a) principal: Pedroso, Fernando Gentil Gizzi de Almeida
• Orientador(a): Santos, Christiano Jorge
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Direito Penal Econômico; Responsabilidade penal; Pessoas jurídicas
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Economic Criminal Law; Criminal liability; Legal entities
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/45240

With the evolution of the structures of the global financial market and the deterioration of other once abundant institutes, has been noticed a greater fragility of the capital scene. This fact brings to the epicenter of the world a recent deleterious (economic) reality that affects, in a single act, a plurality of individuals. At the heart of this problem, whether on a doctrinal or legal level, emerges the perception of companies’ ability to vilify safeguarded legal assets, as they play a central role in the production and circulation of wealth. Thus, we try to establish, through legal control bodies, standards of permitted risks. In this scenario, the criminal liability of legal entities is present in the constitutional text through two articles, with different realities: a) in Title VIII (Social order), Chapter VI (Environment), art.225, §3° CRFB, in wich there is a model of heteroresponsibility implemented by Law nº. 9.605, of February 12, 1998 and b) in Title VII (Economic and financial order), Chapter I (General principles of economic activity), art.173, §5° CRFB, where there is no responsibility model outlined by law. It turns out that, due to the absence of regulations for such harmful types, as well as due to the recent adoption by the Federal Supreme Court of a model of self-responsibility, in dissonance with the systematization then in force force for environmental crimes, it materialized, through a comparative and deductive methodology, a normative proposal for the criminal liability of collective entities