Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Zanela, Angelo Bri?o
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Paran?
Brasil
UFPR
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3509
Resumo: The objective of this thesis was to qualify Perdig?o and Sadia as typical cases of business groups formed in Brazil between 1934-2009. Both companies began their expansion trajectories in the Midwest of Santa Catarina. Perdig?o was founded by brothers Ponzoni and Brandalise in 1934 and Sadia by Att?lio Fontana in 1944. The association between the two companies took place only in 2009, when the groups unified their operations, thus performing one of the stages of the merger process. Two years later it would be approved by the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), enabling the creation of Brasil Foods - BRF, one of the largest food companies in the world. It is believed that these events alone explain why the period of study was delimited between 1934-2009. From the interpretations of scholarly authors, this paper defined the Perdig?o and Sadia structures as Business Groups by arguing that driven by the desire to grow more and more, either through family administration or through professionalized management, these groups faced structural and social difficulties inherents in the less developed economies, always seeking to maintain associative ties with their employees, since their managers understood that the success of the projects depended on a good relationship with people that were able to exercise their potential with creativity and satisfaction. In addition, Perdig?o and Sadia adopted strategies aimed at vertical integration, diversification of products and activities, technological adaptations and insertion in the international market. These strategies were adopted in view of the perception that territorial boundaries did not present an ideal size for the growth of companies as industries. In addition, its managers wished to establish new activities, which would promote related complementary activities and intersectoral synergies that would increase the scope of their business and occupation in the domestic market. Perdig?o and Sadia have always tried to stay ahead of their competitors and reduce the risks to be assumed due to the unstable institutional environment. More detailed analyzes on characteristics and strategies were developed from three essays (articles). The first, ?Business Groups: Theoretical Review and Propositions on the Characteristics and Strategies of Economic Groups in Latin America?, presented the characteristics and strategies that help define business group models globally. Thus, the theoretical bases were established so that from the following essays, ?Perdig?o: Consolidated Business Group in Brazil (1934-2009)? and ?Sadia as a Business Group Model in Brazil (1944-2009)?, the respective economic groups could be characterized as models of Business Groups and consolidated among the most important in the country.
id UFFS_9019931f8e7405366def29503c2d9906
oai_identifier_str oai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/3509
network_acronym_str UFFS
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)
repository_id_str
spelling Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)EmpresasEconomiaInd?stria de alimentosThe objective of this thesis was to qualify Perdig?o and Sadia as typical cases of business groups formed in Brazil between 1934-2009. Both companies began their expansion trajectories in the Midwest of Santa Catarina. Perdig?o was founded by brothers Ponzoni and Brandalise in 1934 and Sadia by Att?lio Fontana in 1944. The association between the two companies took place only in 2009, when the groups unified their operations, thus performing one of the stages of the merger process. Two years later it would be approved by the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), enabling the creation of Brasil Foods - BRF, one of the largest food companies in the world. It is believed that these events alone explain why the period of study was delimited between 1934-2009. From the interpretations of scholarly authors, this paper defined the Perdig?o and Sadia structures as Business Groups by arguing that driven by the desire to grow more and more, either through family administration or through professionalized management, these groups faced structural and social difficulties inherents in the less developed economies, always seeking to maintain associative ties with their employees, since their managers understood that the success of the projects depended on a good relationship with people that were able to exercise their potential with creativity and satisfaction. In addition, Perdig?o and Sadia adopted strategies aimed at vertical integration, diversification of products and activities, technological adaptations and insertion in the international market. These strategies were adopted in view of the perception that territorial boundaries did not present an ideal size for the growth of companies as industries. In addition, its managers wished to establish new activities, which would promote related complementary activities and intersectoral synergies that would increase the scope of their business and occupation in the domestic market. Perdig?o and Sadia have always tried to stay ahead of their competitors and reduce the risks to be assumed due to the unstable institutional environment. More detailed analyzes on characteristics and strategies were developed from three essays (articles). The first, ?Business Groups: Theoretical Review and Propositions on the Characteristics and Strategies of Economic Groups in Latin America?, presented the characteristics and strategies that help define business group models globally. Thus, the theoretical bases were established so that from the following essays, ?Perdig?o: Consolidated Business Group in Brazil (1934-2009)? and ?Sadia as a Business Group Model in Brazil (1944-2009)?, the respective economic groups could be characterized as models of Business Groups and consolidated among the most important in the country.O objetivo desta tese foi qualificar as empresas Perdig?o e Sadia como casos t?picos de business groups formados no Brasil entre 1934-2009. As duas empresas come?aram suas trajet?rias de expans?o no Meio Oeste de Santa Catarina. A Perdig?o foi fundada pelos irm?os Ponzoni e Brandalise em 1934 e a Sadia por Att?lio Fontana em 1944. A associa??o entre as duas empresas ocorreu somente em 2009, momento em que os grupos unificaram suas opera??es, realizando assim uma das etapas do processo de fus?o que dois anos mais tarde seria aprovado pelo Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econ?mica (CADE), possibilitando a cria??o da Brasil Foods ? BRF, uma das maiores companhias de alimentos do mundo. Acredita-se que estes acontecimentos, por si s?s, explicam porque o per?odo de estudo foi delimitado entre 1934-2009. A partir das interpreta??es de autores eruditos este trabalho definiu as estruturas Perdig?o e Sadia como Business Groups ao argumentar que