Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Conceição, Djenane Brasil da
Orientador(a): Rose, Julio Cesar Coelho de lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia - PPGPsi
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/7544
Resumo: In a literate society like ours there are many advantages for both the individual and for the community in knowing how to read and write. Brazil's high illiteracy rates are well known, and eradicating functional illiteracy is a major ethical and political goal that studies and researches can help to reach. The present dissertation is an attempt to advance in this direction. We conducted a comparative analysis of the concept of reading and the method for teaching to read from the viewpoints of Leonard loomfield's structural linguistics and of B. F. Skinner's behavioral analysis. We worked on representative texts about the concept of reading and teaching to read by these two scholars. In behavior analysis, as a result of the findings of this research, we went beyond Skinner's texts, and entered the field of errorless learning. Leonard Bloomfield (1887-1949), one of the most important linguists of the twentieth century, was a behaviorist and influenced many aspects of B. F. Skinner’s work. In the 1930s Bloomfield developed a method for teaching reading, which culminated in the publication of “Let’s Read” in 1961. B. F. Skinner (1904-1990), the founder of behavior analysis, has been considered by many as the most prominent psychologist of the twentieth century. In the 1950s Skinner published "Verbal Behavior" (1957/1992), in which he addressed the study of language conceived as verbal behavior. Bloomfield considered the basic repertoire of reading as alphabetic habit, which consists in emitting vocal verbal responses corresponding to the printed text, a concept that is compatible with the design of Skinner's concept of textual (one of the units of analysis of verbal behavior). Both Bloomfield and Skinner considered the basic repertoire of reading, the alphabetic habit or textual behavior, as a prerequisite for reading comprehension. Teaching grapheme-phoneme correspondences as an essential part of a reading instruction program was advocated by Bloomfield and is nowadays widely accepted by researchers in the field of reading instruction. The fundamental principle that guides Bloomfield's reading instruction method is the systematic organization of the words presented for reading, based on the degree of regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences, from the alphabetic principle to reaching correspondences that deviate far from this principle. The basic teaching procedure is to present pairs of words that contrast in just one or a few letters. This procedure is compatible with differential reinforcement of responses in the presence of specific stimuli procedures used in establishing discrimination in Skinner's behavioral analysis. In addition, we identified in Bloomfield's reading instruction method principles of programmed instruction, which Skinner formulated in the 1950s. For example, requiring the learner to present at least one active response in every step of teaching, reinforcing correct answers immediately after their emission and preparing teaching materials in a gradual progression to enhance the learner's performance in every step of the teaching program. We identified that in Bloomfield's method he advocated errorless learning or learning with few errors, an element that appears in Skinner's behavioral analysis. We concluded that Bloomfield and Skinner's reading concepts are very similar and that Bloomfield's reading instruction method is compatible with behavioral analytical teaching procedures. Bloomfield designed a behavioral reading instruction method, advocated errorless learning or with a minimum of errors and attributed the emission of wrong answers by the learner to teaching method, as supported by the field of errorless learning. It should not be considered that Bloomfield's reading instruction method has actually been tested. Skinner's behavior analysis can contribute to refinements in Bloomfield's reading instruction method, for example, by systematizing the use of extrinsic reinforcers. The adaptation of Bloomfield's reading instruction method to the Portuguese language and its systematic combination with principles and procedures of behavior analysis require the collaborative work of linguists and behavior analysts (at least) and would have great potential, as shown by our analysis, towards solving the problem of Brazil's high rates of functional illiteracy.
