O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran?
| Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Brasil Campus Laranjeiras do Sul Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural Sustent?vel UFFS |
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/2120 |
Resumo: | The present work deals with an analysis of the impact of the benefit of the Bolsa Fam?lia Program on Food and Nutrition Security (SAN) in the urban and rural environment of the municipality of Laranjeiras do Sul / PR. Its main objective is to assess the food insecurity situation of the beneficiaries and to investigate whether there have been changes in the quantity, variety and consumption of healthy food before and after receiving the benefit and also to describe whether there are non-monetary purchases of food, including benefits of other public policies, and to evaluate production for self-consumption. All the objectives were analyzed by comparing the impacts of the Family Grant Program on the SAN in relation to the beneficiaries of the urban and rural environment. This comparison is important so that one can understand if the Program has different impacts in these places of residence and if other issues interfere in this, helping or harming in this conjuncture. The study was carried out in the municipality of Laranjeiras do Sul, and 86 respondents were interviewed, of whom 25 were from rural areas and 60 were from urban areas. Data were collected from semistructured interviews and application of EBIA (Brazilian Scale of Food Insecurity). It was verified that in the urban environment all respondents found themselves in a situation of Food Insecurity, 44.3% mild, 26.2% moderate and 29.5% severe. In rural areas, 16% were in food and nutritional security, 48% in mild food insecurity, 24% moderate and 12% severe. Among the purposes for the use of the benefit, food was the main one (38.4%) among all interviewees, in the urban environment, food is the main purpose of the use of the benefit (45.9%). However, in rural areas, food appears as the third cause of use (20%) and is preceded by the purchase of school supplies (40%) and clothing (28%). In urban areas, there was a significant improvement in the frequency of consumption of healthier and protein foods such as fruits, vegetables, meats, dairy products, eggs, rice and beans, and thus an improvement in nutritional quality after the acquisition of the benefit. The non-monetary acquisition of food demanded a more detailed study on other public policies that, together with the Bolsa Fam?lia Program, influence the nutritional status of these individuals. In the urban environment the Children's Milk Program was highlighted, and in general the self-consumption and the eventual benefit of delivery of basic baskets by the municipality had an impact on the food of the interviewees. Highlight the production for self consumption, as a differential of food between urban and rural, and the same would explain to a large extent the healthiest and adequate food in the rural environment even before receiving the benefit. The techniques used to carry out this practice, as well as urban agriculture may be alternatives for the even more substantial improvement in the food quality of these families. The research showed that the Bolsa Fam?lia Program, combined with other practices, and other public policies to combat poverty in urban and rural areas are fundamental to reduce the social and economic vulnerability indexes of these families. These improvements in food, coupled with the conditionalities of access to education and health, favor the achievement of the substantive and instrumental freedoms described by Amartya Sen, but not in an effective way, since other policies of a structural nature should be made possible to guarantee the improvement of conditions of life and rural development. |
| id |
UFFS_34cf53bfcef992467b024533e1d76525 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/2120 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFFS |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran?Pol?ticas p?blicasSeguran?a alimentarAmbientes urbanosAmbientes ruraisThe present work deals with an analysis of the impact of the benefit of the Bolsa Fam?lia Program on Food and Nutrition Security (SAN) in the urban and rural environment of the municipality of Laranjeiras do Sul / PR. Its main objective is to assess the food insecurity situation of the beneficiaries and to investigate whether there have been changes in the quantity, variety and consumption of healthy food before and after receiving the benefit and also to describe whether there are non-monetary purchases of food, including benefits of other public policies, and to evaluate production for self-consumption. All the objectives were analyzed by comparing the impacts of the Family Grant Program on the SAN in relation to the beneficiaries of the urban and rural environment. This comparison is important so that one can understand if the Program has different impacts in these places of residence and if other issues interfere in this, helping or harming in this conjuncture. The study was carried out in the municipality of Laranjeiras do Sul, and 86 respondents were interviewed, of whom 25 were from rural areas and 60 were from urban areas. Data were collected from semistructured interviews and application of EBIA (Brazilian Scale of Food Insecurity). It was verified that in the urban environment all respondents found themselves in a situation of Food Insecurity, 44.3% mild, 26.2% moderate and 29.5% severe. In rural areas, 16% were in food and nutritional security, 48% in mild food insecurity, 24% moderate and 12% severe. Among the purposes for the use of the benefit, food was the main one (38.4%) among all interviewees, in the urban environment, food is the main purpose of the use