O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional
| Ano de defesa: | 2020 |
|---|---|
| Autor(a) principal: | |
| Orientador(a): | |
| Banca de defesa: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
| Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: | por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Brasil Campus Chapec? Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos Lingu?sticos UFFS |
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: | |
| Link de acesso: | https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3891 |
Resumo: | This research work aims to investigate the treatment of linguistic variation in the ENEM Language Test, Codes and its Technologies - Portuguese Language from 1998 to 2018 in the light of Variationist Sociolinguistics and Educational Sociolinguistics. Initially, we briefly summarize the historical course, the constitution and the characteristics of the LEM - LP Test of ENEM in the period of 20 years. We also carried out a bibliographic survey of some studies on linguistic variation in the LEM - LP test at ENEM. Following, we present the theoretical and methodological contribution of Variationist Sociolinguistics, according to Weinreich, Labov and Herzog ([1968] 2006) and Labov ([1972] 2008), of Educational Sociolinguistics (BORTONI-RICARDO, 2004; 2005) among others. Then, we discuss the methodological decisions adopted, from the perspective of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Afterwards, we dedicate ourselves to the analysis of the treatment of linguistic variation in the LCT - LP Test at ENEM. Our survey resulted in 89 objective questions that are directly linked to the phenomenon of linguistic variation. We found that this theme was more frequent in the second phase of ENEM than in the first phase. In our sample, we did not find any issue related to the treatment of linguistic variation in the years 1999 and 2003, which is different from what is recommended by official documents. As for the type of variation, we identified nine different types related to the internal and external dimension of the variation, which demonstrates the need for the theme to be addressed with greater assessment by the teacher of the Portuguese Language curriculum component in school institutions. The questions involving phenomena related to the social dimension were more recurrent than those covering the linguistic dimension. We also found diversity in the use of discourse genres in the two periods of analysis. Our results also revealed that the genres of the written modality are more recurrent than those of the oral modality and the hybrids (written and oral). As for the discursive domain, fictional genres were the most recurrent in the Exam, followed by instructional and journalistic ones and, to a lesser extent, the genres of the advertising, interpersonal, legal, commercial, leisure and religious discourse domains. Finally, when we opted for the analytical resource of continuous orality-literacy, we found that most of the discursive genres present in the LCT - LP Objective Proof are located in literacy events although we have also found genres located, in a smaller quantity, in events of literacy. orality. Thus, it is suggested to increase the genres focused on orality in ENEM, since the documents support the modality and also because it is a way to further encourage ENEM candidates to reveal the ?linguistic chameleon? that each one carries within them. |
| id |
UFFS_c432f7a22e1badee8cd6be079bda84fc |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/3891 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFFS |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacionalLingu?sticaExame Nacional do Ensino M?dioSociolingu?sticaLinguagemVaria??o lingu?sticaL?ngua PortuguesaThis research work aims to investigate the treatment of linguistic variation in the ENEM Language Test, Codes and its Technologies - Portuguese Language from 1998 to 2018 in the light of Variationist Sociolinguistics and Educational Sociolinguistics. Initially, we briefly summarize the historical course, the constitution and the characteristics of the LEM - LP Test of ENEM in the period of 20 years. We also carried out a bibliographic survey of some studies on linguistic variation in the LEM - LP test at ENEM. Following, we present the theoretical and methodological contribution of Variationist Sociolinguistics, according to Weinreich, Labov and Herzog ([1968] 2006) and Labov ([1972] 2008), of Educational Sociolinguistics (BORTONI-RICARDO, 2004; 2005) among others. Then, we discuss the methodological decisions adopted, from the perspective of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Afterwards, we dedicate ourselves to the analysis of the treatment of linguistic variation in the LCT - LP Test at ENEM. Our survey resulted in 89 objective questions that are directly linked to the phenomenon of linguistic variation. We found that this theme was more frequent in the second phase of ENEM than in the first phase. In our sample, we did not find any issue related to the treatment of linguistic variation in the years 1999 and 2003, which is different from what is recommended by official