id SCAR_558693d04209491885ec9e2cb29392ab
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/7544
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str
spelling Conceição, Djenane Brasil daRose, Julio Cesar Coelho dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3386857761295187Passos, Maria de Lourdes Rodrigues da Fonsecahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4526685697455275http://lattes.cnpq.br/5404269593756474c24b1e45-e2d6-4aa7-afc1-dff2912856092016-09-27T20:02:37Z2016-09-27T20:02:37Z2015-12-15CONCEIÇÃO, Djenane Brasil da. Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner. 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Psicologia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2015. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/7544.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/7544In a literate society like ours there are many advantages for both the individual and for the community in knowing how to read and write. Brazil's high illiteracy rates are well known, and eradicating functional illiteracy is a major ethical and political goal that studies and researches can help to reach. The present dissertation is an attempt to advance in this direction. We conducted a comparative analysis of the concept of reading and the method for teaching to read from the viewpoints of Leonard loomfield's structural linguistics and of B. F. Skinner's behavioral analysis. We worked on representative texts about the concept of reading and teaching to read by these two scholars. In behavior analysis, as a result of the findings of this research, we went beyond Skinner's texts, and entered the field of errorless learning. Leonard Bloomfield (1887-1949), one of the most important linguists of the twentieth century, was a behaviorist and influenced many aspects of B. F. Skinner’s work. In the 1930s Bloomfield developed a method for teaching reading, which culminated in the publication of “Let’s Read” in 1961. B. F. Skinner (1904-1990), the founder of behavior analysis, has been considered by many as the most prominent psychologist of the twentieth century. In the 1950s Skinner published "Verbal Behavior" (1957/1992), in which he addressed the study of language conceived as verbal behavior. Bloomfield considered the basic repertoire of reading as alphabetic habit, which consists in emitting vocal verbal responses corresponding to the printed text, a concept that is compatible with the design of Skinner's concept of textual (one of the units of analysis of verbal behavior). Both Bloomfield and Skinner considered the basic repertoire of reading, the alphabetic habit or textual behavior, as a prerequisite for reading comprehension. Teaching grapheme-phoneme correspondences as an essential part of a reading instruction program was advocated by Bloomfield and is nowadays widely accepted by researchers in the field of reading instruction. The fundamental principle that guides Bloomfield's reading instruction method is the systematic organization of the words presented for reading, based on the degree of regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences, from the alphabetic principle to reaching correspondences that deviate far from this principle. The basic teaching procedure is to present pairs of words that contrast in just one or a few letters. This procedure is compatible with differential reinforcement of responses in the presence of specific stimuli procedures used in establishing discrimination in Skinner's behavioral analysis. In addition, we identified in Bloomfield's reading instruction method principles of programmed instruction, which Skinner formulated in the 1950s. For example, requiring the learner to present at least one active response in every step of teaching, reinforcing correct answers immediately after their emission and preparing teaching materials in a gradual progression to enhance the learner's performance in every step of the teaching program. We identified that in Bloomfield's method he advocated errorless learning or learning with few errors, an element that appears in Skinner's behavioral analysis. We concluded that Bloomfield and Skinner's reading concepts are very similar and that Bloomfield's reading instruction method is compatible with behavioral analytical teaching procedures. Bloomfield designed a behavioral reading instruction method, advocated errorless learning or with a minimum of errors and attributed the emission of wrong answers by the learner to teaching method, as supported by the field of errorless learning. It should not be considered that Bloomfield's reading instruction method has actually been tested. Skinner's behavior analysis can contribute to refinements in Bloomfield's reading instruction method, for example, by systematizing the use of extrinsic reinforcers. The adaptation of Bloomfield's reading instruction method to the Portuguese language and its systematic combination with principles and procedures of behavior analysis require the collaborative work of linguists