Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2025
Autor(a) principal: Barros, Alef Cavalcanti Matias de
Orientador(a): Brasileiro, Jamilson Simões
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Programa de Pós-Graduação: PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM FISIOTERAPIA
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/69777
Resumo: Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury represents one of the most disabling injuries in sports traumatology. Surgicalreconstruction is the gold standard treatment, with success dependenton graft quality and appropriate rehabilitation. The rectus femoris (RF)tendon emerges as a promising alternative to the patellar tendon(BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT). However, significant gaps remainin the evidence regarding functional performance in the postoperativeperiod, particularly concerning recovery of muscular strength.Objectives: Study I = To evaluate bilateral isokinetic performancesymmetry of knee extensors and flexors six months after ACLreconstruction using rectus femoris autograft. Study II = To compareisokinetic knee muscle performance six months after ACLreconstruction using autologous rectus femoris (RF) versus hamstringtendon (HT) grafts.Methods: Study I = This retrospective case series included patientsrecruited consecutively at a single tertiary sports medicine centerbetween January 2023 and July 2024. Inclusion criteria requiredprimary ACL reconstruction with rectus femoris autograft, absence ofprevious knee surgery, and minimum follow-up of 6 months. Patientsundergoing revision surgery or multiligamentous procedures wereexcluded. Isokinetic testing was performed at six monthspostoperatively using a computerized dynamometer. The unaffectedlimb was tested first, followed by the operative limb. Patientsperformed five maximal effort attempts at 60°/s for both extension andflexion. Measured outcomes included peak torque (PT), peak torquenormalized to body weight (PT/BW), angle at peak torque (aPT), totalwork (TW), and mean power (MP) for knee extensors and flexors.Paired t-tests compared limbs, with statistical significance set at p ≤0.05.Study II = In this cross-sectional study, 75 male patients undergoingprimary ACL reconstruction with autologous RF (n = 31) or HT (n =44) grafts were evaluated approximately 6 months postoperatively.Bilateral isokinetic testing at angular velocity of 60°/s measured peaktorque (PT), peak torque normalized to body weight (PT/BW), angle atpeak torque (aPT), total work (TW), and mean power (MP) of kneeflexor and extensor groups.Results: Study I = Thirty-one male patients (mean age 26.3 ± 4.7years) were included with mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 0.4 months. Theoperative limb achieved 71% of contralateral extensor peak torque and75% of mean power, with significant deficits in extension PT (p <0.001), PT/BW (p < 0.001), TW (p < 0.001), and MP (p = 0.002). Nosignificant difference was found for aPT (p = 0.457). Flexorperformance demonstrated near-complete recovery, with the operativelimb achieving 93% of contralateral peak torque and 90% of total work,with p = 0.355, 0.340, 0.902, 0.153, and 0.316 for PT, PT/BW, aPT,TW, and MP, respectively.Study II = No statistically significant differences were observedbetween RF and HT groups in any isokinetic performance variables ofknee extensors (p > 0.05). The RF group demonstrated higher kneeflexor performance values compared to the HT group, except for angleat peak torque (p = 0.300). Conclusions: Study I = After six months, ACL reconstruction withrectus femoris autograft was associated with complete recovery of kneeflexor function but with persistent deficits in extensor function.Study II = Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniqueusing rectus femoris (RF) graft did not result in significant strengthdeficit in knee extensors compared to hamstring tendon (HT)technique. The RF group demonstrated superior knee flexorperformance, suggesting that this technique preserves functionality offlexor muscles.