impulsionados pelo desejo crescer cada vez mais, seja por meio da administra??o familiar ou mediante a forma de gest?o profissionalizada, estes grupos enfrentaram as dificuldades estruturais e conjunturais inerentes ?s economias menos desenvolvidas, procurando sempre manter vinculos associativos com seus colaboradores, j? que seus gestores entendiam que o sucesso dos empreendimentos dependia do bom relacionamento com pessoas que estivessem em condi??es de exercitar suas potencialidades com criatividade e satisfa??o. Al?m disso, Perdig?o e Sadia adotaram estrat?gias voltadas ? integra??o vertical, diversifica??o de produtos e atividades, adequa??es tecnol?gicas e inser??o no mercado internacional. Estas estrat?gias foram adotadas diante da percep??o de que os limites territoriais n?o apresentavam tamanho ideal para crescimento das empresas como ind?strias. Al?m disso, seus administradores desejavam estabelecer novas atividades, as quais promoveriam atividades complementares relacionadas e sinergias intersetoriais que permitiriam aumentar a ?rea de abrang?ncia de seus neg?cios e ocupa??o no mercado nacional. Perdig?o e Sadia tentaram sempre estar ? frente de seus competidores e diminuir os riscos a serem assumidos em virtude do ambiente institucional inst?vel. An?lises mais detalhada sobre as caracter?sticas e estrat?gias foram desenvolvidas a partir de tr?s ensaios (artigos). O primeiro, ?Business Groups: revis?o te?rica e proposi??es sobre as caracter?sticas e estrat?gias dos grupos econ?micos na Am?ricaLatina?, foram apresentadas as caracter?sticas e estrat?gias que ajudam a definir os modelos de business groups em ?mbito global. Dessa forma, estabeleceram-se as bases te?ricas para que a partir dos pr?ximos ensaios, ?Perdig?o: Business Group consolidado no Brasil (1934- 2009)? e ?Sadia como modelo de Business Group no Brasil (19442009)?, os respectivos grupos econ?micos pudessem ser caracterizados como modelos de Business Groups e consolidados entre os mais importantes do pa?s.Universidade Federal do Paran?BrasilUFPRCosta, Armando Jo?o DallaZanela, Angelo Bri?o20192020-02-14T17:01:53Z20202020-02-14T17:01:53Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesishttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3509porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)instacron:UFFS2020-02-14T17:01:53Zoai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/3509Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/oai/requestfranciele.cruz@uffs.edu.bropendoar:39242020-02-14T17:01:53Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)
title Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)
spellingShingle Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)
Zanela, Angelo Bri?o
Empresas
Economia
Ind?stria de alimentos
title_short Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)
title_full Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)
title_fullStr Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)
title_full_unstemmed Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)
title_sort Ensaios sobre business groups: Perdig?o e Sadia e a consolida??o de grupos econ?micos no Brasil (1934-2009)
author Zanela, Angelo Bri?o
author_facet Zanela, Angelo Bri?o
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Costa, Armando Jo?o Dalla
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zanela, Angelo Bri?o
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Empresas
Economia
Ind?stria de alimentos
topic Empresas
Economia
Ind?stria de alimentos
description The objective of this thesis was to qualify Perdig?o and Sadia as typical cases of business groups formed in Brazil between 1934-2009. Both companies began their expansion trajectories in the Midwest of Santa Catarina. Perdig?o was founded by brothers Ponzoni and Brandalise in 1934 and Sadia by Att?lio Fontana in 1944. The association between the two companies took place only in 2009, when the groups unified their operations, thus performing one of the stages of the merger process. Two years later it would be approved by the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), enabling the creation of Brasil Foods - BRF, one of the largest food companies in the world. It is believed that these events alone explain why the period of study was delimited between 1934-2009. From the interpretations of scholarly authors, this paper defined the Perdig?o and Sadia structures as Business Groups by arguing that driven by the desire to grow more and more, either through family administration or through professionalized management, these groups faced structural and social difficulties inherents in the less developed economies, always seeking to maintain associative ties with their employees, since their managers understood that the success of the projects depended on a good relationship with people that were able to exercise their potential with creativity and satisfaction. In addition, Perdig?o and Sadia adopted strategies aimed at vertical integration, diversification of products and activities, technological adaptations and insertion in the international market. These strategies were adopted in view of the perception that territorial boundaries did not present an ideal size for the growth of companies as industries. In addition, its managers wished to establish new activities, which would promote related complementary activities and intersectoral synergies that would increase the scope of their business and occupation in the domestic market. Perdig?o and Sadia have always tried to stay ahead of their competitors and reduce the risks to be assumed due to the unstable institutional environment. More detailed analyzes on characteristics and strategies were developed from three essays (articles). The first, ?Business Groups: Theoretical Review and Propositions on the Characteristics and Strategies of Economic Groups in Latin America?, presented the characteristics and strategies that help define business group models globally. Thus, the theoretical bases were established so that from the following essays, ?Perdig?o: Consolidated Business Group in Brazil (1934-2009)? and ?Sadia as a Business Group Model in Brazil (1944-2009)?, the respective economic groups could be characterized as models of Business Groups and consolidated among the most important in the country.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019
2020-02-14T17:01:53Z
2020
2020-02-14T17:01:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3509
url https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3509
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paran?
Brasil
UFPR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paran?
Brasil
UFPR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)
instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)
instacron:UFFS
instname_str Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)
instacron_str UFFS
institution UFFS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)
collection Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv franciele.cruz@uffs.edu.br
_version_ 1868248301608894464