and behavior analysts (at least) and would have great potential, as shown by our analysis, towards solving the problem of Brazil's high rates of functional illiteracy.Numa sociedade letrada como a nossa, saber ler e escrever traz muitas vantagens tanto para o indivíduo quanto para a comunidade. Os elevados níveis de analfabetismo no Brasil são bem conhecidos e erradicar o analfabetismo funcional é uma importante meta ético-política, que estudos e pesquisas podem ajudar a alcançar. A presente tese é uma tentativa nesta direção. Realizamos uma análise comparativa das concepções de leitura e método preconizado para seu ensino na perspectiva da linguística estrutural de Leonard Bloomfield e da análise comportamental de B. F. Skinner. Trabalhamos com textos representativos da concepção de leitura e de ensino de leitura desses dois autores. Na análise comportamental, como consequência dos próprios achados da pesquisa, avançamos além dos textos de Skinner, ingressando no campo da aprendizagem sem erros. Leonard Bloomfield (1887-1949) foi um dos mais importantes linguistas do século XX, era behaviorista e influenciou vários aspectos da obra de B. F. Skinner. Na década de 1930, Bloomfield elaborou um método de ensino de leitura, culminando na publicação de “Let’s Read” em 1961. B. F. Skinner (1904-1990), o fundador da análise do comportamento, tem sido considerado por muitos como o psicólogo mais proeminente do século XX. Na década de 1950, Skinner publicou "Verbal Behavior" (1957/1992) em que abordou o estudo da linguagem considerada como comportamento verbal. Bloomfield concebeu o repertório básico de leitura como hábito alfabético, consistindo na emissão das respostas verbais vocais correspondentes ao texto impresso, conceito compatível com a concepção de Skinner de textual (uma das unidades de análise do comportamento verbal). Tanto Bloomfield quanto Skinner consideram o repertório básico de leitura (o hábito alfabético ou o comportamento textual) como um pré-requisito para a leitura com compreensão. O ensino das correspondências grafema-fonema como parte essencial de um programa de ensino de leitura foi defendido por Bloomfield e é, hoje em dia, amplamente aceito por pesquisadores no campo do ensino de leitura. O princípio fundamental que norteia o método de ensino de leitura bloomfieldiano é a organização sistemática das palavras apresentadas para leitura em função do grau de regularidade das correspondências grafemafonema, partindo do princípio alfabético até serem atingidas correspondências que se afastam muito deste princípio. O procedimento de ensino básico consiste em apresentar pares de palavras que cotrastam em apenas uma ou algumas letras. Este procedimento é compatível com procedimentos de reforçamento diferencial de respostas na presença de estímulos específicos, empregado no estabelecimento de discriminações numa análise comportamental skinneriana. Além disto, identificamos no método de ensino de leitura bloomfieldiano a presença de princípios da instrução programada, que Skinner formulou na década de 1950. Por exemplo, exigir que o aprendiz emita ao menos uma reposta ativa a cada passo do ensino, reforçando as respostas corretas imediatamente após sua emissão, e elaborar materiais de ensino, numa progressão gradual, que fomente o desempenho preciso do aprendiz a cada passo do programa de ensino. Encontramos no método de Bloomfield a defesa do ensino sem erros ou com poucos erros, um elemento que também aparece na análise comportamental skinneriana. Concluímos que as concepções de leitura de Bloomfield e de Skinner são muito semelhantes e o método bloomfieldiano para seu ensino é compatível com os procedimentos de ensino utilizados na análise do comportamento. Bloomfield elaborou um método comportamental de ensino de leitura, defendeu a aprendizagem sem erros ou com um mínimo de erros, e relacionou a apresentação de respostas erradas pelo aprendiz ao método de ensino, tal como se defende no campo da aprendizagem sem erros. Não se pode considerar que o método de ensino de leitura elaborado por Bloomfield tenha sido efetivamente testado. A análise do comportamento skinneriana pode contribuir para refinar o método de ensino de leitura bloomfieldiano, por exemplo, pela sistematização do uso de reforçadores extrínsecos. A adaptação do método de ensino de leitura bloomfieldiano à língua portuguesa e sua combinação sistemática com princípios e procedimentos analítico-comportamentais requer o trabalho colaborativo de linguistas e analistas do comportamento (no mínimo) e tem grande potencial, como mostram nossas análises, para participar do enfrentamento do problema dos altos índices de analfabetismo funcional no Brasil.Não recebi financiamentoporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus São CarlosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia - PPGPsiUFSCarEnsino de leituraComportamento textualBloomfieldSkinnerLinguísticaAnálise do ComportamentoAprendizagem sem errosReading instructionTextual behaviorBloomfieldSkinnerLinguisticsBehavior AnalysisErrorless learningCIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAOEnsino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de SkinnerReading instruction in Bloomfield's Linguistics and Skinner's Behavioral Analysis.