Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Tâmara Lyz Milhomem de Oliveira
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://hdl.handle.net/1843/LETR-B7JP9E
Resumo: Since the multifaceted constitution of the reading process (COSCARELLI, 1999; GOODMAN, 1967, 1971; LEFFA, 1999; SMITH, [1989] 2003) and considering some of its various constituents and dimensions, we aim to develop in this work, a study focused in the aspects that supports it, the purpose of reading. Our intention is to realize if the specificities of different reading environments have influenced the accomplishing of its goal. For this undertaking, we start a theoretical path that involved the outlines of reading (COSCARELLI, 1999; MOITA LOPES, 1996; SILVEIRA, 2005; GIBSON, 1985; SOARES, 2000; DELLISOLA, 1988; SNOW 2002; CAFIERO, 2005; SCHARDOSIM, 2015; KLEIMAN 1997, 2002, 2004, 2012), it was increased for the discussions around reading performances in multiple sources (AZEVEDO, 2013; COIRO, 2011; COSCARELLI e COIRO 2014, KINGSLEY e TANCOCK, 2014; RIBEIRO, 2009) and it deals with features and issues related to textual materialities and research spaces embedded in our work, related to the digital and the printing (COSCARELLI 2006; RIBEIRO 2009; XAVIER 2004). Regarding this first research step, we used questionnaires and designed reading and research profiles of a big group of subjects, composed by 394 students of a public university. After that, we replicated the experience forwarding it to the observed subjects in this study 34 students of two public teaching institutions. Then, we turned to this investigation observation phase, in which we registered the interaction of these last subjects with texts in different environments: library (reading space of written text) and lab (reading space of digital texts). A practice that had as an aim to verify the relation between the specifities of these spaces and its texts (hipertextuality, mutiplicity of modes, lack of coexistence with searches in the library, exposure to texts of different levels and areas) and the achievement of the reading pruprose. In the last phase of analysis, we evaluate the texts produced by the subjects as result of the searches for information and readings observed in this research. The results obtained by this described work have evidenced the coadjuvant role of the research environment and reading facing the subjects development for the accomplishing of an effective search and communication of the found information. In other words, the relative variable to the reading environment was not decisive, exclusively, for the satisfactory results of reading in multiple sources. Key-words: Reading purpose. Written text. Digital hipertext. Reading. Research.
id UFMG_e63e768cedba3c819c99b2b41bf978c0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/LETR-B7JP9E
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?Sistemas de hipertextoLeituraLeituraTexto impressoObjetivo de leituraHipertexto digitalPesquisaSince the multifaceted constitution of the reading process (COSCARELLI, 1999; GOODMAN, 1967, 1971; LEFFA, 1999; SMITH, [1989] 2003) and considering some of its various constituents and dimensions, we aim to develop in this work, a study focused in the aspects that supports it, the purpose of reading. Our intention is to realize if the specificities of different reading environments have influenced the accomplishing of its goal. For this undertaking, we start a theoretical path that involved the outlines of reading (COSCARELLI, 1999; MOITA LOPES, 1996; SILVEIRA, 2005; GIBSON, 1985; SOARES, 2000; DELLISOLA, 1988; SNOW 2002; CAFIERO, 2005; SCHARDOSIM, 2015; KLEIMAN 1997, 2002, 2004, 2012), it was increased for the discussions around reading performances in multiple sources (AZEVEDO, 2013; COIRO, 2011; COSCARELLI e COIRO 2014, KINGSLEY e TANCOCK, 2014; RIBEIRO, 2009) and it deals with features and issues related to textual materialities and research spaces embedded in our work, related to the digital and the printing (COSCARELLI 2006; RIBEIRO 2009; XAVIER 2004). Regarding this first research step, we used questionnaires and designed reading and research profiles of a big group of subjects, composed by 394 students of a public university. After that, we replicated the experience forwarding it to the observed subjects in this study 34 students of two public teaching institutions. Then, we turned to this investigation observation phase, in which we registered the interaction of these last subjects with texts in different environments: library (reading space of written text) and lab (reading space of digital texts). A practice that had as an aim to verify the relation between the specifities of these spaces and its texts (hipertextuality, mutiplicity of modes, lack of coexistence with searches in the library, exposure to texts of different levels and areas) and the achievement of the reading pruprose. In the last phase of analysis, we evaluate the texts produced by the subjects as result of the searches for information and readings observed in this research. The results obtained by this described work have evidenced the coadjuvant role of the research environment and reading facing the subjects development for the accomplishing of an effective search and communication of the found information. In other words, the relative variable to the reading environment was not decisive, exclusively, for the satisfactory results of reading in multiple sources. Key-words: Reading purpose. Written text. Digital hipertext. Reading. Research.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2019-08-14T13:35:17Z2025-09-08T23:08:51Z2019-08-14T13:35:17Z2018-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/LETR-B7JP9ETâmara Lyz Milhomem de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2025-09-08T23:08:51Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/LETR-B7JP9ERepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2025-09-08T23:08:51Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?
title Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?
spellingShingle Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?
Tâmara Lyz Milhomem de Oliveira
Sistemas de hipertexto
Leitura
Leitura
Texto impresso
Objetivo de leitura
Hipertexto digital
Pesquisa
title_short Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?
title_full Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?
title_fullStr Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?
title_full_unstemmed Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?
title_sort Objetivo de leitura: um caminho que se perdeu?
author Tâmara Lyz Milhomem de Oliveira
author_facet Tâmara Lyz Milhomem de Oliveira
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tâmara Lyz Milhomem de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sistemas de hipertexto
Leitura
Leitura
Texto impresso
Objetivo de leitura
Hipertexto digital
Pesquisa
topic Sistemas de hipertexto
Leitura
Leitura
Texto impresso
Objetivo de leitura
Hipertexto digital
Pesquisa
description Since the multifaceted constitution of the reading process (COSCARELLI, 1999; GOODMAN, 1967, 1971; LEFFA, 1999; SMITH, [1989] 2003) and considering some of its various constituents and dimensions, we aim to develop in this work, a study focused in the aspects that supports it, the purpose of reading. Our intention is to realize if the specificities of different reading environments have influenced the accomplishing of its goal. For this undertaking, we start a theoretical path that involved the outlines of reading (COSCARELLI, 1999; MOITA LOPES, 1996; SILVEIRA, 2005; GIBSON, 1985; SOARES, 2000; DELLISOLA, 1988; SNOW 2002; CAFIERO, 2005; SCHARDOSIM, 2015; KLEIMAN 1997, 2002, 2004, 2012), it was increased for the discussions around reading performances in multiple sources (AZEVEDO, 2013; COIRO, 2011; COSCARELLI e COIRO 2014, KINGSLEY e TANCOCK, 2014; RIBEIRO, 2009) and it deals with features and issues related to textual materialities and research spaces embedded in our work, related to the digital and the printing (COSCARELLI 2006; RIBEIRO 2009; XAVIER 2004). Regarding this first research step, we used questionnaires and designed reading and research profiles of a big group of subjects, composed by 394 students of a public university. After that, we replicated the experience forwarding it to the observed subjects in this study 34 students of two public teaching institutions. Then, we turned to this investigation observation phase, in which we registered the interaction of these last subjects with texts in different environments: library (reading space of written text) and lab (reading space of digital texts). A practice that had as an aim to verify the relation between the specifities of these spaces and its texts (hipertextuality, mutiplicity of modes, lack of coexistence with searches in the library, exposure to texts of different levels and areas) and the achievement of the reading pruprose. In the last phase of analysis, we evaluate the texts produced by the subjects as result of the searches for information and readings observed in this research. The results obtained by this described work have evidenced the coadjuvant role of the research environment and reading facing the subjects development for the accomplishing of an effective search and communication of the found information. In other words, the relative variable to the reading environment was not decisive, exclusively, for the satisfactory results of reading in multiple sources. Key-words: Reading purpose. Written text. Digital hipertext. Reading. Research.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-01
2019-08-14T13:35:17Z
2019-08-14T13:35:17Z
2025-09-08T23:08:51Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1843/LETR-B7JP9E
url https://hdl.handle.net/1843/LETR-B7JP9E
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1856414103323541504