id UFRN_fa65509d2fc9c17ced7ebe6a2f63515d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/69777
network_acronym_str UFRN
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
repository_id_str
spelling Barros, Alef Cavalcanti Matias dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1461899400563857https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-4949http://lattes.cnpq.br/2238444079880883Freitas, Rodrigo Pegado de Abreuhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3462462933163509Lins, Caio Alano de Almeidahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-3114http://lattes.cnpq.br/1378037748813246Borges, Daniel Tezonihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-0191http://lattes.cnpq.br/7662383859100316Ferreira, José Jamacy de Almeidahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-730Xhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7942403520160630Vieira, Wouber Hérickson de Britohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3588-5577http://lattes.cnpq.br/7943769688281372Brasileiro, Jamilson Simões2026-08-11T21:50:11Z2025-12-18BARROS, Alef Cavalcanti Matias de. Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais. Orientador: Dr. Jamilson Simões Brasileiro. 2025. 82f. Tese (Doutorado em Fisioterapia) - Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2025.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/6977723001011043P6Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury represents one of the most disabling injuries in sports traumatology. Surgicalreconstruction is the gold standard treatment, with success dependenton graft quality and appropriate rehabilitation. The rectus femoris (RF)tendon emerges as a promising alternative to the patellar tendon(BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT). However, significant gaps remainin the evidence regarding functional performance in the postoperativeperiod, particularly concerning recovery of muscular strength.Objectives: Study I = To evaluate bilateral isokinetic performancesymmetry of knee extensors and flexors six months after ACLreconstruction using rectus femoris autograft. Study II = To compareisokinetic knee muscle performance six months after ACLreconstruction using autologous rectus femoris (RF) versus hamstringtendon (HT) grafts.Methods: Study I = This retrospective case series included patientsrecruited consecutively at a single tertiary sports medicine centerbetween January 2023 and July 2024. Inclusion criteria requiredprimary ACL reconstruction with rectus femoris autograft, absence ofprevious knee surgery, and minimum follow-up of 6 months. Patientsundergoing revision surgery or multiligamentous procedures wereexcluded. Isokinetic testing was performed at six monthspostoperatively using a computerized dynamometer. The unaffectedlimb was tested first, followed by the operative limb. Patientsperformed five maximal effort attempts at 60°/s for both extension andflexion. Measured outcomes included peak torque (PT), peak torquenormalized to body weight (PT/BW), angle at peak torque (aPT), totalwork (TW), and mean power (MP) for knee extensors and flexors.Paired t-tests compared limbs, with statistical significance set at p ≤0.05.Study II = In this cross-sectional study, 75 male patients undergoingprimary ACL reconstruction with autologous RF (n = 31) or HT (n =44) grafts were evaluated approximately 6 months postoperatively.Bilateral isokinetic testing at angular velocity of 60°/s measured peaktorque (PT), peak torque normalized to body weight (PT/BW), angle atpeak torque (aPT), total work (TW), and mean power (MP) of kneeflexor and extensor groups.Results: Study I = Thirty-one male patients (mean age 26.3 ± 4.7years) were included with mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 0.4 months. Theoperative limb achieved 71% of contralateral extensor peak torque and75% of mean power, with significant deficits in extension PT (p <0.001), PT/BW (p < 0.001), TW (p < 0.001), and MP (p = 0.002). Nosignificant difference was found for aPT (p = 0.457). Flexorperformance demonstrated near-complete recovery, with the operativelimb achieving 93% of contralateral peak torque and 90% of total work,with p = 0.355, 0.340, 0.902, 0.153, and 0.316 for PT, PT/BW, aPT,TW, and MP, respectively.Study II = No statistically significant differences were observedbetween RF and HT groups in any isokinetic performance variables ofknee extensors (p > 0.05). The RF group demonstrated higher kneeflexor performance values compared to the HT group, except for angleat peak torque (p = 0.300). Conclusions: Study I = After six months, ACL reconstruction withrectus femoris autograft was associated with complete recovery of kneeflexor function but with persistent deficits in extensor function.Study II = Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniqueusing rectus femoris (RF) graft did not result in significant strengthdeficit in knee extensors compared to hamstring tendon (HT)technique. The RF group demonstrated superior knee flexorperformance, suggesting that this technique preserves functionality offlexor muscles.Introdução: A lesão do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) está entre asmais incapacitantes na traumatologia desportiva. A reconstruçãocirúrgica é o tratamento padrão-ouro, com sucesso dependente daqualidade do enxerto e reabilitação adequada. O tendão do reto femoral(RF) emerge como alternativa promissora ao tendão patelar (BPTB) eisquiotibiais (IT). Contudo, existem lacunas significativas nasevidências sobre o desempenho funcional no seu pós-operatório,particularmente àqueles relacionados a recuperação da força muscular.Objetivos: Estudo I= Avaliar a simetria do desempenho isocinéticobilateral dos extensores e flexores do joelho, seis meses após areconstrução do LCA, utilizando um autoenxerto do tendão do retofemoral.Estudo II = Comparar o desempenho isocinético dos músculos dojoelho, seis meses após a reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior(LCA) utilizando enxertos autólogos do reto femoral (RF) versustendões isquiotibiais (IT).Métodos: Estudo I= Esta série de casos retrospectiva incluiu pacientes recrutados consecutivamente em um único centro terciário de medicinaesportiva entre janeiro de 2023 e julho de 2024. Os critérios de inclusãoexigiam reconstrução primária do LCA com autoenxerto do retofemoral, ausência de cirurgias prévias no joelho e um acompanhamentomínimo de 6 meses. Pacientes submetidos a revisão ou procedimentosmultiligamentares foram excluídos. O teste isocinético foi realizado aosseis meses de pós-operatório, utilizando um dinamômetrocomputadorizado. O membro não acometido foi testado primeiro,seguido pelo membro operado. Os pacientes realizaram cinco tentativasde esforço máximo a 60°/s, tanto para extensão quanto para flexão. Osdesfechos mensurados incluíram pico de torque (PT), PT normalizadopelo peso corporal (PT/PC), ângulo do pico de torque (aPT), trabalhototal (TT) e potência média (PM) para extensores e flexores do joelho.Testes t pareados compararam os membros, com uma significânciaestatística de p ≤ 0,05.Estudo II= Neste estudo transversal, 75 pacientes do sexo masculinosubmetidos à reconstrução primária do LCA com enxertos autólogos deRF (n = 31) ou IT (n = 44) foram avaliados, cerca de 6 meses após acirurgia. O teste isocinético bilateral, com velocidade angular de 60°/s,mensurou o pico de torque (PT), o PT normalizado ao peso corporal(PT/PC), o ângulo do pico de torque (aPT), o trabalho total (TT) e apotência média (PM) do grupo flexor e extensor do joelho.Resultados: Estudo I= Trinta e um pacientes do sexo masculino (idademédia de 26,3 ± 4,7 anos) foram incluídos no estudo, com umacompanhamento médio de 6,2 ± 0,4 meses. O membro operado atingiu71% do pico de torque extensor contralateral e 75% da potência média,com déficits significativos na extensão PT (p < 0,001), PT/BW (p <0,001), TT (p < 0,001) e PM (p = 0,002). Nenhuma diferençasignificativa foi encontrada para a aPT (p = 0,457). O desempenho dosflexores apresentou recuperação quase completa, com o membrooperado atingindo 93% do torque de pico contralateral e 90% dotrabalho total, com p = 0,355, 0,340, 0,902, 0,153 e 0,316 para PT,PT/BW, aPT, TT e PM, respectivamente.Estudo II = Não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamentesignificativas entre os grupos RF e IT em nenhuma das variáveis dedesempenho isocinético dos extensores do joelho (p>0,05). O grupo RFapresentou maiores valores do desempenho dos flexores do joelhocomparado ao grupo IT, exceto o ângulo do pico de torque (p=0,300).Conclusões: Estudo I= Após seis meses, a reconstrução do LCA comautoenxerto do reto femoral esteve associada à recuperação completada função flexora do joelho, mas com déficits persistentes na funçãoextensora.Estudo II = A técnica de reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior(LCA) com enxerto do reto femoral (RF) não ocasionou déficit de forçasignificativo nos extensores do joelho comparado à técnica comisquiostibiais (IT). O grupo RF apresentou superior desempenho dosflexores do joelho, sugerindo que essa técnica preserva afuncionalidade dos músculos flexores.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NortePROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM FISIOTERAPIAUFRNBRCIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONALReconstrução do ligamento cruzado anteriorLesões do ligamento cruzado anteriorLigamento cruzado anteriorDesempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNORIGINALDesempenhomuscularreconstrucao_Barros_2025.pdapplication/pdf13130106https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstreams/3684b59f-f9e9-4727-b0b2-d15927f00d71/download0db153c1c520974dbf27b7b8fd577717MD51trueAnonymousREAD123456789/697772026-08-26T14:40:59.166759Zopen.accessoai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/69777https://repositorio.ufrn.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/repositorio@bczm.ufrn.bropendoar:2026-08-26T14:40:59Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais
title Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais
spellingShingle Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais
Barros, Alef Cavalcanti Matias de
CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
Reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior
Lesões do ligamento cruzado anterior
Ligamento cruzado anterior
title_short Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais
title_full Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais
title_fullStr Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais
title_full_unstemmed Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais
title_sort Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais
author Barros, Alef Cavalcanti Matias de
author_facet Barros, Alef Cavalcanti Matias de
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorLattes.none.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1461899400563857
dc.contributor.advisorID.none.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-4949
dc.contributor.advisorLattes.none.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2238444079880883
dc.contributor.referees1.none.fl_str_mv Lins, Caio Alano de Almeida
dc.contributor.referees1ID.none.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-3114
dc.contributor.referees1Lattes.none.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1378037748813246
dc.contributor.referees2.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Borges, Daniel Tezoni
dc.contributor.referees2ID.none.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-0191
dc.contributor.referees2Lattes.none.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7662383859100316
dc.contributor.referees3.none.fl_str_mv Ferreira, José Jamacy de Almeida
dc.contributor.referees3ID.none.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-730X
dc.contributor.referees3Lattes.none.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7942403520160630
dc.contributor.referees4.none.fl_str_mv Vieira, Wouber Hérickson de Brito