documents. As for the type of variation, we identified nine different types related to the internal and external dimension of the variation, which demonstrates the need for the theme to be addressed with greater assessment by the teacher of the Portuguese Language curriculum component in school institutions. The questions involving phenomena related to the social dimension were more recurrent than those covering the linguistic dimension. We also found diversity in the use of discourse genres in the two periods of analysis. Our results also revealed that the genres of the written modality are more recurrent than those of the oral modality and the hybrids (written and oral). As for the discursive domain, fictional genres were the most recurrent in the Exam, followed by instructional and journalistic ones and, to a lesser extent, the genres of the advertising, interpersonal, legal, commercial, leisure and religious discourse domains. Finally, when we opted for the analytical resource of continuous orality-literacy, we found that most of the discursive genres present in the LCT - LP Objective Proof are located in literacy events although we have also found genres located, in a smaller quantity, in events of literacy. orality. Thus, it is suggested to increase the genres focused on orality in ENEM, since the documents support the modality and also because it is a way to further encourage ENEM candidates to reveal the ?linguistic chameleon? that each one carries within them.Este trabalho de pesquisa tem como objetivo investigar o tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica na Prova de Linguagens, C?digos e suas Tecnologias ? L?ngua Portuguesa do ENEM de 1998 a 2018 ? luz da Sociolingu?stica Variacionista e da Sociolingu?stica Educacional. Inicialmente, sumarizamos brevemente o percurso hist?rico, a constitui??o e as caracter?sticas da Prova de LCT ? LP do ENEM no per?odo de 20 anos. Tamb?m, realizamos o levantamento bibliogr?fico de alguns estudos sobre a varia??o lingu?stica na prova de LCT ? LP do ENEM. Na sequ?ncia, apresentamos o aporte te?rico-metodol?gico da Sociolingu?stica Variacionista, segundo Weinreich, Labov e Herzog ([1968] 2006) e Labov ([1972] 2008), da Sociolingu?stica Educacional (BORTONI-RICARDO, 2004; 2005) entre outros. Na sequ?ncia, discorremos sobre as decis?es metodol?gicas adotadas, a partir da perspectiva de an?lise quali-quantitativa. Ap?s, nos dedicamos ? an?lise do tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica na Prova de LCT ? LP do ENEM. Nosso levantamento resultou em 89 quest?es objetivas que est?o diretamente ligadas ao fen?meno da varia??o lingu?stica. Aferimos que essa tem?tica foi mais frequente na segunda fase do ENEM do que na primeira fase. Em nossa amostra, n?o localizamos nenhuma quest?o relacionada ao tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos anos de 1999 e 2003, destoando do que ? preconizado pelos documentos oficiais. Quanto ao tipo de varia??o, identificamos nove tipos diferentes relativos ? dimens?o interna e externa da varia??o, o que demonstra a necessidade de o tema ser contemplado com maior aferi??o pelo professor do componente curricular de L?ngua Portuguesa nas institui??es escolares. As quest?es que envolvem fen?menos relacionados ? dimens?o social foram mais recorrentes do que as que abrangem a dimens?o lingu?stica. Constatamos tamb?m diversidade no uso g?neros discursivos nos dois per?odos de an?lise. Nossos resultados tamb?m revelaram que os g?neros da modalidade escrita s?o mais recorrentes que os da modalidade oral e os h?bridos (escritos e orais). Quanto ao tocante ao dom?nio discursivo, os g?neros ficcionais foram os mais recorrentes no Exame, seguido do instrucional e do jornal?stico e, com menor somatiza??o, os g?neros dos dom?nios discursivos publicit?rio, interpessoal, jur?dico, comercial, lazer e religioso. Por fim, ao optarmos pelo recurso anal?tico do cont?nuo oralidade-letramento, constatamos que a maior parte dos g?neros discursivos presentes na Prova objetiva de LCT - LP est? situado em eventos de letramento embora tamb?m tenhamos constatado g?neros situados, em menor quantidade, nos eventos de oralidade. Assim, sugerese o aumento dos g?neros voltados ? oralidade no ENEM, visto que os documentos respaldam a modalidade e tamb?m porque ? uma forma de incentivar ainda mais os candidatos ao ENEM a revelarem o ?camale?o lingu?stico" que cada um carrega dentro de si. Palavras-chave: ENEM. Linguagens, C?digos e suas Tecnologias. G?neros discursivos. Varia??o diam?sica. Sociolingu?stica Variacionista e Educacional.Universidade Federal da Fronteira SulBrasilCampus Chapec?Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos Lingu?sticosUFFSSnichelotto, Cl?udia Andrea RostHentz, Maria Izabel de BortoliLuz, Mary Neiva Surdi daRech, Elisangela2020-08-282021-01-08T13:52:03Z2020-12-292021-01-08T13:52:03Z2020-12-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesishttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3891porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)instacron:UFFS2021-09-29T15:48:16Zoai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/3891Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/oai/requestfranciele.cruz@uffs.edu.bropendoar:39242021-09-29T15:48:16Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional |
