O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2020
Autor(a) principal: Rech, Elisangela
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Brasil
Campus Chapec?
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos Lingu?sticos
UFFS
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3891
Resumo: This research work aims to investigate the treatment of linguistic variation in the ENEM Language Test, Codes and its Technologies - Portuguese Language from 1998 to 2018 in the light of Variationist Sociolinguistics and Educational Sociolinguistics. Initially, we briefly summarize the historical course, the constitution and the characteristics of the LEM - LP Test of ENEM in the period of 20 years. We also carried out a bibliographic survey of some studies on linguistic variation in the LEM - LP test at ENEM. Following, we present the theoretical and methodological contribution of Variationist Sociolinguistics, according to Weinreich, Labov and Herzog ([1968] 2006) and Labov ([1972] 2008), of Educational Sociolinguistics (BORTONI-RICARDO, 2004; 2005) among others. Then, we discuss the methodological decisions adopted, from the perspective of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Afterwards, we dedicate ourselves to the analysis of the treatment of linguistic variation in the LCT - LP Test at ENEM. Our survey resulted in 89 objective questions that are directly linked to the phenomenon of linguistic variation. We found that this theme was more frequent in the second phase of ENEM than in the first phase. In our sample, we did not find any issue related to the treatment of linguistic variation in the years 1999 and 2003, which is different from what is recommended by official documents. As for the type of variation, we identified nine different types related to the internal and external dimension of the variation, which demonstrates the need for the theme to be addressed with greater assessment by the teacher of the Portuguese Language curriculum component in school institutions. The questions involving phenomena related to the social dimension were more recurrent than those covering the linguistic dimension. We also found diversity in the use of discourse genres in the two periods of analysis. Our results also revealed that the genres of the written modality are more recurrent than those of the oral modality and the hybrids (written and oral). As for the discursive domain, fictional genres were the most recurrent in the Exam, followed by instructional and journalistic ones and, to a lesser extent, the genres of the advertising, interpersonal, legal, commercial, leisure and religious discourse domains. Finally, when we opted for the analytical resource of continuous orality-literacy, we found that most of the discursive genres present in the LCT - LP Objective Proof are located in literacy events although we have also found genres located, in a smaller quantity, in events of literacy. orality. Thus, it is suggested to increase the genres focused on orality in ENEM, since the documents support the modality and also because it is a way to further encourage ENEM candidates to reveal the ?linguistic chameleon? that each one carries within them.
id UFFS_c432f7a22e1badee8cd6be079bda84fc
oai_identifier_str oai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/3891
network_acronym_str UFFS
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)
repository_id_str
spelling O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacionalLingu?sticaExame Nacional do Ensino M?dioSociolingu?sticaLinguagemVaria??o lingu?sticaL?ngua PortuguesaThis research work aims to investigate the treatment of linguistic variation in the ENEM Language Test, Codes and its Technologies - Portuguese Language from 1998 to 2018 in the light of Variationist Sociolinguistics and Educational Sociolinguistics. Initially, we briefly summarize the historical course, the constitution and the characteristics of the LEM - LP Test of ENEM in the period of 20 years. We also carried out a bibliographic survey of some studies on linguistic variation in the LEM - LP test at ENEM. Following, we present the theoretical and methodological contribution of Variationist Sociolinguistics, according to Weinreich, Labov and Herzog ([1968] 2006) and Labov ([1972] 2008), of Educational Sociolinguistics (BORTONI-RICARDO, 2004; 2005) among others. Then, we discuss the methodological decisions adopted, from the perspective of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Afterwards, we dedicate ourselves to the analysis of the treatment of linguistic variation in the LCT - LP Test at ENEM. Our survey resulted in 89 objective questions that are directly linked to the phenomenon of linguistic variation. We found that this theme was more frequent in the second phase of ENEM than in the first phase. In our sample, we did not find any issue related to the treatment of linguistic variation in the years 1999 and 2003, which is different from what is recommended by official documents. As for the type of variation, we identified nine different types related to the internal and external dimension of the variation, which demonstrates the need for the theme to be addressed with