O golpe de Estado de 2016 nas charges de Carlos Latuff: Uma análise discursiva.

• Ano de defesa: 2024
• Autor(a) principal: NAYARA ALVES SILVA MENDES VILELA DE SOUSA BRITO
• Orientador(a): Ilka de Oliveira Mota
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Charge. Golpe de Estado. Dilma Rousseff. Discurso. Formação Discursiva.
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufms.br/handle/123456789/9471

Supported by the theoretical and methodological framework of French and Brazilian Discourse Analysis (henceforth DA), this dissertation investigated the discursive functioning of Carlos Latuff’s cartoons based on the production conditions of the impeachment against former president Dilma Rousseff, carried out in 2016. The general objective of the research was to analyze how the cartoons represent the theme of the 2016 impeachment, based on a discursive corpus composed of 15 cartoons selected from Brazilian alternative media outlets. To achieve this, we established the following specific objectives: 1) Understand the discursive functioning of cartoons in general; 2) Analyze how Carlos Latuff’s cartoons function discursively, seeking to identify their regularities and meaning effects; 3) Analyze and discuss the representations of the coup d’état against president Dilma Rousseff, and finally, 4) Discuss the discursive nature of the possible relationships between Latuff’s cartoons and the hegemonic interpretation of the Brazilian bourgeois media regarding the 2016 coup d’état. In other words, we were interested in understanding the discursive memory that informs the cartoons studied in a given socio historical context. The impeachment of Dilma Rousseff, justified by "fiscal maneuvers," is explored through the analysis of cartoons, which played an important role in public debate by expressing both criticism and support. The research addressed fundamental and constitutive aspects of the cartoons: their discursive functioning, their comic nature, and their relationship with politics. Among the constitutive elements of Carlos Latuff’s cartoons, irony and discursive ethos are regular in his art, producing meaning effects. The analysis sought to understand how Latuff’s cartoons generate meaning and their discursive implications, proposing that they reflect class struggles and ideological stances. This study, grounded in Materialist Discourse Analysis, considers the opacity of language and the relationship between what is said and what is unsaid. The dissertation is structured into three chapters: DA theory, the context of the 2016 coup, and the analysis of the cartoons, followed by final considerations and bibliographic references.