of the benefit (45.9%). However, in rural areas, food appears as the third cause of use (20%) and is preceded by the purchase of school supplies (40%) and clothing (28%). In urban areas, there was a significant improvement in the frequency of consumption of healthier and protein foods such as fruits, vegetables, meats, dairy products, eggs, rice and beans, and thus an improvement in nutritional quality after the acquisition of the benefit. The non-monetary acquisition of food demanded a more detailed study on other public policies that, together with the Bolsa Fam?lia Program, influence the nutritional status of these individuals. In the urban environment the Children's Milk Program was highlighted, and in general the self-consumption and the eventual benefit of delivery of basic baskets by the municipality had an impact on the food of the interviewees. Highlight the production for self consumption, as a differential of food between urban and rural, and the same would explain to a large extent the healthiest and adequate food in the rural environment even before receiving the benefit. The techniques used to carry out this practice, as well as urban agriculture may be alternatives for the even more substantial improvement in the food quality of these families. The research showed that the Bolsa Fam?lia Program, combined with other practices, and other public policies to combat poverty in urban and rural areas are fundamental to reduce the social and economic vulnerability indexes of these families. These improvements in food, coupled with the conditionalities of access to education and health, favor the achievement of the substantive and instrumental freedoms described by Amartya Sen, but not in an effective way, since other policies of a structural nature should be made possible to guarantee the improvement of conditions of life and rural development.O presente trabalho trata de uma an?lise do impacto do benef?cio do Programa Bolsa Fam?lia na Seguran?a Alimentar e Nutricional (SAN) no meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/PR. Tem como objetivo principal avaliar a situa??o de inseguran?a alimentar dos benefici?rios, e investigar se houveram mudan?as na quantidade, variedade e no consumo de alimentos saud?veis antes e depois de receber o benef?cio e, ainda, descrever se h? aquisi??es n?o monet?rias de alimentos, incluindo benef?cios de outras pol?ticas p?blicas e produ??o para autoconsumo. Todos os objetivos foram analisados realizando uma compara??o dos impactos do Programa Bolsa Fam?lia na SAN em rela??o aos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural. Esta compara??o ? importante para que se possa entender se o Programa tem diferentes impactos nestes locais de resid?ncia e se outras quest?es interferem nisto, auxiliando ou prejudicando nesta conjuntura. O estudo foi realizado no munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul, e totalizaram 86 entrevistados, sendo que vinte e cinco do meio rural e sessenta e um do meio urbano. Os dados foram coletados dados a partir de entrevistas semiestruturadas e aplica??o da EBIA (Escala Brasileira de Inseguran?a Alimentar). Verificou-se que no meio urbano todos os entrevistados encontraram-se em situa??o de Inseguran?a Alimentar, 44,3% leve, 26,2% moderada e 29,5% grave. No meio rural 16% encontravam-se em seguran?a alimentar e nutricional, 48% em inseguran?a alimentar leve, 24% moderada e 12% grave. Dentre as finalidades para utiliza??o do benef?cio, a alimenta??o foi a principal (38,4 %) entre todos os entrevistados. Sendo que no meio urbano a alimenta??o ? a principal finalidade da utiliza??o do benef?cio (45,9%), por?m, no meio rural, a alimenta??o aparece como terceira causa de utiliza??o (20%) sendo antecedida pela compra de material escolar (40%) e vestu?rio (28%). No meio urbano houve melhora significativa na frequ?ncia de consumo de alimentos mais saud?veis e prot?icos, como frutas, verduras, frango, latic?nios, e panificados, ocorrendo portanto, uma melhora na qualidade nutricional depois da aquisi??o do benef?cio. A aquisi??o n?o monet?ria de alimentos demandou um estudo mais detalhado sobre outras politicas p?blicas que, juntamente com o Programa Bolsa Fam?lia, influenciam na situa??o nutricional desses indiv?duos. No meio urbano destacou-se o Programa Leite das Crian?as e em geral o autoconsumo e o benef?cio eventual de entrega de cestas b?sicas pelo munic?pio apresentaram impacto na alimenta??o dos entrevistados. Destaque ? produ??o para o autoconsumo, como diferencial da alimenta??o entre urbanos e rurais, sendo que a mesma explicaria em grande parte a alimenta??o mais saud?vel e adequada no meio rural mesmo antes do recebimento do benef?cio. As t?cnicas utilizadas para a realiza??o desta pr?tica, assim como a agricultura urbana podem ser alternativas para a melhora ainda mais substancial da qualidade alimentar destas fam?lias. A pesquisa visualizou que o Programa Bolsa Fam?lia aliado a outras pr?ticas e demais pol?ticas p?blicas de combate ? fome a pobreza no meio urbano e rural s?o fundamentais para reduzir os ?ndices de vulnerabilidade social e econ?mica dessas fam?lias. Esta melhora na alimenta??o, somadas ?s condicionalidades de acesso ? educa??o e sa?de favorecem o alcance das liberdades substantivas e instrumentais descritas por Amartya Sen, mas n?o de forma efetiva, apontando para a necessidade de viabilizar outras pol?ticas de car?ter estrutural para garantir a melhoria das condi??es de vida desta popula??o e do desenvolvimento rural.Universidade Federal da Fronteira SulBrasilCampus Laranjeiras do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural Sustent?velUFFSTriches, Rozane MarciaSouthier, Naiara20182018-09-20T12:32:43Z20182018-09-20T12:32:43Z2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesishttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/2120porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)instacron:UFFS2021-09-29T18:03:27Zoai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/2120Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/oai/requestfranciele.cruz@uffs.edu.bropendoar:39242021-09-29T18:03:27Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran? |