greater assessment by the teacher of the Portuguese Language curriculum component in school institutions. The questions involving phenomena related to the social dimension were more recurrent than those covering the linguistic dimension. We also found diversity in the use of discourse genres in the two periods of analysis. Our results also revealed that the genres of the written modality are more recurrent than those of the oral modality and the hybrids (written and oral). As for the discursive domain, fictional genres were the most recurrent in the Exam, followed by instructional and journalistic ones and, to a lesser extent, the genres of the advertising, interpersonal, legal, commercial, leisure and religious discourse domains. Finally, when we opted for the analytical resource of continuous orality-literacy, we found that most of the discursive genres present in the LCT - LP Objective Proof are located in literacy events although we have also found genres located, in a smaller quantity, in events of literacy. orality. Thus, it is suggested to increase the genres focused on orality in ENEM, since the documents support the modality and also because it is a way to further encourage ENEM candidates to reveal the ?linguistic chameleon? that each one carries within them.Este trabalho de pesquisa tem como objetivo investigar o tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica na Prova de Linguagens, C?digos e suas Tecnologias ? L?ngua Portuguesa do ENEM de 1998 a 2018 ? luz da Sociolingu?stica Variacionista e da Sociolingu?stica Educacional. Inicialmente, sumarizamos brevemente o percurso hist?rico, a constitui??o e as caracter?sticas da Prova de LCT ? LP do ENEM no per?odo de 20 anos. Tamb?m, realizamos o levantamento bibliogr?fico de alguns estudos sobre a varia??o lingu?stica na prova de LCT ? LP do ENEM. Na sequ?ncia, apresentamos o aporte te?rico-metodol?gico da Sociolingu?stica Variacionista, segundo Weinreich, Labov e Herzog ([1968] 2006) e Labov ([1972] 2008), da Sociolingu?stica Educacional (BORTONI-RICARDO, 2004; 2005) entre outros. Na sequ?ncia, discorremos sobre as decis?es metodol?gicas adotadas, a partir da perspectiva de an?lise quali-quantitativa. Ap?s, nos dedicamos ? an?lise do tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica na Prova de LCT ? LP do ENEM. Nosso levantamento resultou em 89 quest?es objetivas que est?o diretamente ligadas ao fen?meno da varia??o lingu?stica. Aferimos que essa tem?tica foi mais frequente na segunda fase do ENEM do que na primeira fase. Em nossa amostra, n?o localizamos nenhuma quest?o relacionada ao tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos anos de 1999 e 2003, destoando do que ? preconizado pelos documentos oficiais. Quanto ao tipo de varia??o, identificamos nove tipos diferentes relativos ? dimens?o interna e externa da varia??o, o que demonstra a necessidade de o tema ser contemplado com maior aferi??o pelo professor do componente curricular de L?ngua Portuguesa nas institui??es escolares. As quest?es que envolvem fen?menos relacionados ? dimens?o social foram mais recorrentes do que as que abrangem a dimens?o lingu?stica. Constatamos tamb?m diversidade no uso g?neros discursivos nos dois per?odos de an?lise. Nossos resultados tamb?m revelaram que os g?neros da modalidade escrita s?o mais recorrentes que os da modalidade oral e os h?bridos (escritos e orais). Quanto ao tocante ao dom?nio discursivo, os g?neros ficcionais foram os mais recorrentes no Exame, seguido do instrucional e do jornal?stico e, com menor somatiza??o, os g?neros dos dom?nios discursivos publicit?rio, interpessoal, jur?dico, comercial, lazer e religioso. Por fim, ao optarmos pelo recurso anal?tico do cont?nuo oralidade-letramento, constatamos que a maior parte dos g?neros discursivos presentes na Prova objetiva de LCT - LP est? situado em eventos de letramento embora tamb?m tenhamos constatado g?neros situados, em menor quantidade, nos eventos de oralidade. Assim, sugerese o aumento dos g?neros voltados ? oralidade no ENEM, visto que os documentos respaldam a modalidade e tamb?m porque ? uma forma de incentivar ainda mais os candidatos ao ENEM a revelarem o ?camale?o lingu?stico" que cada um carrega dentro de si. Palavras-chave: ENEM. Linguagens, C?digos e suas Tecnologias. G?neros discursivos. Varia??o diam?sica. Sociolingu?stica Variacionista e Educacional.Universidade Federal da Fronteira SulBrasilCampus Chapec?Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos Lingu?sticosUFFSSnichelotto, Cl?udia Andrea RostHentz, Maria Izabel de BortoliLuz, Mary Neiva Surdi daRech, Elisangela2020-08-282021-01-08T13:52:03Z2020-12-292021-01-08T13:52:03Z2020-12-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesishttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3891porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)instacron:UFFS2021-09-29T15:48:16Zoai:rd.uffs.edu.br:prefix/3891Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://rd.uffs.edu.br/oai/requestfranciele.cruz@uffs.edu.bropendoar:39242021-09-29T15:48:16Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional
title O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional
spellingShingle O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional
Rech, Elisangela
Lingu?stica
Exame Nacional do Ensino M?dio
Sociolingu?stica
Linguagem
Varia??o lingu?stica
L?ngua Portuguesa
title_short O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional
title_full O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional
title_fullStr O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional
title_full_unstemmed O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional
title_sort O tratamento da varia??o lingu?stica nos g?neros discursivos da prova de L?ngua Portuguesa (linguagens, c?digos e suas tecnologias) do Enem (1998-2018) ? luz da sociolingu?stica variacionista e educacional
author Rech, Elisangela
author_facet Rech, Elisangela
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Snichelotto, Cl?udia Andrea Rost
Hentz, Maria Izabel de Bortoli
Luz, Mary Neiva Surdi da
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rech, Elisangela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lingu?stica
Exame Nacional do Ensino M?dio
Sociolingu?stica
Linguagem
Varia??o lingu?stica
L?ngua Portuguesa
topic Lingu?stica
Exame Nacional do Ensino M?dio
Sociolingu?stica
Linguagem
Varia??o lingu?stica
L?ngua Portuguesa
description This research work aims to investigate the treatment of linguistic variation in the ENEM Language Test, Codes and its Technologies - Portuguese Language from 1998 to 2018 in the light of Variationist Sociolinguistics and Educational Sociolinguistics. Initially, we briefly summarize the historical course, the constitution and the characteristics of the LEM - LP Test of ENEM in the period of 20 years. We also carried out a bibliographic survey of some studies on linguistic variation in the LEM - LP test at ENEM. Following, we present the theoretical and methodological contribution of Variationist Sociolinguistics, according to Weinreich, Labov and Herzog ([1968] 2006) and Labov ([1972] 2008), of Educational Sociolinguistics (BORTONI-RICARDO, 2004; 2005) among others. Then, we discuss the methodological decisions adopted, from the perspective of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Afterwards, we dedicate ourselves to the analysis of the treatment of linguistic variation in the LCT - LP Test at ENEM. Our survey resulted in 89 objective questions that are directly linked to the phenomenon of linguistic variation. We found that this theme was more frequent in the second phase of ENEM than in the first phase. In our sample, we did not find any issue related to the treatment of linguistic variation in the years 1999 and 2003, which is different from what is recommended by official documents. As for the type of variation, we identified nine different types related to the internal and external dimension of the variation, which demonstrates the need for the theme to be addressed with greater assessment by the teacher of the Portuguese Language curriculum component in school institutions. The questions involving phenomena related to the social dimension were more recurrent than those covering the linguistic dimension. We also found diversity in the use of discourse genres in the two periods of analysis. Our results also revealed that the genres of the written modality are more recurrent than those of the oral modality and the hybrids (written and oral). As for the discursive domain, fictional genres were the most recurrent in the Exam, followed by instructional and journalistic ones and, to a lesser extent, the genres of the advertising, interpersonal, legal, commercial, leisure and religious discourse domains. Finally, when we opted for the analytical resource of continuous orality-literacy, we found that most of the discursive genres present in the LCT - LP Objective Proof are located in literacy events although we have also found genres located, in a smaller quantity, in events of literacy. orality. Thus, it is suggested to increase the genres focused on orality in ENEM, since the documents support the modality and also because it is a way to further encourage ENEM candidates to reveal the ?linguistic chameleon? that each one carries within them.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-28
2020-12-29
2020-12-28
2021-01-08T13:52:03Z
2021-01-08T13:52:03Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3891
url https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3891
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Brasil
Campus Chapec?
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos Lingu?sticos
UFFS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Brasil
Campus Chapec?
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Estudos Lingu?sticos
UFFS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)
instname:Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)
instacron:UFFS
instname_str Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)
instacron_str UFFS
institution UFFS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)
collection Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFFS (Repositório Digital da UFFS) - Universidade Federal Fronteira do Sul (UFFS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv franciele.cruz@uffs.edu.br
_version_ 1868248302694170624