Competências ambientais: (in)efetividade, conflitos de normas e casos concretos

• Ano de defesa: 2009
• Autor(a) principal: Costa, Karina Pinto
• Orientador(a): Cammarosano, Márcio
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Meio ambiente; (In)efetividade; Conflitos de normas; Brasil [Constituicao (1988)]; Direito ambiental > Brasil; Competencia (Autoridade legal) > Leis e legislacao > Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Environment; Competence; (In)effectiveness; Rules conflicts
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8662

This paper aims to analyze the jurisdiction of the legal authorities that composes the Environmental National Policy System ( Sistema Nacional do Meio Ambiente SISNAMA ), to shed some lights on the inefficiency of the administrative bodies to elaborate environmental rules, as well as to present the conflicts between legal rules in a practical view. This paper is oriented by the Federal Constitution of 1988, which lies on the top of the Brazilian legal system, passing by the definition of the rules under its auspices and the non-legal rules (e.g. Resolução CONAMA), which are lower positioned in the rule hierarchy system and are power limited. Based on the constitutional principle of Legality (article 5, II. CF/88), this research aims to settle a resolution to the remaining conflict of hierarchy of rules, given that the article 59 of Federal Constitution of 1988, which states the legislative procedures, does not mention the procedure of elaboration of Resolução CONAMA. Starting from this constitutional analysis, the major problem involves the ruling jurisdiction of CONAMA, body of SISNAMA, that states rights and obligations through its resolutions, going beyond its regulatory power. For this reason, it makes it necessary to verify if a rule that regulates certain issue is law, regulation or infringes general jurisdiction rules. Moreover, innumerous legal debates have arisen from the lack of general rules that deals with relevant mechanisms of environmental protection as well as assess the potential impacts of activities that are presumed to cause environmental degradation, what causes daily conflicts between environmental agencies and entrepreneurs. To conclude with, this paper aims to provide legal answers to some questions that are still not studied, as the administrative jurisdiction of each federal entity to protect the environment, stated by the paragraph of article 23, of Federal Constitution