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisOnline600600929414c9-d3c0-45c0-8d96-9de32b88e992info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81957https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/5c8f62e2-14fe-41dc-849e-cd4f7086b1e7/downloadae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031dMD52falseAnonymousREADORIGINALTeseDBC.pdfTeseDBC.pdfapplication/pdf7839048https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/af5a1e62-c29a-467e-bcf2-b0f3669f2910/downloadc3d0fceda336ef65dd4a1d6cf7e4f6e0MD51trueAnonymousREADTEXTTeseDBC.pdf.txtTeseDBC.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain340606https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/e83248a1-07ad-4ca3-bf51-1d468c8c4983/download6893776920dcafa936ae1c0f29d1546aMD55falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILTeseDBC.pdf.jpgTeseDBC.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg2797https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/16a4e91e-cbf7-45d0-bb8c-c44239c0b685/download8cbb77b5e8a0955657ce7348e83ab53aMD56falseAnonymousREAD20.500.14289/75442025-02-05 18:51:02.452Acesso abertoopen.accessoai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/7544https://repositorio.ufscar.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestrepositorio.sibi@ufscar.bropendoar:43222025-02-05T21:51:02Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)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
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Reading instruction in Bloomfield's Linguistics and Skinner's Behavioral Analysis.
title Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner
spellingShingle Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner
Conceição, Djenane Brasil da
Ensino de leitura
Comportamento textual
Bloomfield
Skinner
Linguística
Análise do Comportamento
Aprendizagem sem erros
Reading instruction
Textual behavior
Bloomfield
Skinner
Linguistics
Behavior Analysis
Errorless learning
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
title_short Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner
title_full Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner
title_fullStr Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner
title_full_unstemmed Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner
title_sort Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner
author Conceição, Djenane Brasil da
author_facet Conceição, Djenane Brasil da
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5404269593756474
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Conceição, Djenane Brasil da
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Rose, Julio Cesar Coelho de
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3386857761295187
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Passos, Maria de Lourdes Rodrigues da Fonseca
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/4526685697455275
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv c24b1e45-e2d6-4aa7-afc1-dff291285609
contributor_str_mv Rose, Julio Cesar Coelho de
Passos, Maria de Lourdes Rodrigues da Fonseca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ensino de leitura
Comportamento textual
Bloomfield
Skinner
Linguística
Análise do Comportamento
Aprendizagem sem erros
topic Ensino de leitura
Comportamento textual
Bloomfield
Skinner
Linguística
Análise do Comportamento
Aprendizagem sem erros
Reading instruction
Textual behavior
Bloomfield
Skinner
Linguistics
Behavior Analysis
Errorless learning
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Reading instruction
Textual behavior
Bloomfield
Skinner
Linguistics
Behavior Analysis
Errorless learning
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
description In a literate society like ours there are many advantages for both the individual and for the community in knowing how to read and write. Brazil's high illiteracy rates are well known, and eradicating functional illiteracy is a major ethical and political goal that studies and researches can help to reach. The present dissertation is an attempt to advance in this direction. We conducted a comparative analysis of the concept of reading and the method for teaching to read from the viewpoints of Leonard loomfield's structural linguistics and of B. F. Skinner's behavioral analysis. We worked on representative texts about the concept of reading and teaching to read by these two scholars. In behavior analysis, as a result of the findings of this research, we went beyond Skinner's texts, and entered the field of errorless learning. Leonard Bloomfield (1887-1949), one of the most important linguists of the twentieth century, was a behaviorist and influenced many aspects of B. F. Skinner’s work. In the 1930s Bloomfield developed a method for teaching reading, which