As reformas previdenciárias dos servidores públicos

• Ano de defesa: 2006
• Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Patricia Evangelista de
• Orientador(a): Balera, Wagner
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Reformas previdenciárias; Previdencia social > Leis e legislacao > Brasil; Brasil > Servidores publicos
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Welfare reforms
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7383

The work evaluates the process that lead to the approval and establishment of the two generations of welfare reforms, considering the system as a whole, but it concentrates on the changes made in the public servers regime of social security. The analysis is understood among the years of 1995 and 2005. The first reform began with the sending to the National Congress of the Proposal of Constitutional Amendment n. 33, in March 1995. That proposal was discussed during almost the whole first government of the president Fernando Henrique Cardoso, having been approved in December 1998, and turned into the Constitutional Amendment n. 20/98. The second reform already had beginning in April 2003, in the president Luís Inácio Lula da Silva s government, when a new proposal of constitutional amendment (PEC n. 40/2003) was directed to the parliament, focused in the reform of the own public servers regime of social security, based on a diagnosis that appeared that most of the distortions still existent in the system was in that regime. That proposal was approved in December of that same year, and turned into the Amendment n. 41/20303 and, later, in the Amendment n. 47/2005. It analyzes the two reforms of the Brazilian welfare system comparatively, introducing the progresses or setbacks of each one of them, the importance of the group of the changes on the welfare, as well as the reasons that took such reforms to have ways and discussions so differentiated. Finally, it shows the points still modification pendants, the probable future stages and as the reform process in this country is inserted in the international panorama