| title |
O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran? |
| spellingShingle |
O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran? Southier, Naiara Pol?ticas p?blicas Seguran?a alimentar Ambientes urbanos Ambientes rurais |
| title_short |
O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran? |
| title_full |
O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran? |
| title_fullStr |
O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran? |
| title_sort |
O impacto do programa bolsa fam?lia na seguran?a alimentar Dos benefici?rios do meio urbano e rural do munic?pio de Laranjeiras do Sul/Paran? |
| author |
Southier, Naiara |
| author_facet |
Southier, Naiara |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Triches, Rozane Marcia |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Southier, Naiara |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pol?ticas p?blicas Seguran?a alimentar Ambientes urbanos Ambientes rurais |
| topic |
Pol?ticas p?blicas Seguran?a alimentar Ambientes urbanos Ambientes rurais |
| description |
The present work deals with an analysis of the impact of the benefit of the Bolsa Fam?lia Program on Food and Nutrition Security (SAN) in the urban and rural environment of the municipality of Laranjeiras do Sul / PR. Its main objective is to assess the food insecurity situation of the beneficiaries and to investigate whether there have been changes in the quantity, variety and consumption of healthy food before and after receiving the benefit and also to describe whether there are non-monetary purchases of food, including benefits of other public policies, and to evaluate production for self-consumption. All the objectives were analyzed by comparing the impacts of the Family Grant Program on the SAN in relation to the beneficiaries of the urban and rural environment. This comparison is important so that one can understand if the Program has different impacts in these places of residence and if other issues interfere in this, helping or harming in this conjuncture. The study was carried out in the municipality of Laranjeiras do Sul, and 86 respondents were interviewed, of whom 25 were from rural areas and 60 were from urban areas. Data were collected from semistructured interviews and application of EBIA (Brazilian Scale of Food Insecurity). It was verified that in the urban environment all respondents found themselves in a situation of Food Insecurity, 44.3% mild, 26.2% moderate and 29.5% severe. In rural areas, 16% were in food and nutritional security, 48% in mild food insecurity, 24% moderate and 12% severe. Among the purposes for the use of the benefit, food was the main one (38.4%) among all interviewees, in the urban environment, food is the main purpose of the use of the benefit (45.9%). However, in rural areas, food appears as the third cause of use (20%) and is preceded by the purchase of school supplies (40%) and clothing (28%). In urban areas, there was a significant improvement in the frequency of consumption of healthier and protein foods such as fruits, vegetables, meats, dairy products, eggs, rice and beans, and thus an improvement in nutritional quality after the acquisition of the benefit. The non-monetary acquisition of food demanded a more detailed study on other public policies that, together with the Bolsa Fam?lia Program, influence the nutritional status of these individuals. In the urban environment the Children's Milk Program was highlighted, and in general the self-consumption and the eventual benefit of delivery of basic baskets by the municipality had an impact on the food of the interviewees. Highlight the production for self consumption, as a differential of food between urban and rural, and the same would explain to a large extent the healthiest and adequate food in the rural environment even before receiving the benefit. The techniques used to carry out this practice, as well as urban agriculture may be alternatives for the even more substantial improvement in the food quality of these families. The research showed that the Bolsa Fam?lia Program, combined with other practices, and other public policies to combat poverty in urban and rural areas are fundamental to reduce the social and economic vulnerability indexes of these families. These improvements in food, coupled with the conditionalities of access to education and health, favor the achievement of the substantive and instrumental freedoms described by Amartya Sen, but not in an effective way, since other policies of a structural nature should be made possible to guarantee the improvement of conditions of life and rural development. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 2018-09-20T12:32:43Z 2018 2018-09-20T12:32:43Z 2018 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/2120 |
| url |
https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/2120 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul Brasil Campus Laranjeiras do Sul Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural Sustent?vel UFFS |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul Brasil Campus Laranjeiras do Sul Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural Sustent?vel UFFS |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS) instacron:UFFS |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS) |
| instacron_str |
UFFS |
| institution |
UFFS |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
franciele.cruz@uffs.edu.br |
| _version_ |
1868248299000037376 |