culminated in the publication of “Let’s Read” in 1961. B. F. Skinner (1904-1990), the founder of behavior analysis, has been considered by many as the most prominent psychologist of the twentieth century. In the 1950s Skinner published "Verbal Behavior" (1957/1992), in which he addressed the study of language conceived as verbal behavior. Bloomfield considered the basic repertoire of reading as alphabetic habit, which consists in emitting vocal verbal responses corresponding to the printed text, a concept that is compatible with the design of Skinner's concept of textual (one of the units of analysis of verbal behavior). Both Bloomfield and Skinner considered the basic repertoire of reading, the alphabetic habit or textual behavior, as a prerequisite for reading comprehension. Teaching grapheme-phoneme correspondences as an essential part of a reading instruction program was advocated by Bloomfield and is nowadays widely accepted by researchers in the field of reading instruction. The fundamental principle that guides Bloomfield's reading instruction method is the systematic organization of the words presented for reading, based on the degree of regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences, from the alphabetic principle to reaching correspondences that deviate far from this principle. The basic teaching procedure is to present pairs of words that contrast in just one or a few letters. This procedure is compatible with differential reinforcement of responses in the presence of specific stimuli procedures used in establishing discrimination in Skinner's behavioral analysis. In addition, we identified in Bloomfield's reading instruction method principles of programmed instruction, which Skinner formulated in the 1950s. For example, requiring the learner to present at least one active response in every step of teaching, reinforcing correct answers immediately after their emission and preparing teaching materials in a gradual progression to enhance the learner's performance in every step of the teaching program. We identified that in Bloomfield's method he advocated errorless learning or learning with few errors, an element that appears in Skinner's behavioral analysis. We concluded that Bloomfield and Skinner's reading concepts are very similar and that Bloomfield's reading instruction method is compatible with behavioral analytical teaching procedures. Bloomfield designed a behavioral reading instruction method, advocated errorless learning or with a minimum of errors and attributed the emission of wrong answers by the learner to teaching method, as supported by the field of errorless learning. It should not be considered that Bloomfield's reading instruction method has actually been tested. Skinner's behavior analysis can contribute to refinements in Bloomfield's reading instruction method, for example, by systematizing the use of extrinsic reinforcers. The adaptation of Bloomfield's reading instruction method to the Portuguese language and its systematic combination with principles and procedures of behavior analysis require the collaborative work of linguists and behavior analysts (at least) and would have great potential, as shown by our analysis, towards solving the problem of Brazil's high rates of functional illiteracy.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2015-12-15
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-09-27T20:02:37Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2016-09-27T20:02:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv CONCEIÇÃO, Djenane Brasil da. Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner. 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Psicologia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2015. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/7544.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/7544
identifier_str_mv CONCEIÇÃO, Djenane Brasil da. Ensino de Leitura na Linguística de Bloomfield e na Análise Comportamental de Skinner. 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Psicologia) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2015. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/7544.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/7544
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 929414c9-d3c0-45c0-8d96-9de32b88e992
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia - PPGPsi
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/5c8f62e2-14fe-41dc-849e-cd4f7086b1e7/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/af5a1e62-c29a-467e-bcf2-b0f3669f2910/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/e83248a1-07ad-4ca3-bf51-1d468c8c4983/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/16a4e91e-cbf7-45d0-bb8c-c44239c0b685/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ae0398b6f8b235e40ad82cba6c50031d
c3d0fceda336ef65dd4a1d6cf7e4f6e0
6893776920dcafa936ae1c0f29d1546a
8cbb77b5e8a0955657ce7348e83ab53a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.sibi@ufscar.br
_version_ 1851688796713648128