CONSELHO NACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA E OS MEIOS ALTERNATIVOS DE RESOLUÇÃO DE CONFLITOS: avaliação da eficiência dos Centros Judiciários de Solução de Conflitos na comarca de São Luís - MA.

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: BARBOSA, Wermeson Pinheiro
• Orientador(a): RAMOS, Edith Maria Barbosa
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Maranhão
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM DIREITO/CCSO
• Departamento: DEPARTAMENTO DE DIREITO/CCSO
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Conselho Nacional de Justiça; Meios Alternativos de Resolução de Conflitos; Centros Judiciários de Solução de Conflitos e Cidadania
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: National Justice Council; Judicial Centre of Conflict Resolution and Citizenship; Conflict Mediation
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: Teoria Geral do Processo
• Link de acesso: http://tedebc.ufma.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1328

The objective of this research was to evaluate the efficiency of Conflict and Citizenship of the City of St. Louis Solution for Legal Centres - MA from 2013 to 2015, from the actions undertaken by the State of Maranhão Court of Justice to implement Resolution No 125/2010 of the National Council of Justice (CNJ), which established the National Judicial Policy Suitable Treatment of Conflicts of Interest. For this, rebuilt from the modernity, the process of transformation of the state and the judiciary in the world and in Brazil, which resulted in increased litigation and bureaucracy, slowness and inefficiency of the judicial services. This time, he served as theoretical framework the third wave of access to justice movement formulated by Cappelletti and Garth, who presented as a solution for legal problems a wide range of reforms aimed to make it simple, economical and efficient justice system and create alternative means of conflict resolution. It argued that the implementation process of alternative means of conflict resolution in Brazil was the result of international economic pressures of the World Bank and internal dissatisfaction with the performance of the judiciary, especially, after the democratization of the country with the Federal Constitution of 1988 . This reform, which was to mark the Constitutional Amendment No. 45/2010, was influenced by the managerial vision of public administration, established in Brazil by Constitutional Amendment No. 19/98, which encouraged the CNJ to implement the judicial administration typical elements of the initiative private as strategic planning, achievement of goals, measuring results in a clear relationship of cost benefit. It was formulated reasoning from the deductive method, as it left the general impositions of CNJ on the National Judicial Policy Treatment Suitable for Conflicts of Interest to reach local findings on the implementation of efficiency of this policy, taking advantage, for both, the Technical Document 319 of the World Bank, Resolution 125/2010 of the CNJ, Resolution No. 10/2011 of the Maranhão Court of Justice and the reports and crafts provided by Citizenship and Conflict Settlement Judicial centers portrayed the operation of these units in the years from 2013 to 2015. As a result, it was found that CEJUSC, although in full operation, need better structure and can be better exploited.