| title |
O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional |
| spellingShingle |
O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional Rech, Elisangela Lingu?stica Exame Nacional do Ensino M?dio Sociolingu?stica Linguagem Varia??o lingu?stica L?ngua Portuguesa |
| title_short |
O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional |
| title_full |
O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional |
| title_fullStr |
O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional |
| title_full_unstemmed |
O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional |
| title_sort |
O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional |
| author |
Rech, Elisangela |
| author_facet |
Rech, Elisangela |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Snichelotto, Cl?udia Andrea Rost Hentz, Maria Izabel de Bortoli Luz, Mary Neiva Surdi da |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rech, Elisangela |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lingu?stica Exame Nacional do Ensino M?dio Sociolingu?stica Linguagem Varia??o lingu?stica L?ngua Portuguesa |
| topic |
Lingu?stica Exame Nacional do Ensino M?dio Sociolingu?stica Linguagem Varia??o lingu?stica L?ngua Portuguesa |
| description |
This research work aims to investigate the treatment of linguistic variation in the ENEM Language Test, Codes and its Technologies - Portuguese Language from 1998 to 2018 in the light of Variationist Sociolinguistics and Educational Sociolinguistics. Initially, we briefly summarize the historical course, the constitution and the characteristics of the LEM - LP Test of ENEM in the period of 20 years. We also carried out a bibliographic survey of some studies on linguistic variation in the LEM - LP test at ENEM. Following, we present the theoretical and methodological contribution of Variationist Sociolinguistics, according to Weinreich, Labov and Herzog ([1968] 2006) and Labov ([1972] 2008), of Educational Sociolinguistics (BORTONI-RICARDO, 2004; 2005) among others. Then, we discuss the methodological decisions adopted, from the perspective of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Afterwards, we dedicate ourselves to the analysis of the treatment of linguistic variation in the LCT - LP Test at ENEM. Our survey resulted in 89 objective questions that are directly linked to the phenomenon of linguistic variation. We found that this theme was more frequent in the second phase of ENEM than in the first phase. In our sample, we did not find any issue related to the treatment of linguistic variation in the years 1999 and 2003, which is different from what is recommended by official documents. As for the type of variation, we identified nine different types related to the internal and external dimension of the variation, which demonstrates the need for the theme to be addressed with greater assessment by the teacher of the Portuguese Language curriculum component in school institutions. The questions involving phenomena related to the social dimension were more recurrent than those covering the linguistic dimension. We also found diversity in the use of discourse genres in the two periods of analysis. Our results also revealed that the genres of the written modality are more recurrent than those of the oral modality and the hybrids (written and oral). As for the discursive domain, fictional genres were the most recurrent in the Exam, followed by instructional and journalistic ones and, to a lesser extent, the genres of the advertising, interpersonal, legal, commercial, leisure and religious discourse domains. Finally, when we opted for the analytical resource of continuous orality-literacy, we found that most of the discursive genres present in the LCT - LP Objective Proof are located in literacy events although we have also found genres located, in a smaller quantity, in events of literacy. orality. Thus, it is suggested to increase the genres focused on orality in ENEM, since the documents support the modality and also because it is a way to further encourage ENEM candidates to reveal the ?linguistic chameleon? that each one carries within them. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-28 2020-12-29 2020-12-28 2021-01-08T13:52:03Z 2021-01-08T13:52:03Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| format |
masterThesis |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3891 |
| url |
https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3891 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul Brasil Campus Chapec? Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos Lingu?sticos UFFS |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul Brasil Campus Chapec? Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos Lingu?sticos UFFS |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS) instacron:UFFS |
| instname_str |
Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS) |
| instacron_str |
UFFS |
| institution |
UFFS |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
franciele.cruz@uffs.edu.br |
| _version_ |
1868248302694170624 |