dc.contributor.referees4ID.none.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3588-5577
dc.contributor.referees4Lattes.none.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/7943769688281372
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barros, Alef Cavalcanti Matias de
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Freitas, Rodrigo Pegado de Abreu
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3462462933163509
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Brasileiro, Jamilson Simões
contributor_str_mv Freitas, Rodrigo Pegado de Abreu
Brasileiro, Jamilson Simões
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
topic CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
Reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior
Lesões do ligamento cruzado anterior
Ligamento cruzado anterior
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior
Lesões do ligamento cruzado anterior
Ligamento cruzado anterior
description Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury represents one of the most disabling injuries in sports traumatology. Surgicalreconstruction is the gold standard treatment, with success dependenton graft quality and appropriate rehabilitation. The rectus femoris (RF)tendon emerges as a promising alternative to the patellar tendon(BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT). However, significant gaps remainin the evidence regarding functional performance in the postoperativeperiod, particularly concerning recovery of muscular strength.Objectives: Study I = To evaluate bilateral isokinetic performancesymmetry of knee extensors and flexors six months after ACLreconstruction using rectus femoris autograft. Study II = To compareisokinetic knee muscle performance six months after ACLreconstruction using autologous rectus femoris (RF) versus hamstringtendon (HT) grafts.Methods: Study I = This retrospective case series included patientsrecruited consecutively at a single tertiary sports medicine centerbetween January 2023 and July 2024. Inclusion criteria requiredprimary ACL reconstruction with rectus femoris autograft, absence ofprevious knee surgery, and minimum follow-up of 6 months. Patientsundergoing revision surgery or multiligamentous procedures wereexcluded. Isokinetic testing was performed at six monthspostoperatively using a computerized dynamometer. The unaffectedlimb was tested first, followed by the operative limb. Patientsperformed five maximal effort attempts at 60°/s for both extension andflexion. Measured outcomes included peak torque (PT), peak torquenormalized to body weight (PT/BW), angle at peak torque (aPT), totalwork (TW), and mean power (MP) for knee extensors and flexors.Paired t-tests compared limbs, with statistical significance set at p ≤0.05.Study II = In this cross-sectional study, 75 male patients undergoingprimary ACL reconstruction with autologous RF (n = 31) or HT (n =44) grafts were evaluated approximately 6 months postoperatively.Bilateral isokinetic testing at angular velocity of 60°/s measured peaktorque (PT), peak torque normalized to body weight (PT/BW), angle atpeak torque (aPT), total work (TW), and mean power (MP) of kneeflexor and extensor groups.Results: Study I = Thirty-one male patients (mean age 26.3 ± 4.7years) were included with mean follow-up of 6.2 ± 0.4 months. Theoperative limb achieved 71% of contralateral extensor peak torque and75% of mean power, with significant deficits in extension PT (p <0.001), PT/BW (p < 0.001), TW (p < 0.001), and MP (p = 0.002). Nosignificant difference was found for aPT (p = 0.457). Flexorperformance demonstrated near-complete recovery, with the operativelimb achieving 93% of contralateral peak torque and 90% of total work,with p = 0.355, 0.340, 0.902, 0.153, and 0.316 for PT, PT/BW, aPT,TW, and MP, respectively.Study II = No statistically significant differences were observedbetween RF and HT groups in any isokinetic performance variables ofknee extensors (p > 0.05). The RF group demonstrated higher kneeflexor performance values compared to the HT group, except for angleat peak torque (p = 0.300). Conclusions: Study I = After six months, ACL reconstruction withrectus femoris autograft was associated with complete recovery of kneeflexor function but with persistent deficits in extensor function.Study II = Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniqueusing rectus femoris (RF) graft did not result in significant strengthdeficit in knee extensors compared to hamstring tendon (HT)technique. The RF group demonstrated superior knee flexorperformance, suggesting that this technique preserves functionality offlexor muscles.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2025-12-18
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2026-08-11T21:50:11Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv BARROS, Alef Cavalcanti Matias de. Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais. Orientador: Dr. Jamilson Simões Brasileiro. 2025. 82f. Tese (Doutorado em Fisioterapia) - Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2025.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/69777
dc.identifier.capesdegreeprogramcode.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 23001011043P6
identifier_str_mv BARROS, Alef Cavalcanti Matias de. Desempenho muscular após reconstrução do LCA com enxertos do tendão do Reto Femoral versus tendões dos Músculos Isquiotibiais. Orientador: Dr. Jamilson Simões Brasileiro. 2025. 82f. Tese (Doutorado em Fisioterapia) - Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2025.
23001011043P6
url https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/69777
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM FISIOTERAPIA
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRN
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRN
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstreams/3684b59f-f9e9-4727-b0b2-d15927f00d71/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 0db153c1c520974dbf27b7b8fd577717
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@bczm.ufrn.br
_version_ 1876429038850932736