A natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?cia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2016
Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Mara Rubia Rodrigues lattes
Orientador(a): Barbisan, Leci Borges lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Letras
Departamento: Escola de Humanidades
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7142
Resumo: Within the intersection of two perspectives, a journalistic one, emphasizing the objective effect, and another, linguistic, giving emphasis to the enunciative aspect of language, this dissertation aims at analyzing how intersubjectivity and argumentativeness build up meanings in the journalistic discourse, and at how objectivity can be constitutive of this construction. According to Pesquisa Brasileira de M?dia 2015, Brazilian readers keep up considering the newspaper a reliable source of information about daily life events, whether in their neighborhood or in the worldwide domain. Part of this reliability is the fruit of the press' discourse about itself: the discourse of trustworthiness to the facts, which speak for themselves, of the space of plurality of opinions in the name of impartiality as well as of objectivity. On the other hand, the Argumentation Within Language Theory (AWL) demonstrates that the meanings produced in the discourse are an intersubjective and an argumentative construction, considering that argumentativity is inherent to language, which is constitutive of any kind of discourse. According to the AWL, while words are in the virtuality of the linguistic system, they have potential meanings, orientations for the discursive continuum in certain directions. An argumentation consists of, according to the language possibilities, establishing a relation between words, by which the meaning of a word enunciated depends on the meaning of another word also enunciated. The intersubjectivity, within this approach, means that the speaker mobilizes the argumentative resources of the language to make up discursive objects according to multiple perspectives on objects of the factual reality. The speaker does not offer the interlocutor an objective representation of reality, but an argumentative apprehension of it, in order to discuss both.
id P_RS_6d06f7f75185ab80a70f37bbff8e5d1c
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7142
network_acronym_str P_RS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
repository_id_str
spelling Barbisan, Leci Borges123.355.170-15http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4799795D1617.772.260-15http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4990626H4Freitas, Mara Rubia Rodrigues2017-03-06T14:18:45Z2016-12-16http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7142Within the intersection of two perspectives, a journalistic one, emphasizing the objective effect, and another, linguistic, giving emphasis to the enunciative aspect of language, this dissertation aims at analyzing how intersubjectivity and argumentativeness build up meanings in the journalistic discourse, and at how objectivity can be constitutive of this construction. According to Pesquisa Brasileira de M?dia 2015, Brazilian readers keep up considering the newspaper a reliable source of information about daily life events, whether in their neighborhood or in the worldwide domain. Part of this reliability is the fruit of the press' discourse about itself: the discourse of trustworthiness to the facts, which speak for themselves, of the space of plurality of opinions in the name of impartiality as well as of objectivity. On the other hand, the Argumentation Within Language Theory (AWL) demonstrates that the meanings produced in the discourse are an intersubjective and an argumentative construction, considering that argumentativity is inherent to language, which is constitutive of any kind of discourse. According to the AWL, while words are in the virtuality of the linguistic system, they have potential meanings, orientations for the discursive continuum in certain directions. An argumentation consists of, according to the language possibilities, establishing a relation between words, by which the meaning of a word enunciated depends on the meaning of another word also enunciated. The intersubjectivity, within this approach, means that the speaker mobilizes the argumentative resources of the language to make up discursive objects according to multiple perspectives on objects of the factual reality. The speaker does not offer the interlocutor an objective representation of reality, but an argumentative apprehension of it, in order to discuss both.Na intersec??o de duas perspectivas, uma jornal?stica, que privilegia o efeito objetivo no discurso, e outra lingu?stica, que privilegia o aspecto enunciativo da linguagem, o prop?sito desta disserta??o ? analisar de que modo a intersubjetividade e a argumentatividade constroem sentidos no discurso jornal?stico, e em que medida a objetividade pode ser constitutiva dessa constru??o. No que se refere ? perspectiva da imprensa, a Pesquisa Brasileira de M?dia 2015 demonstrou que o p?blico leitor brasileiro continua considerando o jornal uma fonte confi?vel de informa??o sobre os fatos do cotidiano, do seu entorno e mesmo do mundo. Parte dessa confiabilidade ? fruto do pr?prio discurso da imprensa sobre si mesma: o discurso da fidelidade aos fatos que falam por si, do espa?o da pluralidade de opini?es em nome da imparcialidade, que cria um efeito de objetividade bastante convincente. Por outro lado, a Teoria da Argumenta??o na L?ngua (ANL) demonstra que os sentidos produzidos no discurso s?o uma constru??o intersubjetiva e argumentativa, tendo em vista que a argumentatividade ? inerente ? l?ngua, esta constitutiva de todo discurso. Segundo a ANL, enquanto est?o na virtualidade do sistema lingu?stico, as palavras possuem significa??es potenciais, orienta??es para a continua??o discursiva em determinadas dire??es. Argumentar consiste em, a partir das possibilidades inscritas na l?ngua, estabelecer uma rela??o entre as palavras, pela qual o sentido de uma palavra enunciada depende do sentido de outra palavra enunciada. A intersubjetividade, nesse recorte te?rico, ? contemplada pela hip?tese de que o locutor mobiliza os recursos argumentativos da l?ngua para construir objetos discursivos a partir de m?ltiplas perspectivas sobre objetos da realidade factual. Ao se enunciar em determinado sentido ante o interlocutor, o locutor n?o fornece uma representa??o objetiva da realidade, mas uma apreens?o argumentativa da realidade, a qual ele p?e em debate ante o interlocutor.Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2017-03-06T14:18:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf: 1641824 bytes, checksum: 15eea24c21e56ed6b755b0131cb5688f (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-06T14:18:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf: 1641824 bytes, checksum: 15eea24c21e56ed6b755b0131cb5688f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-16Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/167349/DIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em LetrasPUCRSBrasilEscola de HumanidadesARGUMENTA??OINTERSUBJETIVIDADEJORNALISMO - DISCURSOSLINGU?STICALINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRASA natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?ciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis8447345070736321569600600600600-6557531471218110192-54094192628864980882075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILDIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgDIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg2768http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7142/5/DIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg8ac05926afec004dcad62ef5ffdbbf50MD55TEXTDIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf.txtDIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf.txttext/plain237092http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7142/4/DIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf.txt9ca7271ffcd7e924eeb49588adacae68MD54LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8610http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7142/3/license.txt5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1beMD53ORIGINALDIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdfDIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdfapplication/pdf1641824http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7142/2/DIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf15eea24c21e56ed6b755b0131cb5688fMD52tede/71422017-03-06 12:01:01.543oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2017-03-06T15:01:01Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv A natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?cia
title A natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?cia
spellingShingle A natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?cia
Freitas, Mara Rubia Rodrigues
ARGUMENTA??O
INTERSUBJETIVIDADE
JORNALISMO - DISCURSOS
LINGU?STICA
LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
title_short A natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?cia
title_full A natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?cia
title_fullStr A natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?cia
title_full_unstemmed A natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?cia
title_sort A natureza argumentativa da l?ngua no discurso informativo da not?cia
author Freitas, Mara Rubia Rodrigues
author_facet Freitas, Mara Rubia Rodrigues
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Barbisan, Leci Borges
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 123.355.170-15
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4799795D1
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 617.772.260-15
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4990626H4
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas, Mara Rubia Rodrigues
contributor_str_mv Barbisan, Leci Borges
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ARGUMENTA??O
INTERSUBJETIVIDADE
JORNALISMO - DISCURSOS
LINGU?STICA
topic ARGUMENTA??O
INTERSUBJETIVIDADE
JORNALISMO - DISCURSOS
LINGU?STICA
LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LETRAS
description Within the intersection of two perspectives, a journalistic one, emphasizing the objective effect, and another, linguistic, giving emphasis to the enunciative aspect of language, this dissertation aims at analyzing how intersubjectivity and argumentativeness build up meanings in the journalistic discourse, and at how objectivity can be constitutive of this construction. According to Pesquisa Brasileira de M?dia 2015, Brazilian readers keep up considering the newspaper a reliable source of information about daily life events, whether in their neighborhood or in the worldwide domain. Part of this reliability is the fruit of the press' discourse about itself: the discourse of trustworthiness to the facts, which speak for themselves, of the space of plurality of opinions in the name of impartiality as well as of objectivity. On the other hand, the Argumentation Within Language Theory (AWL) demonstrates that the meanings produced in the discourse are an intersubjective and an argumentative construction, considering that argumentativity is inherent to language, which is constitutive of any kind of discourse. According to the AWL, while words are in the virtuality of the linguistic system, they have potential meanings, orientations for the discursive continuum in certain directions. An argumentation consists of, according to the language possibilities, establishing a relation between words, by which the meaning of a word enunciated depends on the meaning of another word also enunciated. The intersubjectivity, within this approach, means that the speaker mobilizes the argumentative resources of the language to make up discursive objects according to multiple perspectives on objects of the factual reality. The speaker does not offer the interlocutor an objective representation of reality, but an argumentative apprehension of it, in order to discuss both.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016-12-16
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-03-06T14:18:45Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7142
url http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/7142
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 8447345070736321569
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -6557531471218110192
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -5409419262886498088
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv 2075167498588264571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Letras
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUCRS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Humanidades
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7142/5/DIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf.jpg
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7142/4/DIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf.txt
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7142/3/license.txt
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/7142/2/DIS_MARA_RUBIA_RODRIGUES_FREITAS_COMPLETO.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8ac05926afec004dcad62ef5ffdbbf50
9ca7271ffcd7e924eeb49588adacae68
5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1be
15eea24c21e56ed6b755b0131cb5688f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.central@pucrs.br||
_version_ 1796793223791771648